Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home page


Observing >> Lunar Observing

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
curiosidad
sage


Reged: 06/09/11

There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon?
      #5784298 - 04/07/13 04:55 PM

Hello,
It is often said that to observe the moon, almost any telescope goes well.
But, in his opinion there is some model above the rest to be a little better for lunar observation?
From what aperture lunar observation becomes interesting, detailed and serious observation?
greetings


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
THEPLOUGH
ELEVEN Grandchildren; FIVE Ducklings
*****

Reged: 01/11/08

Loc: Carlisle, Cumbria, ENGLAND
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: curiosidad]
      #5784504 - 04/07/13 06:38 PM

Well my 8" gives a very good view especially when used with the 13mm EP... I also have a 3" refractor that is half decent, but the bigger the better rule must also apply...

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
buddyjesus
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/07/10

Loc: Davison, Michigan
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: THEPLOUGH]
      #5785063 - 04/07/13 11:40 PM

I agree with the above because you want to get over 100x to get good visualization of finer detail and to dim the image. I think a 4" is considerably better than a 3" for the moon because my 3" reflector maxed out about 75x. Moral of the story, if you get an 80mm, make sure it is an apo or long focal length achromat, not a modest widefield budget reflector.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eric63
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 06/16/12

Loc: Ottawa, Ontario
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: buddyjesus]
      #5785116 - 04/08/13 12:16 AM

Now this is where my 127mm Mak shines! Just amazing on the moon.
Eric


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Astrojensen
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/05/08

Loc: Bornholm, Denmark
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: curiosidad]
      #5785264 - 04/08/13 03:59 AM

Quote:

From what aperture lunar observation becomes interesting, detailed and serious observation?




That is mostly dependent on the observer's skill and enthusiasm. For me, a 60mm of high quality does the job. I know I've seen many things with my 63mm Zeiss that other people have missed, but that is also because I've been studying the Moon for more than twenty years and know what to look for, when to look for it and how to look for it. And many of those details weren't easy to see, but that made it all so more rewarding to finally see them.

My 85mm apochromat is a very clear step up from the 60mm, but a 100mm is a bigger step, but doesn't feel much bigger than the 85mm, oddly enough. It's as if the 85mm is much more than halfway to the 100mm from the 60mm. But a 125mm is a huge leap up from a 100mm and leave the 85mm in the dust.

Today I often use a 150mm f/8 achromat, stopped down to 125mm f/9.6, equipped with a Baader Maxbright binoviewer and 25mm Zeiss eyepieces. Lunar views are extremely good, with very short cooldown time, so that I can be observing quickly. There is a ton of things to see with a 125mm, enough for a lifetime.

But if I didn't have any of the bigger scopes, I would still be observing the Moon with my 60mm scope and enjoy it.


Clear skies!
Thomas, Denmark


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
azure1961p
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/17/09

Loc: USA
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: Astrojensen]
      #5785316 - 04/08/13 06:24 AM

Thomas what about the C8 and 12" reflector.

Pete


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Astrojensen
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/05/08

Loc: Bornholm, Denmark
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5786151 - 04/08/13 02:29 PM

Quote:

Thomas what about the C8 and 12" reflector.




I've sold the C8 back to its original owner, as I didn't use it. The 12" reflector does give fantastic images at up to 160x, but then its astigmatism and spherical aberration starts to get really noticeable. It should be a formidable lunar telescope if it wasn't for the astigmatism and overcorrection. Heck, it still outperforms the 5" refractor, but not as much as doubling the aperture would suggest. Thermal issues are less than in the C8, so the potential to outperform the C8, if not for the optical issues, are certainly there. The C8 was only marginally better than the refractor on most nights and was hysterically sensitive to collimation and focusing, far more so than the newtonian. The newtonian is the easiest scope to collimate I've ever owned, now that I have a laser.


Clear skies!
Thomas, Denmark


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mikewirths
Vendor-Baja Dark Skies
*****

Reged: 06/16/08

Loc: San Pedro Martir Mexico
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: Astrojensen]
      #5786290 - 04/08/13 04:02 PM

If I had to "start over" and buy a new scope I would go for a Starstructure dob (driven) with Carl Zambuto optics. I have had a lot of scopes including a beautiful 5" AP superplanetary but nothing beats the contrast and detail of a fine large (16-18") optic in a premium dob IMO.

I have had jaw-dropping views of the moon during great seeing at high magnifications (600X's and up) in my 18" Starmaster, on the Jovian moons Ihave had fleeting glimpses of detail!

I would get one of these if I had the money:

http://www.starstructure.com/starstructure3_003.htm

cheers

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
azure1961p
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/17/09

Loc: USA
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: mikewirths]
      #5786640 - 04/08/13 06:58 PM

Thomas I had a C8 like that. Gross astigmatism and SA in the mix too. It was an utter shame as mechanically it was a beautiful Celestron. The awful awful views of stars at 270x was wrenching - astigmatism on the verge of wedging. Looking back on it I wonder if it was just an offcenter corrector. I sold it though. It still bugs me because it was so robust but what's it worth if I can't get past 175x without issues. It was Celestrons CLASSIC C8 - bought in the midst of Halley Hoopla.

When I read a review of competing telescope mirrors in the 10" size in Sky and Tel and PARKS walked off with the prize, it was my intention at that point to get a mirror quoted as having "essentially perfect star images". What made it so painful was some folks saying a special night was needed to see diffraction patterns and it wasn't as readily coming as one might expect. I was naive about diffraction so I tried but I knew all along great seeing wouldn't unsquish an astigmatic star image.

Oh the crime that followed - so I finally get the 10" PARKS just a month or so after Mount Pinatubo killed deepsky transparency!!!!! I couldn't see M51s arms, rifts in M31 not M33s arms.

I was losing even when I was winning. Lol it was a frustrating time.

Are you going to have it re figured? Might be better to get a new GSO mirror?

Pete


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Astrojensen
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/05/08

Loc: Bornholm, Denmark
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5787307 - 04/09/13 02:53 AM

Sorry to hear about your lousy C8. Mine had fantastic optics, but that was moot, as the tube currents never settled in the carbon fiber tube (carbon fiber has TERRIBLE thermal properties for closed tube telescopes).

I was actually thinking about letting Carl Zambuto work his magic on the 12" mirror, but he has stopped refiguring of cheap mirrors and I couldn't afford it anyway. Replacing the mirror with another GSO one seems to be the way to go. Teleskop Service in Germany sells certified mirrors with the same focal length and diameter as the one in this scope, but they are a little pricey. I'll need to save up for one, as I can't afford one right now.

And then I find myself still dreaming about a large refractor... A 7" - 8" f/12 would be soooo nice! I am very tempted to get an ISTAR lens and build a large Richard Berry mount for it, now that I have experience with dobsonians and has seen how smooth and stable they can be. There is no question that a refractor would be far superior, aperture for aperture, in my climate.


Clear skies!
Thomas, Denmark


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tom and Beth
Post Laureate


Reged: 01/08/07

Loc: Tucson, AZ
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: Astrojensen]
      #5805352 - 04/17/13 07:53 PM

Quote:

Sorry to hear about your lousy C8. Mine had fantastic optics, but that was moot, as the tube currents never settled in the carbon fiber tube (carbon fiber has TERRIBLE thermal properties for closed tube telescopes).

I was actually thinking about letting Carl Zambuto work his magic on the 12" mirror, but he has stopped refiguring of cheap mirrors and I couldn't afford it anyway. Replacing the mirror with another GSO one seems to be the way to go. Teleskop Service in Germany sells certified mirrors with the same focal length and diameter as the one in this scope, but they are a little pricey. I'll need to save up for one, as I can't afford one right now.

And then I find myself still dreaming about a large refractor... A 7" - 8" f/12 would be soooo nice! I am very tempted to get an ISTAR lens and build a large Richard Berry mount for it, now that I have experience with dobsonians and has seen how smooth and stable they can be. There is no question that a refractor would be far superior, aperture for aperture, in my climate.


Clear skies!
Thomas, Denmark




Anyway you could be convinced to take that mirror and polish it towards perfection? I realize it's a bit large for a first project, but with all the help available on the web, plus maybe a bit of hands on help to grasp the Foucault test....


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Astrojensen
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/05/08

Loc: Bornholm, Denmark
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: Tom and Beth]
      #5807125 - 04/18/13 04:57 PM

Weeellll - I don't think I could be convinced of that, to be honest. Too many hibernating/dead projects already, due to lack of funds/energy/time.

I suppose I could ask some of the Danish mirror makers if they want to have a go at it and earn a little money. I know at least one of them is very good and is currently making a 10" or 12" f/4 (or was it f/3?) astrograph.

It is a shame indeed that the mirror is so bad, as the dob structure itself is pretty nice and performs OK and it is easy to track at 250x - 300x, so a better mirror would instantly transform the scope into an awesome observing machine.


Clear skies!
Thomas, Denmark


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tom and Beth
Post Laureate


Reged: 01/08/07

Loc: Tucson, AZ
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: Astrojensen]
      #5807502 - 04/18/13 07:02 PM

It's something to consider. The VERY thin layer of Aluminum is removed in minutes with a polishing lap. I do understand reluctance to add to the mountain of unfinished projects.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
azure1961p
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/17/09

Loc: USA
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: Tom and Beth]
      #5807785 - 04/18/13 09:48 PM

I realy considered mirror grinding some months ago. The hundreds of hours involved for the size I wanted and the improbability of success was a total downer. If I were younger with more hours in my day than I have now I'd be compelled. Such as it is tho - I have no such time budget or patience to make a 400 hour flop.

Pete

Edited by azure1961p (04/18/13 09:51 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tom and Beth
Post Laureate


Reged: 01/08/07

Loc: Tucson, AZ
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5807989 - 04/19/13 12:19 AM

I'm not sure what size mirror you were considering, but 400 hours?

Like so many other things, it seems daunting until you do it. It does help CONSIDERABLY to have someone guide over the rough spots.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jonbosley
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 10/19/05

Loc: Texas
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: Tom and Beth]
      #5808593 - 04/19/13 12:41 PM

Well, I believe this is the best current scope for the moon:

web page

Jon


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Astrojensen
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/05/08

Loc: Bornholm, Denmark
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: jonbosley]
      #5808929 - 04/19/13 03:20 PM

Quote:

Well, I believe this is the best current scope for the moon:




Wrong! At least in my opinion.

First, it has no aluminum coatings on the primary. That means it has the light grasp of a 6.2" newtonian...

Second, they tout the lack of coatings as an advantage, since it means less scattered light, but hey, isn't the secondary coated? If not, the light grasp is down to that of a 1.4" scope... And if the secondary is coated, the scope has the scatter issue anyway!

Even with my 5" refractor, I run out of light somewhere below 200x, when I want to study the Mare areas and especially the rille regions. Here I often need to keep the exit pupil just under 1mm or preferably larger. My 12" is wonderful for these areas, since it has a luxurious 2mm exit pupil and plenty of light at 150x.

To build a hyper-expensive 28" that is limited to magnifications no higher than those used on a 6", because it has images just as dim, and thus unable to use all the resolution of the large mirror anyway, since most of the details it is capable of resolving can't be magnified enough to be visible, is simply nuts in my opinion. A huge waste of money.

The biggest cause of scattered light in a reflector is not from the aluminum coatings, but from optics with rough or dirty surfaces. I've seen a couple of reflectors with really contrasty, refractor-like images, so I can't believe the coatings are to blame, at least not always. Of course some coatings can be better or worse than others. With freshly cleaned optics, my own 12" newtonian, even with its mediocre optics, produce extremely contrasty views that show myriad subtle contrast features in the lunar Mare. The edge of the Moon snaps from a super bright gray-white to jet black with nothing in between. The crater shadows are ultra black and the bright lunar mountains, even well away from the terminator, show subtle details on their bright peaks. The images look like in my 85mm Zeiss apochromat, just a lot brighter and with much more resolution. Scatter? Not a problem in this scope - when it is clean. If it is not clean, it has plenty of scatter and it doesn't take a lot of dust (or dew!) to scatter a lot of light when observing the Moon.

BTW, I've tested a 6" newtonian with uncoated primary and the image was extremely unimpressive for a 6". It was as dim as that of a 40mm refractor (but extremely sharp at the magnifications typically of a 40mm scope, of course), but it was utterly impossible to use all the resolution of the full aperture, as you ran out of light long before you ran out of resolution.

*

They mention a $40,000 refractor in the ad. For that amount of money, you could get at least a 12" f/15 D&G, if not a 15" f/15, including a huge mount, which would show far more lunar detail than the unaluminized 28" ever can, because of the much brighter images.

And the refractor would of course outperform it even further on targets where light grasp is even more important, such as deep-sky objects.


Clear skies!
Thomas, Denmark

Edited by Astrojensen (04/19/13 03:32 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jonbosley
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 10/19/05

Loc: Texas
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: Astrojensen]
      #5809114 - 04/19/13 05:13 PM

I don't believe a company of Webster caliber would build and market a scope that does not work and they do market it as a lunar not DSO scope.
I guess if some one ever tries one they could enlighten us. They do offer a full coated version even an enhanced coating if you want.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Astrojensen
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/05/08

Loc: Bornholm, Denmark
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: jonbosley]
      #5809237 - 04/19/13 06:30 PM

I did say it was in my opinion!

Of course it does work at 200x - 300x (which maximum is what the seeing will support at most places anyway) but at higher powers it will run out of light, especially in the Mare regions. Just like any other 6" scope...

A lot of observers completely fail to understand that the bright images of the Moon in their scopes is a blessing, not a curse, as it allows their eyes to work at maximum speed and catch details between the seeing ripples. The remedy to avoid eye fatigue and making the brain confused from seeing one very bright image and one dark one, is to use a binoviewer. And turn on the outdoor lights, it also helps tremendously, by hindering your eyes from dark adapting. It is better than any filter.

Even at 150x, I strongly prefer my unfiltered 12" over my 5" refractor, since the very bright images allow me to catch subtle details in the Mare and rilles, by maximizing contrast and minimizing floaters.


Clear skies!
Thomas, Denmark


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
buddyjesus
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/07/10

Loc: Davison, Michigan
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: Astrojensen]
      #5809798 - 04/19/13 11:10 PM

I prefer a moon that doesn't blind me. It actually at 2mm exit pupil is just on the edge of tolerable. My favorite view is 1.2mm exit pupil(with a #8 yellow filter and 83x) to cut down the glare. I see more when able to have my eye at the eyepiece and I see nothing when I have to take frequent brakes due to eye comfort.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rg55
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 08/02/08

Loc: western US
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: Eric63]
      #5809845 - 04/19/13 11:38 PM

Quote:

Now this is where my 127mm Mak shines! Just amazing on the moon.
Eric




For a quick, light grab and go for the Moon, I totally agree.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
larrytOMC200
sage
*****

Reged: 07/05/07

Loc: New Zealand
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: curiosidad]
      #5810049 - 04/20/13 03:59 AM

Hi,
I saw your post and would like to say that 8 years ago I took the plunge and bought an Orion Optics(UK) OMC200,- orion optics makssutov 8 inch F20 scope. I wanted a telescope that was more suited to lunar observing and planetary observing. I have never regretted that decision. When the seeing is good the detail and contrast is superb. I allso use this scope for imaging and it has a good image scale at the prime focus without the need for barlows. Strangely enough, it gives pleasing views of globulars and small planetaries as well. Anyway, I just thought I would let you people know my thloughts on my telescope. Keep well. Larry


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Astrojensen
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/05/08

Loc: Bornholm, Denmark
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: larrytOMC200]
      #5810937 - 04/20/13 01:38 PM

Oohh - an OMC 200! Now there's a scope I've been lusting for, for years. Never been able to afford one.

And that is gives pleasing views of planetaries and globulars is no surprise to me. It should also be killer on small galaxies. I would not hesitate to hunt small galaxies with it.


Clear skies!
Thomas, Denmark


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eric63
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 06/16/12

Loc: Ottawa, Ontario
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: rg55]
      #5812760 - 04/21/13 10:55 AM

Hi Richard

I have seen your images of the moon with the 180 Mak and I am truly blown away. To me, the Mak was designed for the moon . Eventually I see myself upgrading to a larger Mak, but first I was to see how much the seeing here will let me upgrade

Eric


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
la200o
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 09/09/08

Loc: SE Michigan, USA
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: Eric63]
      #5818655 - 04/23/13 09:16 PM

My TV76 on a good night will show plenty and can go up to 60x per inch of aperture if the conditions are right. They rarely are. But I can see plenty with a 3.7mm Ethos at 130x or, with the 4.7E, at 102x. Having said that, if I have time for the slightly slower set up for a 4" (different mount, two trips), I prefer it.

Almost any scope will show satisfying views of the moon, IMO.

Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rg55
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 08/02/08

Loc: western US
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: la200o]
      #5818783 - 04/23/13 10:25 PM Attachment (57 downloads)

Here's some Moon taken through my 5" Mak. NexImage 5 camera.

Edited by rg55 (04/23/13 10:27 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
doug mc
super member
*****

Reged: 03/21/09

Loc: Tamborine Mountain Australia
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: buddyjesus]
      #5818930 - 04/23/13 11:32 PM

One that is well baffeled for stray light. The moon puts out a lot of light into your scope. scattered light ruins the view

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eric63
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 06/16/12

Loc: Ottawa, Ontario
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: rg55]
      #5819727 - 04/24/13 12:47 PM

That's really nice Richard. I'm new at lunar observing and I just love the view in my 127Mak. I often view at 200X and it can easily take 250X. I'm now flocking my 150F5 Newt and can't wait to test it on the moon.

To think that last year I hated when the moon was out since I affected DSO viewing. Now I'm dissapointed when it is NOT out.

Eric


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
PhilCo126
Post Laureate


Reged: 01/14/05

Loc: coastline of Belgium
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: Eric63]
      #5823634 - 04/26/13 06:00 AM

Visual observing Moon & Planets = refractor ( I use a 152 mm achro to observe visually ).

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Nyctophobia, Maryland, USA
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: rg55]
      #5823818 - 04/26/13 08:55 AM

Quote:

Here's some Moon taken through my 5" Mak. NexImage 5 camera.




How did it look when you were actually using your eyes, not the camera?


Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Nyctophobia, Maryland, USA
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: curiosidad]
      #5823835 - 04/26/13 09:03 AM

Quote:

Hello,
It is often said that to observe the moon, almost any telescope goes well.
But, in his opinion there is some model above the rest to be a little better for lunar observation?
From what aperture lunar observation becomes interesting, detailed and serious observation?
greetings




There are levels of lunar detail to suit most any aperture and type of telescope that you point at the Moon. But if you are interested in finer surface detail, you will need larger aperture. Of course, I can see the most detail with my 10" Dob, but I still enjoy taking out the 90mm Mak for grab-n-go views of the Moon.

The only telescope I have which I do not think is a good Moon scope is my ST80. IME, fast refractors, especially small ones, have too much chromatic aberration for enjoyable lunar observing. At least I didn't like it. My 100mm f/9.8 achromat wasn't bad for lunar, but I still prefer reflectors when viewing the Moon. Whether Newt, Mak or SCT, I think they give a cleaner, purer image. Just my preference. I'm sure an APO would be fine for lunar, but I doubt if I'll ever have one of those.

Also, IMO & IME, binoculars do not cut it for Moon viewing. Just not enough magnification for a good look, even in my 25x100 binos.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Nyctophobia, Maryland, USA
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5823867 - 04/26/13 09:25 AM

Pete,

Quote:

I realy considered mirror grinding some months ago. The hundreds of hours involved for the size I wanted and the improbability of success was a total downer. If I were younger with more hours in my day than I have now I'd be compelled. Such as it is tho - I have no such time budget or patience to make a 400 hour flop.





I agree. My time is worth something. I'd rather take my chances with the Chinese Mirror Lottery or buy a mirror special made for me by a skilled craftsman.

But so far my luck with the Chinese Mirror Lottery has been pretty good!

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
pdxmoon
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 06/27/13

Loc: Oregon
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: Sarkikos]
      #5956833 - 07/05/13 10:38 PM

Resurrecting this because I'm in the agony of buying a scope primarily for lunar viewing.

I have to tell you I prefer a refractor; I'm not up to messing with collmenation; if I have to worry about that, the scope will never get used.

I want to keep scope, mount and eyepieces in the 1k range.

I've had the following suggestions:

Vixen ED80s with a Porta II
SkyWatcher 100ED with Porta Mount or a cobbled together heartier mount that sets me back between $400 or $450 (and a bit over budget.)

I'm wondering about this:
Celestron Omni

I'd appreciate your thoughts.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
A6Q6
professor emeritus


Reged: 05/31/11

Loc: Stroudsburg,Pa,U.S.A
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: pdxmoon]
      #5957856 - 07/06/13 04:50 PM

what do you have now? How about a used one. I just got a classic orange tube Celestron 5 that I think is from 1980-83 the optics are unbelievable. I got it at a pawn shop for only $100. Bigger is not always better. Its all about the time you have to setup, location(seeing)and what you have to spend. If you get a good used scope that is easy to set up you will use it more. Down the road you can get something bigger, but a good grab and go is always a great thing to have. The little C5 has become that for me.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
photonovore
Moonatic
*****

Reged: 12/24/04

Loc: tacoma wa
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: pdxmoon]
      #5957865 - 07/06/13 04:54 PM

Depends on how much of a hurry you are in. ~5" is the minimum aperture i'd want.

Hurry: The 120 omni seems a reasonable choice-- altho i know nothing about the optical quality--so i would only buy with return rights (which really goes for any scope--cause you never know...). I'd be sure and add the drives (129$) and an orion accufocuser (60$) as well.. Any aid that eliminates *touching* the scope during use is a big plus--elec focuser + driven mount= zero observing frustration.

If time is your friend:
AR-5 w/ the LXD-75 mount (~300$ota+500$mount). Little color and when unlimited by seeing the resolution you will get is simply extraordinary. The mount is much better then the Omni's too of course. But, downside, you'd have to wait, stalk the classifieds and spend a couple hundred extra for this option.

Either way, you'll need a diagonal: GSO/Owl dielectric 2" diagonal w/ 1.25 adapter is a good choice (~100$)-- but with just the Moon a good 90% reflectivity diagonal (GSO) will do just fine (~70$). And a good 2x ED barlow will keep ep costs down. EP's are easy to overspend on. My favs are unobtainium these days (Apogee orthos) but I can say this: "ortho" (or expensive) doesn't necessarily mean "good"--I have gotten *better* resolution from cheap GSO plossls (Owl Astronomy) than from UO orthos for example. Speaking of Owl, they currently carry the Parks line (Lumicon) which, if *i* was shopping ep's, i'd take a hard look at. He might make you a deal if you get a package of a barlow, a couple of parks silver line ep's (100$) and a diagonal. Limit minimum focal lengths based upon the 50x/inch rule. A good ~10mm and ~17mm is about all you'd need with either scope (1000-1200mm) to get started along with a decent ED barlow. If you really get into this you'll want a binoviewer down the road.

The Moon is, optically, a very pedestrian (undemanding) target. All you need to enjoy it is good narrow/mid field monochromatic resolution and this can be had without resorting to pricey optical exotica. A 1K budget, wisely spent, should set you up very nicely.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
pdxmoon
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 06/27/13

Loc: Oregon
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: photonovore]
      #5958854 - 07/07/13 12:30 PM

A6Q6, I have a Celestron Firstscope 80EQ. It's been a good scope, but I'm about to lose it to my son, so I'll be without. I'd like to stick with a refractor.

I've been thinking about moving up to a Skywatcher 100ED, or the 80ED, or the Vixen 80ED. If I could find any of these used, I'd probably go for it.

I want it almost exclusively for the moon. I'm also not opposed to another 80mm f/11. I can deal with the small amount of CA I may get.

Edited by barnum54 (07/07/13 12:31 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
azure1961p
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/17/09

Loc: USA
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: pdxmoon]
      #5959167 - 07/07/13 03:46 PM

The refractor forum would offer excellent advice Barnum!

Pete


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
pdxmoon
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 06/27/13

Loc: Oregon
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5959170 - 07/07/13 03:50 PM

Thank you--the refractor forum has given me good counsel!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
coopman
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/23/06

Loc: South Louisiana
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: pdxmoon]
      #5971085 - 07/14/13 07:47 PM

Back when I had my C8, it gave me some great views when it was cooled down & the atmosphere cooperated properly. Like Thomas said above, aperture is very important so that you can pump up the power w/o the image getting too dim due to the exit pupil issues. Contrast is the best with a refractor, but the small aperture limits how much power you can use effectively. More aperture = better resolution too. The moon usually looks impressive with any decent scope, but if you really want to get good, detailed close-up views at 300X or higher, I recommend at least 8" of aperture.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Da Bear
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 11/21/06

Loc: Kali-Forn-Ya
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: coopman]
      #5976099 - 07/17/13 02:17 PM Attachment (19 downloads)

My 8" f/8 Cave reflector is a great moon scope, and I can use a 4mm ep on nights with great seeing.

Da Bear


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
russell23
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/31/09

Loc: Upstate NY
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: buddyjesus]
      #5980135 - 07/19/13 04:41 PM

Quote:

I prefer a moon that doesn't blind me. It actually at 2mm exit pupil is just on the edge of tolerable. My favorite view is 1.2mm exit pupil(with a #8 yellow filter and 83x) to cut down the glare. I see more when able to have my eye at the eyepiece and I see nothing when I have to take frequent brakes due to eye comfort.




I have a similar preference. I use a 107mm aperture mask with my 140mm refractor and enjoy the views the best at 100-120x.

Dave


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Dave MitskyModerator
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 04/08/02

Loc: PA, USA, Planet Earth
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: russell23]
      #5982116 - 07/20/13 10:15 PM

Over the years, I've observed the Moon through many dozens of different telescopes of varying designs and apertures. One of the scopes that I've used quite often is a 17" f/15 classical Cassegrain reflector, usually at magnifications ranging from 162 to 324x. I feel no need to use filters at smaller exit pupils. Occasionally, I'll use the old trick of turning on a white light.

Dave Mitsky


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Javier1978
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 02/12/09

Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: Dave Mitsky]
      #5983792 - 07/21/13 11:03 PM

I became a really enthusiastic lunar observer in the last year. I have a Syntha 8" f6 dob an itīs a terrific performer. A couple of nights ago I saw the Alpine Valley Rille at 270x for the first time, impressive experience. Catena Davy also looked terrific.

With a 1" thick mirror, I think itīs a really powerful "semi" grab an go.

Edited by Javier1978 (07/21/13 11:15 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
pdxmoon
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 06/27/13

Loc: Oregon
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: Javier1978]
      #5983832 - 07/21/13 11:21 PM

Since I first wrote my first post in this thread, I've observed the moon through several scopes:

The Celestron 80ED has given me wonderful views, with 200x bright and clear, about all I can push it to with good seeing.

The Cometron 60mm has also been lovely at low power; crisp, clean, helped me learn the basic selenology of the lunar surface.

A 70mm Celestron short scope that I got at a garage sale gave me some very good grab and go views--a 10mm barlowed at 2x was sharp and bright.

And finally, a new to me late 60s Tasco gave me a very acrobatic (I had to lay on the ground, haha) view of the moon last night. But there was magic looking through that ep and that small FOV and seeing THE MOON there.

At a star party last night, I looked through 8" dobs, a 13?" dob, a Vixen 100mm Mak, the Orion 90 Mak, a few gigantic maks with complex computers, 102 4" achro, and even a reflector or two. And I came away with this overwhelming feeling that just about every scope will do service as a moon scope. They all have their special properties, and one may have a two speed focus pull and one more aperture, but I no longer worry that I don't have enough scope for the moon.

Thank goodness there is one celestial object where just about anybody, at any entry price point, can have the joy of exploration!No matter how you observe it, with whatever instrument you use, the moon is always more than just a faint dot in a black field. Lady Luna always puts on a show.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cpsTN
Carpal Tunnel
****

Reged: 04/26/07

Loc: Rutherford Co, TN
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: curiosidad]
      #5992645 - 07/27/13 09:33 AM

I commonly use my 12" f/5 dob (FL 1520mm) on the Moon at 243x (12.5x and 2x barlow). Great detail and smooth-ish surface.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ed_turco
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 08/29/09

Loc: Lincoln, RI
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #6000033 - 07/31/13 01:16 PM

It does NOT take 400 hours to work that size mirror. What mfg told you this?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
67champ
professor emeritus


Reged: 07/03/06

Loc: Ohio, USA
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: ed_turco]
      #6001868 - 08/01/13 06:35 PM

Eric,

I also have a 127mm Mak-cass and I love it. However, for about 3 weeks I had a 180mm Mak-cass, and it was noticably better! One day I would like to get another 180mm mak or bigger again. Probably need a focal reducer with them though.....

dana t


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TomCorbett
sage


Reged: 07/08/13

Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: Da Bear]
      #6009553 - 08/06/13 02:04 PM

Nice scope . . . nice retriever.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
pdxmoon
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 06/27/13

Loc: Oregon
Re: There is the telescope "perfect" for the Moon? new [Re: TomCorbett]
      #6033323 - 08/18/13 06:00 PM Attachment (11 downloads)

Well, I'd like to nominate a scope for darn near perfect grab and go for the moon:

The AT72ED

Great views!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
0 registered and 3 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Dave Mitsky, star drop, Starman81 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 4253

Jump to

CN Forums Home




Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics