Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Equipment

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | (show all)
Steve Drapak
member


Reged: 09/18/08

Loc: Toronto, Canada
Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: JeffBosworth]
      #5635744 - 01/21/13 09:21 PM

Quote:

I have heard from a trusted source in the industry that Meade is in fact on the verge of bankruptcy




Why don't we band together and set up a Kickstarter.com account to collect reserves and be the ones to buy Meade ourselves? Stranger things have happened at sea...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Littlegreenman
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/09/05

Loc: Southern California
Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: rigelsys]
      #5635757 - 01/21/13 09:26 PM

Add another factor: optics and metal parts last a long time. Electronics and plastic parts may or may not. What this means for astronomy is that the basic parts, the optics, metal tubes and focusers, and metal mounts and legs--wood legs too, can last a lifetime or more.
Burgers and cars need to be replenished more often.

For a telescope company, this means in the scheme of things their customers during their lifetime are only making a few purchases.

LGM


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RealSorin
super member


Reged: 10/22/12

Loc: Denver, CO
Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: Littlegreenman]
      #5635894 - 01/21/13 10:56 PM

Even more to the point, observing is a hobby for most people. You need to eat, and you need transportation, but a telescope or new eyepiece is entirely discretionary. The industry's fortunes also rise and fall with the broader public interest in science and astronomy, in addition to macro-economic factors.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Stew57
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 05/03/09

Loc: Silsbee Texas
Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: Steve Drapak]
      #5636176 - 01/22/13 03:11 AM

Quote:

Why don't we band together and set up a Kickstarter.com account to collect reserves and be the ones to buy Meade ourselves? Stranger things have happened at sea...




Meade is a public company so... we could just buy a controlling interest. The risk could be greater but maybe less after a bankruptsy. It is a risky investment either way. The LX850 may turn out to be great but I can't see the LX80 doing much for the company. The LS line got a bad reputation early (deservedly so) and was too expensive at launch. One thing the meades, celestron, and orions lack is good customer service. Where are the parts list with the equipment? Sell all the parts. Be the first.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rcdk
super member


Reged: 11/13/10

Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: Stew57]
      #5636443 - 01/22/13 09:08 AM

Put a 6" reflector in Walmart on a dob mount. If people shopping for that first telescope could actually buy something capable of keeping their interest the equipment companies would be doing much better.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bierbelly
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/23/04

Loc: Sterling, VA
Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: jgraham]
      #5636616 - 01/22/13 10:41 AM

Quote:

I'll never understand why Meade gutted the lower end of their line and poured money into high-end imaging gear.




Profit margin v. volume. There has to be a shrinking market for astro equipment. If the volume isn't there on the low end, they had to try and compete for the bigger margin...like that was going to happen. Let's see, Meade or Astro Physics....what should I buy...?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
stratocaster
sage
*****

Reged: 10/27/11

Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: bierbelly]
      #5636804 - 01/22/13 12:33 PM

In my opinion Meade's issues have been a long time in the making. When I first got seriously into this hobby was back when the first ETXs came out. My first purchases were an ETX 90 astro and a 10" meade starfinder. The ETX was $599 back then with no tripod and no autostar. The starfinder was $695 with the 'deluxe' cheapo plastic 2" focuser.

As my experience with the ETX grew I realized that I needed to get a tripod - the tabletop experience and the photo tripod just weren't cutting it. So I bought the Meade tripod for the ETX. That wasn't much better than the photo tripod and the leg locks had this habit of slipping. Then I had to get an aftermarket right angle finder because the one that came with the scope was unusable. So now I'm into the ETX to the tune of about $750.

The starfinder was sticky and creaky, though the views were pretty good. The plastic focuser was a joke and had huge image shift problems.

For all intents and purposes I was firmly in the meade camp with my scopes and eyepieces. Then based on a lot of what I read on-line on various telescope sites there always seemed to be optical problems with meade refractors, and customer service was somewhere between so-so and terrible.

I then read about the new ETX with autostar, and kinda lusted after one of those. I remember talking to someone at Pocono Mountain Optics about it (might have been a fellow customer) and he suggested to wait a bit before considering an ETX/autostar purchase so Meade could "get the bugs out". I remember naively thinking "what bugs would need to be worked out." Remember, I was a newbie at the time. Then I started reading about all the software/alignment issues that were incurred by even experienced users.

I then dropped out of the hobby for many years, but when I got back in I vowed to never buy another meade product because of my experience. The products were half-baked upon release and/or a conscious decision was made to use cheapo materials that were just too cheap for the task at hand.

I looked at the announced LX80 with some distant interest because it looked like it might be a great product. So I was interested in seeing if the product would be rolled out half-baked and if the quality of materials would be too cheap for what they were designed to do. Sure enough, it appeared that it was business as usual.

While it may be too late in the short-term, Meade needs to be delivering quality products and providing great customer service. While no doubt pricing plays a role in market share, people would be willing to pay more for perceived value. And I think it's a general lack of value and customer service that over the last many years has brought Meade to its current state.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bierbelly
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/23/04

Loc: Sterling, VA
Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: stratocaster]
      #5636820 - 01/22/13 12:42 PM

I think Meade need to drop back and punt. They have a widely recognized trademark, but in recent years have tried to be everything to everybody.

If they were smart they'd look on here, in the Beginner's section, and see how many posts ask for a telescope at the $200 price range. Is it possible that a decent beginner's telescope can't be made, even with the ready accessibility of Chinese optics, at this price point? Do they all have to be made with plastic tubes and lousy mounts?

Instead, even on their low end they're pushing goto scopes, with questionable electronics.

Wake up Meade. There's a market, it's low end but it's almost entirely unserved. Make a decent 60mm achro on a stable mount and sell it for $200. Christmas comes every year.

Edited by bierbelly (01/22/13 12:43 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Glen A W
professor emeritus


Reged: 07/04/08

Loc: USA
Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: rcdk]
      #5636863 - 01/22/13 12:59 PM

Quote:

Put a 6" reflector in Walmart on a dob mount. If people shopping for that first telescope could actually buy something capable of keeping their interest the equipment companies would be doing much better.




They won't buy it! So many of the general public I know really just know one thing about scopes - motors buzzing and pointing it at all sorts of things the scope won't show. I think it is worse than back when they sold them based on magnifying power! GW


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Lorence
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 09/15/08

Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: Glen A W]
      #5637162 - 01/22/13 03:29 PM

Quote:

They won't buy it! So many of the general public I know really just know one thing about scopes - motors buzzing and pointing it at all sorts of things the scope won't show.




The one thing many amateur astronomers refuse to admit is they really can't see a lot through their eyepieces. There a few bright objects but most are nothing more than a vague patch of light.

Considering the quality and quantity of astrophotos available to everyone with a web connection, can you blame newcomers for being disappointed. "Is that all there is to see" is not exactly the best marketing slogan I've ever heard.

There is equipment that will greatly improve one's view but the equipment and those that use it are not considered as true astronomers by the community in general.

Too bad. There are probably many that would be interested in newer technology but when the subject of video and near live viewing comes up the traditionalists get their noses out of joint and demand the video people go back where they belong. Great way to foster interest in the hobby.

For what it's worth and to keep Meade in the subject here's the result of two minutes time on a Meade 10" LX200 ACF.

http://www.mts.net/~lmlod/Photo/M42%20Full%20Res%202%20min.jpg

No processing. Image downloaded from camera to the screen then saved to disk.

Of course this is not really astronomy. You have to see it with your own eyes or mash the image data through Photoshop for a few hours before it is really astronomy. Make sure that message is made very clear to any newcomer. Show up with one of those new fangled cameras and you ain't welcome here son.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starman1
Vendor (EyepiecesEtc.com)
*****

Reged: 06/24/03

Loc: Los Angeles
Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: Lorence]
      #5637220 - 01/22/13 04:03 PM

Interesting picture. Compared to the visual view,
--the image is overexposed in the center
--the outer envelope of the nebula is missing.
--the star images are bloated.
So, not the equal of a visual image.

BUT, that image could have been taken in LA, while the visual image of the nebula in the same locale will not be any better and probably require an expensive filter.

Video astronomy has its place, but the equipment to do it is beyond the budget of beginners. By the time someone is willing to invest in the equipment to make it a reality, they are already outside the realm of the beginners. It isn't going to happen for $300 total outlay, for example, and even $300 is stretching it for most beginners.

Except on the Moon, where a $75 HD video camera could be attached to any telescope that tracks (and I've seen some at <$200 that do) for some great Moon images.

But even that is going to be highly disappointing to a beginner who has been led to believe his $75 60mm refractor will give him full-color, Hubble-like, images visually.

Face it. Meade's woes are those of the astronomy world in general in addition to poor management choices:
--a shrinking demographic. The astronomers I meet at star parties are all getting older and young entries into the hobby are few and far between.
--a poor economy. Discretionary expenditures are still not at pre-2008 levels.
--light pollution. This continues to get worse every year, and 97% of Americans live in heavily light-polluted areas.
--Unrealistic expectations. Most non-informed consumers think that all you have to do is plug any telescope into a computer and you'll get Hubble-quality photographs. They think that computerized scopes are ones that give images when plugged into a laptop. They don't understand about mounts and cameras and tracking and all the issues related to getting such an image. Learning the truth about how an image is produced is an interest-crushing letdown for most of those people.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Alph
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 11/23/06

Loc: Melmac
Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: csrlice12]
      #5637312 - 01/22/13 04:41 PM

Quote:

Saw in another thread an item about Meade possibly going bankrupt. Then saw this article too:
http://www.macroaxis.com/invest/ratio/MEAD--Probability_Of_Bankruptcy





The cited webpage states
"The Probability Of Bankruptcy for all stocks is 125.19% lower than the firm."
That's a joke. They better go back to school and learn math.
That reminds me of one European politician back in the 90's who promised to lower prices by 100%. He made a laughing stock of himself. People are still mocking him to this day. Little did he know that he basically promised to make everything free.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
csrlice12
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/22/12

Loc: Denver, CO
Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: Alph]
      #5637328 - 01/22/13 04:52 PM

That's another way of saying Meade is 125.19% MORE likely to go bankrupt then their average counterpart (NOT 25% more likely, but 125% or 5 TIMES more likely)--in other words, Meade's doing really bad financially. I agree with what you say though, as the rest of the paragraph was written in just the opposite language, making them appear to say different things when they were really saying basically the same thing...Meade's not doing well against its competitors, nor is it doing well financially. In fact, looking at its other financial data; I'm surprised its still around......

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
StarStuff1
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/01/07

Loc: South of the Mason-Dixon Line
Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: Steve Drapak]
      #5637448 - 01/22/13 05:52 PM

Quote:



With luck (well, for us, not the local producers), the Chinese quality will progress like the Japanese did years ago. Though with the world economy in the shape it is now, not many people are willing to make good solid products that cost more to make.




The Chinese have the ability to make astro stuff every bit as good as the importer/distributer is willing to pay for it.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
D. Perry
super member
*****

Reged: 09/28/07

Loc: Southern California, USA
Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: EricRemy]
      #5637567 - 01/22/13 07:08 PM

They've been operating on financially thin ice for years now. It's important to remember that filing for bankruptcy protection does not necessarily mean a company will fold and disappear. It's a chance for them to make good on debts and restructure their business.

The mistakes Meade has made over the years are too many to list, both from a product and a business perspective. But they have 3 core flaws in my opinion: (1) The people who run the business move forward way to easily and quickly on the ideas their product and marketing managers put forth. This leads to poorly conceived products for which the market is questionable. (2) They make mechanically sloppy devices thinking they can software engineer them back to "observatory-like" performance. It just don't work that way. And (3), very closely related to the first two, Meade often introduces their products as geared for beginners... yet they price them way out of reach for most people who might be insterested in such a product.

Their Lightswitch is clearly a telescope for beginners. It does everything for you, narrates, has lots of bells and whistles (that come off as gimmicky), etc. The 8" is $2,000!

Their extremely clumsy-looking LX850 mount is $6,000?! Anyone in the market for a $6,000 mount will probably turn to Losmandy or Astro-Physics before they ever consider Meade's contraption.

Meade is a company that doesn't know what it wants to be, so it tries to be everything to everyone.

I don't intend to bash Meade. I absolutely don't want to see them go away. I just think they have been a misguided and poorly managed company for a long time. And it's sad to see a company suffer partly because of their own actions. They need a CEO who has the knowledge and leadership to get them to profitability, someone who will likely sell off or shut down the less profitable divisions, replace some marketing folks with high level engineers and product developers, condense their product lines, and focus on who they want their customer to be.

Ugh... I feel like I could go on and on, but looking back at what I've written, I think I've gone on too long already. :-)

I DO wish them the best.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rcdk
super member


Reged: 11/13/10

Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: D. Perry]
      #5637605 - 01/22/13 07:35 PM

There is a class of "beginner" this is perfect for: The middle ager with lots of cash looking for toys. But to reach him you need to market it through a sharper image catalog. (I bought my LX90 for my wife )

The LX800/850's problems are a bit more practical than how it looks.
Quote:


...
Their Lightswitch is clearly a telescope for beginners. It does everything for you, narrates, has lots of bells and whistles (that come off as gimmicky), etc. The 8" is $2,000!
...
Their extremely clumsy-looking LX850 mount is $6,000?! Anyone in the market for a $6,000 mount will probably turn to Losmandy or Astro-Physics before they ever consider Meade's contraption.
...





Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Isaacs
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/16/04

Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA
Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: D. Perry]
      #5637689 - 01/22/13 08:36 PM

Quote:

Meade is a company that doesn't know what it wants to be, so it tries to be everything to everyone.




I think this is the long and short of it. The company does not have nor has it ever really had a vision. They started out making Newtonians on the RV-6 and Cave model. Then they made SCTs on the Celestron model while importing various Japanese refractors and reflectors. Their Dobsonians had promise but were too much like the Coulters. They hit the mark with the LX-200, perfecting something Celestron had been trying. Their ED refractors were problematic...

Compare Meade to Orion. Somehow Orion seems to have a sense of where the market is going... they are leaders rather than followers.

Jon


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mr Magoo
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/05/05

Loc: Indiana
Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: Jon Isaacs]
      #5637757 - 01/22/13 09:03 PM

Jon, I think one big difference between Meade and Orion is that Orion is nothing but a equipment seller. To my knowledge they don't R&D anything.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Isaacs
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/16/04

Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA
Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: Mr Magoo]
      #5637794 - 01/22/13 09:20 PM

Quote:

Jon, I think one big difference between Meade and Orion is that Orion is nothing but a equipment seller. To my knowledge they don't R&D anything.




I am not sure how involved they are with the R&D but they certainly seem to be in touch with the marketplace and seem to assemble a wide variety of products from a wide variety of sources. I believe Orion designed the original XT-10, they have been the first to introduce a number of innovative products, the ED-80 for example, it just seems like they must be a collaborative effort between Orion and the various manufacturers.

In terms of what could be done, why is it that Orion is the only one who has something like Intelliscope, certainly it was within Meade's capabilities, they could have been there first. I think it is a lack of vision within the company.

Jon


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ed Kessler
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 05/17/06

Loc: Millersburg, PA
Re: Problems at Meade??? new [Re: Jon Isaacs]
      #5637872 - 01/22/13 10:16 PM

I haven't bought a Meade product in years. Based on the problems I've had with their products in the past, they deserve to go under.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | (show all)


Extra information
13 registered and 25 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  tecmage, rflinn68 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 12162

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics