Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Eyepieces

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
Sean13
sage


Reged: 11/17/12

Loc: North Platte, Nebraska
Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new
      #5540259 - 11/26/12 12:46 PM

I recently bought a Celestron 6" Advanced Series SCT. My primary use for the scope is photography, so I hadn't planned on buying any additional eps for the scope. I see now that weather for photography is not always optimal, and some nights I would just like to be able to use the scope for visual purposes. I don't need to spend a fortune, just want some nice quality ep's that I can use to enjoy those not so perfect nights.

The Scope is a 6" SCT, f/10 with f/6 reducer. FL of 1500mm before reducer. I see eye pieces with different FOV's. How large of a FOV am I going to want with a scope like this?

Ideally I'd like to purchase a kit with some filters, any recommendations on a brand? I don't really like looking thru tiny holes so I'd like something with larger eye relief if this isn't a bad thing. Would like to spend in the range of $400 either for a kit or for a few eyepieces and a descent barlow. What would you recommend looking at?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
sg6
professor emeritus


Reged: 02/14/10

Loc: Norfolk, UK.
Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: Sean13]
      #5540322 - 11/26/12 01:37 PM

You will get at the top about 1 degree FoV.
Based on the following:

32mm plossl = 47x = 1.1 degree FoV
25mm Astro-Tech Paradigm = 60x = 1 degree FoV

Smaller focal length eyepieces give less FoV

1 degree is the size of the Orion nebula and the Pleiades. Andromeda is somewhat bigger.

Used the above as the Paradigms are a fair selection of eyepieces, 6 of them at $60 each. You could get the 12mm, 15mm, 18mm, 25mm for your scope and a 32mm plossl for around $300, then pick a barlow.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
csrlice12
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/22/12

Loc: Denver, CO
Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: Sean13]
      #5540376 - 11/26/12 02:07 PM Attachment (19 downloads)

Quote:

I recently bought a Celestron 6" Advanced Series SCT. My primary use for the scope is photography, so I hadn't planned on buying any additional eps for the scope. I see now that weather for photography is not always optimal, and some nights I would just like to be able to use the scope for visual purposes. I don't need to spend a fortune, just want some nice quality ep's that I can use to enjoy those not so perfect nights.

The Scope is a 6" SCT, f/10 with f/6 reducer. FL of 1500mm before reducer. I see eye pieces with different FOV's. How large of a FOV am I going to want with a scope like this?

Ideally I'd like to purchase a kit with some filters, any recommendations on a brand? I don't really like looking thru tiny holes so I'd like something with larger eye relief if this isn't a bad thing. Would like to spend in the range of $400 either for a kit or for a few eyepieces and a descent barlow. What would you recommend looking at?




I'd grab a 30mm ES 82, the 18mm ES82, and the 11mm ES82, those will be right at $400. Get a GSO 2" barlow with 1.25" adapter. That would give you 50X, 83X, and 136X (double that for a barlow). Attached is an eyepiece chart you can use. Just plug in the f/l and size of the scope and the F/l and FOV of the eyepiece, and it will give you the TFOV (at least close, as all eyepieces will vary a little bit). You have also just discovered the SCT drawback-narrow FOV due to the long f/l of the scope.

Edited by csrlice12 (11/26/12 02:08 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MikeBOKC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/10/10

Loc: Oklahoma City, OK
Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: Sean13]
      #5540386 - 11/26/12 02:14 PM

SCTs are pretty forgiving of eyepieces. The ES/Barlow suggestion is good . . . though it is only on nights of really good seeing that you will be able to push magnification much past 200-250 on planets and other seeing-senstitive objects. As for filters, a moon filter is pretty vital, maybe an O-III nebula filter, but the colored ones are not high priority in my view. If you are on a strict budget the comment on the Astro Tech paradigm line is a good one, or just a decent spread of quality plossls from someone like Televue.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
The Ardent
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 10/24/08

Loc: Virginia
Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: Sean13]
      #5540390 - 11/26/12 02:16 PM

Just get the 10mm Delos.

150x, 1mm exit pupil, giant eye lens and gobs of eye relief.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sean13
sage


Reged: 11/17/12

Loc: North Platte, Nebraska
Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: The Ardent]
      #5540476 - 11/26/12 03:08 PM

So you would advise getting 2" eyepieces/barlow and using a 1.25" adapter instead of using all 1.25" components?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
faackanders2
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 03/28/11

Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: Sean13]
      #5540618 - 11/26/12 04:30 PM

Explore scientific has the least expensive good widefields.
If your scope can take 2" I'd recommend 20mm 100 AFOV for $299. If your scope takes 1.25" only I'd recommend $99 14mm 82 AFOV or $TBD 24mm 68 AFOV. A barlow can effectively double the number of your eyepieces (just divide mm by barlow power).


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sean13
sage


Reged: 11/17/12

Loc: North Platte, Nebraska
Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: faackanders2]
      #5540625 - 11/26/12 04:34 PM

It has a 1 1/4" visual back on it, I'm not sure if its capable of taking a 2" eye piece with a different back?

EDIT: From the sounds of it, I want as wide of an AFOV as possible that my budget allows, correct?

Edited by Sean13 (11/26/12 04:36 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
csrlice12
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/22/12

Loc: Denver, CO
Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: Sean13]
      #5540633 - 11/26/12 04:38 PM

If you can't use 2" eyepieces, then I'd recommend the ES68 24mm or 20mm, or even the ES68 28mm....

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mike B
Starstruck
*****

Reged: 04/06/05

Loc: shake, rattle, & roll, CA
Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: Sean13]
      #5540647 - 11/26/12 04:47 PM

A 1-1/4" VB is what i thot might be the case on that scope- so *yes*, you should constrain your collection to 1-1/4" EPs.

If you can find one, the Meade series 5000 18mm UWA should be a winner in that scope! Most other 18mm UWA's on the market therse days are 2" format. Yet a 24mm 68* EP (aka "SWA") would show a skosh more sky.

Otherwise, the 'Paradigm' EP suggestion sounds pretty decent... i've never used one, but i hear they're quite good... they compare favorably with EPs i HAVE used, and if i were headed that way myself, i'd be lookin' very closely at the Paradigms!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mike B
Starstruck
*****

Reged: 04/06/05

Loc: shake, rattle, & roll, CA
Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: Sean13]
      #5540665 - 11/26/12 04:58 PM

Quote:

EDIT: From the sounds of it, I want as wide of an AFOV as possible that my budget allows, correct?




Well, sort of. *Apparent* FoV is just how wide the view circle *looks* to the eye... ie. "drinking-straw" or "picture-window". The TFoV ("True" FoV) is what you're actually after, and that's simply the EP's AFoV divided by the magnification produced therewith.

So if you're constrained to 1-1/4" EPs, you want the combination of FL+AFoV that nets you the most *true* field. As i suggested re: the Meade 18mm UWA, the scope at 1500mm used with the 18mm EP yields ~83x, and the 82* AFoV of this EP divided by that magnification is 0.98* TRUE field... whereas a 24mm SWA EP would yield 1500/24 = ~63x, and 68*AFoV/63 = 1.09* TRUE field... a bit more.

So MOST of what you're probably after is that net field seen. However, all things are seldom "equal", and after looking thru both of these EPs, you might totally fall in love with the ultra-wide display of the 18mm EP, and decide to forgo that extra 0.09* for the sake of the panache of the UWA!

We widefield addicts do this all the time. This forum is where we come to get therapy...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
wky46
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 12/12/05

Loc: west Ky.
Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: Sean13]
      #5540711 - 11/26/12 05:34 PM

I've settled on just one after nearly 20 yrs. with my sct @f10- 32mm Plossl (1 1/4"). All the other EP's in my case along with my Barlow gathers dust. The 32mm is a sweetspot through my eye, from the moon to mars to galaxies. Exit pupil to magnification, it's a joyous wedding of optical alignments. Now, I realize that could probably change if I went to 2" ep's but for 1 1/4", it's eyeball bliss

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
faackanders2
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 03/28/11

Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: csrlice12]
      #5541141 - 11/26/12 09:57 PM

Quote:

If you can't use 2" eyepieces, then I'd recommend the ES68 24mm or 20mm, or even the ES68 28mm....




ES68 28mm 1.25"???


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
faackanders2
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 03/28/11

Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: faackanders2]
      #5541161 - 11/26/12 10:10 PM

es68 28mm is a 2" eyepiece.
widest es68 1.25" is a 24mm.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ibase
Vendor Affiliate
*****

Reged: 03/20/08

Loc: Manila, Philippines 121*E 14*N
Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: Sean13]
      #5541198 - 11/26/12 10:30 PM

Quote:

I recently bought a Celestron 6" Advanced Series SCT. My primary use for the scope is photography, so I hadn't planned on buying any additional eps for the scope. I see now that weather for photography is not always optimal, and some nights I would just like to be able to use the scope for visual purposes. I don't need to spend a fortune, just want some nice quality ep's that I can use to enjoy those not so perfect nights.

The Scope is a 6" SCT, f/10 with f/6 reducer. FL of 1500mm before reducer. I see eye pieces with different FOV's. How large of a FOV am I going to want with a scope like this?

Ideally I'd like to purchase a kit with some filters, any recommendations on a brand? I don't really like looking thru tiny holes so I'd like something with larger eye relief if this isn't a bad thing. Would like to spend in the range of $400 either for a kit or for a few eyepieces and a descent barlow. What would you recommend looking at?




My 1st scope was a Celestron 6SE SCT and the 1st thing I bought for it was a Celestron EP/filter kit. Not satisfied, I replaced the kit with a Baader Hyperion 8-24mm zoom and it worked great - the views were sharper, clearer, and wider. At 8mm zoom setting, the apparent field of view (AFOV) is around 70-deg (68 published), considered as a "widefield" but narrows down in the longer focal lengths. Still, it's a good option to consider for the 6SCT. The ES fixed focal length EP's are also good as others have suggested.

Best,


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: Sean13]
      #5541231 - 11/26/12 10:48 PM

The good news is that of all of the elements of the optical train - the atmosphere, the observer (eyesight and experience), the objective and finally the eyepiece - the eyepiece is the least important in terms of quality of the final image. There are few truly bad eyepieces, and SCTs are relatively forgiving of eyepiece designs (i.e., they work well with pretty much any eyepiece). The fact that yours is on a driven mount makes eyepiece choice even less important. A scope that doesn't track benefits from wide field eyepieces more than one that does track.

So honestly, the eyepieces it came with are probably fine. The prism diagonal that comes with the scope could be improved upon. Personally, I'd invest in this:

http://agenaastro.com/gso-1-25-90-deg-99-dielectric-mirror-diagonal.html

And then I would get one of these...

http://store.smartastronomy.com/smsmch.html

And one of these...

http://www.astrozap.com/scripts/prodList.asp?idCategory=47

Those are the keys to many, many hours of comfortable, seated, contemplative observing, and will far and away improve your observing experience compared to any eyepiece upgrade. Notice, though, that I left ~$100 of your $400 budget intact. If you're desperate to try a different eyepiece, I'd take that $100 and buy one that puts up a 2mm exit pupil in your scope (i.e., ~20mm). The 20mm Sterling Plossl is a sweetie, at just $40.

http://store.smartastronomy.com/120stpl55def.html

I'm also partial to the 20mm GSO Superview in SCTs:

http://agenaastro.com/gso-20mm-superview-eyepiece.html

Also about $40.

A third option with a decent reputation is the 20mm ES 68, which runs about $100.

https://www.astronomics.com/explore-scientific-20mm-68-degree-field-waterproo...

Lastly, I'd skip 2" accessories on this scope. It has an itty-bitty diameter baffle and anything 2" and truly wide field will show edge darkening due to vignetting.

Regards,

Jim

Edited by jrbarnett (11/26/12 10:51 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SeattleScott
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 10/14/11

Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions [Re: ibase]
      #5541232 - 11/26/12 10:48 PM

The Baader zoom would be a nice combination with a 6" SCT, but it is also something like $275 and doesn't provide the widest possible FOV. From what I hear a 6" SCT is not really designed for 2" eyepieces - can be done, but negligible benefit. I would second the notion of a 32mm plossl. After using a very nice 24mm ES 82 deg eyepiece with my F9 refractor for a couple years, I was pleasantly surprised at the improved brightness of objects when I picked up a 38mm SWA. Both of these are 2" eyepieces, but the principle is the same. A longer focal length eyepiece makes a wider exit pupil, which makes objects brighter. How bright you want to go depends a lot on the light pollution where you are, but 3.2mm (using a 32mm eyepiece) is certainly not overkill. I would take that any day over a 24mm or 18mm eyepiece that gave the same field of view.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Keith
sage
*****

Reged: 05/14/05

Loc: Costa Mesa, CA USA
Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: SeattleScott]
      #5541595 - 11/27/12 07:25 AM

While OP's budget did not include a 2" upgrade (eats at least $99 for a decent GSO dielectric diag), I would have to say that 2" eps work fine with these scopes. It is the .63 reducers that cause vignetting on anything past a 20nagler/27panoptic/32 plossl 5k sized field stop. Without a reducer and they light up the EP just fine for visual purposes, we can handle 70% illumination on the edges just fine. IMO better than giving up the TFOV by making the 1.25" only sacrafice.

That being said, the f6.3 reducer does get you about as wide as a 35mm panoptic without the reducer, so given the budget I would not suggest 2" at this time, but it would be a good thing to consider for the future.

24SWA or ES68 would be my low power EP, considering the f6.3 will only bring it to about 4mm exit pupil


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bob S.
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/14/05

Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5541667 - 11/27/12 08:33 AM

Quote:

The good news is that of all of the elements of the optical train - the atmosphere, the observer (eyesight and experience), the objective and finally the eyepiece - the eyepiece is the least important in terms of quality of the final image. Jim




Jim, I do not disagree with your basic premise about the other variables that have greater weightings in the variance of telescope performance. However, I think for some of us, eyepiece performance carries more weight in the overall visual experience than possibly for others? I know that my eyes really have fairly strong preferences for certain brands (an particular eyepieces within a brand) and types of eyepieces and the viewing experience for me is either enhanced or diminished by the final part in the optical train which is the eyepiece. For this reason, I have generally made my eyepiece selection based on what looks the best for my eyes and the types of equipment I am using. I tend to stay pretty exclusively with high-end equipment because I do not want to have to worry about the equipment limiting what I am seeing. OTOH, I fully agree that the seeing is EVERYTHING. Bob


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
t.r.
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 02/14/08

Loc: Upstate NY
Re: Overwhelmed with eyepeice decisions new [Re: Bob S.]
      #5541690 - 11/27/12 09:01 AM

As a few others have said, get the Baader Zoom 8-24. It is a perfect match to the 6" SCT. Get a longer focal length eyepiece later in the 30-40mm range for the really wide experience and you're done with two eyepieces!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
10 registered and 19 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  ausastronomer, droid, cbwerner, kkokkolis 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1180

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics