Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home page


Observing >> Solar Observing and Imaging

Pages: 1
Jesus Munoz
sage


Reged: 03/09/07

Loc: Querétaro, México
DS vs TS images new
      #5519287 - 11/14/12 10:05 AM Attachment (107 downloads)

Hi,

Last Sunday I was working with my Lunt 60 scope and I took some images with a PGR Chameleon and a FR working at around 375mm for getting a full solar disk.

This is a comparison of placing one etalon for double-stacking and two etalons for triple-stacking. Obviously the capturing parameters changed drastically because I got less light with the TS setup.

Thanks for your comments


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jesus Munoz
sage


Reged: 03/09/07

Loc: Querétaro, México
Re: DS vs TS images new [Re: Jesus Munoz]
      #5519291 - 11/14/12 10:08 AM Attachment (86 downloads)

And this image is the triple stack sample.

Thanks for your comments


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ValeryD
Vendor (Aries)
*****

Reged: 11/26/05

Loc: Kherson, Ukraine.
Re: DS vs TS images new [Re: Jesus Munoz]
      #5519390 - 11/14/12 11:22 AM

The difference is quite small and TS for photography has no real advantage. One can record a longer movie and stack more frames - to increase the S/N and then rise the contrast higher and finally the pictures will be almost identical.
Better to invest in larger aperture than in TS.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Andy Devey
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 05/06/11

Re: DS vs TS images new [Re: ValeryD]
      #5520573 - 11/15/12 05:12 AM

Hi Jesus

I triple stack my SM90 and it really comes into its own at long focal lengths and especially on the limb. I have found that with TS detail can be seen right up to the edge where as with DS the photosphere has leaked through and the chromosphere appears much fainter around the edge.

Mostly TS movies

Regards

Andy


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Matt Wastell
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 07/05/09

Loc: Paddington, Brisbane, Australi...
Re: DS vs TS images new [Re: Andy Devey]
      #5520600 - 11/15/12 05:57 AM

Hello Jesus,
Both are great images - these is a bit more pop in the TS.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jesus Munoz
sage


Reged: 03/09/07

Loc: Querétaro, México
Re: DS vs TS images new [Re: Matt Wastell]
      #5522562 - 11/16/12 10:10 AM

Thank you Valery, Andy and Matt for your comments. I think there is more contrast in the TS and it deserves the extra effort for using 3 etalons.

Great videos as always Andy! TS and long focal lenght, incredible.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BYoesle
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 06/12/04

Loc: Goldendale, Washington USA
Re: DS vs TS images new [Re: Andy Devey]
      #5524280 - 11/17/12 12:21 PM

Wonderful images Jesus!

Quote:

I have found that with TS detail can be seen right up to the edge where as with DS the photosphere has leaked through and the chromosphere appears much fainter around the edge.




Hi Andy. Do you have any comparison images you could post?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Andy Devey
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 05/06/11

Re: DS vs TS images new [Re: BYoesle]
      #5525591 - 11/18/12 06:50 AM Attachment (45 downloads)

Hi Bob

Here are a couple of typical images but they were not taken at the same time - it was one of your comments on an earlier post that got me to experiment on the limb and TS is great for prominences and filament-prominence features

This is a DS limb photo

Edited by Andy Devey (11/18/12 06:52 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Andy Devey
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 05/06/11

Re: DS vs TS images new [Re: Andy Devey]
      #5525594 - 11/18/12 06:53 AM Attachment (44 downloads)

Here is a TS limb photo

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Andy Devey
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 05/06/11

Re: DS vs TS images new [Re: Andy Devey]
      #5525616 - 11/18/12 07:21 AM

Hi Jesus

I downloaded your two stunning full disc shots and if you switch from one to the other continuously the difference id detail is massive!

Regards

Andy


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mbucky
Post Laureate


Reged: 10/21/07

Loc: San Diego
Re: DS vs TS images new [Re: Andy Devey]
      #5525731 - 11/18/12 09:08 AM

nice stuff man, TS seems to deliver some good results by cutting back on stray light

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BYoesle
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 06/12/04

Loc: Goldendale, Washington USA
Re: DS vs TS images new [Re: mbucky]
      #5527762 - 11/19/12 11:36 AM Attachment (31 downloads)

Hi Andy -

This is curious, as I do not see any hint of a double limb with photospheric leakage with double stacking my two front mounted SM90's (image below)... rather it looks almost identical to your triple stacking image: The DS view you have above looks more like a typical 0.7 A FWHM image, and the TS looks more like a >0.5 A FWHM image.

You may want to experiment in getting your DS tilts and rotations optimized link (for instance using a auxiliary refractor telescope), and then do the triple stack. The only other issue that might be involved is that if your DS mode uses an internal etalon, where the bandpass (and therefore contrast uniformity) can vary across the field of view/ image due to increased field angles, you may not be getting all the benefits of DSing in all parts of the image plane...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BYoesle
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 06/12/04

Loc: Goldendale, Washington USA
Re: DS vs TS images new [Re: BYoesle]
      #5527766 - 11/19/12 11:39 AM Attachment (36 downloads)

Identical processing: Single stack @ 0.7 A FWHM left, double stack @ >0.5 A FWHM right:

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jesus Munoz
sage


Reged: 03/09/07

Loc: Querétaro, México
Re: DS vs TS images new [Re: Jesus Munoz]
      #5529084 - 11/19/12 11:11 PM Attachment (32 downloads)

Very interesting points Bob and Andy. Here I present a comparison of TS-DS-SS in the same region of the Sun taken last Sunday. I think the TS shows a little better the solar limb, but marginally. None shows double image

Regards


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BYoesle
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 06/12/04

Loc: Goldendale, Washington USA
Re: DS vs TS images new [Re: Jesus Munoz]
      #5529315 - 11/20/12 02:22 AM Attachment (37 downloads)

Great comparison images Jesus!

But your image of a single stacked (SS) does indeed show the double limb phenomena quite well. I have cropped and enlarged your image, and placed the tip of the arrow on the inner limb, which is actually the edge of the photosphere showing through at 0.7 A FWHM. This parasitic light reduces the contrast of the chomospheric details, giving the edge of the chromosphere a fainter-translucent appearance as noted by Andy, and makes getting exposures and processing of the prominences with disk detail more difficult. With double stacking (DS), the FWHM of the filter system is >0.5 A, and photospheric leakage/contamination is eliminated, which significantly improves contrast and prominence detail. Triple stacking (~0.3 A FWHM) appears to have less effect, if at all - at least in these images.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BYoesle
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 06/12/04

Loc: Goldendale, Washington USA
Re: DS vs TS images [Re: BYoesle]
      #5529318 - 11/20/12 02:27 AM Attachment (29 downloads)

Triple vs Double Stacked (I actually prefer the DS image over the TS - but it may just be the processing):

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1


Extra information
11 registered and 13 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Scott in NC, Phillip Creed 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1204

Jump to

CN Forums Home




Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics