|
tarotmac
member
Reged: 09/13/12
Loc: Ellesmere Port, UK
|
Celestron C11-SGT (XLT) V CPC 1100 xlt and wedge
#5520580 - 11/15/12 05:27 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Which of these two do you consider the better option for mobile use and Astrophotography Celestron C11-SGT (XLT)or the CPC 1100 and wedge. Hoping to get one or the other in may, but which one
|
Bob Griffiths
Getting Grouchy
   
Reged: 10/10/05
Loc: Frederick Maryland
|
Re: Celestron C11-SGT (XLT) V CPC 1100 xlt and wedge
[Re: tarotmac]
#5520722 - 11/15/12 08:19 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
The Gem mounted one ...
Wedges are expensive The weight of the fork and OTA is quite substantial ...Toss in a wedge and the Gem is simply easier to transport and set up
That said I have no use for Gem mounts anymore because my old body is not as flexible as it used to be and I have no interest in AP
Bob G
|
tarotmac
member
Reged: 09/13/12
Loc: Ellesmere Port, UK
|
Re: Celestron C11-SGT (XLT) V CPC 1100 xlt and wedge
[Re: Bob Griffiths]
#5523887 - 11/17/12 07:02 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Thanks Bob, comments duly noted and appreciated
|
HeyJP
sage
Reged: 12/11/10
Loc: Boulder, CO
|
Re: Celestron C11-SGT (XLT) V CPC 1100 xlt and wedge
[Re: tarotmac]
#5524136 - 11/17/12 10:50 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Tarot,
Here's the way I break it down. The CPC (alt/az) is best for visual observing and quick astrophoto setup for 30 second snaps. Comfortable viewing angles. Less than a minute to align.
An EQ mount (GEM or CPC/wedge) is required for long exposure photography and requires polar alignment which is a bit more consuming than a quick align on CPC.
I think it comes down to your astrophotography requirements. I tend to do visual observations 90% of the time and some amount of astrophotography. So I just picked up a CPC1100 this summer and love it! I am in the process of picking up the HD Wedge. While installing the scope on the wedge is a bit more pain, I don't expect to do it a lot and having the more portable, quicker setup Alt/Az dominates.
But, if you are going to spend 40-50% of your time, or more, doing photography. You certainly might be better off with the GEM mount.
My 1.5 cents worth.
Jim
|
oldstargazer
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 08/03/11
Loc: Western Oklahoma
|
Re: Celestron C11-SGT (XLT) V CPC 1100 xlt and wedge
[Re: HeyJP]
#5534509 - 11/22/12 09:38 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
The cpc on the wedge tracks well but isn't nearly as steady as the gem mount. With the gem a light breeze won't make it shake at all and can even image in some wind that is maybe up to a few mph. The cpc on the wedge can't image in anything that you can feel because it makes the structure very shaky. With the cpc in alt/az mode you can image in wind that you can feel almost as well as the gem except for the sky rotation.
So my vote goes for the gem with the much better bite sized weight sharing pieces. Putting the cpc on the tripod is a bear anyway, add the wedge and it is a grissly bear.
|
|
1 registered and 4 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: BRisley
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|