Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Eyepieces

Pages: 1
Brian Risley
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 09/04/06

Loc: SW Florida
Smoothside Meade 4k 8.8/14 Parfocal?
      #5533141 - 11/21/12 11:37 PM

I am not sure if the 8.8/14mm I got used had the bottom 1.25 barrels (with lens) swapped. If someone has both and uses them in 2" focuser, are they somewhat close to parfocal or do you need to do a lot of turns to get them to focus?
In swapping them around, I find that the actual field of view is either very similar when looking at the moon, or very different. Without another one to compare to, I can't tell. (I do have a TV 13mm Type 1 I can compare to, should the 14 be similar to its view.)
Brian


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
The Planetman
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 01/27/06

Loc: Western KY
Re: Smoothside Meade 4k 8.8/14 Parfocal? new [Re: Brian Risley]
      #5533145 - 11/21/12 11:41 PM

Hi Brian.
I had both and the 8.8 requires about 3/8" out travel on the focuser in comparison to the 14mm if I remember correctly.
RW


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Brian Risley
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 09/04/06

Loc: SW Florida
Re: Smoothside Meade 4k 8.8/14 Parfocal? new [Re: The Planetman]
      #5533180 - 11/22/12 12:08 AM

Thanks Ross. I just compared the 14 to the TV 13 and with the units swapped from the way I got them, when looking at Jupiter, its moons and some background stars, the fields are just about the same. With them the way I got them, the field on the 14 was quite a bit tighter. In that config, the 14 and the 8.8 had about the same field of view. With them swapped, the 8.8 is quite a bit tighter (can just get Jupiter and its moons in my 2120 LX-6) while the 14 has the moons and several outlying stars, so I suspect they were swapped when I got them.
Brian


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ji4m
member
*****

Reged: 12/29/10

Re: Smoothside Meade 4k 8.8/14 Parfocal? new [Re: Brian Risley]
      #5533337 - 11/22/12 03:28 AM

The series 4000 8.8 UWA does require racking the focuser outward about a half-inch compared to the 14 UWA. Strangely, I don't have the number recorded as I have measured the focus position of my eyepieces. The field stop location of the 14 is about 7mm below the 2" shoulder. I remember the 8.8 being close to parfocal with the Nagler 11mm Type 1, which has a field stop located about 20mm below its shoulder. These measurements are for the smoothside version without rubber eyecups.

I've never taken mine apart so I can't help with the "swapped field lens" configuration. It sounds like you have it fixed.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
astrodon
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 04/07/05

Loc: Portland, OR, USA
Re: Smoothside Meade 4k 8.8/14 Parfocal? new [Re: ji4m]
      #5533773 - 11/22/12 11:20 AM

I wonder if when they are swapped, the eyepieces are different fls?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ji4m
member
*****

Reged: 12/29/10

Re: Smoothside Meade 4k 8.8/14 Parfocal? new [Re: astrodon]
      #5534413 - 11/22/12 08:24 PM

Went back and checked. The 8.8 UWA field stop is about 21mm below the shoulder, so that is 14mm different from the 14 UWA, or just over a half inch.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1


Extra information
28 registered and 27 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  ausastronomer, Scott in NC, iceblaze 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 280

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics