|
Smittty692k4
scholastic sledgehammer
   
Reged: 07/05/11
Loc: East Bernard, TX
|
Nikon D3200 users?
#5623253 - 01/14/13 07:11 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Before posting in the Astroimaging forum, I wanted to check my Nexstar family first. Wife just bought this as a christmas gift from me to her. Anyone here use it? Comparable with the Canon T3i or T4i? Any and all comments welcome. Thank you.
|
Tel
Postmaster
   
Reged: 03/31/06
Loc: Wallingford England
|
Re: Nikon D3200 users?
[Re: Smittty692k4]
#5623800 - 01/15/13 03:56 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Hi Matt,
I've never used a Nikon for astro-imaging but I imagine that it will perform very well. However, and I don't know for sure, but for this specific purpose you might have been better off with a Canon as there appears to be much more software (Microsoft) available to support this make.
For example, I use Craig Stark's "Nebulosity 2" program to capture, stack and (part) process my Canon 350D images and also those from my Atik 314L. However while "Nebulosity 2" suppports many other camera types and makes, it does not support Nikon for whatever reason.
It is of course not entirely necessary to use such software in combination with an imaging camera, but obviously it does make the combined process of capture, stacking and processing a little easier with all being contained in "one package", so to speak.
All said though, there may well be some Nikon suppportive software available of which I am totally unaware but which is in constant use with these cameras.
Best regards, Tel
|
Arthur Dent
Galactic Hitch-Hiker
   
Reged: 10/23/08
Loc: South Yorkshire, UK
|
Re: Nikon D3200 users?
[Re: Tel]
#5623833 - 01/15/13 05:03 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Hi Matt,
Like Tel, I am aware of quite a lot of software for the Canon range of cameras but know of nothing that is compatible with Nikon. Good job I have a Canon
|
Smittty692k4
scholastic sledgehammer
   
Reged: 07/05/11
Loc: East Bernard, TX
|
Re: Nikon D3200 users?
[Re: Arthur Dent]
#5624532 - 01/15/13 02:31 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I was afraid of that. I tried to convince her to get the Canon, but to no avail. It doesnt really bother me, I was just curious.
I guess I should have also mentioned that I was interested in strictly piggy-backing for now. Does that change anything as far as post-processing goes? I really wanted to make my own Milky Way movie like on youtube. But also take some shots of other objects.
|
|
4 registered and 9 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: KWB, WaterMaster
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|