Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Binoviewers

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
vkhastro1
sage
*****

Reged: 08/21/05

Loc: Ontario, Canada
Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ?
      #5836240 - 05/02/13 12:59 PM

Has anyone done a direct "shootout" between the Baader Mark V and the Denkmeier Binotron? Which is the preferred option based on ergonomics,
optical quality, smallest back focus (especially for SCT),etc ? I presently use the Baader Maxbrights and Baader Zeiss T2 prism setup for the minimal back focus in the SCT mode. I also have the Denkmeier II supersystem binoviewer with powerswitch/filter slider setup for use with refractor, reflector and SCT.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
denis0007dl
sage
***

Reged: 04/17/12

Loc: Croatia
Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: vkhastro1]
      #5836314 - 05/02/13 01:29 PM

johnnyha have them both, so we expect soon shootout

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
johnnyha
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 11/12/06

Loc: Sherman Oaks, CA
Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: denis0007dl]
      #5836488 - 05/02/13 02:36 PM

Well the Mark V clearly requires the least amount of backfocus. I have not had a chance to compare them head to head due to weather, but they are both excellent. The Mk Vs are of course known for their quality but I have been extremely happy with the B27's optical quality after just two outings. I also prefer the B27's ergonomically due to their easily adjusted diopters, I can incrementally shift the focus on either eyepiece "on the fly" while viewing with both eyes. This feature alone is so fantastic that it makes it difficult for me to even reach for the MkV's again. I also love the collimation feature of the B27's and their lighter weight.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ryuno
sage


Reged: 05/09/13

Loc: Tokyo
Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: johnnyha]
      #6063366 - 09/04/13 08:48 PM

Hello Johnny
Are their any updates about your comparison of the binoviewers?
I am shopping for one and deciding between a Denkmeier, a Baader and a Vernonscope.

The Vernonscope is the cheapest of the three. Do you happen to know this bino or know someone who knows it?

Best regards from Tokyo
Heinz


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
REC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/20/10

Loc: NC
Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: Ryuno]
      #6063970 - 09/05/13 09:09 AM

Where id Eddgie??

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eddgie
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/01/06

Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: REC]
      #6064011 - 09/05/13 09:31 AM

I have used both.

They are very different units with very different strengths.

Optically though, I find little difference. Both are optically superb.

The differences are basically mechanical differences. The Binotron without the powerswitch is lighter, but with the powerswitch is heavier.

The Binotron has excellent diopter function. Easier to access than the very thin ring on the Mark V, but the very low profile of the Mark V allows for a much shorter light path.

The diopter ring adjustment ring on the Binotron is recessed and I found it a little harder to get at even without gloves on. It is much easier to change eyepeices on the Mark V, but if you have the Supersystem you most likey do far less eyepiece changing, yes? So, one is easier to change eyepeices, the other greatly reduces eyepeice changes.

The Mark V is king of the hill for clear apeture. Even 28mm feild stop eyepeices are bright and crisp right to the edge.

The Mark V has a really excellent collimatino adjustment, but the Mark V I have has perfect collimation.. This could be a neutral, but for someone that has had trouble with merging, the Binotron would fix that problem.

And of course the Binotron can have a powerswitch.

A la carte, I personally still prefer the Mark V, but the powerswitch is an important factor, and I can easily seeing that beeing the over-riding factor in many purchases.

Optically though, I find the performance to be pretty much identical.

I want a Binotron, but at the same time, I don't see myself selling the Mark V. I actually prefer it for my EdgeHD 8". Due to apeture loss caused by the long light path, I found the Binotron not well suited to that scope, and in the Newt, I don't see a huge advantage to the Binotron other than the powerswitch.

Both are first class binoviewers, so it is more the mechanical features, powerswitch, and clear apeture that seprate them.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
REC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/20/10

Loc: NC
Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: Eddgie]
      #6064189 - 09/05/13 10:58 AM

Ed, just a quick question on my Denk2 PS...can the power switch be removed easily if I just want to use the BV alone and save some weight and light path? Does it just unscrew...seems to be on there pretty tight?

Thanks,

Bob


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Levine
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 03/24/06

Loc: 40° 47' 52" N / 85° 49' 14" ...
Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: Eddgie]
      #6064219 - 09/05/13 11:16 AM

Eddgie, Thomas, and others:

Consider the following:

-Cost is off the table as a determining factor
-Flexibility, reliability, ease of use, and service after the sale are the primary concerns
-You are restricted to only ONE binoviewer:

Would you choose the Mark V or the Binotron?

...Or would you consider a 2" system (Siebert)?

...Or none of the above?!

Why?



Edited by Levine (09/05/13 12:10 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TGModerator
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 11/02/06

Loc: Latitude 47
Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: Levine]
      #6064308 - 09/05/13 12:08 PM

I have no experience of the Binotron but here's what I love about the Mark V:

- Optically perfect. Star testing my AP178 with the binoviewer, I find no difference from star testing it without. Shine a laser into the "nose" of the Mark V and two identical beams come out the eyepiece ends. Project them on a far wall and you can see how well it's collimated. It's no surprise that this is the only BV that AP recommends and sells.

- Perfect color balance. BVs typically have different hues for the two sides. The Mark V is perfectly balanced. It's easy to verify: put a white paper over your scope and illuminate evenly and take images from either eyepiece and compare the histograms; they come out identical.

- Solid Zeiss quality, Zeiss coatings. What more is there to say.

- Click-lock. Love this feature.

- 28mm clear aperture.

Here's what I don't like about it:

- Attaching to the diagonal can be fraught with peril as the many tales of Mark V's hitting concrete in this group attest.

- Sucks up a good deal of back-focus. I had to shorten the tube on my AP. With a mirror diagonal, I had observable spherical aberration in my C11HD till I went with the Maxbright prism diagonal.

- OCAs are all telenegative amplifiers. There is no zero power OCA available like the one from Siebert.

- Price. You could buy a 4" TV refractor on Amart for its price. But in the end I think the quality is worth the price, and it keeps it value very well.

- Minor nit: the opening/closing action to adjust the pupillary distance is fairly stiff. While it may be a feature, I much preferred the smooth action on Siebert's Black Knight BVs, the only other ones I've owned.

Sorry, I don't have a direct comparison with Binotron but I hope the above helps.

Tanveer.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Levine
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 03/24/06

Loc: 40° 47' 52" N / 85° 49' 14" ...
Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: TG]
      #6064442 - 09/05/13 01:21 PM

Tanveer,

Thanks for this!

"Crashing Bino Syndrome" as it pertains to the Mark V, may be traced back to some not fully tightening the setscrew on the Quick Release adapter. The screw would then loosen further, fall out, and provoke tears.

This from Edggie, on another thread in this Forum. I have no personal experience with the Mark V.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eddgie
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/01/06

Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: REC]
      #6064511 - 09/05/13 01:55 PM

Yes, the power switch can be removed. It unscrews from the bino body. The nose can then be threaded directly into the bino body.

This cuts about 19mm or so from the light path.

There is a very thin ring at the top of the threaded part of the powerswitch that screws into the base of the BV. You will see this ring when you separate them.

This ring may move when you remove the powerswitch.

The symptom will be that when you re-install the powerswitch, it may not line up perfectly with the body of the bino. The little thin ring is a stop that allows you to adjust the final stopping place of the powerswitch so you can restore the correct alignment. If the power switch rotates to far or not far enough on re-install, you can remove the power switch and raise or lower this little ring as necessary to get the rotation of the switch perfect.

It most likely will not move when you remove the powerswitch, but if it does, it is very simple to get it back into proper position.

Anyway, it should unscrew. I would not get crazy with the force, but it may take some amount of pressure to get it off the first time.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DaveJ
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/07/05

Loc: NE Ohio
Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: Levine]
      #6064514 - 09/05/13 01:57 PM

Quote:

"Crashing Bino Syndrome" as it pertains to the Mark V, may be traced back to some not fully tightening the setscrew on the Quick Release adapter. The screw would then loosen further, fall out, and provoke tears.




There's no maybe about it, that's the only thing it could possibly be. Keeping the large easy-to-see, easy-to-grab screw tightened with a gentle twist is all that's required. I've never come close to dropping my Mark Vs. Someone mentioned it being too short. I lengthened mine with an inch of hard rubber fuel hose purchased for a few cents from an auto parts store.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Levine
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 03/24/06

Loc: 40° 47' 52" N / 85° 49' 14" ...
Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: DaveJ]
      #6064588 - 09/05/13 02:36 PM

Quote:

Quote:

"Crashing Bino Syndrome" as it pertains to the Mark V, may be traced back to some not fully tightening the setscrew on the Quick Release adapter. The screw would then loosen further, fall out, and provoke tears.




There's no maybe about it, that's the only thing it could possibly be. Keeping the large easy-to-see, easy-to-grab screw tightened with a gentle twist is all that's required. I've never come close to dropping my Mark Vs. Someone mentioned it being too short. I lengthened mine with an inch of hard rubber fuel hose purchased for a few cents from an auto parts store.






Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
REC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/20/10

Loc: NC
Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: Eddgie]
      #6064602 - 09/05/13 02:42 PM

Thanks Ed, do you think the 19mm saved would be worth removing the PS....maybe a little brighter.

I would like to do a final comparison between the WO I have and the Denk. Probably going to sell the WO.

Another thought is that my WO will work on my ED80 but not the Denk the way I have it now setup and would have to buy more "stuff".

Do you think using a BV in the 80ED is a good idea in the first place? I have to attach the 1.6x barlow in front of the diagonal to get it to focus.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eddgie
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/01/06

Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: REC]
      #6064841 - 09/05/13 05:06 PM Attachment (33 downloads)

Well, I think that it will be a much fairer test to compare the Denk to the WO with a bit more similar light path.

As for binoviewing the 80ED, I mean you can, but I don't know what the point would be. You are turning your wonderful wide field scope into a fairly narrow AFOV 70mm telescope (just figuring the dimming factor).

But that is me. I do use the Mark V on my C5, but this even seems dim to me.

I have thought about selling the C5 and replacing it with a C6, but it never seems to end, so for now, I am just hanging tight.

I did buy a cheap ($59) Celestron 4" Achromat and I am using it with binoviewers, though I had to cut the tube to do that. For $59, it was worth it....

But an 80mm scope is pretty small. I guess it just depends on you.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
REC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/20/10

Loc: NC
Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: Eddgie]
      #6065008 - 09/05/13 06:41 PM

Good point on using the BV in the 80mm.

I bought that $59.00 close out as well....hella of a deal I could not pass up! I stuck it on my EQ2 that i have..looks like you have one like it as well. Pretty nice scope and I will compare it to my ETX-125 on Saturn tonight.

Clear Skies:)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DaveJ
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/07/05

Loc: NE Ohio
Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: REC]
      #6065031 - 09/05/13 07:07 PM

Quote:

Good point on using the BV in the 80mm...




I use binoviewers in my wife's 80mm triplet APO all the time and much prefer the view to mono-eyepiece mode. There's something magical about binoviewers regardless of aperture of the telescope. I've binoviewed through scopes from 80mm to 16" in aperture and have a hard time going back to mono now in any of them.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eddgie
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/01/06

Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: REC]
      #6065066 - 09/05/13 07:33 PM

The Celestron did not reach focus with BVs. I had to cut 1.25" from the end of the tube.

Now it reaches focus with the Mark V/T2 Prism.

It actually works really well. I get about a 1.5 degree true field with 24mm ES68s, and about 1.55 degrees with the 35mm Ultimas. The Ultimas work great for faint targets but for general sweeping, I prefer the 24 ES expansive 68 degree field.

Still, the view seems dim to me. If my sky conditions were darker, I think I could get more into it, but from my city location, a 4" refractor just isn't much telescopes.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
johnnyha
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 11/12/06

Loc: Sherman Oaks, CA
Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: Ryuno]
      #6065528 - 09/06/13 02:38 AM

Quote:

Hello Johnny
Are their any updates about your comparison of the binoviewers?



I haven't had a chance to use them lately so no real updates. I think Eddgie has covered the differences pretty well. I definitely prefer the B27 ergonomics altho I see essentially no difference optically. And I have nothing but good things to say about Russ's customer service at Denkmeier. As I have reported here before, turnaround for Denk repair was one week and for MkV it took 9 months so that is a pretty major difference and a very real consideration.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eddgie
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/01/06

Re: Baader Mark V vs Denkmeier Binotron binoviewer ? new [Re: Levine]
      #6065793 - 09/06/13 09:50 AM

Quote:

-Cost is off the table as a determining factor
-Flexibility, reliability, ease of use, and service after the sale are the primary concerns


Would you choose the Mark V or the Binotron?

...Or would you consider a 2" system (Siebert)?




Last one first.

I would not consider a 2" system. The back focus requirements are so onerous that I think you would find them to be impractical in most scopes.

The light path through this system is I believe over 150mm. By the time you add a 2" diagonal for an SCT, and a visual back, you are looking at a back focus of over 300mm. No SCT made will be better than barely within diffraction limit with this much back focus (spherical aberration will be near 1/4th wave).

No Newtonian or no refractor is going to reach focus without at least a 2x barlow and maybe more. This means that while you can use 2" eyepeices, you may still get a wider true field using 1.25" eyepecies in either the Denk or the Mark V. The big barlow requirement imposed by the big light path length does more to offset the big prism than the big prism buys you by allowing the use of a big eyepiece. Lets not even get into the weight issue.

And before I answer further, let me be clear that off axis performance is extremely important to me. This means that I want a field that is completely free of vignetting, and that is not loosing off axis rays from the light cone so that the illumination is falling off (these are two different things). I value these things perhaps far more than most people.

With that said, if you made me pick, I would pick the Mark V.

The details of the answer would bore the life out of any reader out there, but in the end, I believe that for my particular mix of scopes, the Mark Vs would give me the best overall result.

If the only scope I had was a medium focal ratio Newt or Dob, the answer might be different.

But I have a variety of scopes, and I get the best balance of function in all of the scopes with the Mark V.

That is me though, and you asked me for my own answer. I am sure that others will differ.

One use of any powerswitching system made in the EdgeHD 8" though would tell you immediately that it is not a good match. You cannot use this kind of system in this particular scope without serious performance compromises.

If the only scope I was going to use was the 12" f/4.9 dob, It would be a more difficult decision.

The 24mm ES 68s don't give quite the same low power, but the much larger field stop than the D21s makes the true field surprisingly close.

The 1.7 GPC is a true coma correcting design and even inexpensive eyepeices like 24mm Hyperion seem to give very sharp off axis performance.

My biggest concern about the powerswitching systems though is that in the low power arm, the field illumination is very uneven, being much brighter at the center and falling off evenly from there. The illumination of the Mark V with 1.7x GPC seems much more even to me though to be fair, this is over a slightly narrower true field (though if you do the math, you realize that the field is not that much smaller).

On the other hand, using a powerswtich type system, many observers could go all night without having to change eyepecies, and there is a lot to be said for that.

So, if cost is no object, I would say to own them both.

But if you really made me have to choose, then with my own mix of scopes and my own preference for a fully unvignetted and well illuminated field, it would be the Mark Vs. The EdgeHD was completely unsatisfying to use with the Binotron, even with a T2 Prism diagonal. In low power, I might as well have been using a C6 with a Maxbright/T2 prism. In the EdgeHD, the Mark V with a pair of 35mm Ultimas gave a far better result than the low power arm of the powerswtich did. There is simply far to much aperture loss when you use any kind of reducer system with the EdgeHD 8" and back focus over about 110mm.

I think that one of the other forum members (REC) may also be seeing aggressive aperture reduction in another SCT (f/8 I think).

Anyway, my own requiremts for no vignetting and an even field illumination would make me choose the Mark V.

I like the Binotrons and intend to buy a pair, but they just are not a good choice for my other scopes. In the Newt though, I think that even with the field illumination dropoff, I will still use them.

But the question was absolute, and my answer is absolute as well. If you made me pick one of the other, it would be the Mark V.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
2 registered and 5 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  TG, Geo557 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 3892

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics