Sarkikos
Postmaster
   
Reged: 12/18/07
Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
|
Re: 21st Century Atlas of the Moon
[Re: RobertED]
#5660807 - 02/03/13 10:03 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Tea's great, too, but you have to drink twice as much to get the same amount of caffeine as in a coffee.
Mike
|
RobertED
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 07/11/03
Loc: Johnston, RI
|
Re: 21st Century Atlas of the Moon
[Re: Sarkikos]
#5662365 - 02/04/13 07:42 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
True dat!!....what about Coke????
|
Rick Woods
Postmaster
   
Reged: 01/27/05
Loc: Inner Solar System
|
Re: 21st Century Atlas of the Moon
[Re: RobertED]
#5662807 - 02/05/13 01:17 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Illegal!
|
Sarkikos
Postmaster
   
Reged: 12/18/07
Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
|
Re: 21st Century Atlas of the Moon
[Re: Rick Woods]
#5662976 - 02/05/13 07:12 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Not that kind of Coke! 
 Mike
|
RobertED
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 07/11/03
Loc: Johnston, RI
|
Re: 21st Century Atlas of the Moon
[Re: Sarkikos]
#5664351 - 02/05/13 09:31 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Noooo....the OTHER kind!!!
|
RobertED
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 07/11/03
Loc: Johnston, RI
|
Re: 21st Century Atlas of the Moon
[Re: RobertED]
#5664353 - 02/05/13 09:34 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
True dat!!....what about Coke????
....ok, ok.....I mean...PEPSI!!!!!!
|
ed_turco
Pooh-Bah
   
Reged: 08/29/09
Loc: Lincoln, RI
|
Re: 21st Century Atlas of the Moon
[Re: Stellarfire]
#5665048 - 02/06/13 11:37 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I am always interested in new lunar atlases and for $29.95, this looks really nice. But no farside coverage? The Lunar Orbiters took loads of pics of the farside as well as more recent and better photo images by far more advanced spacecraft..
Will still buy this book.
And this puts the topic on track again.
Ed Turco
The best M-Object in the Universe is M00n!
|
THEPLOUGH
ELEVEN Grandchildren; FIVE Ducklings
   
Reged: 01/11/08
Loc: Carlisle, Cumbria, ENGLAND
|
Re: 21st Century Atlas of the Moon
[Re: ed_turco]
#5665807 - 02/06/13 06:32 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
|
Tom Laskowski
super member
Reged: 04/28/08
Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
|
Re: 21st Century Atlas of the Moon
[Re: THEPLOUGH]
#5666685 - 02/07/13 09:20 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I ordered this atlas a few weeks ago and am anticipating its arrival. I'm curious to know from those who have it how the Charles Wood's Lunar 100 is treated in this? Is there a separate index/appendix for the Lunar 100 or are there plenty of references for the 100 list? I've just started to observe the L100 after many years of treating the moon as something to avoid and am looking forward to start some serious observing/imaging of this beautiful object.
|
Rick Woods
Postmaster
   
Reged: 01/27/05
Loc: Inner Solar System
|
Re: 21st Century Atlas of the Moon
[Re: Tom Laskowski]
#5666989 - 02/07/13 12:16 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Objects from the L100 that are on each chart are identified; so they're all shown somewhere in the book. But, there's no L100 list (gotta buy that separate!)
|
Ain Soph Aur
sage
   
Reged: 08/11/11
Loc: West Tennessee
|
Re: 21st Century Atlas of the Moon
[Re: Rick Woods]
#5669672 - 02/08/13 07:45 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I ordered a copy Saturday evening Feb. 2 and was pleased to find it in my mailbox today Feb. 8. It is a very nice atlas, and I am already thinking about ordering a second one for outdoor use at the eyepiece.
|
refasali
member
Reged: 01/28/12
Loc: Oregon & Washington
|
Re: 21st Century Atlas of the Moon
[Re: Ain Soph Aur]
#5671631 - 02/10/13 12:04 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I have a question regarding size of maps. I am using a library copy of Rukl's, but the ~5x7" sections are kinda small for my beginning in-feild use. I realize the 21st Century atlas divides the moon into 25 sections, whereas my Rukl presents 76 parts, necessitating less magnified detail in the 21st. But how big are the map sections on page in your 21st? Bigger than ~5x7"? The pages as I understand are 8.5x11" - how much is used for map?
Also, same question for the Cambridge atlas, if someone has a second...
Thanks
|
Rick Woods
Postmaster
   
Reged: 01/27/05
Loc: Inner Solar System
|
Re: 21st Century Atlas of the Moon
[Re: refasali]
#5671759 - 02/10/13 02:57 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
The 21st Century charts are 6.5" x 8"; but the scale is smaller than the Rukl atlas. If you're a beginner, the best thing you could do is to get the S&T/Rukl field map, which has four foldable quadrants. That is bar-none the best value in a lunar map today, and the one I would keep over all others if I had to choose.
|
refasali
member
Reged: 01/28/12
Loc: Oregon & Washington
|
Re: 21st Century Atlas of the Moon
[Re: Rick Woods]
#5671990 - 02/10/13 09:04 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I am considering getting the map. But I'd also like a text.
Thanks Rick- I'll add that I'm midway through the Astronomical League's Lunar I & II programs. Doing'em simultaneously and hoping to find a detailed atlas to use outside. I've been using Rukls, but the sections have been cut a bit small for me at this time in my observing. I'm looking into the Cambridge atlas and it seems a good fit between the 21st and Rukl. Not as many sections as Rukl but more than the 21st.. Any thoughts?
|