CuriousOne
member
Reged: 01/22/13
|
Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
#5636235 - 01/22/13 04:56 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Hello.
I found your forum very interesting and got answers to lot of questions while reading. However, there are still some aspects on which I need your advice.
I want some large binoculars with power zoom. I will mainly use it for wildlife observation during daylight, and ocasionally for sky viewing. I perfectly understand what is exit pupil, front lens diameter, focal distance, multicoating, field of view and so on. In military, I was serving at borderline security, so there we had all kind of serious optics, with up to $100K price tags.
So, considering my practical observations and past experience, I came to conclusion, that I need something like 40x80 or even 60x80 binoculars. Unfortunately, such binoculars appear to be made only in zoom binocular department, so my choice is quite limited. Since this is just hobby, I'd prefer not to spend more than $200 for that. I understand perfectly that in this price range I should not expect anything serious, so, for start-up, I've purchased celestron Upclose G2 binoculars 10-30x50. Besides heavy chromatic abberations, it has another serious flaw. The piece, on which eyepieces are mounted, is made of very thin plastic, so even if you touch it slightly with your eye, it changes position and looses focus. Since I'm using it for terrestrial observation, even slight movement of eyepiece makes focus loose, so I need to constantly re-adjust the focus, which is very troublesome.
Unfortunately, these zoom ones aren't sold in local stores, so I depend on amazon/ebay/etc for such purchases.
So, I'd like to hear, whenever these giant large zoom, inexpensive binoculars from barska, celestron, bushnell and so on, suffer from the same issue? As I mentioned above, personally, I'd prefer fixed 40x80 binoculars, but was not able to find such one for my price range.
Thanks in advance,
Alex
|
Mark9473
Postmaster
   
Reged: 07/21/05
Loc: 51°N 4°E
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: CuriousOne]
#5636241 - 01/22/13 05:10 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
There definitely are 40x80 binoculars that don't zoom (e.g. from Docter Optics), but like you said they're above your price range.
To be honest a $200 80mm zoom binocular is going to be a waste of money. Your best bet at getting close to your target, IMHO, is looking for a fixed 30x80 binocular. But my recommendation would be to save up for something better (a 70 or 80mm binocular telescope with interchangeable eyepieces) or think outside the box (a spotting scope with zoom eyepiece).
|
CuriousOne
member
Reged: 01/22/13
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: Mark9473]
#5636246 - 01/22/13 05:18 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Actually, I already went that way, but I found later that dual-eyed view is much more comfortable.
I currently also own the following setup:
Camlink 15-45x50 spotting scope, to which I attached 1.7x tele zoom attachment from old Sony DSC-717 camera. It works quite nicely. Also, I have 1000mm/F10 reflex lens, for which I DIYed eyepiece holder, and using 12mm C mount CCTV camera lens as eyepiece. It also works fine, especially for observing the moon, when it is low on horison and located above distant mountains, in this case, mountains also do appear in view, and huuuge moon above them, very spacey and extra-terrestrial look it gives.
|
Mark9473
Postmaster
   
Reged: 07/21/05
Loc: 51°N 4°E
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: CuriousOne]
#5636256 - 01/22/13 05:45 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Then I think I would advise you to save up for something like the Oberwerk BT70 45°. It is angled at 45° which will work well also for daytime observation. Garrett has a very good BT70 90° also but it's a 90° model so not as convenient for daytime viewing.
|
edwincjones
Close Enough
   
Reged: 04/10/04
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: CuriousOne]
#5636260 - 01/22/13 05:49 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Vixen has/had a 125mm binocular with zoom eps, quality was good at around $3500US, but FOV narrow;
you could also get one of the Binocular-Telescopes with inter changeable EPs and use zoom EPs (but need click stops)
edj
|
Tony Flanders
Postmaster
   
Reged: 05/18/06
Loc: Cambridge, MA, USA
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: CuriousOne]
#5636288 - 01/22/13 06:28 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Given your requirements, I'm reasonably sure that a conventional single-objective telescope equipped with a binoviewer is what you really need.
|
dunk1947
member
Reged: 08/11/12
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: Tony Flanders]
#5636304 - 01/22/13 06:51 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
According to several reviews, a zoom binocular's collimation can subject to error because it's difficult to maintain throughout the zoom range - and they are difficult to recollimate and service - in fact some repairers will not offer to service them. Personally I'd steer clear of zoom binoculars - with the possible exception of the Docter 40x model with zoom eyepieces.
dunk
|
CuriousOne
member
Reged: 01/22/13
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: dunk1947]
#5636306 - 01/22/13 07:03 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I've used binoviewers, not on telescope, but as night vision device. They do not provide that feel of volume which is provided by true binoculars.
|
EdZ
Professor EdZ
   
Reged: 02/15/02
Loc: Cumberland, R I , USA42N71.4W
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: CuriousOne]
#5636320 - 01/22/13 07:17 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I would also recommend against zoom binoculars. Read th "Best Of" thread rregardingg zooms.
There are no good reasons to buy a zoom binocular.
edz
|
CuriousOne
member
Reged: 01/22/13
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: EdZ]
#5636341 - 01/22/13 07:39 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I can buy zoom binocular, but add additional hardware, to make them fixed zoom, so remove any wobble and collimation problems, related to zoom mechanism.
|
Mark9473
Postmaster
   
Reged: 07/21/05
Loc: 51°N 4°E
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: CuriousOne]
#5636343 - 01/22/13 07:41 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Go ahead and prove us wrong then.
|
CuriousOne
member
Reged: 01/22/13
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: Mark9473]
#5636347 - 01/22/13 07:46 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Well, that is just idea, I think technically it's possible. But sure, I'd prefer to waste less time and get better output.
|
Jawaid I. Abbasi
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 06/19/07
Loc: LEVITTOWN, PA
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: CuriousOne]
#5636366 - 01/22/13 08:13 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Zoom Binocular? 10000000000% not recommandad Binoviewer with richfield scope (YES) BT-70 Definatly YES
|
CuriousOne
member
Reged: 01/22/13
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: Jawaid I. Abbasi]
#5636372 - 01/22/13 08:19 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Binoviewer excluded, if I wanted one eyed, I would stick with telescope. I'm doing mostly terrestrial observations, so binoculars are must.
|
Jon Isaacs
Postmaster
   
Reged: 06/16/04
Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: CuriousOne]
#5636431 - 01/22/13 09:04 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
Binoviewer excluded, if I wanted one eyed, I would stick with telescope. I'm doing mostly terrestrial observations, so binoculars are must.
I saw you had a small spotting scope as well as a reflex lens, what other telescopes do you have? Good views at higher powers require decent optics. The view though and inexpensive spotting scope or reflex lens is not going to be anywhere near as Sharp as a decent quality telescope.
The real issue here is the $200 budget. Good optics cost money and binoculars have many optical components, many opportunities to degrade the image. They also must be properly aligned, so robust mechanical construction is a necessity. Telescopes can be much simpler so a decent astronomical telescope can be more affordable.
Jon
|
BillC
on a new path
   
Reged: 06/04/04
Loc: Lake Stevens, WA, USA
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: CuriousOne]
#5636475 - 01/22/13 09:26 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
"10000000000% not recommended"
C'mon Jawaid; say what you really mean!
Welcome CuriousOne:
You have asked about the "mechanical quality of ZOOM binoculars."
THERE IS NONE!!! Yes, there are some who will give the old “What about the . . .” However, I’m not one to give Jack the Ripper a pass because he once helped a cripple across the street. 
You have also received some very informative posts from some very informed observers. SO, to help you further if I can, I would like to SEE their years of practical observing experience and RAISE decades in the optical industry and repairing and collimating more binoculars than most bino executives have ever seen in a warehouse—including thousands of military units.
The following is from a monograph on binocular realities:
*****
12. ZOOM BINOCULARS AND OTHER CONCEPTS FROM HELL
There are many reasons to be even more aware of “ZOOM” binoculars! To the uninitiated the ability to “ZOOM” is a feature; to the serious observer they are anything but! For the most part, the zoom is made possible by the movement of an auxiliary system in the ocular (eyepiece) assembly of each telescope. The tubes move fore and aft along the optical axis by means of a small brass screw which passes through helical slots in the walls of the auxiliary tubes. When the zoom is operated, a series of spur gears move the screws to send the auxiliary lens systems back and forth. As you may have guessed, there’s going to be a lot of lost motion. And, even if the lenses were flawlessly matched in curvatures, spacings, thicknesses and glass types, the lost motion in the zoom mechanism is usually bad enough (especially as the instrument begins to age) to degrade the image. Also, while the brain can compensate for small errors in collimation, it can’t compensate for differences in magnification. That means your binocular could be collimated exceptionally well and you still wouldn’t have a good image!
Another negative attribute of almost all zoom binoculars is that they produce smaller fields of view than their fixed-power counterparts at any given magnification. Some are so bad, one might get the impression he or she is looking through a pipe instead of an optical instrument! Finally, the auxiliary systems that make zooming possible are seldom sufficiently blackened. This causes a scattering of light and a loss of contrast across the entire field of view. So, can I recommend a really good zoom binocular? All the really good ZOOM binoculars I know of are listed in the box below:
(small rectangular box)
And, if you still feel it would be great to have a zoom mechanism on your binocular, please stop to consider why three of the most respected manufacturers of binoculars (Zeiss, Leica and Swarovski) don’t have a zoom binocular in their line-up. NOTE: The Leica Duovid only appears to zoom between its two fixed powers. If a high-quality zoom ever comes to the market, Leica is likely to be the company responsible.
*****
Yes, the above has been posted several times. But then, the problem has been raised several times, too.
If you still want a zoom instrument, please go ahead; sadly, experience is a far better teacher than I will ever be.
That monograph addresses several other bino misconceptions and I would be happy to send it to you should you send me your personal email address—my computer is full of them.
Again, welcome to our little family of misfits who might—just after taking the dog out at 3 a.m. in 18 degree weather—have to check the Cloudy Nights account before returning to bed . . . GUILTY!
Cheers. 
BillC
|
CuriousOne
member
Reged: 01/22/13
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: BillC]
#5636691 - 01/22/13 11:31 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Thanks everyone for warm welcome and friendly hints. But, I'd like to return to question I asked in the first post.
The cheap binoculars have very poorly made focusing system. So I asked, whenever such problem exists in larger ones?
Regarding the zoom binoculars, as I said, I can "convert" them into fixed zoom ones, by mechanically fixing the zoom components in place, so no miszoom will occur.
As I'm aiming mainly for daylight observation, say 15x80 will be less usable for me, than say 25x60.
|
Jawaid I. Abbasi
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 06/19/07
Loc: LEVITTOWN, PA
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: BillC]
#5636716 - 01/22/13 11:45 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Just wanted him to away from zoom binocular because I had it one time and the views were dim, do not stay focus, feel like seeing through straws and lot of false colours. I gaveup after few weeks. I should have bought a $4000.00 fixed zoom instead the sub-$100 binocular but did not have that kind of money.
|
SMark
professor emeritus
   
Reged: 08/29/11
Loc: Atlanta, GA USA
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: Jawaid I. Abbasi]
#5636772 - 01/22/13 12:17 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
It's doubtful that anyone here will ever recommend a zoom binocular to anyone. There are many years of experience behind this.
You are going to be limited to looking at low quality Chinese made binoculars for the most part. Just try searching Amazon and other websites for the requirements you desire.
The best advice for you is simply to use a source that will allow you unlimited returns, since you should expect any binocular meeting your requirements to have quality issues. Just keep trying until you get one that is acceptable to you.
And most of all...
GOOD LUCK!
|
Andresin150
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 08/14/07
Loc: Bogotá - La Calera / Colombia
|
Re: Need advice on mechanical quality of zoom binos
[Re: CuriousOne]
#5636799 - 01/22/13 12:30 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Why would you want to buy a low quality zoom and then invest in "convert" them? there are also low and mid quality fixed power binoculars of 30x80. Any of them should be better than a zoom, let alone a "converted" one... Are you capable of professionally "convert" it? or you are just planning on gluing the mechanism with gorilla glue when you feel the magnification is what you want? Having looked trough 100K optics is different than having the skills for doing that job, and for sure, someone that have the skills to do that job probably think is a waste of money and time. And, I'm really not sure of having seen a $200 good high magnification 80mm binocular... maybe a bit more saving would help..
|