Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Cats & Casses

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
azure1961p
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/17/09

Loc: USA
C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do?
      #5743213 - 03/19/13 03:20 PM

Hypothetically: you are an observer of deepsky galaxies and such as much as mars and the moon. Even more amazingly you are given a choice (oh hell it s free) of a ten inch apo or c14 - which would you pick?

Because the planetary is at least good in a c14 and its got the extra aperture for galaxies, I'd opt for a 14.

Am I wrong or can the apo wver match the 14 on galaxies. Contrast only goes so far.

Pete


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Whichwayisnorth
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 07/04/11

Loc: Southern California
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5743226 - 03/19/13 03:26 PM


A ten inch APO would be so expensive that I would get that one and sell it.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GlennLeDrew
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/18/08

Loc: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: Whichwayisnorth]
      #5743251 - 03/19/13 03:33 PM

If someone were offering for free either a C14 (Edge, I'm assuming) or a 10" apo, I'd choose the former. A lot easier to make an observatory for! And the extra aperture is a boon.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
saemark30
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 02/21/12

Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: GlennLeDrew]
      #5743303 - 03/19/13 03:54 PM

If someone was offering a C14 or a 10" apo for free, I would take the 10" APO until I needed the money and then sell it.
I could then buy 10 to 100 C14's or go with a 18" dob and have change for a 180mm APO.
Heck it depends if you just want to see Messiers or NGC stuff.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Darren Drake
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/09/02

Loc: Chicagoland
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: GlennLeDrew]
      #5743313 - 03/19/13 03:58 PM

Deep sky obviously goes to the C14 with almost twice the light. Lunar/planetary is close but the seeing issues favor the apo. Resolution would be better in the C14 but the contrast on small features in the apo about makes up for it. This makes lunar planetary about a draw (Assuming the C14 has very good optics.) Overall winner is the C14.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
WadeH237
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 02/24/07

Loc: Snohomish, WA
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: Darren Drake]
      #5743338 - 03/19/13 04:06 PM

I already have a C14, so I would go for the APO. Mounting could be an issue, but i suspect that my AP1600 could probably even carry a 10" APO.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bilgebay
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 11/06/08

Loc: Turkiye - Istanbul and Marmari...
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: Darren Drake]
      #5743341 - 03/19/13 04:08 PM

I would get the 10" APO and sell it. Then I would invest the money on a remote observatory and all the equipment needed for that.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Paul G
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/08/03

Loc: Freedonia
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: bilgebay]
      #5743345 - 03/19/13 04:09 PM

Quote:

I would get the 10" APO and sell it. Then I would invest the money on a remote observatory and all the equipment needed for that.






Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MikeBOKC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/10/10

Loc: Oklahoma City, OK
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5743680 - 03/19/13 06:35 PM

Well a ten inch APO is sort of a fantasy isn't it? I am sure some exist and are permanently mounted in professional or university observatories, but I doubt if there are more than a few dozen worldwide something like a 60 inch Newt. The cost would be stratospheric likely $20k or more, and the mounting requirement would be equally prohibitive as to space and cost. A c-14 however actually exists and is achievable. However, given the option of either at no cost, I'd probably take the 10 inch APO, set it up and charge five bucks a head for the hundreds of CN members who would make weekly pilgrimages to view and caress it and buy myself a couple of C-14s to play with in the adjoining field. Then I'd list it in the classifieds and watch 10,000 heads explode . . .

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jared
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 10/11/05

Loc: Piedmont, California, U.S.
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5743695 - 03/19/13 06:42 PM

Quote:

Hypothetically: you are an observer of deepsky galaxies and such as much as mars and the moon. Even more amazingly you are given a choice (oh hell it s free) of a ten inch apo or c14 - which would you pick?

Because the planetary is at least good in a c14 and its got the extra aperture for galaxies, I'd opt for a 14.

Am I wrong or can the apo wver match the 14 on galaxies. Contrast only goes so far.

Pete




You're asking this question on the Cats and Casses forum... I hope you're not surprised by the answers!

By my calculations, the C14 would have an advantage of roughly 25% in actual image brightness (throughput) , once you account for light loss from central obstruction, typical reflectivity for modern mirrors (with enhanced over coatings), etc.. That's a real advantage, but not anything like the 2x you'd expect from just comparing straight apertures.

If I assume a 90% Strehl for the Edge and a 95% for the refractor, then the MTF curves at critical frequencies would be almost identical for the two with a slight edge to the C14.

I wouldn't want to have to figure out a mount for the refractor, and I believe it can be difficult to get a triplet above 8" or so to cool fully if you don't live in Florida. The same can be said for a C14, of course... Obviously, the C14 is the more practical scope in terms of ease of mounting and ease of use. But there is still something special about big refractors. If I didn't have to worry about an observatory or about mounting it, I'd go with the 10" apochromat.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
highfnum
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 09/06/06

Loc: NE USA
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: Jared]
      #5743756 - 03/19/13 07:02 PM

any specific examples of 10 inch apo

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BKBrown
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 08/23/09

Loc: Northern Virginia, USA
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5743819 - 03/19/13 07:22 PM Attachment (46 downloads)

If I'm not picking up the tab, the 10" Apo...the APM/LZOS 254mm f/9 is my "dream" scope". But at 42,773 euros ($55,177 US) it is unattainable by mere mortals. Not only the cost of the scope, but you'll spend a hefty percentage of that price getting a first rate mount and accessories; and of course it cries out for an observatory. So even if you got the scope free, you'll be dropping 50k for other stuff. At least I could use my TEC 140 as a wide field finder

Clear Skies,
Brian


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
PatHolland
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/11/09

Loc: Clever, Missouri
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: BKBrown]
      #5744125 - 03/19/13 10:11 PM

If I bought a 10" APO, I would need to take out a loan for my divorce attorney. My APO and I would most likely have to get an apartment somewhere - but at least we'd be together.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Scott BeithAdministrator
SRF
*****

Reged: 11/26/03

Loc: Frederick, MD
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: PatHolland]
      #5744164 - 03/19/13 10:35 PM

10" apo all the way!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
David PavlichAdministrator
Transmographied
*****

Reged: 05/18/05

Loc: Mandeville, LA USA
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: Scott Beith]
      #5744206 - 03/19/13 10:53 PM

Quote:

10" apo all the way!




Well, duh!!

David


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Scott BeithAdministrator
SRF
*****

Reged: 11/26/03

Loc: Frederick, MD
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: David Pavlich]
      #5744216 - 03/19/13 10:59 PM



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
David PavlichAdministrator
Transmographied
*****

Reged: 05/18/05

Loc: Mandeville, LA USA
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5744232 - 03/19/13 11:06 PM

First, you're comparing an off-the-shelf SC to a hand built refractor. This is a common comparison, one I could never understand.

Now, let's get Mike Lockwood to make us a hand figured primary and secondary mirror to the very best of his ability...maybe Mike's best mirrors ever! And we'll also get Mike to figure the corrector as closely matched to these mirrors as his prolific skills will allow.

Now, let's make sure that the OTA has active cooling. And let's make sure that the tolerances of the mirror riding on the baffle tube is incredibly tight, to the point that the lube is specially formulated so that it can be very slippery but the amount of lube is only a few microns. And the focusing mechanism is extremely rigid to limit image shift to virtually nothing.

Ok...now we would have a fair comparison in optics, mechanics and price.

David


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Cotts
Just Wondering
*****

Reged: 10/10/05

Loc: Toronto, Ontario
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: David Pavlich]
      #5744269 - 03/19/13 11:29 PM

Not to gloat or anything but my 16" f/5 Teeter/Zambuto at a 'mere' $7K would be a better than either of those scopes for resolution, contrast and light gathering (taken together). The 10" would have better contrast but with noticeably less resolution and light gathering. The 14" SCT would be closer but still not quite the equal of the 16".

Now, if they were giving them away, I'd still take the 10" APO - there is still that refractor 'mystique'..

Dave


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Stelios
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/04/03

Loc: West Hills, CA
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: Cotts]
      #5744362 - 03/20/13 02:01 AM

The question should have precluded the possibility of resale, as obviously the much more expensive APO makes more sense then. But if the scope was non-transferable, even if it came gifted with an appropriate mount, I think the C14 would win unless one had or could build an observatory in a dark site. Transporting a 10" APO and appropriate mount seems a daunting undertaking, even for non-girly men.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Erik Bakker
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 08/10/06

Loc: The Netherlands, Europe
Re: C14,versus a 10" apo... What will you do? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5744472 - 03/20/13 04:11 AM Attachment (68 downloads)

Hi Pete,

I have observed for hundreds of nights with a 10.5 " Alvan Clark for over a decade. A mere doublet operating at f/15 and like a big dob it requires a ladder

Include is a picture of this scope, so you get an idea of the size, mount and housing such a scope needs.

The images were very nice, but no match for my MW 16" f/5. In sizes larger than around 7", refractors loose some of the advantages we all know from smaller sizes. They can take a very long time to cool for example, especially in (airspaced) triplets. If one wants superb images from a large scope, a high-end dob with a small CO and proper thermal management is a great choice. Or a ditto Newt, Mak-Newt. And even well designed and manufactured MCT's or SCT's from a high-end maker deliver great images.

But money, housing etc. no object, a 10" f/15 apo will do better than any 14" SCT including a C14. The aperture difference is just too small.

You can do a scaled-down experiment with some more easily obtainable instruments: a 90mm f/9 Vixen fluorite or 92 mm f/7 A-P Stowaway vs a Celestron C5.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
16 registered and 29 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Starman27, kkokkolis 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 3819

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics