|
MG1962
sage
Reged: 08/13/11
|
Has anyone ever tried this
#5576724 - 12/18/12 01:28 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Would variable polarized filters have much effect on double stars where one companion is buried in the glare of the primary such as Sirius A and B
|
Rachal
member
   
Reged: 04/07/09
Loc: Alexandria LA
|
Re: Has anyone ever tried this
[Re: MG1962]
#5577018 - 12/18/12 09:50 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
If you have one, give it a shot on something easier like Rigel and see how it works. Interesting question. It would be nice if it would; one might have better luck with an occulting bar, however.
|
MG1962
sage
Reged: 08/13/11
|
Re: Has anyone ever tried this
[Re: Rachal]
#5577118 - 12/18/12 11:09 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I dont own one, and have never done enough Luna observing to consider the expense - Rigel would be an excellent target because I can already split that and can compare the performance
|
Rachal
member
   
Reged: 04/07/09
Loc: Alexandria LA
|
Re: Has anyone ever tried this
[Re: MG1962]
#5577568 - 12/18/12 04:39 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Years ago I made an 'apodizing' filter using window screen, which is "supposed" to help with double stars. You might do a search to see if this is something that would interest you.
|
blb
Post Laureate
Reged: 11/25/05
Loc: Piedmont NC
|
Re: Has anyone ever tried this
[Re: Rachal]
#5578142 - 12/18/12 11:28 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
Years ago I made an 'apodizing' filter using window screen, which is "supposed" to help with double stars. You might do a search to see if this is something that would interest you.
Easy to make and it works well.
|
Asbytec
Guy in a furry hat
Reged: 08/08/07
Loc: La Union, PI
|
Re: Has anyone ever tried this
[Re: blb]
#5578227 - 12/19/12 12:35 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
When apodizing, you really have to optimize the screen for high frequencies of double stars. Apodizing tends to slightly enlarge the spurious disc while greatly diminishing the bright ring pattern. This improves contrast at lower spacial frequencies starting about, say, 3 to 5 or more times the Raleigh limit depending on the mesh and radii used.
At these separations doubles would not qualify as close pair where ring brightness might matter. You might loose the dark space at the Raleigh limit observing a classic Raleigh pair and Dawes splits would be more difficult. Wider doubles might be more aesthetically pleasing, however, as well as larger planetary details.
Another trick to observing Sirius pup is to have very clean optics to reduce glare. Some folks have uses square aperture mask to change the shape of diffraction. But, a good neutral density filter might help, too.
|
Ed Wiley
professor emeritus
Reged: 05/18/05
|
Re: Has anyone ever tried this
[Re: Asbytec]
#5579358 - 12/19/12 05:52 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
You might be interested in these articles by Jim Daley. JDSO is always a good source for innovative techniques.
http://www.jdso.org/volume3/number4/Daley.pdf http://www.jdso.org/volume4/number4/Daley.pdf
Ed
|
|
1 registered and 2 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: PJ Anway, RLTYS
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|