Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> ATM, Optics and DIY Forum

Pages: 1
kram2105
member


Reged: 09/02/09

Light Cone & Object Image ??
      #5524688 - 11/17/12 04:52 PM

I built a folded 6 f12 refractor. I started with a tapered paper representation of the light cone i wanted to fold. 6 inches wide at the objective, 72 inches long, comming to a point at the focal plane. at 36 inches there is a 3 inch dia. mirror on a 10 degree angle bouncing the light back toward the objective. it was later that i learned about object image at the focal plane and i began to wonder if the 3 inch mirror should have been bigger. if a fellow atm'r could offer some guidance i would be much obliged.
my questions are, how much of full feild am i getting
( 100% 80% etc ) and also, does the black retaining ring around the mirror act as a baffle? Thanks for your time Mark F. Bristol, Pa


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sean Cunneen
Let Me Think
*****

Reged: 08/01/07

Loc: Blue Island Illinois
Re: Light Cone & Object Image ?? new [Re: kram2105]
      #5524809 - 11/17/12 06:06 PM

Have you built it yet? Is your tube baffled as well? You won't be missing much, maybe in the 10% range if you keep the design as-is and everything else is okeedokee. Cutting off the outside of the image won't affect things too much and in some cases, it can help. The edge of an objective is often where the errors are, so having a smaller secondary can act like a mask and keep some of those errors at bay. Also, planetary targets, bright nebula, etc won't be affected by a smaller illuminated field.
What you'll want to check is vignetting with any baffles or your focuser tube. That's where the monsters hide...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GlennLeDrew
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/18/08

Loc: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: Light Cone & Object Image ?? new [Re: Sean Cunneen]
      #5524844 - 11/17/12 06:27 PM

At the half focal point (midway between objective and focus), your 3" mirror just accommodates the on-axis light cone. Therefore the circle of full illumination is if course a point. But due to the considerable separation of the obstructing edge of the mirror, the shadowing is quite diffuse and so the illumination fall-off is very gradual. Without drawing it up, my intuition says you'll have something near 70% illumination at the edge of a 2" circle. Even a 3" image circle would have not much less than 50% illumination at its edge.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
kram2105
member


Reged: 09/02/09

Re: Light Cone & Object Image ?? new [Re: Sean Cunneen]
      #5531195 - 11/20/12 10:34 PM

The scope is finished with no baffles. I used a tube with black flocking inside so i don't see the need for baffles.
thanks for your input, i also have a Jegars 6" an f10. I'll use it to compare brightness and see what i get. TY Mark


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
kram2105
member


Reged: 09/02/09

Re: Light Cone & Object Image ?? new [Re: GlennLeDrew]
      #5531224 - 11/20/12 10:41 PM

You mention "draw it up", exactly what i need to learn to do. I have a book "all about Telescopes" but the part about ray tracing was a bit complicated hense my simple approach. in any case the mirror can be replaced with a larger size.
TY Mark


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GlennLeDrew
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/18/08

Loc: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: Light Cone & Object Image ?? new [Re: kram2105]
      #5532033 - 11/21/12 11:28 AM

Mark,
The simplest ray trace has just one light cone converging to a point at the field center. But one's field of view is not just a point, but rather is a circle defined by the eyepiece's field stop, which for 1.25" eyepieces can be as large as 27mm, and for 2" eyepieces 46mm. Draw at the focus a line which represents the largest field stop you will use. Now draw a new light cone converging at each end of this line. You now see the full envelope of light cones which firm image points across the full field.

Where your 3" mirror was placed at the halfway point, you'll note that it was just barely large enough accommodate the on-axis light cone only. Edge-of-field light cones have small portions missing the mirror's edge.

Hopefully this ultra-brief lesson will get you going with your ray tracing adventures. Sam Brown's books are quite possibly the best of their kind, with clear illustrations galore, for those of us who are more visually oriented.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
nytecam
Postmaster


Reged: 08/20/05

Loc: London UK
Re: Light Cone & Object Image ?? new [Re: kram2105]
      #5533339 - 11/22/12 03:36 AM Attachment (12 downloads)

Quote:

I started with a tapered paper representation of the light cone i wanted to fold. 6 inches wide at the objective, 72 inches long, comming to a point at the focal plane.


The 'cone' shouldn't come to a point but at the focal plane = width of the intended EP fov - then the folded points on the cone = min size 2nd/3rd plane mirrors' major axes



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
AV in CMH
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 11/07/05

Loc: Columbus Ohio
Re: Light Cone & Object Image ?? new [Re: nytecam]
      #5536393 - 11/23/12 10:39 PM Attachment (13 downloads)

Hello,

Interesting project.

You might consider cutting a paper pattern of the light cone, with a .5 to .75" dia at the far end. With a paper cone you can experiment with different folding patterns.

One pattern I have seen used is attached. I like this type of folding as it brings exit pupil up by 90* without using a star diag.

Good luck, have fun,

Anthony

PS drawing is not to scale.

Edited by AV in CMH (11/23/12 10:40 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bremms
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 08/31/12

Loc: SC
Re: Light Cone & Object Image ?? new [Re: AV in CMH]
      #5536479 - 11/23/12 11:52 PM

In one word, yes it is too small. One nice feature of a refractor is a wide unvingetted field. You don't want to cut off the light cone, you are wasting aperture. Mirrors tend to be worse at the edges. Best thing to do is, 4 inch mirror and put in a couple of baffles. That way you have an unobstructed light path over the whole field. And, you won't be using the edges of the mirror near COF.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dan_h
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 12/10/07

Re: Light Cone & Object Image ?? new [Re: bremms]
      #5537288 - 11/24/12 02:00 PM

Quote:

In one word, yes it is too small. One nice feature of a refractor is a wide unvingetted field. You don't want to cut off the light cone, you are wasting aperture. Mirrors tend to be worse at the edges. Best thing to do is, 4 inch mirror and put in a couple of baffles. That way you have an unobstructed light path over the whole field. And, you won't be using the edges of the mirror near COF.




That would be a good solution for the reasons stated. Another option is to move the 3" mirror further back from the objective but if the tube is already constructed that isn't possible.

dan


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1


Extra information
8 registered and 19 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  ausastronomer, richard7, Starman81 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 786

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics