Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Reflectors

Pages: 1
orlyandico
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 08/10/09

Loc: Singapore
coma corrector: Baader vs GSO
      #5829471 - 04/29/13 01:59 AM

the new Baader MPCC is now rated down to f3.5

but GSO claims that their version will work down to f3!

anybody used the GSO with a fast scope and can post some star images?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dtripz
member
*****

Reged: 04/01/08

Loc: Brooklyn NY
Re: coma corrector: Baader vs GSO new [Re: orlyandico]
      #5829940 - 04/29/13 11:14 AM

To add to the posters question, can these be used for visual, the paracor 2 seems quite expensive.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MikeBOKC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/10/10

Loc: Oklahoma City, OK
Re: coma corrector: Baader vs GSO new [Re: dtripz]
      #5830240 - 04/29/13 01:36 PM

I have the Astro Tech coma corrector which I suspect is pretty much the same as the ones mentioned above and it is fine for visual in my 4.6 Dob.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cjc
sage


Reged: 10/15/10

Loc: Derbyshire, England
Re: coma corrector: Baader vs GSO new [Re: MikeBOKC]
      #5830871 - 04/29/13 06:26 PM

The GSO was optimised, I understand for F/4.5, so F/3.0 would surely be pushing it, but I know of no published spot information. Roger Ceragioli did the optical design for the Astro-Tech/GSO corrector and is also one of the authors of Telescopes, Eyepieces and Astrographs: Design, Analysis and Performance of Modern Astronomical Optics which contains a possibly related corrector design also optimised for F/4.5 but said to be suitable for mirrors slower than F/3.5.

The issue with visual use is setting up the correct spacing to the focal plane with eyepieces that are not parfocal. The Paracorr includes a turntable to set the spacing. The GSO, with its back focus of 75mm will be more forgiving than the Baader at 55mm.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starman1
Vendor (EyepiecesEtc.com)
*****

Reged: 06/24/03

Loc: Los Angeles
Re: coma corrector: Baader vs GSO new [Re: cjc]
      #5830896 - 04/29/13 06:41 PM

I can't speak for the GSO corrector, but the Baader, at least, is more of a photographic coma corrector than a visual one. It adds appreciable spherical aberration, if you read all the myriad of CN posts and threads over the last decade (likely to be a significant problem for resolution at higher powers, but not an issue in imaging), and a fair number of spacers of differing lengths will be necessary to place the lens the correct distance from the eyepiece (since it is threaded onto the bottom of the eyepiece or extension tube).

The GSO corrector and TeleVue Paracorr function like barlows, in that the eyepiece is inserted in a tube, so spacing the eyepiece can be more easily done with parfocalizing rings (on the GSO) or by merely sliding the Tunable top (on the Paracorr).

The current Paracorr keeps the comatic star image smaller than the Airy disc down to f/3.5 and does a credible job below that. I don't believe any other corrector currently corrects as completely to such a low f/ratio. The Paracorr also flattens the field slightly, improving star images for eyepieces that have less-than-flat focal planes. It's expensive, but easier to use and to produce better results with. I can see the owner of a less-expensive scope might look for a lower-priced alternative. You should also look at the pile of threads on the GSO/Astrotech coma corrector here on CN, too, as it might point out what you're getting yourself into, where adjusting the corrector for different eyepieces is concerned. Do note that you only have to do this once, though.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cjc
sage


Reged: 10/15/10

Loc: Derbyshire, England
Re: coma corrector: Baader vs GSO new [Re: Starman1]
      #5831533 - 04/30/13 03:10 AM

Quote:

I can't speak for the GSO corrector, but the Baader, at least, is more of a photographic coma corrector than a visual one. It adds appreciable spherical aberration...




This applies to the previous version. The new Baader Multi Purpose Coma Corrector (MPCC) Mark III coma corrector is described here.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
beatlejuice
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 04/05/11

Loc: Hamilton, ON,Canada
Re: coma corrector: Baader vs GSO new [Re: cjc]
      #5831541 - 04/30/13 03:21 AM

Quote:

This applies to the previous version. The new Baader Multi Purpose Coma Corrector (MPCC) Mark III coma corrector is described here.




My Bitdefender just blocked me from going to that site because of malware!

Eric


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cjc
sage


Reged: 10/15/10

Loc: Derbyshire, England
Re: coma corrector: Baader vs GSO new [Re: cjc]
      #5831545 - 04/30/13 03:23 AM

Don is of the view that eyepieces should be parfocalised so the corrector gives the best possible correction for all.

With the GSO, I use eyepieces that are close to parfocal with a compromise setting, described here.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cjc
sage


Reged: 10/15/10

Loc: Derbyshire, England
Re: coma corrector: Baader vs GSO new [Re: beatlejuice]
      #5831547 - 04/30/13 03:29 AM

Quote:


My Bitdefender just blocked me from going to that site because of malware!

Eric




Apologies! I hope this link is better.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
beatlejuice
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 04/05/11

Loc: Hamilton, ON,Canada
Re: coma corrector: Baader vs GSO new [Re: cjc]
      #5831869 - 04/30/13 09:49 AM

Quote:

Apologies! I hope this link is better.





Thanks Chris, it is.

Eric


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
precaud
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 12/05/12

Loc: north central New Mexico
Re: coma corrector: Baader vs GSO new [Re: cjc]
      #5831875 - 04/30/13 09:51 AM

Quote:

Don is of the view that eyepieces should be parfocalised so the corrector gives the best possible correction for all.




I think Don's approach is the most precise one and I will end up doing that, once I get/make enough parfocal rings to do all of my EP's.

Until then, the "compromised" approach is working really well. All of my EP's except two are within 2mm of the target 75mm for my High Point/GSO CC and the results are excellent. Having said that, I did a brief experiment last night to if I could see the difference between 73mm and 75mm on a 25mm EP, and the answer is a definite yes, correction was better edge-to-edge with the proper distance. So I will definitely be making the proper spacers.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Metalmanstan
super member


Reged: 07/02/12

Loc: Oneonta, NY
Re: coma corrector: Baader vs GSO new [Re: precaud]
      #5832054 - 04/30/13 11:32 AM

I have the astrotech coma corrector and it definitely works fine in my 12" f4.9 scope. It's a lot cheaper then the other brands and it does the job just fine. If you don't want to spend that much money, I would definitely go with the astrotech, it will save you money!!

Stash


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starman1
Vendor (EyepiecesEtc.com)
*****

Reged: 06/24/03

Loc: Los Angeles
Re: coma corrector: Baader vs GSO new [Re: Metalmanstan]
      #5832309 - 04/30/13 01:11 PM

Well, regardless of spacers or parfocalizing rings, you only do it once, and then you get the benefits of coma correction thereafter. It's sort of like the pain of installing a new piece of audio visual equipment. After the initial "installation", everything is easy.

And the really EZ thing is you only need to have one eyepiece perfectly positioned and all your other eyepieces follow from that.

Using a Paracorr with its tunable top doesn't parfocalize your eyepieces (though the tunable top does so in action), but the other coma correctors sort of force you to do that to dial in each eyepiece to the corrector.

As for adapters and rings to do so, many sellers have these things (e.g. Scopestuff, telescopeadapters.com). Even blank filter casings come in handy when you only need to change the insertion of an eyepiece a few millimeters.

Edited by Starman1 (04/30/13 01:15 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
orlyandico
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 08/10/09

Loc: Singapore
Re: coma corrector: Baader vs GSO new [Re: Starman1]
      #5833478 - 04/30/13 11:48 PM

Actually I was thinking of AP use. Here's what I thought:

1) you can get an f/4 newtonian and buy the very expensive Keller reducer to get it down to f/3

2) you can pay (a lot of cash) for an f/3 newtonian and then use one of these coma correctors.....?

At the end of the day, I don't know what is more expensive, a garden-variety 8" f/4 or 10" f/4 with the Keller reducer, or pay someone like Royce (presumably a steep sum) for an 8" f/3 or 10" f/3 mirror.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bratislav
sage


Reged: 09/07/06

Re: coma corrector: Baader vs GSO new [Re: orlyandico]
      #5833544 - 05/01/13 01:10 AM

How many fast Newtonians have you critically collimated (I mean collimated well enough so it does not show focal plane tilt and decenter on a decent size CCD chip) ? If answer is "not many" (as I expect), my suggestion is to stay with f/5 Newts until you learn the ropes first. 6" f/5 is cheap to play with (and it WILL produce great images to boot!) and you can keep your corrector for later when you get your 8" or 10" f/fast. In fact if you buy the 6" second hand you may not even lose any money in the process.
Believe me it gets very, very far from trivial once you get below f/4.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
orlyandico
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 08/10/09

Loc: Singapore
Re: coma corrector: Baader vs GSO new [Re: bratislav]
      #5835679 - 05/02/13 06:13 AM

trouble is f/5 is no better than my refractor.

was looking for more speed.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jarad
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 04/28/03

Loc: Atlanta, GA
Re: coma corrector: Baader vs GSO new [Re: orlyandico]
      #5835731 - 05/02/13 07:35 AM

How about one of these:

Fastar F2 imaging

Jarad


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1


Extra information
6 registered and 23 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  ausastronomer, Phillip Creed, JayinUT, okieav8r 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1474

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics