Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Eyepieces

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | (show all)
RodgerHouTex
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 06/02/09

Loc: Houston, Texas, USA
Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs
      #5817237 - 04/23/13 11:22 AM

Before I start let me state that everything I say below is my opinion, so don't beat me up. I'm entitled to it.

Because of all the glowing reviews on CN I decided to buy the Leica. Things like "...as good as my ZAOs." and "I sold my ZAOs because the Leica was that good". etc., etc.

Well I received mine yesterday and tried it out in my 8se. Now the OTA is optically near perfect. Intra and extra focal star images are identical and show no surface roughness. It really is an awesome scope. So anyway, I let the OTA cool and then started swapping the Leica and my 9mm and 18mm BGOs.

The conclusion, after comparing back and forth on the moon and Jupiter - while the Leica is sharp, bright, and very contrasty (is that a word?), it did not show me anything that the BGOs didn't. I used Plato and Fentenelle on the lunar surface. I spent a lot of time looking for features that were just at the limit of detection. I then swapped out the eyepiece and viola it was also there.

Leica advantages:

1.Wider Field of View
2.Ability to Zoom

Leica disadvantages:

1.Horrendously expensive (10X the price with Starlight adapter of a BGO).
2.Large and heavy

I think I have finally convinced myself that uber expensive eyepieces are, for me, not worth spending that kind of money. Now whenever I get the urge, I'll just take out the Leica and convince myself again.

As always ymmv,


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
howard929
Member
*****

Reged: 01/02/11

Loc: Low End of High Ground
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: RodgerHouTex]
      #5817316 - 04/23/13 12:05 PM

Very interesting. Thank you for sharing.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
johnnyha
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 11/12/06

Loc: Sherman Oaks, CA
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: howard929]
      #5817332 - 04/23/13 12:14 PM

I respect your opinion Rodger. BUT - my opinion - Give it some more time. First of all, this is not a fair comparison, try it again on an excellent night of seeing with your FS152. A typical commercial 8" SCT, imho, has too much diffraction from the large central obstruction to make critical comparisons between quality eyepieces. The usual line on these scopes is "any eyepiece will look good in an SCT doesn't matter what you get" etc. Give the Leica another shot, I definitely see what the fuss is about when using it in excellent seeing with my FS152.

Perhaps it's not for you Rodger but, I suggest you try it again with a different scope on some great nights, don't judge it from one night with an SCT...

All that being said, I don't see anything at all negative with a wide angle zoom keeping up with a BGO ortho, an excellent eyepiece - that is HUGE + imho. Remarkable, in fact. Plus it does not seem like you took the time to explore the advantages of the ZOOM, buddy! It annihilates a single focal length BGO in that sense.

Good luck, again I obviously trust your opinion - but I too have made snap judgements based on a single night's viewing, but later grew to love certain eyepieces. The Leica ASPH is one I have definitely grown to love and respect and I hope you do too.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dyslexic nam
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/28/08

Loc: PEI, Canada
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: johnnyha]
      #5817405 - 04/23/13 12:56 PM

Quote:

All that being said, I don't see what is wrong with a wide angle zoom keeping up with a BGO ortho, an excellent eyepiece - that is HUGE + imho.




I think this is more in line with what I would expect from the Leica. To me, the fact that it is visually equal to very high quality modern orthos while being wider, zoom-able, and more comfortable (even at the shorter f'l's where ortho's can get pretty tight) is a pretty amazing achievement.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BillP
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 11/26/06

Loc: Vienna, VA
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: RodgerHouTex]
      #5817455 - 04/23/13 01:14 PM

Definitely give the comparison a shot in other scope designs. Eyepieces compare differently in different scopes and different apertures. The amount of scatter the scope produces I have found to also be quite critical to outcomes, particularly for planetary details. Mirrored optics typically produce more scatter (and way more if you don't clean Dob mirrors often) than refractors. My experience has been that easy to gleen differences between eyepieces in my refractors, much more difficult if not impossible in my mirrored scopes, especially the SCT.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SteveG
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 09/27/06

Loc: Seattle, WA
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: BillP]
      #5817485 - 04/23/13 01:27 PM

Thanks for the brief review. I think it says a lot that the Leica can match the performance of the ortho's, with a wider field (and zoom).

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Smithfr2000
member


Reged: 09/12/09

Loc: Nantes - France
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: SteveG]
      #5817535 - 04/23/13 01:49 PM

I compared my new leica (barlowed) with a BGO6 last week end with my 20" Dobson : Spend a lot of time on the moon.
Compared also to Nag5 and Ethos 8/13.

Tone was colder in the Leica, BGO and Ethos than nag5.
I did not find any detail not seen in any EP, but image was more pleasant in Leica/Ethos. The BGO suffer the lack of field, the nag a slightly yellowish tone and a a little less sharp.
Almost no CA on the moon border in any

All were very close ;
seeing was 2.5/5.

Edited by Smithfr2000 (04/23/13 01:51 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RodgerHouTex
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 06/02/09

Loc: Houston, Texas, USA
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: johnnyha]
      #5817650 - 04/23/13 02:21 PM

I will give it some time. And I do recognize that the BGOs are really excellent eyepieces. That's why I used them for the comparison.

One of the problems I have with my refractors is that the Zeiss diascope, which is another excellent spotting scope eyepiece with the adapter, won't come to focus. Not enough "in" travel. That's why I choose the 8se. It has plenty of back focus.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starman1
Vendor (EyepiecesEtc.com)
*****

Reged: 06/24/03

Loc: Los Angeles
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: RodgerHouTex]
      #5817700 - 04/23/13 02:44 PM

Rodger,
Well, that's not an unexpected finding. Most high quality optics produce good images. Despite the posts here on the Eyepieces Forum, the differences in eyepieces pale in comparison to the differences between scopes.
However, look at it another way:
--you gained quite a bit of FOV--up to 4X the area of field.
--you didn't lose any sharpness over a simple design with a small number of lenses. You gained an ultrawidefield with the image quality of a narrowfield.
--you gained a whole lot of focal lengths. Even if you just count even millimeter lengths, the zoom is the equivalent of 9 to 10 eyepieces. If you count the half millimeter focal lengths (more critical toward the upper end of the range), you have the equivalent of even more eyepieces.
--on your SCT, one low-power widest-field, eyepiece and this Zoom, and you have the equivalent of a whole set of widefields. Talk about simplicity!
--if you bought a set of ultrawides of equal optical quality as separates, you would have spent well over $3K and possibly over $5K. That makes the Leica Zoom a veritable bargain in comparison.
--it can fill in the niche for both lunar/planetary eyepieces AND excellent, high-end, DSO eyepieces. There are other wide field eyepieces that can do that--at $400-$600+ each.
--You never have to struggle with "this eyepiece has too high a magnification and seeing compromises the view, but my next eyepiece down has too low a magnification. I need one in between." Now you have the in-between eyepiece. You can ALWAYS find the exact correct magnification for that object and seeing conditions.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
t.r.
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 02/14/08

Loc: Upstate NY
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: Starman1]
      #5817715 - 04/23/13 02:51 PM

Quote:

You never have to struggle with "this eyepiece has too high a magnification and seeing compromises the view, but my next eyepiece down has too low a magnification. I need one in between." Now you have the in-between eyepiece. You can ALWAYS find the exact correct magnification for that object and seeing conditions.




That right there, may be the single most important reason to own a zoom eyepiece.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
andydj5xp
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 05/27/04

Loc: 52.269 N/10.571 E
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: Starman1]
      #5817913 - 04/23/13 04:28 PM

Quote:

--if you bought a set of ultrawides of equal optical quality as separates, you would have spent well over $3K and possibly over $5K. That makes the Leica Zoom a veritable bargain in comparison.
--it can fill in the niche for both lunar/planetary eyepieces AND excellent, high-end, DSO eyepieces. There are other wide field eyepieces that can do that--at $400-$600+ each.
--You never have to struggle with "this eyepiece has too high a magnification and seeing compromises the view, but my next eyepiece down has too low a magnification. I need one in between." Now you have the in-between eyepiece. You can ALWAYS find the exact correct magnification for that object and seeing conditions.




You have nailed it: my experience since 2009 when the Leica ASPH zoom entered the astro scene.

Andreas


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ibase
Vendor Affiliate
*****

Reged: 03/20/08

Loc: Manila, Philippines 121*E 14*N
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: RodgerHouTex]
      #5818482 - 04/23/13 07:25 PM

Thanks, very nice honest comparison. The notion that the 8" SCT will not benefit from premium quality eyepieces is off - I can readily see the difference between a mediocre EP and a good one on it. Don't underestimate the 8" SCT, it is a most capable scope, a jack-of-all-trades, ranking around the top on scope type/size sold. Just my 2 cents.

Best,


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mgwhittle
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 08/24/11

Loc: Chattanooga, TN
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: ibase]
      #5818552 - 04/23/13 08:03 PM

I don't think Bill meant that you can't tell a difference between a mediocre eyepiece and a good one on an SCT. My take is that is easy on any telescope. But when you are comparing a BGO and a Leica, the differences are more subtle and require a telescope with a high performance objective to wrangle out the differences between two high quality eyepieces.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ibase
Vendor Affiliate
*****

Reged: 03/20/08

Loc: Manila, Philippines 121*E 14*N
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: mgwhittle]
      #5818568 - 04/23/13 08:11 PM

Sorry, wasn't responding to anyone in particular, just that notion that the 8 SCT can't benefit from premium EP's that's been circulating around in general.

Best,


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GeneT
Ely Kid
*****

Reged: 11/07/08

Loc: South Texas
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: RodgerHouTex]
      #5818659 - 04/23/13 09:20 PM

I recommend giving it some more time. Your Leica Zoom is one of the best eyepieces out there.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ManuelJ
professor emeritus


Reged: 12/19/05

Loc: Madrid, Spain
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: RodgerHouTex]
      #5819093 - 04/24/13 03:07 AM

Quote:

Things like "...as good as my ZAOs." and "I sold my ZAOs because the Leica was that good". etc., etc.




Don't trust everything you read, obviously a Leica Zoom is not as good/better than a ZAO. Not everyone has the ability to tell the difference, does not have good enough skies, or who knows what.

But man, if you believe that the Leica is up to the BGO, you've a great eyepiece there!. Remember it's a wide angle multi element zoom!.

Regards,
Manuel.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
howard929
Member
*****

Reged: 01/02/11

Loc: Low End of High Ground
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: BillP]
      #5819242 - 04/24/13 07:28 AM

Quote:

Definitely give the comparison a shot in other scope designs. Eyepieces compare differently in different scopes and different apertures. The amount of scatter the scope produces I have found to also be quite critical to outcomes, particularly for planetary details. Mirrored optics typically produce more scatter (and way more if you don't clean Dob mirrors often) than refractors. My experience has been that easy to gleen differences between eyepieces in my refractors, much more difficult if not impossible in my mirrored scopes, especially the SCT.




Thanks for that Bill. With the 2 poor mans telescopes I have and will never venture out from them it's a good reason WHY the stinking ES 82's I have seem so excellent and will never need upgrading.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
t.r.
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 02/14/08

Loc: Upstate NY
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: howard929]
      #5819458 - 04/24/13 10:34 AM

I don't think that the Leica is touted as a replacement for other eyepieces...but it is a DARN good compliment to the smaller glass offerings!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs new [Re: RodgerHouTex]
      #5819486 - 04/24/13 10:47 AM

Thanks for your report. I've been mulling over the purchase of a Lecia ASPH for at least two years now and still haven't pulled the trigger. I think I'll continue to mull.


Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
Re: Leica Asph Zoom No Better Than BGOs [Re: t.r.]
      #5819494 - 04/24/13 10:52 AM

t.r.,

Quote:

I don't think that the Leica is touted as a replacement for other eyepieces...but it is a DARN good compliment to the smaller glass offerings!




Well, at least in a sense it is a replacement. I've read many threads where a purchaser of the Leica sold such and such eyepieces in order to afford the Leica. That strongly implies that the Leica is indeed a replacement for those eyepieces.

In fact, if I were to buy a Leica ASPH, it better be as a replacement for other eyepieces! I'm not paying $950 for an eyepiece that is merely a compliment. Not happenin'. No way.


Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | (show all)


Extra information
16 registered and 36 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  ausastronomer, Scott in NC, iceblaze 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 5558

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics