Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green GuÖ uh, User

General Astronomy >> Beginners Forum

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
bleep
super member
*****

Reged: 08/06/12

DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes
      #5610240 - 01/07/13 01:22 PM

Hi all
I've noticed on different websites that tell what's in the sky for the month say that the object is view able in binoculars or small or large telescopes. I was wondering what size is a small telescope or a large telescope? What size would my Orion XT8 be? or even my 10x32 binoculars? Thanks!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
kfiscus
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/09/12

Loc: Albert Lea, MN, USA
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: bleep]
      #5610249 - 01/07/13 01:31 PM

There are a variety of opinions on this question. I know there was a thread about this last fall. For reflectors 4" and under is small, 6"-10" medium, 12" and above large. Others will argue that 8" is the top end of medium and 10" is large.

Other types of scopes and binos will have will have their own unofficial size classes.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
kenrenard
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 12/13/12

Loc: Dunmore, PA
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: kfiscus]
      #5610304 - 01/07/13 02:10 PM

What's viewable would be more dependent on sky conditions then size. M31 looks like a smudge in the city in a scope and is naked eye in good skies.

I would say 8 is medium as Ken stated.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
csrlice12
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/22/12

Loc: Denver, CO
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: kenrenard]
      #5610315 - 01/07/13 02:19 PM

If you are using Sky Maps, your 8" should be able to see most anything listed. I belive Skymaps actually does state in some entries that it requires a 12" or larger scope on some objects. I use skymaps regularly to help me plan a night out.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Dave Mitsky
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 04/08/02

Loc: PA, USA, Planet Earth
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: csrlice12]
      #5610611 - 01/07/13 05:34 PM

Since there are a number of amateur-owned telescopes nowadays with apertures greater than 30 inches, including ones of 40, 41, and 48 inches and a 70-incher that's under construction, I classify reflectors up to 10 inches as small, from 10 to 20 inches as medium, and over 20 inches as large.

Dave Mitsky


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CosmoSat
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 07/24/09

Loc: India
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: Dave Mitsky]
      #5611176 - 01/07/13 11:44 PM

I held back from posting earlier because the replies would be varied with everybody having their own opinions and not a single conclusion can be met upon. But guess thats the way it is..

For the newtonian scopes on dob mountings, I like to categorize them with not just their diameter but also their f/ratio. As this is the beginners forum, for the popular sizes available..

f/8 to f/6 - 4.5" to 8" = small
f/5 - 10" to 14" = medium
f/4.5 and faster - 16" or bigger = Large

Clear Skies!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ed D
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 04/30/10

Loc: Sunny South Florida
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: CosmoSat]
      #5611383 - 01/08/13 05:51 AM

In the context of your post, the XT8 can be considered a medium to large size scope, a small scope being a 60mm or 70mm entry level refractor or 3" or 4.5" reflector. You can get a whole range of answers, as you can see, depending who you ask and in what context.

Ed D


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tony Flanders
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/18/06

Loc: Cambridge, MA, USA
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: bleep]
      #5611408 - 01/08/13 06:38 AM

Quote:

I've noticed on different websites that tell what's in the sky for the month say that the object is view able in binoculars or small or large telescopes. I was wondering what size is a small telescope or a large telescope? What size would my Orion XT8 be? or even my 10x32 binoculars? Thanks!




As a professional astronomy writer, I find myself caught between a rock and a hard place when trying to make these kinds of statements.

I could use specific apertures, and say, for instance, that Pluto is visible in a 12-inch scope -- which I know to be true from personal experience. But on the one hand, a fair number of people have seen Pluto in 4-inch scopes. And on the other hand, a newbie in a bright city probably wouldn't be able to see Pluto with a 20-inch scope, and certainly wouldn't be able to identify it.

Skill counts for a huge amount. Experienced observers like Sue French and Steve O'Meara have seen things in their 4-inch scopes that elude me in my 12-inch. And I routinely see things in my 3-inch refractor that would challenge newbies with 8-inch scopes.

So I often prefer to be vague, and use term like "big" and "small." When I use them, I think of 4 inches and less as being small, and 12 inches and more as being big. Where that leaves 5 to 11 inches is up to you.

As for binoculars, when used without qualification that means normal, hand-holdable binoculars. Your 10x32s definitely qualify.

Tony Flanders
Associate Editor, Sky & Telescope

Edited by Tony Flanders (01/08/13 06:39 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Isaacs
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/16/04

Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: Tony Flanders]
      #5611446 - 01/08/13 07:32 AM Attachment (12 downloads)

Quote:



Skill counts for a huge amount. Experienced observers like Sue French and Steve O'Meara have seen things in their 4-inch scopes that elude me in my 12-inch. And I routinely see things in my 3-inch refractor that would challenge newbies with 8-inch scopes.

So I often prefer to be vague, and use term like "big" and "small." When I use them, I think of 4 inches and less as being small, and 12 inches and more as being big. Where that leaves 5 to 11 inches is up to you.

As for binoculars, when used without qualification that means normal, hand-holdable binoculars. Your 10x32s definitely qualify.






I agree... small, medium and large are guidelines, there are other factors that are equally important, the skill of the observer as well as the conditions, the darkness of the sky, the steadiness of the sky. These are big factors.

I agree with Tony's rating system but add "very large" to include very large scopes.... Where the boundary's lie, it is vague but I know my 25 inch F/5 is a vary large scope because it is very large... Circular logic. And I know my 12.5 inch and 16 inch are large scopes because people looking at them certainly think they are large.

Medium and small are more difficult to define but I think of up to about 4 inches as small, up to about 6 inches as smaller though refractors tend to confuse the rankings.

Jon

Edited by Jon Isaacs (01/08/13 07:34 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ed D
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 04/30/10

Loc: Sunny South Florida
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: Jon Isaacs]
      #5611483 - 01/08/13 08:17 AM

Jon, be careful you don't fall off that ladder or you may float out into space.

Ed D


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Dave Mitsky
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 04/08/02

Loc: PA, USA, Planet Earth
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: Ed D]
      #5612749 - 01/08/13 09:22 PM

I agree that the semantics involved are vague.

However, I find it curious that large tends to be qualified into very large in such discussions, but that never seems to happen with small telescopes.

Times have changed. In the 1960s, when most amateurs owned 60mm refractors or 6" reflectors, a 12.5" Newtonian was considered a giant telescope but by today's standards, thanks to Mr. Dobson, it's not very large at all.

Most of the DSOs listed in my monthly calendar can be seen with an 8" aperture from a good dark site by an experienced observer.

http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/5596155/Main...

Dave Mitsky


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
City Kid
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 05/06/09

Loc: Northern Indiana
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: bleep]
      #5612785 - 01/08/13 09:51 PM

Something to think about: a telescope that is "medium" size when viewing through it can suddenly turn into a "large" scope when it comes to transporting and storing it.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tony Flanders
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/18/06

Loc: Cambridge, MA, USA
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: Dave Mitsky]
      #5613198 - 01/09/13 06:50 AM

Quote:

I find it curious that large tends to be qualified into very large in such discussions, but that never seems to happen with small telescopes.




Interesting point -- but where would you draw the line?

I think we can safely agree that any telescope with an aperture under 60 mm is very small.

See my blog on Ridiculously Small Optics.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Isaacs
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/16/04

Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: Dave Mitsky]
      #5613205 - 01/09/13 07:03 AM Attachment (21 downloads)

Quote:

a 12.5" Newtonian was considered a giant telescope but by today's standards, thanks to Mr. Dobson, it's not very large at all.




To you and me, a 12.5 inch Dobsonian may seem relatively small and certainly in comparison to an equatorially mounted 12.5 inch of days of yore, the Dob is much more compact and manageable but it is still a large telescope that requires planning and effort...

(For comparison purposes, my two 12.5 inch telescopes)

Jon


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jammer53
super member


Reged: 12/18/12

Loc: Central NY
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: Jon Isaacs]
      #5615384 - 01/10/13 12:01 PM

Wait. What? That big scope is clearly two feet taller than you. How in the world do you use the spotting scope when it's mounted so near the front lens???

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
newtoskies
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 07/15/12

Loc: SE Ma.
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: Jammer53]
      #5615477 - 01/10/13 12:54 PM

Love those two buckets Jon....and the sign too...lol

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Isaacs
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/16/04

Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: Jammer53]
      #5615900 - 01/10/13 05:05 PM

Quote:

Wait. What? That big scope is clearly two feet taller than you. How in the world do you use the spotting scope when it's mounted so near the front lens???




The scope is mounted in "rotating rings" so the observer can position the eyepiece and the finder for comfortable viewing. But for most objects, this is definitely a "ladder scope." Before John Dobson, this is what a 12.5 inch Newtonian looked like. In the previous photo, the scope on the right has the same aperture but is much easier to use, it's a Dobsonian. There are advantages to large scopes on equatorial mounts but transporting them is not one of them.

Jon



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Gert K A
sage


Reged: 07/16/12

Loc: Copenhagen, Denmark
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: Jon Isaacs]
      #5616200 - 01/10/13 08:15 PM

Thatís a wholesome scope but I would wear slippers

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tony Flanders
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/18/06

Loc: Cambridge, MA, USA
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: Gert K A]
      #5616699 - 01/11/13 05:02 AM

Quote:

Thatís a wholesome scope but I would wear slippers




Slippers on a metal-rung ladder would be a really bad idea. There's a reason they're called slippers, you know!

Bare feet always give the best grip, except on ice and snow.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MawkHawk
sage
*****

Reged: 08/23/09

Loc: SE Michigan, USA
Re: DSO Telescope Viewing Sizes new [Re: Tony Flanders]
      #5616885 - 01/11/13 09:13 AM

Man, I used to drool over those big GEM-mounted reflectors back in the day. Yours is a thing of beauty.
I actually did have an RV-6 and even that was so heavy. I remember thinking then that there must be a better way, and John Dobson showed us that there was....


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
10 registered and 32 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  zjc26138, WOBentley, kkokkolis 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1731

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics