Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Refractors

Pages: 1
tomnjulie
member


Reged: 12/04/12

Loc: Texas
Refractor input
      #5629325 - 01/18/13 03:58 AM

I currently have an Edge HD 8, Astro-Tech 8IN and a Vixen 110. I want a refractor that gets me a little closer. Is there something in the $1500ish price range that fits that bill?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Astrojensen
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/05/08

Loc: Bornholm, Denmark
Re: Refractor input new [Re: tomnjulie]
      #5629339 - 01/18/13 04:37 AM

Define "closer". A refractor that outperforms the Edge HD 8, if it is a good one and well thermally stabilized, is going to cost you a *lot* more than $1500.


Clear skies!
Thomas, Denmark


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
tomnjulie
member


Reged: 12/04/12

Loc: Texas
Re: Refractor input new [Re: Astrojensen]
      #5636118 - 01/22/13 01:49 AM

Thats what I thought. After more thought I think portability is becoming an issue. Like the refractors because they so often come with a much more compact case than the Edge. Thinking about the Levy newt. I just need something better than my Vixen but also fits in my planes baggage better than the Edge. My cg5 fits in the unpressurized aft baggage so the mount is no problem. I need something more compact than the Edge because its case takes up a lot of space. I'm open to suggestions now that we've narrowed down what I need which is viewing close to the Edge but more compact.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mmalik
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 01/13/12

Loc: USA
Re: Refractor input new [Re: tomnjulie]
      #5636134 - 01/22/13 02:05 AM

For visual get TEC 140ED F/7


Note: For imaging get TAK FSQ-106EDXIII (Read this...)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
tomnjulie
member


Reged: 12/04/12

Loc: Texas
Re: Refractor input new [Re: mmalik]
      #5636167 - 01/22/13 03:02 AM

I wish. Aren't those 5k telescopes? I'm residing more in the 1 to 2k range. What I need is a scope that is more manageable than the fork mount edge 8 for my fiancee and partner in crime. If I was going to go ahead and drop 5k we would go ahead and dive into the astrophotography pool.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Aquarist
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 08/27/12

Loc: Illinois
Re: Refractor input new [Re: tomnjulie]
      #5636368 - 01/22/13 08:15 AM

Actually, if you dive into the astrophotography pool, it could be more expensive than that.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mark Costello
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 03/08/05

Loc: Matthews, NC, USA
Re: Refractor input new [Re: tomnjulie]
      #5636465 - 01/22/13 09:22 AM

Hi tomnjulie. As was earlier stated, you probably won't find a highly portable refractor for $1,500 that will get you a little closer compared to a C8 and help with the jump to astrophotography. If you retain the specs on portability and $1,500 or more broadly $1,000 - S2,000, you'll find that a lot of 80mm and some 90mm class ED/apo refractors in that category. But the C8 optical tube assembly is almost as portable as the picture in the following review shows....

C8_review_on_Astromart


All success in picking out a winner....

Edited by Mark Costello (01/22/13 09:31 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mmalik
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 01/13/12

Loc: USA
Re: Refractor input new [Re: tomnjulie]
      #5636519 - 01/22/13 09:57 AM

Quote:

If I was going to go ahead and drop 5k we would go ahead and dive into the astrophotography pool.




Sorry to take you on a tangent with AP but why not? It will definitely be more compact [but may not be "closer" visually]. TAK FSQ-106EDXIII... being pricey, here is an alternative:

AT65EDQ... $599.00
60Da... $1,499.00 [My setup...]
Note: BIG hidden expense being a solid EQ mount for imaging.

CCD will be pricey; CCD talk here....


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Aquarist
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 08/27/12

Loc: Illinois
Re: Refractor input new [Re: mmalik]
      #5636564 - 01/22/13 10:15 AM

Quote:

Quote:

If I was going to go ahead and drop 5k we would go ahead and dive into the astrophotography pool.




Sorry to take you on a tangent with AP but why not? It will definitely be more compact [but may not be "closer" visually]. TAK FSQ-106EDXIII... being pricey, here is an alternative:

AT65EDQ... $599.00
60Da... $1,499.00 [My setup...]
Note: BIG hidden expense being a solid EQ mount for imaging.

CCD will be pricey; CCD talk here....




Yes, the mount and camera are going to be more expensive than the initial OTA. Hence my previous comment about the "depth of the AP pool".


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rossmon
sage
*****

Reged: 07/09/10

Loc: Marin County, CA
Re: Refractor input new [Re: mmalik]
      #5636724 - 01/22/13 11:48 AM

the Tec 140 will need a sizeable case. I was just admiring one a few days ago. It is not small. True, its not as wide, but the case isn't narrow and it is a lot longer.
One possibility is to get a small refractor, an 80. And a Mallincam video cam, small field lcd panel like a 6" Hier and a modest sized battery pack(if allowed on planes). This should only cost about $2K, even less. then u r in biz!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
csrlice12
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/22/12

Loc: Denver, CO
Re: Refractor input new [Re: Rossmon]
      #5637104 - 01/22/13 03:02 PM

Well, you could consider the Vixen VMC2000L, you scope's bigger brother. It's about 10" in diameter and 20" long and weighs 13lb, so it should fit into a carryon size bag (probably just).

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
watcher
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/21/07

Loc: St. Louis, MO
Re: Refractor input new [Re: tomnjulie]
      #5637553 - 01/22/13 06:59 PM

Still not quite sure what you're asking, but if it's a refractor that is more portable than your current scope, and won't give up too much, as far as the views, how about this?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mgwhittle
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 08/24/11

Loc: Chattanooga, TN
Re: Refractor input new [Re: watcher]
      #5637648 - 01/22/13 08:10 PM

Lets see, you are also considering a Mak-Newt so what about a Celestron C6? Very compact, more light gathering power than a 100mm refractor, works well on most small mounts and costs $400.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FoxTrot
sage


Reged: 06/01/06

Loc: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Refractor input new [Re: mgwhittle]
      #5638198 - 01/23/13 02:30 AM

I think Joe/watcher has made the best suggestion here. Arguably a 110mm refractor like the Stellarvue, or the Astrotech, is about as close to the specs given i.e. refractor, better than the Vixen 110, and in that price range. Also, I seem to recall some company making apo refractors with highly colourful metallic finished (carbon fibre?) tubes, that might also be in the size and price range ... Cheers, Fox

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1


Extra information
44 registered and 56 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Scott in NC, FirstSight, panhard, star drop 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1416

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics