pfile
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 06/14/09
|
AT6RC collimation under different loads
#5510913 - 11/09/12 12:58 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
well, i kind of posted this over in the CCD section, but maybe that was the wrong place.
the short question: is it normal to have collimation results that are wildly different when switching camera payloads on an AT RC telescope?
when using my DSLR+FR my collimation is spot-on and my field is flat.
when i switched to a heavier camera (STT-8300M), FHWM analysis across the field shows that the optical center is nowhere near the center of the CCD. the flattener has left the train due to plumbing issues. so i don't expect the field to be flat, but i expected it to be centered on the CCD.
is it normal to have to recollimate in this situation, or do i have some other problem?
|
WadeH237
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 02/24/07
Loc: Snohomish, WA
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: pfile]
#5511313 - 11/09/12 09:45 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
It sounds like your focuser might be sagging a bit.
|
pfile
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 06/14/09
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: WadeH237]
#5511391 - 11/09/12 10:37 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I thought of that - but the focuser is a brand-new moonlite. also I see the problem if the telescope is pointed straight up...
could it be that the moonlite is not up to the task? the weight adjustment is tightened down as far as I could with my fingers.
|
Peter in Reno
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 07/15/08
Loc: Reno, NV
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: pfile]
#5511463 - 11/09/12 11:27 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I believe the focuser tube (not external focuser) inside OTA is connected to the primary mirror which is not a good design and causes collimation changes from point to point if there is a somewhat heavy imaging train. So when the scope is pointing to Zenith, that probably creates maximum stress to primary mirror/focuser tube.
Peter
Edited by Peter in Reno (11/09/12 11:29 AM)
|
pfile
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 06/14/09
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: Peter in Reno]
#5511531 - 11/09/12 12:19 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
yeah, actually i should have linked my post in the CCD forum over here. one of my possible conclusions is that it's a 'cheap' scope and the way the primary is connected to the focuser tube is causing the problem.
the fwhm analysis shows what looks like sag, so i guessed that when the weight of the camera is pulling straight down on the mirror, that the tilt would be gone. but you are right that this situation represents the maximum force on the focuser tube and perhaps just the slight angle (i can't point exactly straight up due to the tripod) is enough to cause the tilt.
anyway, is it a dumb idea to recollimate the scope under this load?
|
Peter in Reno
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 07/15/08
Loc: Reno, NV
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: pfile]
#5511549 - 11/09/12 12:33 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
If you collimate at Zenith, the mirror/focuser tube may still shift elsewhere in the sky.
Peter
|
pfile
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 06/14/09
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: Peter in Reno]
#5511968 - 11/09/12 04:47 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
i guess i'm boned then i hope the AT10RC is more tolerant of this heavier load. that's my final destination here...
|
Peter in Reno
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 07/15/08
Loc: Reno, NV
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: pfile]
#5511975 - 11/09/12 04:58 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Not necessarily. How far off is the collimation under heavy load? I have seen many fantastic images taken with AT6RC scopes. The focal length may be short enough not to notice collimation shifts at prime focus or with focal reducer.
You should double check with the manufacturer about their design in AT10RC. I believe AT8RC has same design as AT6RC.
Peter
|
jjongmans
super member
Reged: 02/11/12
Loc: The Netherlands
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: Peter in Reno]
#5511997 - 11/09/12 05:17 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
All the GSO RC's (6", 8", 10" and 12") have the same design: the focuser is connected to the primary.
|
pfile
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 06/14/09
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: jjongmans]
#5512025 - 11/09/12 05:33 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
GAH maybe it's a tad stronger, we shall see. lots of people use these scopes successfully so in theory it should be possible.
|
korborh
professor emeritus
   
Reged: 01/29/11
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: jjongmans]
#5512029 - 11/09/12 05:36 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
pfile, are you planning to get the AT10RC scope? That is a much more expensive scope and it also has the focuser connected to primary mirror design flaw. So you may want to take this into consideration before buying. These scopes are very hard to collimate correctly, so I think you should not try to tweak it for different parts of the sky. Apart from wearing out the mechanics of adjustments, it will wear you out also
|
jjongmans
super member
Reged: 02/11/12
Loc: The Netherlands
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: pfile]
#5512031 - 11/09/12 05:37 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Is the miscollimation only noticeable with software, or can you easily see it?
|
pfile
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 06/14/09
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: Peter in Reno]
#5512032 - 11/09/12 05:37 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
Not necessarily. How far off is the collimation under heavy load? I have seen many fantastic images taken with AT6RC scopes. The focal length may be short enough not to notice collimation shifts at prime focus or with focal reducer.
You should double check with the manufacturer about their design in AT10RC. I believe AT8RC has same design as AT6RC.
Peter
it's way off, check this out:

the stars in the corner look like seagulls.
|
pfile
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 06/14/09
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: pfile]
#5512040 - 11/09/12 05:42 PM Attachment (36 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
here's a screenshot of the upper left corner and the lower right corner...
|
pfile
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 06/14/09
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: pfile]
#5512041 - 11/09/12 05:42 PM Attachment (34 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
and the lower right
|
Peter in Reno
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 07/15/08
Loc: Reno, NV
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: pfile]
#5512045 - 11/09/12 05:46 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Not good.
Maybe if you collimate at Zenith, it might minimize collimation shift elsewhere in the sky.
Peter
|
pfile
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 06/14/09
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: korborh]
#5512049 - 11/09/12 05:47 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
pfile, are you planning to get the AT10RC scope? That is a much more expensive scope and it also has the focuser connected to primary mirror design flaw. So you may want to take this into consideration before buying. These scopes are very hard to collimate correctly, so I think you should not try to tweak it for different parts of the sky. Apart from wearing out the mechanics of adjustments, it will wear you out also
well, i already have it, i have not deployed it for real yet. basically i have been working my way up to it, trying to get my mount tuned up and understanding how to use OAG with the AT6.
i freely admit that i did not think all of this out very well. the AT6 was a bit of an impulse buy since they were so steeply discounted. and i was pretty successful with it with a light load (DSLR + TRF-2008). so basically i never saw the problems that the mirror/focustube design can cause.
that experience made me think i could probably be successful with the AT10RC. i may be in for a surprise, but i will at least try, since i already have the scope. at least i bought it used
|
jjongmans
super member
Reged: 02/11/12
Loc: The Netherlands
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: pfile]
#5512051 - 11/09/12 05:48 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Did you adjust the primary already? If so, maybe you should try to tighten the collimation bolts.
|
pfile
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 06/14/09
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: jjongmans]
#5512066 - 11/09/12 05:58 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
Did you adjust the primary already? If so, maybe you should try to tighten the collimation bolts.
i have not adjusted this telescope at all, ever, mainly because of what korborh said above... the collimation looked really good with the DSLR/TRF so i never had to mess with it.
i am willing to try collimating it, because i've come to realize that if you own one of these telescopes, you must learn how to do it. having said that, i had the AT10 collimated professionally. of course, once there's a camera attached to it, it may be out of collimation again just as the AT6 seems to be.
|
jjongmans
super member
Reged: 02/11/12
Loc: The Netherlands
|
Re: AT6RC collimation under different loads
[Re: pfile]
#5512073 - 11/09/12 06:01 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
How heavy is your ccd including filterwheel, oag, etc?
|