Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Speciality Forums >> Science! Astronomy & Space Exploration, and Others

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
InterStellarGuy
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 06/25/08

Loc: Overland Park, KS
Nuke the moon new
      #5544455 - 11/28/12 07:55 PM

Ever been angered by the brightness of the moon bleeding out those sometimes elusive DSOs? Messier marathons spoiled by that bright arrogant circle in the sky?

Well, in the 1950s, they almost did something about it, in the form of nuking the moon:
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/11/28/u-s-had-plans-to-nuke-the-moon/?hpt=...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
llanitedave
Humble Megalomaniac
*****

Reged: 09/26/05

Loc: Amargosa Valley, NV, USA
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: InterStellarGuy]
      #5544561 - 11/28/12 09:12 PM

There have been dumber ideas.



But not many.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ColoHank
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/07/07

Loc: western Colorado
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: llanitedave]
      #5544673 - 11/28/12 10:11 PM

Quote:

There have been dumber ideas.





I'm not so sure about that. What could be dumber than declaring war on the Moon? Imagine how embarrassing it would have been if we'd done it and lost...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick Woods
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/27/05

Loc: Inner Solar System
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: ColoHank]
      #5544717 - 11/28/12 10:32 PM

Quote:

Quote:

There have been dumber ideas.





I'm not so sure about that. What could be dumber than declaring war on the Moon? Imagine how embarrassing it would have been if we'd done it and lost...




We would certainly have lost!

And the guy said there's no way the Moon would have blown up! Hey, I saw the remake of "The Time Machine", and they nuked the Moon and blew it up! So I know it would happen, because they couldn't say it if it wasn't true.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
skyguy88
sage


Reged: 11/13/06

Loc: Prescott, AZ
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: Rick Woods]
      #5544867 - 11/29/12 12:26 AM

In the early 70's there was serious consideration of nuking the moon to provide a strong signal that the Apollo seismic network could use to examine the lunar interior. The idea was shot down quickly.

Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FlorinAndrei
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 09/28/10

Loc: California
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: InterStellarGuy]
      #5544928 - 11/29/12 02:10 AM

Humanity in the '50s and '60s was like a high school kid who suddenly got bodybuilder-like muscles and couldn't wait to use all that new-found power. The corny, immature, embarrassing hubris of those years. It was awesome.

Some good things came out of it, like the beginning of space exploration. But then they had stuff like the Soviet plan to dig artificial rivers using nuclear explosions. Or this silly idea to nuke the Moon. Jeez.

I like to think we're wiser now. But at the same time we're less bold, more introverted, and we've lost a good deal of inspired imagination. It's time to tackle again some great challenges - and I mean in the real world, not on the social media.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
scopethis
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/30/08

Loc: Kingman, Ks
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: FlorinAndrei]
      #5545665 - 11/29/12 02:53 PM

yea..and those X-ray Vision glasses ordered from a comic book never arrived....

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
InterStellarGuy
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 06/25/08

Loc: Overland Park, KS
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: scopethis]
      #5545708 - 11/29/12 03:21 PM

I dunno guys, lets not toss the baby out with the bath water. We need to get that cheese off the moon somehow!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
russell23
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/31/09

Loc: Upstate NY
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: InterStellarGuy]
      #5546020 - 11/29/12 06:57 PM

According to the "Rare Earth" hypothesis we have the Moon to thank for our existence. It helps stabilize the Earth's tilt which provides climate stability.

Dave


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
llanitedave
Humble Megalomaniac
*****

Reged: 09/26/05

Loc: Amargosa Valley, NV, USA
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: russell23]
      #5546154 - 11/29/12 07:59 PM

They weren't trying to blow it up, they only wanted to spend millions of dollars to create a momentary flash and a small crater.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick Woods
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/27/05

Loc: Inner Solar System
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: llanitedave]
      #5546505 - 11/30/12 12:23 AM

Quote:

They weren't trying to blow it up, they only wanted to spend millions of dollars to create a momentary flash and a small crater.




That would give a whole new meaning to cutting the cheese.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
D_talley
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/07/05

Loc: Richmond VA
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: Rick Woods]
      #5546761 - 11/30/12 08:04 AM

It is too bad that it was not done. We could use the data from the explosion to determine the size of a blast we would need to divert a threat to the earth.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ColoHank
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/07/07

Loc: western Colorado
Re: Nuke the moon [Re: D_talley]
      #5547037 - 11/30/12 11:48 AM

Quote:

It is too bad that it was not done. We could use the data from the explosion to determine the size of a blast we would need to divert a threat to the earth.







I'm sure we've got data like that from test shots here on Earth. It's also easy (not for me) to simulate all manner of blasts and blast effects using supercomputers, which is what the US has been doing since signing the nuclear test-ban treaty. Detonating a nuke on the Moon would have been a shame, needlessly polluting the surface and perhaps compromising later research efforts there. And grandstanding like that just to impress our adversaries would have been pretty childish, in my judgment. I'm glad we decided not to do it, whatever the rationale.

Edited by ColoHank (11/30/12 06:05 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
D_talley
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/07/05

Loc: Richmond VA
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: ColoHank]
      #5547396 - 11/30/12 03:27 PM

I agree with you and we should not do it but I am thinking long term and when it comes time to move a 6 mile wide chunk of iron would the bomb go off like an old style flash bulb, a lot of light and heat but nothing else.

On Earth most of the blast of a bomb is the overpressure of the air and the shock wave that follows. There would be no (very little)shock wave in space to breakup the object. Or am I looking at this wrong.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FirstSightModerator
Duke of Deneb
*****

Reged: 12/26/05

Loc: Raleigh, NC
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: D_talley]
      #5547706 - 11/30/12 07:06 PM

Quote:


On Earth most of the blast of a bomb is the overpressure of the air and the shock wave that follows. There would be no (very little)shock wave in space to breakup the object. Or am I looking at this wrong.




WELL THEN, if there's no shock wave in space, they how do all those spacecraft in the "Star Wars" movies broadcast such loud rocket engine noise as they whiz by? Answer that one, Mr. smarty science pants.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
llanitedave
Humble Megalomaniac
*****

Reged: 09/26/05

Loc: Amargosa Valley, NV, USA
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: FirstSight]
      #5548038 - 11/30/12 11:26 PM

I'm thinking that if an asteroid is relatively solid, a penetrating bomb could burrow in a few tens of meters maybe into the regolith before it detonates. The energy shooting back out through the entry hole could act a bit like a nozzle, propelling the whole body just a nudge in the desired direction.

A really loose asteroid would probably just fragment, though.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
InterStellarGuy
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 06/25/08

Loc: Overland Park, KS
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: llanitedave]
      #5548057 - 11/30/12 11:41 PM

Quote:

I'm thinking that if an asteroid is relatively solid, a penetrating bomb could burrow in a few tens of meters maybe into the regolith before it detonates. The energy shooting back out through the entry hole could act a bit like a nozzle, propelling the whole body just a nudge in the desired direction.

A really loose asteroid would probably just fragment, though.




When it comes to nuking asteroids I have read before where scientists claim nuking an asteroid might be bad because it would send many fragments at Earth which would still do damage, but I do not understand this rationale.
A huge solid asteroid will make a huge crater which will send up dust and soot, block out the Sun, lead to the extinction of all life. Fragments, will atleast burn up some as they enter the atmosphere, and the ones that do hit, yes will cause mass damage and death, but sans huge crater and sans extinction.

If given the choice between total extinction vs mass death, but non-extinction, isn't the latter less negative than the former?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jarad
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 04/28/03

Loc: Atlanta, GA
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: InterStellarGuy]
      #5548473 - 12/01/12 09:37 AM

Quote:

If given the choice between total extinction vs mass death, but non-extinction, isn't the latter less negative than the former?





If those are the only two choices, yes. But as I recall, they didnt simply oppose nuking an asteroid, they proposed alternatives like landing a thruster on it to nudge it away intact, or coating one side with reflective or absorptive material to cause solar light pressure to nudge it over time, etc.

In other words, if the choices are between total extinction, mass death, or no damage at all, they prefer door #3.

Jarad


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
llanitedave
Humble Megalomaniac
*****

Reged: 09/26/05

Loc: Amargosa Valley, NV, USA
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: InterStellarGuy]
      #5548597 - 12/01/12 11:13 AM

Quote:


When it comes to nuking asteroids I have read before where scientists claim nuking an asteroid might be bad because it would send many fragments at Earth which would still do damage, but I do not understand this rationale.





The rationale is that most asteroids aren't really solid, but basically are big rubble piles. The approach I suggested would only work for the relatively solid ones, or comets(if even then), but not for more typical bodies like Itokawa.

As Jarad pointed out, there are gentler approaches that are likely to be more effective.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
StarWars
Mr. Postmaster Man
*****

Reged: 11/26/03

Loc: At the Gym >Spudtastic<
Re: Nuke the moon new [Re: InterStellarGuy]
      #5549194 - 12/01/12 06:26 PM


Launch a space craft to the Moon with a huge paintball gun full of flat black paint...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
4 registered and 2 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  LivingNDixie, FirstSight, JayinUT 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1581

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics