John Jarosz
Astro Gearhead
   
Reged: 04/25/04
Loc: Chicago area, IL
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: tim53]
#5550014 - 12/02/12 09:36 AM Attachment (35 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Here's 3 pics of the focuser. Please excuse the dust on the top surface of the Paracorr. I didn't realize it was that bad. In use (because this is an F4 mirror) the Paracorr stays in it's correct position relative to the main mirror. So this screw focuser doesn't get used anymore, but it keeps the sled in the right position (I built this configuration before I got a Paracorr). There is another helical eyepiece focuser that mounts onto the Paracorr so I can accommodate the different positions of field stops in different eyepieces.
|
John Jarosz
Astro Gearhead
   
Reged: 04/25/04
Loc: Chicago area, IL
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: John Jarosz]
#5550021 - 12/02/12 09:39 AM Attachment (30 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Here's a view of the leaf spring and the attachment. In the above photo you can see the curved spider dimly on the right
|
John Jarosz
Astro Gearhead
   
Reged: 04/25/04
Loc: Chicago area, IL
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: John Jarosz]
#5550029 - 12/02/12 09:43 AM Attachment (30 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Here is the half nut being disengaged by deflecting the leaf spring. The half nut is made from an aluminum block that is fairly long, tapped to match the threaded rod (3/8 - 24 UNF) and then sliced in half. Some deburring required.
|
tim53
Postmaster
   
Reged: 12/17/04
Loc: Highland Park, CA
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: John Jarosz]
#5550197 - 12/02/12 11:42 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Thanks for the pics! They give me some ideas. I like the half-nut solution to going from fine to coarse focus. How much focus travel do you have? I'm trying to decide whether I want to accomodate things like my SBIG ST2000 with CFW10 filter wheel for the occasional DSO imaging - yeah, at f/9 the stars ought to be nice and sharp to the edge of the chip!... but mainly, this is a planetary imaging scope!
-Tim.
|
Pinbout
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 02/22/10
Loc: Montclair
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: tim53]
#5550217 - 12/02/12 11:55 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Hey Tim,
too bad you can't use the microscope stand, that would be so steampunk'ish. very cool anyway.
|
John Jarosz
Astro Gearhead
   
Reged: 04/25/04
Loc: Chicago area, IL
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: tim53]
#5550218 - 12/02/12 11:55 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
There's about 5" of travel in my arrangement. Excessive, but this is a very old detail from back in the day when eyepiece weren't so standardized. But for photography it will give you all kinds of flexibility; you should be able to accommodate almost any configuration. Making the sled longer than you need won't really affect performance as long as you keep the sled axis parallel to the optical axis.
|
tim53
Postmaster
   
Reged: 12/17/04
Loc: Highland Park, CA
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: John Jarosz]
#5550288 - 12/02/12 12:45 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
yes, and a long sled will be easier to align with the tube
|
Dick Parker
professor emeritus
   
Reged: 08/17/07
Loc: Tolland, CT and Chiefland, FL
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: John Jarosz]
#5550325 - 12/02/12 01:14 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
John -
Very nice sled focuser arrangement. Clever, well executed, clean. Thanks for sharing.
Dick Parker
|
tim53
Postmaster
   
Reged: 12/17/04
Loc: Highland Park, CA
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: Dick Parker]
#5561304 - 12/08/12 06:26 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
So I couldn't stand the look of the rubbed on polyurethane. Sanded it with 320 sandpaper, then rubbed on some more gel stain to even out some bright spots a bit better than I had before. It's nice and smooth now, but I'll need to put something over the stain to protect it from wearing off. Prolly spray a thin coat of poly over it tomorrow or next weekend.
So now, I have to figure out how I'm going to mount the primary and the focuser. Going back to the beginning of this thread, you might notice that the cherry I made the tube from was only 5 1/2 feet long, so the tube is 6 inches shorter than the focal length (exactly 72 inches). I figured I'd make a removable cell for the primary that hangs off the end of the tube, similar to what I did for my 10" f/6, only longer.
Then, for the focuser, if I really do go with a sled, I'm cogitating on making something that could double as a "retractable" section/dewshield/lightshield/focuser that will fit over the outside of the tube and extend beyond the end during use. I've got a pair of full-extension drawer slides that I'd bought a few years back for a similar concept (a moving secondary support to put a camera at the focus of a 12.5" f/3.5 mirror, that i haven't finished). I'd mount the slides to the tube, and mount the extension/focuser to the slides. Then, I'd focus with the threaded rod and half nut, like John's focuser does, only the half nut would be mounted to the tube and the threaded rod to the focuser/tube extension, so it could retract with the extension for stowing the scope.
Since the extension would be a full-circumference gizmo, I could conceivably use a conventional spider and make slots in the tube to allow the spider to retract with the extension. But I think I'll make a curved one instead.
To avoid "ugly", I think I'll start with figuring out how to mount my lazy suzan rotating rings to the tube, so that I can use the same design elements/outer dimensions for both the focuser extension and primary support.
if I were a sketchup sort of person, I'd draft it all up before cutting any wood. But I'm not, really. I tend to make chicken scratch drawings with measurements to keep track of what's in my haid and identify what won't work, then start cutting and fitting as I go.
Whadaya think?
-Tim.
|
tim53
Postmaster
   
Reged: 12/17/04
Loc: Highland Park, CA
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: tim53]
#5561355 - 12/08/12 07:09 PM Attachment (30 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
So here's what I've gots:
The lazy susan rotating rings are very close to the OD of the tube. I'll need to make rings that the inner half of the lazy suzan ring bolts to that bolts (not adjustable) or clamps (better, adjustable) onto the tube. Initially, I was thinking of something along the lines of the forms that I used to clamp the tube during glueup, but I think I'll want something thinner and stronger than that. Thin, in the radial dimension, it can be wide, though. Maybe still set it up so it clamps around the tube, though.
And I remembered something: At one of the Rockler sales about a year ago, I bought a kit to steam bend wood. Will have to make a box for the steaming, depending on the dimensions of the stuff I want to bend, but I could cut thin strips of Maple and bend them around the tube, laminating them up as I go to make a multi-ply ring with the grain concentric rather than cutting something out of plywood and trying to pretty it up later.
Here's the tube with one of the lazy suzan bearings around it. The bearing is aluminum, but I was planning on painting it to look like brass.
Edited by tim53 (12/08/12 07:10 PM)
|
tim53
Postmaster
   
Reged: 12/17/04
Loc: Highland Park, CA
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: tim53]
#5561359 - 12/08/12 07:11 PM Attachment (29 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Another shot showing the tube, the rings, and one of the forms used for glueing up the tube.
|
tim53
Postmaster
   
Reged: 12/17/04
Loc: Highland Park, CA
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: tim53]
#5561362 - 12/08/12 07:13 PM Attachment (26 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Tube, full length
Edited by tim53 (12/08/12 07:19 PM)
|
tim53
Postmaster
   
Reged: 12/17/04
Loc: Highland Park, CA
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: tim53]
#5561376 - 12/08/12 07:23 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
So, if I make steam bent maple multiply rings that have the same OD as the outer lazy susan ring, and put them on the outside of the rotating ring assembly, I could mount my steambent rings to the inner ls rings, and rig up a braking system that bears against the outer ring to keep the tube from rotating too freely. That way, I could leave the ball bearings in the rings and save a long, involved step of converting the rings into Cave-like rings like I did on my 10" f/6.
-Tim.
|
tim53
Postmaster
   
Reged: 12/17/04
Loc: Highland Park, CA
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: tim53]
#5561383 - 12/08/12 07:25 PM Attachment (29 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
And so, if the steam bending Idea works like it should, I'll make 5 of these rings. Two will go on the outside of the rotating ring assembly, two on either end of the focuser/extension tube, and 3 at the primary end (one to reinforce the tube and two to make the primary cell.
And the primary cell and focuser/extension will be walled with the thin mahogany plywood I bent back when I was experimenting making the tube.
Edited by tim53 (12/08/12 07:26 PM)
|
tim53
Postmaster
   
Reged: 12/17/04
Loc: Highland Park, CA
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: tim53]
#5561385 - 12/08/12 07:27 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Okay, its starting to get dark. Better figure on putting stuff away for the night.
Also, gonna dig up my steam bending kit and try to find those drawer slides and make sure they're tight enough to do what I want them to.
-Tim.
|
tim53
Postmaster
   
Reged: 12/17/04
Loc: Highland Park, CA
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: tim53]
#5565834 - 12/11/12 12:14 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
This past weekend I mostly ran around looking for supplies and ideas, but I did manage to rub on another thin coat of poly (thinned about 60% with mineral spirits). It came out really nice.
I know some will cringe at this, but I've decided to make this puppy focus by moving the primary by mounting a custom cell support on a pair or bearing drawer slides. They don't seem to have any play over a good 6" of travel (more than I'll ever need), and I have 9" of length to use to mount the mirror support to them and them to the cell support, which will bolt to the end of the tube.
If I don't like it, I can replace it with a fixed cell and cut the opening for the eyepieces larger to mount a sled focuser.
Tim
|
tim53
Postmaster
   
Reged: 12/17/04
Loc: Highland Park, CA
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: tim53]
#5565844 - 12/11/12 12:21 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
For the moving mirror focuser, I plan to move it with a threaded rod and nut between the drawer slides.
Since I'll have rotating rings close to the od of the tube, I'll have to run the focusing rod up the inside of the tube. At first, I'll probably put the knob on the sky end of the tube so if I need to change things, I haven't made any extra holes in the tube. But if it works well, I might mount the focus k on on the tube primaryward of the eyepiece and use a pair of bevel gears to turn the focus rod.
Tim
|
Wes James
Postmaster
   
Reged: 04/12/06
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: tim53]
#5567255 - 12/12/12 10:02 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Tim- It looked like you pretty well had your focuser design finalized... what made you change your mind and decide to go with the moving primary??? Do you think moving the primary may affect collimation much?? Glad the thinned poly is working good for you... I find it to be an excellent finishing method. Wes
|
tim53
Postmaster
   
Reged: 12/17/04
Loc: Highland Park, CA
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: Wes James]
#5567542 - 12/12/12 12:57 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Hi Wes:
One of the main reasons for wanting to try moving the primary is that I won't have to make any unnecessary holes in the tube, other than a place to put an eyepiece. If I decide to abandon the moving primary, I can then design a sled focuser and cut the tube to fit it.
I don't expect collimation will change much with motion of the mirror. These linear bearings are nice, smooth, and tight, especially in the range of a few inches. Since they're 9 inches long, I'll also have good control on mounting them parallel to the tube's axis (my corners will serve as straight edges). I may make the mirror cell support that attaches to the slides out of square steel tubing (1/2"), welded together. So I don't expect there to be any flexure there, either. I don't think I'll need springs to take up backlash in the threaded focusing rod either - just let the weight of the mirror take up the backlash.
I would probably not try this with a big mirror, though.
-Tim.
|
Masvingo
sage
   
Reged: 01/10/12
Loc: Ayrshire, Scotland
|
Re: Delmarvascopics 8" f/9 OTA build
[Re: tim53]
#5568011 - 12/12/12 05:47 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Very impressive workmanship Tim, that tube's a beaut! Looking forward to seeing the finished scope and how the moving primary turns out.
Quote:
The B&L also has a rack under the stage for a light or something, and it's really interesting because it's got a ring there with a set screw that compresses a ring around the light, or whatever was in there.
Re the microscope, my guess would be that a 'condenser lens' fitted in the ring which acts to concentrate light from the illumination source onto or through whatever is being looked at.
James
|