orlyandico
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 08/10/09
Loc: Singapore
|
Berlebach Uni 8 Capacity?
#5556142 - 12/05/12 06:29 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I'm looking at this tripod to use with a Mach1. It would carry at most a C9.25
I know Rob Miller Tri36L costs not much more and is rated 200+ lb while the Uni 8 is only rated 110 lb. But... the Uni 8 is wood and I assume more resistant to dings. And it collapses down to 2' long.
Any Berlebach Units users can comment? I don't want to spend a lot on the mount and end up with a shaky tripod...
|
Jim7728
Postmaster
   
Reged: 04/10/05
Loc: Stoop Landing Observatory, NYC
|
Re: Berlebach Uni 8 Capacity?
[Re: orlyandico]
#5556208 - 12/05/12 07:01 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
The Planet seems to be the one everyone recommends, even AP offers it at their website for the Mach1GTO. UNI 8 seems to be a bit light for that mount head.
http://www.astro-physics.com/products/accessories/mounting_acc/piers.htm#awtber
Looking to get the Planet tripod for my Discmount 6.
|
orlyandico
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 08/10/09
Loc: Singapore
|
Re: Berlebach Uni 8 Capacity?
[Re: Jim7728]
#5556432 - 12/05/12 09:11 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I have heard about the Planet but the "transportation length" is 38 inches, vs 26 inches for the Uni.
So it is bulky, and at that point the Rob Miller Tri36L (which also has non-collapsible legs) becomes a more attractive alternative.
|
Waldemar
member
Reged: 08/02/08
Loc: Netherlands
|
Re: Berlebach Uni 8 Capacity?
[Re: orlyandico]
#5566135 - 12/11/12 03:22 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I can tell you from experience that the Planet is a hell of a tripod. With a larger plate, elephants could have intercourse on it... 
just my 2 c (uhh elephants)
|
M44
sage
   
Reged: 03/24/07
Loc: SoCal.
|
Re: Berlebach Uni 8 Capacity?
[Re: orlyandico]
#5566150 - 12/11/12 03:33 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I do have Uni 15 and Planet. There is no comparison. Uni series is suitable for small refractors and mounts.
One negative about Uni series is, the stance is not wide. It is easy to tip the tripod with a 3" refractor on Teegul mount.
Planet has a wider stance and is more suitable for Medium duty GEMs like Mach1 GTO.
|
Jim7728
Postmaster
   
Reged: 04/10/05
Loc: Stoop Landing Observatory, NYC
|
Re: Berlebach Uni 8 Capacity?
[Re: Waldemar]
#5566162 - 12/11/12 03:41 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|

Okay... I keep reading about the Rob Miller Tri36L, but can't find out much from his site.
http://www.catamountsystems.com/
Is he in business anymore?
Does look like a good option for the OP.
|
Waldemar
member
Reged: 08/02/08
Loc: Netherlands
|
Re: Berlebach Uni 8 Capacity?
[Re: Jim7728]
#5566330 - 12/11/12 05:22 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Planet can carry 220 Lbs...that is probably why it is called Planet! I really think there is no better dempening material than wood... But again: I am a bit biased.
|
woodworkt
super member
   
Reged: 06/07/06
Loc: Northern Virginia
|
Re: Berlebach Uni 8 Capacity?
[Re: Waldemar]
#5566668 - 12/11/12 10:20 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
There used to be something in between the Uni and the Planet (not made by Berlebach) that AP called the "AP wood tripod." From what I saw at some events with our astronomy club, it worked fine with the Mach 1. Lighter than a Planet, but probably a bit more substantial than a UNI.
They may not sell them anymore, but it might be available on the used market.
--Ken T.
|
Agatha
professor emeritus
Reged: 06/04/12
Loc: Minneapolis, MN
|
Re: Berlebach Uni 8 Capacity?
[Re: woodworkt]
#5566716 - 12/11/12 10:51 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I think that was possibly the Baader hardwood tripod that would be between the Uni and Planet.
Best, Linda B.
|
orlyandico
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 08/10/09
Loc: Singapore
|
Re: Berlebach Uni 8 Capacity?
[Re: Agatha]
#5566884 - 12/12/12 01:13 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
That's the Baader. It wasn't too stable, so a Lapides spreader was also made for it.
The Lapides spreader was $650 new, and add to the price of the Baader tripod, used examples still command $800 to $1000. There is one right now on the other site for $1000.
Given that a Rob Miller Tri36L is only $600 without the levelers (which the Berlebachs and Baader don't have anyway)... the AP/Lapides tripod is not good bang for the buck unless you really like wood.
|