Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums
Privacy Policy |
Please read our Terms
of Service | Signup and
Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User
ghataa
professor emeritus
Reged: 06/20/11
Loc: Central, NJ
|
Classic Atlas or New Alt/Azm Atlas?
#5686030 - 02/17/13 09:45 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Hi All,
I am looking to move to a beefier mount for AP and had basically settled on the Atlas until the new Atlas Pro mount came out. While I appreciate the upgrades on be Pro, I have no interest in alt/azm feature and curious if everything else is essentially equal between the two mounts. For example, weight capacity, ability to do long exposures while guiding etc. The $800 dollar difference is significant and let's me think about other goodies, especially if performance is practically the same for AP.
Thanks,
George
|
Lane
Post Laureate
Reged: 11/19/07
Loc: Frisco, Texas
|
Re: Classic Atlas or New Alt/Azm Atlas?
[Re: ghataa]
#5687119 - 02/18/13 03:17 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Weight capacity is highter and theoretically the belt drive will make AP better on the new mount.
Having ALT/AZ is really a benefit for those of us that do visual viewing. Keeps the eyepiece at a reasonable position and does not flip the scope upside down, which helps with mirror flop issues in an SCT.
|
hcsceo
super member
   
Reged: 10/14/09
Loc: Austin, TX
|
Re: Classic Atlas or New Alt/Azm Atlas?
[Re: ghataa]
#5687134 - 02/18/13 03:23 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
George, I just went through this over the weekend and went with the Classic Atlas. I can't really speak for the Pro version as I've never even seen one, but I didn't want to deal with any issues that might hang up my imaging so went with the tried and true classic mount. I'll never use it in ALT/AZ either so I didn't see a reason to go with the added complexity and risk issues. Looks like it has encoders which could be beneficial if the resolution is good and appears to support 4 extra pounds of weight (Not sure if that really means anything). I currently run a C8 and a C9.25 could be in my future and know the atlas will handle either well. I did want to use EQMod since my imaging is completely robotic now and I've yet to see anyone using EQMod with it so not sure if it will work. Basically, I know the Classic Atlas will work for me and I had too many questions about the PRO to risk it. Plus the added savings puts more money in my pocket for other stuffs. I'm generally not a first revision kind of person and with something this expensive there is no way I'm going to risk my hobby on a bad experience. Not sure any of this helps you but that was my thought process.
|
EFT
Vendor - Deep Space Products
   
Reged: 05/07/07
Loc: Phoenix, AZ
|
Re: Classic Atlas or New Alt/Azm Atlas?
[Re: hcsceo]
#5688786 - 02/19/13 12:17 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
If you have no intention of using the Alt/Az then I would see no reason for going with the Atlas Pro. While they have added a belt drive system, there is a misconception as to what a belt drive may or may not do. There seems to be an idea that a belt drive will not have backlash and will somehow operate better than a spur gear drive. However, these are toothed belts and pulleys that we a talking about and toothed belts and pulleys can have backlash, just like spur gears. In fact, you would probably get less backlash with a high precision set of spur gears than you could with a set of pullies and belts made by different companies. If this were a non-toothed belt system then you would have no backlash, but you could have slippage. Belt stretching can be a concern, but these days most belts are made with materials that are pretty resistant to stretching.
So, I would recommend going with the classic Atlas in your case. You won't really be missing out on anything except the extra cost.
|
ghataa
professor emeritus
Reged: 06/20/11
Loc: Central, NJ
|
Re: Classic Atlas or New Alt/Azm Atlas?
[Re: EFT]
#5688878 - 02/19/13 01:02 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Thanks for the responses guys.
Ed and Steve: I really appreciate the recommendation given my AP focus. Thanks for saving me some cash!
Best,
George
|
Lane
Post Laureate
Reged: 11/19/07
Loc: Frisco, Texas
|
Re: Classic Atlas or New Alt/Azm Atlas?
[Re: ghataa]
#5691900 - 02/20/13 10:44 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I thought the point of the new belt drive mounts was to eliminate periodic error by eliminating the teeth. What good is belt drive with teeth?
|
|
26 registered and 37 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: Bowmoreman, bilgebay, iceblaze
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|