Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Cats & Casses

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | (show all)
Phil Hosey
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/29/08

Loc: LaGrange, GA
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: jrcrilly]
      #5827094 - 04/27/13 07:19 PM

There are a number of cameras that have come out recently that have small pixels that will get you around 1.5"/pixel and many of these are even shaped with Hyperstar in mind. There is also the filter drawer system that can be used to swap out filters making monochrome imaging with Hyperstar much more doable. I am plannig at some point to get one of the new the mono cameras with the Sony 674 or 694 chips so I can do some narrowband with the Hyperstar. Until then I'll continue to use my T2i which gives me 1.58"/pixel

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
wolfman_4_ever
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 07/15/11

Loc: El Segundo, Ca, So. Cal
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: Phil Hosey]
      #5827200 - 04/27/13 07:51 PM

Hi Phil and others.

I have the starizona filter drawer for hyperstar and the 694. The SX 894 would give you a pixel size of 1.36 The 694 is 1.67. I have never used the hyperstar or filter drawer.. lol. My 127is gives me a FOV about the same when using said h694.. aperture/speed would be the difference.... guess i'll have to do an experiment one of these days..

OSC only in hyperstar is no longer your only option.

USB wireless/bluetooth 3.0, etc dongles and sticks are becoming more widespread and faster.. Soon you'll only have that darn power wire hanging down..

Can I get some longer distance wireless power please


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
frolinmod
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 08/06/10

Loc: Southern California
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: wolfman_4_ever]
      #5827306 - 04/27/13 08:46 PM

We only need to transmit that power from the edge of the OTA to the camera hanging off the Hyperstar lens. Perhaps 12 inches. If only!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mmalik
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/13/12

Loc: USA
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: Phil Hosey]
      #5827320 - 04/27/13 08:56 PM

Quote:

It seems to me the issue Jared is talking about is in regard to image scale only.




For a given sensor image scale would translate into resolution one is going to get. With the same aperture say C8 one is going to get less resolution with HyperStar (being wide FOV) than without HyperStar (being narrow FOV) using the same sensor. Regards


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mmalik
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/13/12

Loc: USA
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: Starhawk]
      #5827340 - 04/27/13 09:12 PM

Quote:

I'm not sure this was a subtle insight any of us had missed and needed to have explained.




Not at all Rich; was not implying that. What I have been implying, Jared I think has taken it a step further in explaining pros and cons of the HyperStar system even more eloquently. Regards

Edited by mmalik (04/27/13 09:19 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Phil Hosey
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/29/08

Loc: LaGrange, GA
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: mmalik]
      #5827361 - 04/27/13 09:34 PM

Quote:

Quote:

It seems to me the issue Jared is talking about is in regard to image scale only.




For a given sensor image scale would translate into resolution one is going to get. With the same aperture say C8 one is going to get less resolution with HyperStar (being wide FOV) than without HyperStar (being narrow FOV) using the same sensor. Regards




Yes, I know that, but you seem to imply that there is something wrong with Hyperstar being fast other than the affect it has on the focal length. Unless that is what you meant all along in which case it is obvious. But a Hyperstar C11 at 560mm is basically the same as an NP101 (540mm) as far as image scale with the same sensor, but the Hyperstar is faster.

I guess I still don't quite understand the point you are trying to make. If all you are saying is that because the focal length of an f/2 Hyperstar system is short compared to a C8 at f/10 or f/7, then yes, this is purely a function of image scale and image scale affects resolution, but being 560mm is nothing unique to Hyperstar, there are plenty of other optical configurations that would put one in that focal length range.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mmalik
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/13/12

Loc: USA
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: Phil Hosey]
      #5827399 - 04/27/13 10:11 PM

Quote:

I guess I still don't quite understand the point you are trying to make.




Besides my main reservation HyperStar being on obstructed SCT/'not so solidly put together platform', I guess another way of looking at it would be one taking casual, less resolved pics in lesser amount of time on HyperStar than one taking sophisticated, more resolved pics in bit more time on unobstructed refractors. Regards


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrcrillyAdministrator
Refractor wienie no more
*****

Reged: 04/30/03

Loc: NE Ohio
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: mmalik]
      #5827417 - 04/27/13 10:21 PM

Quote:

Besides my main reservation HyperStar being on obstructed SCT/'not so solidly put together platform', I guess another way of looking at it would be one taking casual, less resolved pics in lesser amount of time on HyperStar than one taking sophisticated, more resolved pics in bit more time on unobstructed refractors. Regards




So you don't approve of the Riccardi-Honders or Epsilon either? I've never heard them relegated to casual use before.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
milby
super member
*****

Reged: 03/11/12

Loc: Indiana, USA
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: jrcrilly]
      #5827489 - 04/27/13 11:24 PM

Five pages of facts and theory demonstrating the ingenuity and facility of the HS platform and refuting the unfounded biases of the original poster. And it turns out he just doesn't like it because it's "casual."

To quote the 21st Century philosopher Katt Williams, "Haters gonna hate. It's what they do."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: milby]
      #5827689 - 04/28/13 02:26 AM

Milby, I think you've got it. It's pretty clear the arc in tech development favors this system. And that annoys some people for specific reasons they don't want to voice. So, here we are with a thread with the final complaint boiling down to, "I just don't like it."

Sounds like the time has come to wrap it up if you ask me.

-Rich


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Phil Hosey
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/29/08

Loc: LaGrange, GA
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? [Re: milby]
      #5827721 - 04/28/13 03:08 AM

Quote:

Five pages of facts and theory demonstrating the ingenuity and facility of the HS platform and refuting the unfounded biases of the original poster. And it turns out he just doesn't like it because it's "casual."

To quote the 21st Century philosopher Katt Williams, "Haters gonna hate. It's what they do."




Just for the record, I'm the original poster. I like SCTs and I like Hyperstar. Oh yea, and sometimes I like to be casual. I don't have any unfounded biases for or against it. Oh wait, maybe I do.. I just like it. I think you may be referring to the one who prompted me to start this thread in the first place.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mmalik
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/13/12

Loc: USA
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: Phil Hosey]
      #5827754 - 04/28/13 04:41 AM

This has been a great discussion I think; I am sure there is lot for everyone to take away from this. I surely feel more informed than before about HyperStar and it's capabilities. Thanks to all who contributed, especially Phil for starting the discussion. Regards

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
telfish
sage
*****

Reged: 11/17/10

Loc: Adirondack Mountains NY
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: mmalik]
      #5827902 - 04/28/13 08:53 AM

I love my Hyperstar "crude" or not.

The End.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
milby
super member
*****

Reged: 03/11/12

Loc: Indiana, USA
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: telfish]
      #5827947 - 04/28/13 09:24 AM

Sorry, Phil. I was, indeed, referring to the author of the "casual" comment.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: milby]
      #5828044 - 04/28/13 10:40 AM

Seriously Mike, with a rig at the level you're using, you should just get a hyperstar SCT and play with it then draw your own conclusions.

What's completely missing from this discussion is what it's like to use hyperstar in practice. You go out, get aligned, and then swap the secondary for hyperstar and hook up the camera. After that, the biggest problem is coming up with more objects to photograph and choosing camera orientations for the image capture. I

t's just a radically different experience from setting up an autoguider and spending several nights working on just one object.

-Rich


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
milby
super member
*****

Reged: 03/11/12

Loc: Indiana, USA
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: Starhawk]
      #5828103 - 04/28/13 11:09 AM

It's also possible to align using the Hyperstar.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: milby]
      #5828213 - 04/28/13 12:08 PM

This is true. Especially in the case of a permanent mount, there's little reason to be setting up and taking down a hyperstar system. Come to think of it, that's what what the ISS installation is like.

-Rich


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rmollise
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/06/07

Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: mmalik]
      #5828293 - 04/28/13 01:01 PM

Quote:

Quote:

I guess I still don't quite understand the point you are trying to make.




Besides my main reservation HyperStar being on obstructed SCT/'not so solidly put together platform', I guess another way of looking at it would be one taking casual, less resolved pics in lesser amount of time on HyperStar than one taking sophisticated, more resolved pics in bit more time on unobstructed refractors. Regards




Have you TRIED Hyperstar/Fastar or watched somebody using it? As I said in my post above, most of your assumptions are incorrect. If you don't want to image at this focal ratio, that's fine. It doesn't fit in with everybody's goals, but your fears and reservations are incorrect. It works just fine.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JMW
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 02/11/07

Loc: Nevada
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: rmollise]
      #5829417 - 04/29/13 12:37 AM

Just ordered a Hyperstar III lens for my C11 EdgeHD. Picked up a used Starlight Xpress 26C to use with it. Do most people auto guide with Hyperstar? I will have it mounted on a AP900GTO and PEC does pretty well. I have done 10 minute unguided with a SV115T at 800mm and got nice round stars.

I figure sky glow will be quickly be my limit when imaging at my home. Hopefully will be able to go deeper when I take the rig to the GSSP in July. What's the typical exposure when doing one shot color a f/2 in a light polluted area?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: Why do some consider Hyperstar a 'crude' platform? new [Re: JMW]
      #5829462 - 04/29/13 01:45 AM

You can expect to be sky limited within a minute. I've been curious myself about what can be done with really long exposures, but it would require remarkably dark skies to find out.

-Rich


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | (show all)


Extra information
10 registered and 15 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  cbwerner, Starman27, kkokkolis 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 6051

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics