jdbastro
super member
Reged: 08/18/07
Loc: W. Coast
|
M42 Pic thru Image Intensifier - 0.5 Sec Exposure
#5638125 - 01/23/13 12:51 AM Attachment (70 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Snapped this pic over the weekend under heavily light polluted skies (Los Angeles). Scope is a 155mm f7 refractor. Intensifer is Gen 3 thin film housed in a Micro Monocular. Camera is a Panasonic G5 with 20mm f1.7 lens coupled to Micro eyepiece (afocal). Used a 12 nm H-alpha filter. Half second exposure.
Haven't gotten into image stacking - yet.
|
jdbastro
super member
Reged: 08/18/07
Loc: W. Coast
|
Re: M42 Pic thru Image Intensifier - Half Second
[Re: jdbastro]
#5638127 - 01/23/13 12:53 AM Attachment (52 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Here's the Horsehead under same conditions as M42, but with 2 sec exposure time.
|
jdbastro
super member
Reged: 08/18/07
Loc: W. Coast
|
Re: M42 Pic thru Image Intensifier - Half Second
[Re: jdbastro]
#5638129 - 01/23/13 12:54 AM Attachment (47 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
And finally the Flame under same conditions as M42, but also with 2 sec exposure.
|
PEterW
professor emeritus
Reged: 01/02/06
Loc: SW London, UK
|
Re: M42 Pic thru Image Intensifier - Half Second
[Re: jdbastro]
#5638199 - 01/23/13 02:33 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
How do they compare to the view to the eye. Guess your light pollution is similar to what I have in London. Peterw
|
highfnum
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 09/06/06
Loc: NE USA
|
Re: M42 Pic thru Image Intensifier - Half Second
[Re: PEterW]
#5639459 - 01/23/13 07:29 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
great job on m42 when i did it it gets overcooked(exposed)
|
mpgxsvcd
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 12/21/11
Loc: Raleigh, North Carolina
|
Re: M42 Pic thru Image Intensifier - Half Second
[Re: highfnum]
#5639715 - 01/23/13 10:47 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
That is really cool.
|
jdbastro
super member
Reged: 08/18/07
Loc: W. Coast
|
Re: M42 Pic thru Image Intensifier - Half Second
[Re: PEterW]
#5639916 - 01/24/13 01:29 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
How do they compare to the view to the eye. Guess your light pollution is similar to what I have in London. Peterw
To the eye, M42 shows very similar nebulosity detail, many fine wisps, witih the 12nm filter. The central trapezium region shows the four resolved stars and is less bright than the pic shown above. The HorseHead and Flame look about 30% as bright to the eye as in the pics. At a dark sight, the HorseHead and Flame look about 80% as bright to the eye vs. these pics - although I'm sure at a dark site I would get much better pics. May try that in Feb.
|
highfnum
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 09/06/06
Loc: NE USA
|
Re: M42 Pic thru Image Intensifier - Half Second
[Re: jdbastro]
#5641321 - 01/24/13 07:37 PM Attachment (29 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
your flame image has a lot of lovely hidden info i did some processing on it - would you like to see? horse had a bit to much noise need faster f num of more expose time here is a shot of HH i took with BIPH - used on their web site
|
jdbastro
super member
Reged: 08/18/07
Loc: W. Coast
|
Re: M42 Pic thru Image Intensifier - Half Second
[Re: highfnum]
#5641891 - 01/25/13 02:47 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
your flame image has a lot of lovely hidden info i did some processing on it - would you like to see? horse had a bit to much noise need faster f num of more expose time here is a shot of HH i took with BIPH - used on their web site
That's a very nice shot of the HH. Good contrast. What scope did you use and what were the sky conditions? I'd like to see how your processing improved my Flame nebula pic. Thanks.
|
highfnum
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 09/06/06
Loc: NE USA
|
Re: M42 Pic thru Image Intensifier - Half Second
[Re: jdbastro]
#5641905 - 01/25/13 03:28 AM Attachment (27 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
f/4 ,10 inch ,several seconds
here is mild process flame
there is more you can do to surpress noise
Edited by highfnum (01/25/13 03:29 AM)
|
highfnum
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 09/06/06
Loc: NE USA
|
Re: M42 Pic thru Image Intensifier - Half Second
[Re: highfnum]
#5642147 - 01/25/13 09:09 AM Attachment (27 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
here is a bit more agressive processing my HH was in NYC area suburb sky was clear
|
jdbastro
super member
Reged: 08/18/07
Loc: W. Coast
|
Re: M42 Pic thru Image Intensifier - Half Second
[Re: highfnum]
#5643632 - 01/26/13 12:22 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Your processing results are very impressive. May I ask what software you are using?
Thanks.
|
highfnum
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 09/06/06
Loc: NE USA
|
Re: M42 Pic thru Image Intensifier - Half Second
[Re: jdbastro]
#5644312 - 01/26/13 12:27 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
photoshop cs3 however it how you use it not what your using i recommend reading any ccd image processing books like the zone method or ccd astronomy im by no means an expert - i picked up stuff from others that do deep sky imaging and apply some of it to II
|