I have an old digital rebel 300d that I no longer need. I've tried selling it as a camera, but nobody seems to want a 6 mp camera anymore. I was wondering, if I modded it, would it have any value to an astrophotographer or would I just be wasting my time and money?
Thanks
What to do with an old DSLR?
Started by
da_guy2
, Jan 14 2013 11:29 PM
20 replies to this topic
#2
Mike Clemens
-
-
- Posts: 7,825
- Joined: 26 Nov 2005
Frozen to Eyepiece
Posted 15 January 2013 - 12:43 AM
Interesting question... was thinking of selling my 40D too. It's not worth much any more though. Maybe I should mod it too... I wonder if the instructions for our cameras are out there.
#3
nofxrx
-
-
- Posts: 5,760
- Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Fly Me to the Moon
Posted 15 January 2013 - 12:47 AM
Unless you are modifying it yourself, and doing a Full Spectrum mod(so as not to have to buy the Baader filter), then **I** would personally not bother..
I would however make it an IR camera or something..that would be a great way to expand your daytime photography..
Would be pretty easy...just buy an IR filter and install it inside the camera, replacing the stock filter with it.
Again, that is if you are doing it yourself..
If none of that works, find someone in your family that is a bit creative and see if they would like to try photography..
I have an old camera sitting around collecting dust that I will probably give to my niece sometime...
I would however make it an IR camera or something..that would be a great way to expand your daytime photography..
Would be pretty easy...just buy an IR filter and install it inside the camera, replacing the stock filter with it.
Again, that is if you are doing it yourself..
If none of that works, find someone in your family that is a bit creative and see if they would like to try photography..
I have an old camera sitting around collecting dust that I will probably give to my niece sometime...
#4
nofxrx
-
-
- Posts: 5,760
- Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Fly Me to the Moon
Posted 15 January 2013 - 12:50 AM
Interesting question... was thinking of selling my 40D too. It's not worth much any more though. Maybe I should mod it too... I wonder if the instructions for our cameras are out there.
Mike: ***HERE*** or ***HERE*** (just use your IP to translate..)
OP: ****HERE****
#5
mmalik
-
-
-
- Posts: 14,291
- Joined: 13 Jan 2012
DSLR camera modifications
Posted 15 January 2013 - 12:56 AM
Instead of selling you could use it as a sand-box and learn how to modify cameras. You could just remove LPF-2, wouldn't cost anything; may be use it yourself for astro-imaging after the mod. Thx
#6
da_guy2
-
-
topic starter
- Posts: 153
- Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Vostok 1
Posted 15 January 2013 - 08:49 AM
Hmmm I had been looking at http://ghonis2.ho8.com/rebelmod.html where they replace with just clear glass. At ~$25 it's fairly reasonable to do.
How important is something like a Baader filter? I can't seem to find them for less than $150 a which point it starts to not make common or financial sense to do any more. Is there any cheaper alternatives other than just clear glass?
How important is something like a Baader filter? I can't seem to find them for less than $150 a which point it starts to not make common or financial sense to do any more. Is there any cheaper alternatives other than just clear glass?
#8
Alex McConahay
-
-
- Posts: 13,331
- Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Hubble
Posted 15 January 2013 - 09:52 AM
Your camera still takes pictures as well as it did when it was new (probably) and would still make a good astro camera. If you don't need it, take it to your club and tell them you have a camera for somebody to start up on......(If you don't have a club, contact me off line. I will find a user).
Alex
Alex
#9
NeilMac
-
-
- Posts: 4,125
- Joined: 25 Sep 2010
Skylab
Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:11 AM
Use it to practice Afocal AP, I used my 5meg P&S with great success.
#10
Mike Clemens
-
-
- Posts: 7,825
- Joined: 26 Nov 2005
Frozen to Eyepiece
Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:31 AM
Thanks Brent.... whoa... looks like ample opportunity to screw up.
#11
da_guy2
-
-
topic starter
- Posts: 153
- Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Vostok 1
Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:38 AM
Thanks Brent.... whoa... looks like ample opportunity to screw up.
Ya I don't blame you fro being wary. I had heard about modding when I first got the 300d, but I didn't want to take the risk. The 300d body is probably worth $50 or less now, so if I mess up it's not the end of the world. Your 400d body is still probably worth at least $150 so a mistake on it would be more expensive.
#12
jgraham
-
-
- Posts: 24,437
- Joined: 02 Dec 2004
ISS
Posted 15 January 2013 - 12:44 PM
The 300D is one generation too old. It might be a good opportunity to practice modifying a camera before trying it on a newer one. If noting else see if you can take it apart, remove the IR cut filter, and put it back together. I also like to use old cameras for 'high risk' imaging, like leaving them out all night for time lapse imaging. If the dew kills them it's not a big loss.
#13
nofxrx
-
-
- Posts: 5,760
- Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Fly Me to the Moon
Posted 15 January 2013 - 10:10 PM
Hmmm I had been looking at http://ghonis2.ho8.com/rebelmod.html where they replace with just clear glass. At ~$25 it's fairly reasonable to do.
How important is something like a Baader filter? I can't seem to find them for less than $150 a which point it starts to not make common or financial sense to do any more.
baader filter is not THAT important. It will provide absolute best IR Blocking possible, period.
BUT, the difference is VERY minimal and you can easily get away with only using a clear glass replacement for LPF-2 (**assuming LPF-1 remains intact**)
No..not that I am aware of..Is there any cheaper alternatives other than just clear glass?
I have pre-cut clear glass replacements(I buy in large sheets and cut my filters to size, very cost effective).
Good luck!
#14
da_guy2
-
-
topic starter
- Posts: 153
- Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Vostok 1
Posted 15 January 2013 - 10:40 PM
baader filter is not THAT important. It will provide absolute best IR Blocking possible, period.
BUT, the difference is VERY minimal and you can easily get away with only using a clear glass replacement for LPF-2 (**assuming LPF-1 remains intact**)
No..not that I am aware of..
I have pre-cut clear glass replacements(I buy in large sheets and cut my filters to size, very cost effective) that I usually sell for very little $...fwiw
Good luck!
Yes but alas the 300D only has one filter. So this wouldn't work.
I read This today (boy that took a while) and I now understand a lot more. I could do a full spectrum mod by replacing with clear glass, but then I'd only be able to use it with a reflector (which I currently don't own).
I think I'm kinda stuck. I may just do the full spectrum mod just for fun, but baring spending more than the camera's worth, I don't think I'll be able to use it for anything. Maybe I'll find someone with a reflector I can sell it to and at least recoup some of the costs.
#15
Phil Sherman
-
-
- Posts: 4,905
- Joined: 07 Dec 2010
Aurora
Posted 15 January 2013 - 10:56 PM
If you do a full spectrum mod, you can always add an IR filter in the nosepiece that attaches it to the camera. I've also seen 1.25" filter adapters that fit between the camera's T adapter and the T fitting that attaches the camera to the scope. If your scope isn't too low an f/ ratio, the smaller filter won't cause vignetting because it's right at the front of the camera body. Even if it causes some vignetting, it'll still make a good experimentation camera.
Phil
Phil
#16
RedLionNJ
-
-
-
- Posts: 8,501
- Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Cosmos
Posted 16 January 2013 - 10:26 AM
I would think a 300D (with larger than average pixels) would make a pretty good astro camera!
Grant
Grant
#17
da_guy2
-
-
topic starter
- Posts: 153
- Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Vostok 1
Posted 16 January 2013 - 10:36 AM
I would think a 300D (with larger than average pixels) would make a pretty good astro camera!
Grant
Yet again unfortunately no. I guess the technology has just improved so much that it outweighs the larger pixel size. It only goes up to 1600 iso and there is signicicant noise at that point. I'd say you have to keep it 400 iso and less to keep the noise down, which is much worse than any of the more recent cameras.
#18
Hap Griffin
-
-
-
- Posts: 228
- Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Vendor (Imaging Infinity)
Posted 16 January 2013 - 05:04 PM
Agreed. The noise in the 300D, not to mention the amp glow, is pretty horrendous compared to more recent models.
#19
Tom and Beth
-
-
- Posts: 4,184
- Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Skylab
Posted 16 January 2013 - 05:25 PM
I have an old digital rebel 300d that I no longer need. I've tried selling it as a camera, but nobody seems to want a 6 mp camera anymore. I was wondering, if I modded it, would it have any value to an astrophotographer or would I just be wasting my time and money?
Thanks
Don't know how many other hobbies you have, but DSLRs have been turned into Nature Cams, Weather Cams, Sunset Cams...
There's a whole industry around adding remote triggers and such.
Might as well get some use out of it, eh?
#20
AB9MS
-
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: 19 Oct 2012
Sputnik
Posted 16 January 2013 - 07:36 PM
Citizen Science variable star research comes to mind. As long as it will give raw you don't need a scope for it. Just stock lens.
#21
tecmage
-
-
- Posts: 2,724
- Joined: 13 Jan 2010
Mercury-Atlas
Posted 16 January 2013 - 08:32 PM
I have an old digital rebel 300d that I no longer need. I've tried selling it as a camera, but nobody seems to want a 6 mp camera anymore. I was wondering, if I modded it, would it have any value to an astrophotographer or would I just be wasting my time and money?
Thanks
Don't know how many other hobbies you have, but DSLRs have been turned into Nature Cams, Weather Cams, Sunset Cams...
There's a whole industry around adding remote triggers and such.
Might as well get some use out of it, eh?
+1
CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.
Recent Topics
-
-
-
-
The Moon with my Orion 8" F4 Astrograph 4-16-24
Mikeiss - Apr 19 2024 12:22 PM
Lunar Observing and Imaging
-
-
-
-
-
-
Large Super Group of Active Regions in High Res | HA, CaK | April 19th 2024MalVeauX - Apr 19 2024 11:19 AM
Solar Observing and Imaging
