Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home page


Telescope Specific Forums >> Celestron NexStar

Pages: << 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | >> (show all)
Arthur Dent
Galactic Hitch-Hiker
*****

Reged: 10/23/08

Loc: South Yorkshire, UK
Re: new [Re: CelestronDaddy]
      #5588435 - 12/25/12 12:46 PM

What a lovely picture Milby.

Isn't left and right swapped over though??

Art


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Skip
Starlifter Driver
*****

Reged: 01/23/08

Loc: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Re: new [Re: CelestronDaddy]
      #5588867 - 12/25/12 08:32 PM

Wow! Nice Flame and Horsehead!!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ghataa
professor emeritus


Reged: 06/20/11

Loc: Central, NJ
Re: new [Re: CelestronDaddy]
      #5588871 - 12/25/12 08:34 PM

Beautiful HH!!

Congratulations!!

George


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tel
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 03/31/06

Loc: Wallingford England
Re: new [Re: ghataa]
      #5589220 - 12/26/12 04:49 AM

Belated many thanks for all the feedback, Andy and I have received from you guys re. our joint Jupiter webcam/processing project. It's nice to know that it looks good to others and therefore confirms that we've not exhausted the ability of the ol' Philips SPC900NC !

Congratulations also to Milby on his fine images of the Rosette and the Horse Head ! They get ever better !

Best regards,
Tel


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Alex Post
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 09/24/08

Loc: Iowa, USA
Re: new [Re: Tel]
      #5589775 - 12/26/12 01:42 PM

Stunning. You folks are amazing. Thank you.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tel
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 03/31/06

Loc: Wallingford England
Re: new [Re: Alex Post]
      #5591641 - 12/27/12 07:11 PM Attachment (19 downloads)

Nothing new due to the atrocious weather of late.

As a result, and to prevent complete "stir craziness", I've spent the afternoon reworking a few AVIs of Saturn captured back in May of this year. (This is in line with my exploration of latent capacity within my webcam before deciding to move to something more sophisticated for planetary imaging).

Thus:

Celestron 8i mounted on a Skywatcher HEQ5Pro + X2 Celestron Barlow.

15 fps X 180 secs. using a Philips SPC900NC webcam.

Stacked and processed in Registax 5 completed in P/Shop CS2

Thank you for viewing.

Best regards,
Tel


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
milby
super member
*****

Reged: 03/11/12

Loc: Indiana, USA
Re: new [Re: Tel]
      #5591916 - 12/27/12 10:35 PM

Just a thought that's probably been explored previously but I wonder if posters have shared FITS files for processing here. It would be very interesting to see the different interpretations of the data. Especially when the weather is overcast over much of our sight-lines!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
haytor
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 11/29/07

Loc: Smethwick near Birmingham UK.
Re: new [Re: milby]
      #5592183 - 12/28/12 06:32 AM

Nice one Tel, good banding and "C" div, like the scale too. .I might well join you in processing some older data, after all, its not as if we in the UK have any imaging options at the moment given this crud weather of ours.

milby, theres no way of sharing fits files on this forum given file size restrictions,there are third party sites that allow you to link to them, where you can upload fits files to share, however many including myself wont do that as you have to give email and possibly other personal information, for security reasons then, you can understand why people are reluctant to share files when you cannot be certain whats happening to your personal details.

best regards,

Tom.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tel
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 03/31/06

Loc: Wallingford England
Re: new [Re: haytor]
      #5592225 - 12/28/12 07:50 AM

Thanks Tom, it's amazing how one has to amuse oneself on these eternally bleak afternoons !

On your other comment though, and bearing in mind what you say about the problems in supplying FITS format, would it not perhaps be possible to provide an image, (of whatever object), purely stacked from its subframes in, let's say, Registax, but without any further processing, converted to jpeg format for the various interpretations according to Milby's interest ?

I know it's not an ideal format, but perhaps better than none and surely capable of producing the probable variation in processor techniques which appears to be of interest here ?

(Of course, the quality of the outcome would depend entirely on the quality of the initially submitted subframe stack).

Possible ? Worth doing ? What do you guys think ?

Best regards,
Tel


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
haytor
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 11/29/07

Loc: Smethwick near Birmingham UK.
Re: new [Re: Tel]
      #5592251 - 12/28/12 08:19 AM

Hi Tel,

milby`s mention of fits files,and i am assuming, was mentioned on the grounds, that with fits files, we dont get any compression of data, therefore, as we all know, its the best format to allow full processing of data captured.So i dont think milbys mention of us sharing fits files was anything other than what he said, milby can correct me if i`m wrong of course.

It is of course possible, to stack and align our fits files as you mentioned, then using the stacked fits file,totally unprocessed, convert the fits file to jpeg for posting and allowing others to manipulate the data, but again, being so compressed, we are never going to get the best out of the data in jpeg format, even if the converted jpeg is totally unprocessed.

milby of course can jump in and perhaps just clarify the situation, as to whether as i suspect, its the sharing of fits files is what he means.

best regards,

Tom.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tel
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 03/31/06

Loc: Wallingford England
Re: new [Re: haytor]
      #5592448 - 12/28/12 10:55 AM

Hi Tom,

What you say is very true.

Unwanted jpeg compression is certainly undesirable but then if we, as a forum group, have already been interactive in the past in "reworking" (jpeg) images produced and posted here by each other to (hopefully) good effect and have perhaps learnt a little more of processing techniques in passing, then isn't this "messing" (with permission of course), worthwhile .... (even with jpegs) ?

So saying and I thank you for the appreciation of my Saturn rework, but I note from your email that the final colour was not to your particular taste. As always therefore, Tom, and in keeping with the spirit of this post, please feel free to adjust it !

Best regards,
Tel


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
haytor
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 11/29/07

Loc: Smethwick near Birmingham UK.
Re: new [Re: Tel]
      #5594028 - 12/29/12 10:00 AM

Hi Tel,

not much point my messing and adjusting your Saturn Tel, you know full well i usually steer clear of colour images as i have no skills in that direction, give me mono anyday, far less of a problem

Having said that, and given that like you, i have no new data to play with, i too went back and found a Saturn AVI capture i made back in 2007, (i think it was 2007).

Just had a play with my old Saturn data and came up with this,still not happy with the colour though.



best regards,

Tom.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Arthur Dent
Galactic Hitch-Hiker
*****

Reged: 10/23/08

Loc: South Yorkshire, UK
Re: new [Re: haytor]
      #5594043 - 12/29/12 10:07 AM

Lovely snap of Saturn Tom.

Colour looks fine to me

Art


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tel
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 03/31/06

Loc: Wallingford England
Re: new [Re: Arthur Dent]
      #5594088 - 12/29/12 10:26 AM

Lovely banding with excellent resolution and a good Cassini division, Tom !

Was that taken with your now defunct "Neximage" back in '07 ?

Best regards,
Tel


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
haytor
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 11/29/07

Loc: Smethwick near Birmingham UK.
Re: [Re: Tel]
      #5594130 - 12/29/12 10:45 AM

Many thank`s Art,sad though that i have to play with old data rather than something new given our cruddy weather.

Hi Tel, many thanks to you too for your kind comments, yes i think it must have been the old original NexImage planetary ccd,(and we both know what happened to that, lol) used with my 6" f/8 yard cannon,(Skywatcher refractor) and i think a 2X barlow, its been so long ago since i`ve done any lunar or planetary i just dont remember that well, i can say though, that this was the best capture i made of Saturn in all the time i imaged it,this was captured at 10 frames per second on a very clear and stable night.

EDIT...just checked the details on the AVI,this Saturn image was aquired on the 12th May 2007 at 10.33 pm at 10 frames a second, 601 frames captured, and all frames used in the stacking

regards,

Tom.

Edited by haytor (12/29/12 11:39 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Peter9
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/30/08

Loc: Yorkshire - Born & Bred
Re: new [Re: haytor]
      #5594336 - 12/29/12 12:47 PM

Two fine Saturn images and good processing to boot. Helps while away the frustration, keeps your hands in, and treats us to something to feast our eye on.

Thanks for posting.

Regards. Peter.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Maverick199
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/27/11

Loc: India
Re: new [Re: haytor]
      #5594368 - 12/29/12 01:07 PM

Hi Tom, that's a stunning Saturn.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Alex Post
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 09/24/08

Loc: Iowa, USA
Re: [Re: Maverick199]
      #5594763 - 12/29/12 05:34 PM

^^ What Maverick said.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Skip
Starlifter Driver
*****

Reged: 01/23/08

Loc: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Re: [Re: Alex Post]
      #5594905 - 12/29/12 07:01 PM

One of the better ones I've seen, Tom.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
haytor
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 11/29/07

Loc: Smethwick near Birmingham UK.
Re: [Re: Skip]
      #5595689 - 12/30/12 08:39 AM

Many thank`s to all for your comments on that Saturn redo

best regards,

Tom.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: << 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | >> (show all)


Extra information
1 registered and 9 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Brian Risley, panhard, mayidunk 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 86219

Jump to

CN Forums Home




Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics