Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Eyepieces

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | (show all)
Skywise2
member


Reged: 08/26/11

Loc: Michigan
Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail new
      #5534524 - 11/22/12 09:53 PM

What is your favorite eyepiece for planetary viewing? Right now, I'm using a 10" SCT, but plan to invest in a TV NP101IS

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
killdabuddha
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 08/26/11

Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail new [Re: Skywise2]
      #5534568 - 11/22/12 10:37 PM

Our 11mm T6 is our best for 170x most the time. No tracking. The 82* even lets us scan. ES would be good, too.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jim Rosenstock
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/14/05

Loc: MD, south of the DC Nebula
Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail new [Re: Skywise2]
      #5534574 - 11/22/12 10:44 PM

That's like asking which of your children is your favorite. Not Fair.

That said, when I'm looking at planets, I find myself reaching for my Brandon 6mm far more often than any other.

Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
beatlejuice
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 04/05/11

Loc: Hamilton, ON,Canada
Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail new [Re: Skywise2]
      #5534586 - 11/22/12 10:51 PM

5mm and 7mm BGO's, but last spring I got terrific views of Saturn in my 10" with ES 14-82/2.5x powermate combo.

Eric


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ibase
Vendor Affiliate
*****

Reged: 03/20/08

Loc: Manila, Philippines 121*E 14*N
Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail new [Re: beatlejuice]
      #5534605 - 11/22/12 11:00 PM

UO-HD 5mm, 6mm BGO, 6mm Delos, Nagler 5T6, RGO 7mm.

Best,


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jaimo!
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 10/11/07

Loc: Exit 135 / 40° North
Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail new [Re: ibase]
      #5534615 - 11/22/12 11:12 PM

4mm, 7mm &10.5mm Meade RG Orthos. In most of my scopes.

Jaimo!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
operascope
sage
*****

Reged: 09/03/08

Loc: Canada
Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail new [Re: Jaimo!]
      #5534672 - 11/23/12 12:33 AM

ES 6.7mm. I observe with a 6" f/9.4 dob and a 12.3" f/5 dob.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MikeBOKC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/10/10

Loc: Oklahoma City, OK
Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail new [Re: Jaimo!]
      #5534673 - 11/23/12 12:34 AM

24 Panoptic, 13 Ethos or 16 Brandon, depending on seeing.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Taeyoung
member


Reged: 04/26/10

Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail new [Re: Jaimo!]
      #5534684 - 11/23/12 12:43 AM

4.4mm, 5.9mm, 7.3mm ball lens eyepieces and XO 5, Televue 8mm Pl, Brandon 8mm with my 10" dob.
They are cool^^


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Svezda
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 06/01/07

Loc: Texas
Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail new [Re: Taeyoung]
      #5534711 - 11/23/12 01:24 AM

Pentax:
5XW, 7XW, 10XW (have 14-40mm but too low for most details I want to see)
5XO - fills the spot where a 5mm SMC would be; also acts as a 'ZAO-II 5mm' (since there isn't one)
6, 7, 9, 12 SMC orthos (have 18 but too low power for details)

Zeiss:
ZAO-II set + Zeiss/Baader 2x
25 aspheric micro ep (superb contrast)+ 2x Zeiss Barlow
ZAJ set excluding the 4mm, 8mm

Docter 12.5 84deg AFOV (on 'never sell no matter what' list)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Isaacs
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/16/04

Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA
Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail new [Re: Svezda]
      #5534766 - 11/23/12 02:17 AM

For me, it depends on the telescope and the conditions, these are far more important than the particular eyepiece I am using.

If the seeing supports 400x, I need first to be using a telescope that is performs well at 400x and then I will choose the appropriate eyepiece. The 25 inch, that would be the 9mm Nagler, in the 12.5 inch F/6, the 4.8mm... In the 12.5 inch F/6 it would be the 4.8mm Nagler, in the 12.5 inch F/4.06, the 3.5mm...

Jon


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
kkokkolis
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 09/23/09

Loc: Piraeus, Greece
Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail new [Re: Jon Isaacs]
      #5534886 - 11/23/12 05:14 AM

Since when in city all I can enjoy are the planets, I use all my eyepieces on them. I consider as planetaries my BGOs (I prefer the 18 and 12.5 with Powermate 2.5 over 9 & 6 for eye relief), Delos 10 & 6 and Radian 8. Baader zoom is also great, it shows almost what the other show with a bit of lateral color sometimes, but it gives me the perfect magnification everytime, as is or barlowed.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Doug Culbertson
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 01/06/05

Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail [Re: kkokkolis]
      #5534928 - 11/23/12 07:06 AM

Leica ASPH zoom, in all three telescopes. It beat out the Pentax XWs that I had, and was the equal of the ZAO IIs that I had on loan. It's nice to be able to dial in the right magnification to match the seeing.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
junomike
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 09/07/09

Loc: Ontario
Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail new [Re: Doug Culbertson]
      #5534951 - 11/23/12 07:29 AM

5mm XO = 155X in AT111EDT. Perfect magnification for Jupiter and Saturn in my skies. I have other well (LVW, TMB SMC), but nothing can match the snap focus and detail in the XO (although the TMB SMC comes close).

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
REC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/20/10

Loc: NC
Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail new [Re: junomike]
      #5535107 - 11/23/12 09:29 AM

ES 6.7mm in my ED80mm and the ES11mm in my 8"SCT....on a good seeing night. Otherwise it's my 16mm Brandon. Something mysterious with that EP on the Moon?

Bob


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
j3ffr0
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 07/06/08

Loc: Virginia
Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail new [Re: REC]
      #5535145 - 11/23/12 09:54 AM

In my refractor the 3-6 Nagler zoom is my favorite. In my SCT's my 16mm Nagler Type 5 has always impressed me.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sean Cunneen
Let Me Think
*****

Reged: 08/01/07

Loc: Blue Island Illinois
Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail new [Re: j3ffr0]
      #5535162 - 11/23/12 10:03 AM

I like the 12mm Brandon for Jupiter. In my refractor, 8mm or 6mm tends to bump against seeing.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BillP
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 11/26/06

Loc: Vienna, VA
Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail [Re: Skywise2]
      #5535195 - 11/23/12 10:25 AM

Quote:

What is your favorite eyepiece for planetary viewing? Right now, I'm using a 10" SCT, but plan to invest in a TV NP101IS




Unfortunately, what will work good in your SCT won't even be a candidate for planetary in the NP101 because of the radically different focal lengths. A 5mm eyepiece in the SCT will get you around 500x and in the NP101 only 100x. So the planetary choices will be quite different.

Magnification and exit pupil should be considerations in the choice, as well as what your local seeing conditions will allow on most evenings, and on rarer evenings. For me, the local seeing usually allows 200x most all the time, and then more rarely 400x. So that is my working range.

I also find that a .75mm exit pupil is a good working max for maintaining good contrast. Not a hard-fast rule but just what my eye tends to like. In the NP101 that exit pupil would be produced by a 4mm eyepiece (135x). In your SCT that exit pupil is produced by a 7.5mm eyepiece (330x). But that magnification is a bit high so if you back it down to 200x then the SCT would be using a 12.5mm eyepiece. Bottom line is that the SCT, due to its larger aperture, will having working planetary eyepieces between 12.5mm to 7.5mm or even 6mm, whereas the NP101 will likely have a working range starting at 4mm then getting smaller, probably down to 2mm on the very rarest evenings under very dark conditions since the view will be dim using 2mm.

If it were me, I would be looking for 3 eyepieces for the SCT, probably 8mm, 10mm, and 12mm. Without getting exotic, an 8mm and 12mm Brandon, then need to find some suitable eyepiece near 10mm, so perhaps an 11mm TV Plossl or the older 10.5mm smoothsided version. Going exotic would opt for the 8-10-12 TMB Supermonocentrics or AP-SPLs since they both come in those focal lengths.

For the NP101 the 2-4 Nagler Zoom gets you the focal length range you need in one eyepiece, so something to consider. Another thing you could do would be to get the 8-10-12 trio for the SCT, then get a 3x Barlow to use those same three with the NP101. This way save some money by using the Barlow to get to the shorter focal lengths that the NP101 needs for productive planetary. Yes, not a purist approach for planetary mandating a Barlow, but it works good enough and IMO a higher class planetary, like the Brandon, when Barlowed will at least be the equal of the 2-4 Zoom in terms of how detailed the image is.

A final consideration is to think about operating ergonomics. The NP101 shines as a rich field telescope with its very short focal ratio. In that role you are likely to be using very wide field eyepieces with some good eye relief. So the switch to a tight eye relief narrow FOV planetary may not "feel" like a great transition. So the better tactic from this standpoint would be to perhaps get some wide fields with good reputations for planetary also and then Barlow them for the NP101. So in the 8-12mm focal length range you could assemble some Pentax XWs or Delos to fit that also.

Lots to consider...most of it driven really by personal preferences.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bremms
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 08/31/12

Loc: SC
Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail [Re: BillP]
      #5535238 - 11/23/12 10:50 AM

7mm and 9mm UO ortho. My generic 12mm Japanese vintage ortho I got with a scope is super sharp, it surprises me all the time. Great on Jupiter in the C11 when the seeing won't tolerate the 9 or 7 mm. My 9mm UO was only OK until I realized the field lens was very dirty and the field stop was not in the correct place. It had a lot of scattered light and a fuzzy field stop.
It's great now. I mean it was DIRTY... a film and dirt. blew off the dirt and used 91%Iso with dist H2O. It may become my favorite now. Have to say my 17mm TV smoothie is darn good too.
My award goes to the underdog 12.5 generic Ortho for now.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FirstSight
Duke of Deneb
*****

Reged: 12/26/05

Loc: Raleigh, NC
Re: Your favorite eyepiece for planetary detail [Re: BillP]
      #5535251 - 11/23/12 10:59 AM

I have an NP101, and for planetary viewing find the 2x Powermate invaluable. Here's my two primary planetary observing sets:
(1) 7mmT6 Nagler, 5mmT6 Nagler, 2" 2x Powermate
which respectively give (magnification, exit pupil):
7T6: (77x, 1.3mm)
5T6: (108x, 0.96mm)
7T6 + 2xPM: (154x, 0.65mm)
5T6 + 2xPM: (216x, 0.46mm)

(2) 4.7mm Ethos; 3.7mm Ethos, 2" 2x Powermate
4.7E: (115x, 0.87mm)
3.7E: (146x, 0.68mm)
4.7E + 2xPM: (230x, 0.46mm)
3.7E + 2xPM: (292x, 0.34mm)

Obviously, the 3.7E + 2xPM pushes the scope a bit over its recommended "true" magnification limit of around 250x, as well as producing an exit pupil problematically small for many people. The 5T6 + 2xPM or 4.7E + 2xPM are at the realistic useful limits most nights, or even just the 3.7E by itself on really mediocre-minus nights.

If the scope is undriven, the 3.7E and 4.7Es keep planets within the FOV luxuriously long, and therefore easier to pick up fine detail from extended uninterrupted study than with the Naglers. For my tastes, in an undriven NP101 a narrower-field EP (e.g. 50deg AFOV) would require annoyingly frequent nudging in the magnification ranges useful for viewing planetary detail.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | (show all)


Extra information
23 registered and 22 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  ausastronomer, Scott in NC, iceblaze 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 7577

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics