Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Eyepieces

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
azure1961p
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/17/09

Loc: USA
28mm RKE junk now or still good?
      #5819277 - 04/24/13 08:16 AM

The 28mm RKE has been touted often as a great eyepiece but some say it used to be but now its plagued with quality control issues. Wouldnt something like a 32mm TV Plossl outdo it , albeit at less magnification, or is the 28mm RKE better still?

Thanks in advance!

Pete


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MRNUTTY
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/22/11

Loc: Mendon, MA
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5819284 - 04/24/13 08:27 AM

I bought a set of RKE's and the Erfle, except the 28mm, new from Edmund Optics less than a year ago. There were no quality issues with the EP's I bought. my pair of 28's came from surplusshed. I don't believe if I had also purchased the 28's new there would have been any difference across the product line. The major glee factor comes from the floaty-effect of the 28, other than that, it's a competent EP in all respects.

I also bought the Edmund Scientific 8mm Plossl, which was of equal fit and finish.

Edited by MRNUTTY (04/24/13 08:28 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FirstSight
Duke of Deneb
*****

Reged: 12/26/05

Loc: Raleigh, NC
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: MRNUTTY]
      #5819318 - 04/24/13 09:01 AM

Quote:

The major glee factor comes from the floaty-effect of the 28, other than that, it's a competent EP in all respects.




I thought the "floaty" effect of the 28 RKE was considered a prime feature, rather than a bug, by that EPs aficionados. I myself find it a fun feature when I've looked through a fellow club member's 28 RKE, though not quite enough of a thrill to want to own one myself.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
hottr6
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/28/09

Loc: 7,500', Magdalena Mtns, NM
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: FirstSight]
      #5819343 - 04/24/13 09:22 AM

+1. I consider the 28RKE a specialty EP, in the "fun" category. I've not found a serious application for them.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jeff B
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 12/30/06

Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: hottr6]
      #5819434 - 04/24/13 10:18 AM

Quote:

+1. I consider the 28RKE a specialty EP, in the "fun" category. I've not found a serious application for them.




Other than serious fun.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DNTash
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 09/02/07

Loc: GMT+2
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5819747 - 04/24/13 12:59 PM

Quote:

The 28mm RKE has been touted often as a great eyepiece but some say it used to be but now its plagued with quality control issues. Wouldnt something like a 32mm TV Plossl outdo it , albeit at less magnification, or is the 28mm RKE better still?

Thanks in advance!

Pete




I'll be able to test those two in another day or two, clouds pending. Have the 32. The 28 is on it's way.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starman81
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 03/06/08

Loc: Metro Detroit, MI, USA
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: DNTash]
      #5819860 - 04/24/13 01:54 PM

Quote:

Quote:

+1. I consider the 28RKE a specialty EP, in the "fun" category. I've not found a serious application for them.




Other than serious fun.






On a more serious note, I bought the RKE 28 brand new last year from Edmund Optics and there is no issue whatsoever with the quality. I think there were small number of SurplusShed units that had jagged field stops or other minor blemishes.

The TV 32 Plossl is perhaps the nicest ~30-32 Plossl out there (has anyone compared it to the Sterling Plossl 30mm?). The RKE 28 is what it is and it's main draw is the really cool floaty effect. I think most people look past the aberrations at the edge because the novelty of the effect trumps all other considerations. So if you want a more 'clinical view' the TV 32 might win out but the RKE is more novel.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rdandrea
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/13/10

Loc: Colorado, USA DM59ra
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5819920 - 04/24/13 02:26 PM

I bought one of the 28mm RKEs from Surplus Shed and it's fine. No quality issues. I bought mine early--maybe by the end of the sale the bottom of the barrel wasn't so good.

Now on to the nitty-gritty. Between the RKE and my old Meade RG 28mm Ortho, two eyepieces of the same focal length and similar vintage, I prefer the Ortho, although the RKE is no slouch. Both have a little too much eye relief for me, however. Some see a "floaty" effect; I suppose that's true with careful eye placement. Mainly what I see, though, is blackouts and kidney-beaning like you get with any other "too much eye relief" eyepiece.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
John Kuraoka
sage
*****

Reged: 12/12/12

Loc: Sunny San Diego, CA
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: Starman81]
      #5819938 - 04/24/13 02:37 PM

I have a fairly small eyepiece toolkit, and the 28mm RKE is one I bought out of sheer nostalgia. That said, I have found it to be a very useful eyepiece on open star clusters that need just a bit more magnification than my 35mm, and for giving a bit more context to other objects than my 25mm. It is superb Barlowed, giving me a useful and punchy 14mm. The floating-image effect is just an amusing ancillary feature, albeit one I never tire of.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MRNUTTY
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/22/11

Loc: Mendon, MA
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: John Kuraoka]
      #5820079 - 04/24/13 03:42 PM

I especially like the RKE 28 as a terrestrial piece in my C6-SCT since it's so easy to position your eye. My mom likes it too! For the same reason I got two (good ones) for my bino-viewer. They're good pieces i can use with the whole family.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Messyone
professor emeritus


Reged: 05/02/12

Loc: Down Under
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: MRNUTTY]
      #5820697 - 04/24/13 07:51 PM

Just bought a pair of RKE 28's from Edmund Optics a couple of weeks back, no issues here with quality. Got them as a replacement for a pair of Vixen 30 NPL's but will keep both pairs. The RKE's are going to take a bit of getting used to, as has been said in other threads they are in a class all there own.
Matt


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mak17
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 02/08/11

Loc: Central Florida
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: Messyone]
      #5822324 - 04/25/13 02:35 PM

Good compared to kellners and ramsden eyepieces. Not good if you're used to Naglers and ES 82s.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
fishuntime53
journeyman
*****

Reged: 09/14/12

Loc: Missouri
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: Messyone]
      #5822326 - 04/25/13 02:35 PM

My deep loyalty to Edmund (going back to the days I ground my 8" mirror in 1970) has kept me from expressing what I'm about to post. I returned to this hobby last year with a C11 and I'm loving it. I ordered the Edmund 28mm RKE and 32mm RKE/Erfle. Imagine my surprise to find that the filter threads on the 28mm were sub-standard, so I returned the eyepiece. In discussing the return with Edmund's Customer Service, they asked me why I would use filters with eyepieces. The 'technical' rep did not have the slightest familiarity with astronomy. Filters?
I moved on and bought an excellent 'older' 28mm from another source. I am truly saddened to see the decline in Edmund's expertise. Quality Control can only inspect what they are aware of, I suppose...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Isaacs
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/16/04

Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: mak17]
      #5822359 - 04/25/13 02:55 PM

Quote:

Good compared to kellners and ramsden eyepieces. Not good if you're used to Naglers and ES 82s.




A while back I bought a Parks/Carton 60mm F/7 refractor, it was built in around 1990 and the one eyepiece that came with it was a 28mm Kellner that seems to have many of the same characteristics as the 28mm RKE, both had the same 23.3mm field stop and a image that seems to be as large as the barrel.

Vintage eyepieces, the one on the left...

It's not a 31mm Nagler but it doesn't weigh 2 lbs. What was nice about that eyepiece is that it while it had a rather narrow AFoV, the AFoV just seemed much larger, I call such views, "The Big Easy View."

Jon


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5822459 - 04/25/13 03:56 PM

"Wouldnt something like a 32mm TV Plossl outdo it , albeit at less magnification, or is the 28mm RKE better still?"

Yes. The 32mm Televue Plossl is a better eyepiece than the 28mm RKE. I've had multiple iterations of each, and the Televue does a MUCH better job curbing haloing and reflections. What the Televue is missing, though, is the illusion that the image is floating atop the eye lens. IMO that's the main reason to own a 28mm RKE; a "parlor trick".

Regards,

Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mak17
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 02/08/11

Loc: Central Florida
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5822491 - 04/25/13 04:14 PM

That kellner looks nice. I wasn't trying to bash kellners just saying if you're used to wide fields that are well corrected you may be disappointed. I had a Meade DS90 with a .965 visual back and awful eyepieces as a first scope. The eyepieces had little pinholes with maybe a 40 degree field and maybe 10mm ER. I thought them great bc I had nothing to compare them to. When I got some 1.25 inch starter plossls i thought them amazing. After using nothing but Naglers and the like for the past year I now know better.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bcuddihee
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/04/06

Loc: Cincinnati Ohio
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5822501 - 04/25/13 04:22 PM

"parlor trick" ...I think that trivializes the effect and pleasure this eyepiece can give a viewer. After all one could say that a 100 degree ep is only a parlor trick, one trick pony etc.. ep as well. I would label this ep's visual nuance a a "more immersive view", perhaps even describe it as having the "majesty factor"...oops i think I've heard that one somewhere before. All in all I've never had quality issues with this ep and I've had several. It's a serious observers ep and delivers superb views.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ckwastro
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 11/23/05

Loc: Tempe, AZ
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5822662 - 04/25/13 05:23 PM

Quote:

The 28mm RKE has been touted often as a great eyepiece but some say it used to be but now its plagued with quality control issues.




I got a set for my binoviewer about 14 months ago direct from Edmunds........they are now my favorites for lunar & planetary observing in my Mewlon. No QC issues at all. In fact I grabbed the 21s and 15s as well and those were excellent as well. I'm looking to fill out the rest of the sets soon.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Isaacs
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/16/04

Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: mak17]
      #5822717 - 04/25/13 05:57 PM

Quote:

That kellner looks nice. I wasn't trying to bash kellners just saying if you're used to wide fields that are well corrected you may be disappointed. I had a Meade DS90 with a .965 visual back and awful eyepieces as a first scope. The eyepieces had little pinholes with maybe a 40 degree field and maybe 10mm ER. I thought them great bc I had nothing to compare them to. When I got some 1.25 inch starter plossls i thought them amazing. After using nothing but Naglers and the like for the past year I now know better.




I have a set of Naglers plus a fair number of other eyepieces. I appreciate the Naglers, particularly in a fast Newtonian fitted with a Paracorr or fast refractor. I consider them my first string eyepieces for most uses.

But other eyepieces have their own virtues and I appreciate a good Kellner, particularly in a slower scope. The RKEs are quite far removed from those 0.965" eyepieces that you got with that Meade DS-90, they are reasonably well made, they have sufficient eye relief and the 28mm, while it doesn't have a Nagler like AFoV, it does have a field stop large enough to allow for 47 degree or so AFoV.

I think it would be a nice eyepiece in your Meade 310. At F/11, it will be quite sharp across the field of view and you won't be giving up too much field of view to a 32mm Plossl or 24mm WF.

Jon

Edited by Jon Isaacs (04/25/13 06:00 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mak17
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 02/08/11

Loc: Central Florida
Re: 28mm RKE junk now or still good? new [Re: Jon Isaacs]
      #5822870 - 04/25/13 07:21 PM

Jon

What virtue do you appreciate most with the more primitive kellner design in a slow scope?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
28 registered and 23 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  ausastronomer, droid, Scott in NC 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 2163

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics