treyk
member
   
Reged: 12/12/07
Loc: Roswell Georgia
|
Help: A nasty little M42(SDC-435)
#5587753 - 12/24/12 09:10 PM Attachment (82 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Got a new scope and I wanted to try some video imaging on it the other evening. This did not go so well. Attached is a screen cap of M42. Here's some data:
Seeing: Fair to good in suburban Atlanta
Platform: AT72ED on CGEM (go to was pretty good)
Cam modifications: Stock IR removed, Fan installed & wired remote
Optical train: SDC-435>blue fireball nose>GSO .5x FR>Orion IR cut>Orion Imaging Skyglow>AT72ED (no diagonal involved)
My gut tells me there is a problem in the optics here. I tried just about every adjustable setting on the cam and the problem remained as long as the object was visible. I’m pretty confident in the focusing having used a mask though it took a really bright object to get the pattern to focus with. The best focus I could achieve was toward the end of the focuser travel though I can slide the nose out a bit and still have travel room to spare. I approximate that FR is around 57mm from the CCD chip.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Trey
|
Ira
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 08/22/10
Loc: Mitzpe Ramon, Israel
|
Re: Help: A nasty little M42(SDC-435)
[Re: treyk]
#5587757 - 12/24/12 09:14 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Star of Bethlehem? 
/Ira
|
treyk
member
   
Reged: 12/12/07
Loc: Roswell Georgia
|
Re: Help: A nasty little M42(SDC-435)
[Re: Ira]
#5587760 - 12/24/12 09:17 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Thanks Ira ... I knew I'd get an answer here!
|
Ira
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 08/22/10
Loc: Mitzpe Ramon, Israel
|
Re: Help: A nasty little M42(SDC-435)
[Re: treyk]
#5587766 - 12/24/12 09:23 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
|
StarStuff1
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 04/01/07
Loc: South of the Mason-Dixon Line
|
Re: Help: A nasty little M42(SDC-435)
[Re: Ira]
#5587791 - 12/24/12 09:52 PM Attachment (46 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
It kinda does look like a focus and exposing problem. Here is a pic I made almost two years a go with a 435 and a similar sized optic. Too many scopes to remember the exact one or exposure time...sorry.
|
StarStuff1
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 04/01/07
Loc: South of the Mason-Dixon Line
|
Re: Help: A nasty little M42(SDC-435)
[Re: StarStuff1]
#5587797 - 12/24/12 09:54 PM Attachment (42 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
OK, I can do a little better than that.
|
StarStuff1
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 04/01/07
Loc: South of the Mason-Dixon Line
|
Re: Help: A nasty little M42(SDC-435)
[Re: StarStuff1]
#5587800 - 12/24/12 09:58 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Both are just quick point 'n' shoot screen shots. The scope was (I think) a 5.1-in f/5 newt.
|
Martin Lyons
sage
   
Reged: 10/06/08
Loc: Cape Town, South Africa
|
Re: Help: A nasty little M42(SDC-435)
[Re: StarStuff1]
#5587984 - 12/25/12 01:27 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Try without all those filters. I suspect there's some sort of internal reflection interference going on between all those parallel surfaces. Also, I have thrown away my GSO reducers because they introduced more distortion and abberations than I needed no matter where I had them positioned (both 2" and 1.25" versions)
Start with just the scope and camera and then introduce each additional component until the symptom re-appears.
Martin
|
Dwight J
sage
   
Reged: 05/14/09
Loc: Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
|
Re: Help: A nasty little M42(SDC-435)
[Re: Martin Lyons]
#5588010 - 12/25/12 01:48 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I concur with Martin. I have the GSO reducer as well and it was not very good with the videocam, especially with the extension tube. The glow around the stars is the giveaway for internal reflections.
|
treyk
member
   
Reged: 12/12/07
Loc: Roswell Georgia
|
Re: Help: A nasty little M42(SDC-435)
[Re: Dwight J]
#5588242 - 12/25/12 09:35 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Thanks ya'll will try that next and will post the result (as soon as the sky clears and the inlaws leave).
Trey
|
GlennLeDrew
Postmaster
   
Reged: 06/18/08
Loc: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
Re: Help: A nasty little M42(SDC-435)
[Re: treyk]
#5589113 - 12/26/12 12:33 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Wow! This has the appearance of a diffractive effect. As Martin suggests. Start simplest, and go from there in complexity re. the number of additional components. Sometimes, simply peering into the optical train from both ends when the camera is removed can supply clues. Point the scope toward a variety of light sources, a flashlight across the room being one possibility.
|
Craig in Tacoma
super member
Reged: 01/27/11
Loc: WA, USA
|
Re: Help: A nasty little M42(SDC-435)
[Re: treyk]
#5601143 - 01/02/13 12:09 PM Attachment (29 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I just had to say this is not typical of what you can produce with the Samsung and an AT 72mm ED telescope. I agree you may have too much in between the camera and M42. Here's a shot I took with no filters, the SDC435/Astro Tech 72mm ED, on an iOptron Minitower from 2.8 mag skies..You should be able to duplicate this easily with your set up.
Craig
|