Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
My 8" dob resolves the stars well in all but the very small ones with a 15 mm ortho. To me, they look like greenish blobs with the stars on the outer layers. On the biggest ones like M13, M22, and M92, I can pretty much resolve stars to almost the core. I will be getting the Meade 16" starfinder dob someday soon. Going to be a pain to transport but with having a pickup it won't be that tough. I cannot imagine what my clusters will look like through this scope.
|
Ronny Floyd
professor emeritus
   
Reged: 06/24/04
Posts: 757
Loc: Chattanooga,Tennessee
|
|
With my 22" Dob and my 5mm Nagler (501x). Globs like M-13, M-22, M-5 and so on, makes me feel I'm on the starship Enterprise with a voice saying " Captain Kirk we are now entering the globular cluster"!
Karl
22" f/4.5 Dob 12.5" F/4.8 Dob 6" F/8 Refractor 4.7" F/5 Refractor
Truely a classic post !
-------------------- Ronny Floyd
Hardin DSH12/Telrad/Flocked/Baltic Birch Base/Orion Accu-Focus
Walt's Observing Chair
Megrez72/Telepod
EP:40MM Paragon/19MM Panoptic/8&5MM BO/TMB
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Quote:
With my 22" Dob and my 5mm Nagler (501x). Globs like M-13, M-22, M-5 and so on, makes me feel I'm on the starship Enterprise with a voice saying " Captain Kirk we are now entering the globular cluster"!
Makes me look forward to getting the 16" Starfinder even more. I wish coulter still made their 17" dob, it was only $1000 and the optics were every bit as good as Meade or Orion. Karl
22" f/4.5 Dob 12.5" F/4.8 Dob 6" F/8 Refractor 4.7" F/5 Refractor
Truely a classic post !
|
Mark K
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 12/16/04
Posts: 860
Loc: Bury, Lancashire, UK
|
|
Most globs look like misty spots in the ETX-125, but I have managed to resolve individual stars in six of them under best conditions from suburbia (ZLM 5.1 at best).
I have found that higher powers in the 120x-180x range give the best results.
M13 can be resolved well into the 'inner middle distance', with scores of stars visible in direct vision, and many more in averted, giving a hypnotic 'flickering fireflies' effect.
I have also resolved the outer parts of M3, M5, M15, M92, and - surprisingly from Northern England - M22 (at 12 deg up !).
Indeed, M22 was looser than M13 and gave up some of its stars at lower power.
No doubt Omega Centauri would blow even M13 and M22 out of the water.
--------------------
Mark K.
Meade ETX-125
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
I love the way globs look in both my bino's and 10". The wide field view is spectacular from from the perspective of context, whereas resolving deep brings its own reward. While so many were at the Mt Pinos party this week, we had a group at Blue Jay, and for the first time I was able to push my SCT up to insane powers! Viewing M2 and M92 at 832x was jaw-dropping. I have not begun to see them all as yet, but so far, M2 and M92 are my favorites because they sit in such isolation. Think I spent about 3 hours at the eyepeice with M2...and the time FLEW by!
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
They remind me of a gray-green popcorn ball made of stars.
|
bicparker
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 02/07/05
Posts: 1438
Loc: Plano, TX
|
|
G1 looks like a little faint fuzzy dot at 555x.
David M.
-------------------- Bic Parker
17.5" f/5 dob
10" f/10 SCT
5" f/8 refractor
80mm f/6 refractor
66mm f/6 refractor
Plus a few others out of the rotation
|
moynihan
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 07/22/03
Posts: 1517
Loc: Wisconsin
|
|
Last Friday night I was lucky to find myself in a "barrens area" (not a clear cut, rather a short stubby vegetation area, and sandy) in the middle of a local national forest. It was one of the most transparent nights i have seen in years, and the air was the unusual (for around here) combination of clear and dry. I had my 80ED along. M13 in my 9mm orthoscopic was a shock. While not "resolved" across the main body, the main body of the cluster looked like a small, round pile of sugar, surrounded by a halo of scattered stars, with irregular tendrils resolved. I have never seen it that well in that small of an aperture. A good sky really makes a difference. Generally speaking, a 10" really kicks in on the globulars.
-------------------- "Gosh, you've... really got some nice toys here"
Dual mount/ambient temperature Hominid Widefield Photon Collectors®
Pleistocene™ ˝ watt Wetware Integration Unit.
entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
|
Darris
member
 
Reged: 01/13/05
Posts: 62
Loc: Detroit mich
|
|
I have to agree with half meter, the image intensifying eyepeice is pretty amazing if you can afford one. I had a chance to look though his last weekend up in Gladwin Mi, it looks like the picture only better. Thanks for letting us look though it and showing us things we had never seen before. Jeff and I had a great time. Darris
-------------------- 100mm svp
6in hardin dsh
10in xt orion dob
|
half meter
Postmaster
   
Reged: 05/05/04
Posts: 12518
Loc: Great Lakes
|
|
No problem, Darris!
Glad you and Jeff enjoyed the I3 eyepiece. Some folks are initially turned off by the green color, but then most objections just melt away when they see a familiar globular
-------------------- Gary
Collins I3 (Thin Film) Image Intensifying Eyepiece
Coronado Maxscope DS 90 <0.5A w/BF30
152 mm f/8 TMB/A&M Carbon Fiber APO; f/5 with 4" Borg ED Field Flattener/Reducer
20" Obsession/OMI Mirror/Servocat/Argo Navis
First Light for the 30" Obsession at BEOTS!
|
jfaaz
sage
Reged: 05/13/04
Posts: 445
Loc: Connecticut
|
|
My 10" really resolves M13 and M3 very well.
My homemade 8" works well too.
-------------------- Jon
XT10i
8" Homemade Dob
6" DSH
WO ZS80/CG-4
|
andersha4000
member
Reged: 03/18/05
Posts: 50
Loc: Denver, CO
|
|
they resolve very nicely in the N11
-------------------- N11 GPS
Burgess Binoviewers
Orion 80ED
Coronado PST
|
Mark K
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 12/16/04
Posts: 860
Loc: Bury, Lancashire, UK
|
|
The nights of August 6 and 7 were the best for some time, with ZLM of 5.2 / 5.3, and I could add three more globs to my 'part resolved' list :
Suspected in averted: M10 Seen in averted: M12, M2
--------------------
Mark K.
Meade ETX-125
|
snorkler
Aperture Aficionado
   
Reged: 10/11/04
Posts: 8269
Loc: Bay Area, California
|
|
I've been able to capture that granular appearance with a 6" reflector on M13, but can resolve it to the core with a 10" Dob, and you can really go deep with high magnification in an 18" Dob.
The 18" resolves a lot of the brighter globulars to the core, but I doubt even it can resolve the core in the really dim globs like NGC 6712. I haven't looked at 6712 in the 18", only in a 12.5", but it's awfully dim.
It's not considered a glob, but M11, the Wild Duck Cluster, looks entirely different in a big scope. In my 10", I can see a triangle shaped mass of bright stars like salt on black velvet. In my 18", it looks like a uniform nearly circular mass of salt on velvet, with a bright star near the center jumping out at you.
--------------------
Lotteries are a tax on people who don't understand math - Snorkler
|
RRaubach
AstroCowboy
   
Reged: 01/26/05
Posts: 2173
Loc: Douglas (Converse County),WY
|
|
Maybe we should try tabulating "resolved" GC's vs. Aperture, but then we would need a definition of "resolved", wouldn't we?
Rodger
-------------------- Rodger
Meade SN-10 (UHTC) on Tak EM-200 mount/Antares rotating rings. Moonlite focuser.
Parallax 14.5" Newtonian on HD 200 mount (arriving soon!) w/ conical Royce mirror.
TMB 203 f/7 APO refractor on Tak NJP-160 mount.
Discovery 12.5" PDHQ
Schneider 18x80 "Flakfernrohr" binoculars/tripod mounted. Canon 15x50 IS binoculars
Unihedron Sky Quality Meter
|