csrlice12
Postmaster
   
Reged: 05/22/12
Loc: Denver, CO
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: Sarkikos]
#5716289 - 03/06/13 12:23 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Went to the scope store to pick up the 5XO she had (still new in box) and someone had just beat me to it ($309). Got the XW instead.....then the next XW.....and the next....and the next....you're getting the picture....Think I'm done now for awhile, anybody know where you can buy some Cloud-B-Gone?????
|
Mike B
Starstruck
   
Reged: 04/06/05
Loc: shake, rattle, & roll, CA
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: csrlice12]
#5716380 - 03/06/13 01:22 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
No, but i think i saw a cloud filter on Amart last week... might still be there?
|
csrlice12
Postmaster
   
Reged: 05/22/12
Loc: Denver, CO
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: Mike B]
#5716417 - 03/06/13 01:36 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Wherever I go, Clouds follow me. I charge by the trip....
|
Starman81
Pooh-Bah
   
Reged: 03/06/08
Loc: Metro Detroit, MI, USA
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: csrlice12]
#5716437 - 03/06/13 01:44 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Vendors must love it when it is cloudy... We end up buying so much stuff during those dreary days when we can't use what we already have!
|
csrlice12
Postmaster
   
Reged: 05/22/12
Loc: Denver, CO
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: Starman81]
#5716464 - 03/06/13 01:56 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
It's why their first purchases were cloud machines........
|
Mike B
Starstruck
   
Reged: 04/06/05
Loc: shake, rattle, & roll, CA
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: csrlice12]
#5716809 - 03/06/13 04:37 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
It's them gol'derned nerds at Apple Inc... marketing all that "cloud" storage... soon it'll be so stuffed we'll be lucky to sneak peeks past the edges!
|
csrlice12
Postmaster
   
Reged: 05/22/12
Loc: Denver, CO
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: Mike B]
#5716820 - 03/06/13 04:44 PM Attachment (29 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
For those who are interested (and if the lenses end up in your lap, you'll need this).
|
Dan Finnerty
sage
Reged: 09/11/11
Loc: Pasadena, CA
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: csrlice12]
#5716913 - 03/06/13 05:32 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
That is really interesting how much the eyepiece designs change between focal lengths. I never would have guessed that.
|
Ultron
member
Reged: 08/11/12
Loc: New Jersey
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: Dan Finnerty]
#5716985 - 03/06/13 06:13 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
My XW 10mm arrived yesterday. Snow and rain arrived today. Can't wait to use it!
I was looking for a replacement for my 10mm plossl. Was going to wait for the ES82 11mm to be in stock, but jumped for the XW10 when I saw it might not be around anymore. Thank god these "scares" don't happen more often. I'd be spending too much money!
Does the 10mm Barlow well? I have a 6mm TMB planetary but I'd like to see how much better the views are with the barlowed XW10.
|
Mike B
Starstruck
   
Reged: 04/06/05
Loc: shake, rattle, & roll, CA
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: Ultron]
#5717039 - 03/06/13 06:44 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
I have a 6mm TMB planetary but I'd like to see how much better the views are with the barlowed XW10.
If you care even an ounce for that 6mm TMB, you won't allow it too near the Pentax... all it takes is a split second, and *ZAP* - the TMB will be reduced to a smoldering lump of salt. 
Other than that, the TMB is a decent eyepiece...
|
Scanning4Comets
Markus
   
Reged: 12/26/04
Loc: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: Mike B]
#5717101 - 03/06/13 07:20 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
If you care even an ounce for that 6mm TMB, you won't allow it too near the Pentax... all it takes is a split second, and *ZAP* - the TMB will be reduced to a smoldering lump of salt.
|
ausastronomer
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 06/30/03
Loc: Kiama NSW (Australia)
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: Scanning4Comets]
#5717210 - 03/06/13 08:25 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
There is a lot of good information about all the Pentax Eyepieces on the Pentax Japan Website
Pentax XW lens configuration diagrams
Pentax XW Light Transmission Graphs
Pentax XW Astigmatism and Field Curvature Graphs
It's in Japanese but its easy enough to interpret the graphs. You can also translate it to read most of the commentary, if you wish.
Cheers,
|
Mariner@sg
super member
   
Reged: 06/28/12
Loc: Little Red Dot
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: csrlice12]
#5717485 - 03/06/13 10:54 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
Wherever I go, Clouds follow me. I charge by the trip....
Stay away from my area
|
csrlice12
Postmaster
   
Reged: 05/22/12
Loc: Denver, CO
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: Mariner@sg]
#5717906 - 03/07/13 08:31 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
That's what the charge is for.....to NOT take the trip
|
stevetaylor199
sage
   
Reged: 09/21/11
Loc: SE Wisconsin
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: ausastronomer]
#5718389 - 03/07/13 12:57 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
There is a lot of good information about all the Pentax Eyepieces on the Pentax Japan Website
Pentax XW lens configuration diagrams
Pentax XW Light Transmission Graphs
Pentax XW Astigmatism and Field Curvature Graphs
It's in Japanese but its easy enough to interpret the graphs. You can also translate it to read most of the commentary, if you wish.
Cheers,
Great stuff -- thanks for these links! I had seen only one of these pages before.
Would anyone mind explaining the aberration curves?
Translated by Google into my native language, it reads, "how to shift the focus in the direction of radial and concentric This astigmatism curves, which indicates the amount of focal shift (the apparent angle), and the horizontal axis the distance from the center of the field of view in the vertical axis, solid line concentric The amount of focal shift direction (DS), the dashed line indicates (DM) in the direction of the focal shift amount of radiation."
I'm not grasping what the DS and DM lines actually represent. I get that the x-axis is marked at -0.2m and +0.2m (which sounds like a LOT, btw), and that the y-axis is the distance from the center.... but I'm not getting what's represented by DS and DM. It looks like nearly all of these eps have some amounts of field curvature (and astigmatism?), except the 10mm, on one of the two measures.
|
Sarkikos
Postmaster
   
Reged: 12/18/07
Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: Mike B]
#5718431 - 03/07/13 01:23 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
The only praise a TMB Planetary ever deserved was faint.
Mike
|
Ultron
member
Reged: 08/11/12
Loc: New Jersey
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: stevetaylor199]
#5718439 - 03/07/13 01:28 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
Great stuff -- thanks for these links! I had seen only one of these pages before.
Would anyone mind explaining the aberration curves?
Translated by Google into my native language, it reads, "how to shift the focus in the direction of radial and concentric This astigmatism curves, which indicates the amount of focal shift (the apparent angle), and the horizontal axis the distance from the center of the field of view in the vertical axis, solid line concentric The amount of focal shift direction (DS), the dashed line indicates (DM) in the direction of the focal shift amount of radiation."
I'm not grasping what the DS and DM lines actually represent. I get that the x-axis is marked at -0.2m and +0.2m (which sounds like a LOT, btw), and that the y-axis is the distance from the center.... but I'm not getting what's represented by DS and DM. It looks like nearly all of these eps have some amounts of field curvature (and astigmatism?), except the 10mm, on one of the two measures.
I was curious too. I found this post Pentax XW Astigmatism and Field Curvature
The description is in the last post.
|
stevetaylor199
sage
   
Reged: 09/21/11
Loc: SE Wisconsin
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: Ultron]
#5718496 - 03/07/13 01:55 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
That's a perfect explanation. Looks like the 5 is a real winner, in that it has very little astigmatism and field curvature (possibly) canceling that of many scopes. And, as that poster notes, FC is less of an issue at smaller exit pupils.
Funny how that info and these eyepieces are 8 years old, btw.
Edited by stevetaylor199 (03/07/13 01:56 PM)
|
Starman1
Vendor (EyepiecesEtc.com)
   
Reged: 06/24/03
Loc: Los Angeles
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: stevetaylor199]
#5718669 - 03/07/13 03:23 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
There is a lot of good information about all the Pentax Eyepieces on the Pentax Japan Website
Pentax XW lens configuration diagrams
Pentax XW Light Transmission Graphs
Pentax XW Astigmatism and Field Curvature Graphs
It's in Japanese but its easy enough to interpret the graphs. You can also translate it to read most of the commentary, if you wish.
Cheers,
Great stuff -- thanks for these links! I had seen only one of these pages before.
Would anyone mind explaining the aberration curves?
Translated by Google into my native language, it reads, "how to shift the focus in the direction of radial and concentric This astigmatism curves, which indicates the amount of focal shift (the apparent angle), and the horizontal axis the distance from the center of the field of view in the vertical axis, solid line concentric The amount of focal shift direction (DS), the dashed line indicates (DM) in the direction of the focal shift amount of radiation."
I'm not grasping what the DS and DM lines actually represent. I get that the x-axis is marked at -0.2m and +0.2m (which sounds like a LOT, btw), and that the y-axis is the distance from the center.... but I'm not getting what's represented by DS and DM. It looks like nearly all of these eps have some amounts of field curvature (and astigmatism?), except the 10mm, on one of the two measures.
Simply this: The two curves represent the Sagittal (essentially vertical) and tangential or Meridional (essentially horizontal) surfaces. The deviation between them is zero at the center of the field (the bottom of the graph), and the deviation at the top (the edge of the field) indicates astigmatism. The units on the bottom are diopters of deviation and, ideally, the curves should not deviate by more than 1 diopter or the astigmatism will be visible. And the vertical center line would indicate a perfectly flat field, with a curve to the left indicating negative field curvature and a curve to the right indicating positive field curvature. However, the Petzval curve usually lies between the S and M curves, and it is that deviation from the center line that more determines whether or not field curvature is visible. The Petzval curve is not illustrated. As I mentioned, a deviation of 1 diopter is usually accommodatable. If the S and M curves are very close together, there is little astigmatism. If both curves go to the right or left, it may indicate that focusing somewhere in the field other than the center may be necessary to bring the whole field into focus. If the two curves are identical and one goes right and the other goes left, the field will appear flat but there may be excessive astigmatism.
|
teskridg
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 01/15/08
Loc: PA
|
Re: Pentax XW's Toast?
[Re: Starman1]
#5730697 - 03/13/13 04:56 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
S and M curves? Isn't this a family forum? Tim
|