Rich V.
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 01/02/05
Loc: Lake Tahoe area, Nevada, USA
|
12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
#5638528 - 01/23/13 09:52 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Just a link to a post on Refractors showing pictures of a new 12" binocular telescope on an equatorial mount. It uses a "rotary clamp" similar to what I've seen on Matsumoto's site to keep the binos level for EQ viewing.
12" BT in Germany
Very cool!
Rich
|
Andresin150
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 08/14/07
Loc: Bogotá - La Calera / Colombia
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: Rich V.]
#5638715 - 01/23/13 11:21 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Incredible!, My 40x150's now look portable, aren't they? amazing project!
|
hallelujah
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 07/14/06
Loc: Colorado Rocky Mountains
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: Rich V.]
#5638742 - 01/23/13 11:36 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
http://www.astromart.com/classifieds/details.asp?classified_id=808439
|
richsvt
sage
Reged: 01/09/09
Loc: North Shore of Boston
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: hallelujah]
#5639267 - 01/23/13 05:17 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
makes anything I have look like a toy.
|
PhilCo126
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 01/14/05
Loc: coastline of Belgium
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: richsvt]
#5643798 - 01/26/13 04:48 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Check the vendor topic: http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/5636500
|
edwincjones
Close Enough
   
Reged: 04/10/04
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: PhilCo126]
#5643825 - 01/26/13 05:45 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
why 
edj
|
edwincjones
Close Enough
   
Reged: 04/10/04
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: edwincjones]
#5643829 - 01/26/13 05:50 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I can understand going up to 150mm (I have one), but have never understood the logic, reason, usefulness of the larger BT due to the cost, duplication of optics Why not just get a larger scope with binoviewer?
Other than uniqueness, doing it because you have the money and can, what is the advantage of this binocular over a telescope?
edj
|
Joad
Wordsmith
   
Reged: 03/22/05
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: edwincjones]
#5644450 - 01/26/13 01:55 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I have the same questions, but I think I know the answer. There is a certain mystique to binoculars (as opposed to telescopes) that those of us on this forum have personally experienced. It is indeed far more rational to get a big truss dob and use a binoviewer. You can even move the big truss dob to a dark site, while this ton-and-a-half binocular must be permanently placed in a professional quality observatory. And there also seems to be a sort of unofficial law of diminishing returns when it comes to what binoculars can manage relative to magnification and precise collimation.
So I think I this is a harmless indulgence (at $500,000 it is a lot cheaper than I would have expected) on the part of someone with good taste and lots of money. There are a lot worse things to indulge oneself with, and this one will probably be a good investment on top of everything else.
|
GlennLeDrew
Postmaster
   
Reged: 06/18/08
Loc: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: Joad]
#5644484 - 01/26/13 02:18 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
"...unofficial law of diminishing returns..." Unofficial indeed, for it does not apply. 
If a gigantor of a binocular is not relevant, nor is any size bino. Whether big or small, one is using two eyes and hence enjoying the same gain in signal to noise. The improvement realized when going from, say, a 2" to a 4" bino is the same gain found when transitioning from a 6" to a 12" bino. It's all about ratios. And for given exit pupil diameter, the true bino always offers an image twice as bright as that of the BV-equipped mono job. The humongous bino is quite as relevant as any other size.
|
Joad
Wordsmith
   
Reged: 03/22/05
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: GlennLeDrew]
#5644512 - 01/26/13 02:34 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Ah, but I'm not referring to the precisions of optical law; I'm referring to the fact that, say, a 100mm binocular telescope (like my BT) simply cannot manage the magnification of a good quality 100mm refractor, and is hugely sensitive to the slightest collimation offsets in a way that the telescope isn't.
I expect that this custom 12 inch binocular will be built with the intention of being so mechanically and optically perfect that it can perform equally with respect to a mid-sized telescope (I count 12" as mid-sized), but I wouldn't be surprised if the final result was not able to achieve such a level of perfection.
Some evidence for my expectations lies in the reviews I've seen of the giant reflector binoculars made by JMI. They are definitely not high magnification instruments, though their aperture is capable of very high magnification in a telescope.
|
edwincjones
Close Enough
   
Reged: 04/10/04
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: GlennLeDrew]
#5644518 - 01/26/13 02:38 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
"...unofficial law of diminishing returns..." Unofficial indeed, for it does not apply. 
If a gigantor of a binocular is not relevant, nor is any size bino. Whether big or small, one is using two eyes and hence enjoying the same gain in signal to noise. The improvement realized when going from, say, a 2" to a 4" bino is the same gain found when transitioning from a 6" to a 12" bino. It's all about ratios. And for given exit pupil diameter, the true bino always offers an image twice as bright as that of the BV-equipped mono job. The humongous bino is quite as relevant as any other size.
ok-I can see this
having the 12" binoculars are no more extreme to me than me having 25x150s are to many others
thanks Glenn for the insight
edj
|
faackanders2
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 03/28/11
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: hallelujah]
#5644526 - 01/26/13 02:40 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
http://www.astromart.com/classifieds/details.asp?classified_id=808439
WOW, It really is for sale. I thought is was made for someone or some observatory.
|
faackanders2
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 03/28/11
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: edwincjones]
#5644531 - 01/26/13 02:43 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
I can understand going up to 150mm (I have one), but have never understood the logic, reason, usefulness of the larger BT due to the cost, duplication of optics Why not just get a larger scope with binoviewer?
Other than uniqueness, doing it because you have the money and can, what is the advantage of this binocular over a telescope?
edj
Wouldn't it have much wider TFOV for the aperture (than binoviewing with equivalent aperture)?
|
faackanders2
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 03/28/11
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: Joad]
#5644544 - 01/26/13 02:49 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
Ah, but I'm not referring to the precisions of optical law; I'm referring to the fact that, say, a 100mm binocular telescope (like my BT) simply cannot manage the magnification of a good quality 100mm refractor, and is hugely sensitive to the slightest collimation offsets in a way that the telescope isn't.
I expect that this custom 12 inch binocular will be built with the intention of being so mechanically and optically perfect that it can perform equally with respect to a mid-sized telescope (I count 12" as mid-sized), but I wouldn't be surprised if the final result was not able to achieve such a level of perfection.
Some evidence for my expectations lies in the reviews I've seen of the giant reflector binoculars made by JMI. They are definitely not high magnification instruments, though their aperture is capable of very high magnification in a telescope.
Isn't the reason why people choose binos for the wide views (as mentioned binoviewers provide narrow views).
|
EdZ
Professor EdZ
   
Reged: 02/15/02
Loc: Cumberland, R I , USA42N71.4W
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: faackanders2]
#5644547 - 01/26/13 02:50 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
depends on the f# of the scope being used to binoview and whether or not it has been designed (shortened as some are) to accomodate a binoviewer witthout the need for an OCS. If you were trying to use a scope/binoviewer to do this you would most certainly design in tose accomodations. In which case, fov then becomes a limitation of the eyepices that can be used. There are binoviewers that will allow use of a 45mm field stop. So, I would say this can easily be accomplished with a scope binoviewer combo. An 18" f/4 scope with a 45mm clear aperure binoviewer would easily accomodate the same field of view, at a fraction of the cost.
edz
|
edwincjones
Close Enough
   
Reged: 04/10/04
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: faackanders2]
#5644720 - 01/26/13 04:54 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.astromart.com/classifieds/details.asp?classified_id=808439
WOW, It really is for sale. I thought is was made for someone or some observatory.
I am waiting for the "no reserve" auction
edj
|
Mark9473
Postmaster
   
Reged: 07/21/05
Loc: 51°N 4°E
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: faackanders2]
#5644793 - 01/26/13 05:36 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
WOW, It really is for sale. I thought is was made for someone or some observatory.
The one that's finished now isn't for sale, it's going to China, but they're offering to build you another one by 2015.
|
edwincjones
Close Enough
   
Reged: 04/10/04
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: Mark9473]
#5645123 - 01/26/13 08:58 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
it is really not that bad only 35% down and time payments over the next 2-3 years let's see -$175,000 down -about $13,000 month x 24 months + any interest
edj
|
GlennLeDrew
Postmaster
   
Reged: 06/18/08
Loc: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: edwincjones]
#5645311 - 01/27/13 12:05 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
An arbitrarily large bino need not impose any particular difficulty whatsoever as regards similarity of image scale and collimation.
If we allow magnification to differ by 1-2%, as is the case for small binos, the allowable errors on radii of curvature simply scale in proportion, which poses no problem at all in fabrication.
Collimation is never problematic, no matter the magnification, when on-the-fly adjustment is afforded the user. Adherence to basic engineering practice for the avoidance of any significant differential flexure assures reliable performance.
|
edwincjones
Close Enough
   
Reged: 04/10/04
|
Re: 12" Binocular Telescope on Refractors
[Re: GlennLeDrew]
#5645524 - 01/27/13 06:11 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Glenn,
that said,
what would one do with a 12" that could not be done with 4" or 6" binoculars?
when I have gotten larger binoculars,
there has always been a goal
-the Ms I couldnot find with smaller
-the AL H400s
I would guess better reach for comets,
galaxy groups, smaller open clusters
other objects better seen with binoculars than scopes?
edj
|