Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Binoviewers

Pages: 1
dcoyle
professor emeritus


Reged: 10/11/05

Loc: Turbulent but dark skies, N.M.
17mm Aperture stop on "22mm" CA Celestron BV's new
      #5542967 - 11/27/12 10:22 PM

I just recieved my new BV's from Celestron, who advertise it as a 22mm clear aperture. Instead, it has a 17 or 18 mm diameter stop screwed in about a half inch into the 22 mm ID nose piece.

What's up with that?

Thanks,

Dan

Edited by dcoyle (11/27/12 10:24 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GlennLeDrew
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/18/08

Loc: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: 17mm Aperture stop on "22mm" CA Celestron BV's new [Re: dcoyle]
      #5543761 - 11/28/12 12:24 PM

The 22mm aperture as claimed is to allow the use of some lower power eyepieces without edge-of-field darkening to become too evident. So in a sense the 'spec' is correct. An aperture stop well ahead of the focus had an impact on the fastest scope useable. For example, if we assume the optical path length between the 17mm stop and the focus to be 100mm (it's likely different--this us merely an example), the fastest scope which can be used before aperture reduction occurs is 100 / 17 = f/5.88.

It's nice to have extra aperture at the front end, of course, as this increases the size of the circle of full illumination at the focus. However, this is not as important as suppressing internal reflections, which I suspect that 17mm stop is there for.

In the end, as long as you get full illumination on axis you're doing well. Off-axis fall-off due to the front end stop will almost certainly NOT be detectable, and if reflections are indeed supressed or lessened, so much the better.

Unless you're trying to fit the BV to a faster scope (e.g., f/5), fear not!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dcoyle
professor emeritus


Reged: 10/11/05

Loc: Turbulent but dark skies, N.M.
Re: 17mm Aperture stop on "22mm" CA Celestron BV's [Re: GlennLeDrew]
      #5545502 - 11/29/12 12:59 PM

Thanks for taking the time to respond, Glenn.

I was hoping someone would say "Oh, we take that out."

Instead, you have the message that things won't be that bad.

I'm quite disappointed with Celestron. I have no doubt that if Celestron spent the money to put it there, it was needed.

The last thing I need using a binoviewer on a small scope is further reduction of light throughput.

I'm returning them.

Thanks again.

Dan


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1


Extra information
4 registered and 3 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  TG, Geo557 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 590

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics