Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Equipment

Pages: 1
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Celstron 8" EdgeHD vs Meade 8" LX90-ACF?
      #5845152 - 05/07/13 09:19 AM

They both claim no coma but I believe the Celestron boats clear images to the edge. How does it compare with the LX90-ACF? The Meade is $400 less expensive plus it weighs about 18 pounds less than the EdgeHD at 52 pounds.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eddgie
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/01/06

Re: Celstron 8" EdgeHD vs Meade 8" LX90-ACF? new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5845468 - 05/07/13 12:42 PM

I am not sure of the exact configurations of these scopes, but let me take a guess???

The 8" ACF is a fork mounted telescope. It breaks down into two pieces and the fork with the optical tube weighs about 33 lbs. The tripod weighs about 20 lbs I think.

The EdgeHD 8" is a much different configuration. The Optical Tube alone comes off of the mount and only weighs about 13 lbs, but the mount itself is more like 40 lbs.

The CGEM mount though offers the ability to mount other telescopes. This may be useful if you one day decide to compliment your scope with something like a 4" refractor for wide field work.

So, very different configurations, and price differential is really in the fact that the EdgeHD 8" is on a more versitile mount.

Optically, if you see yourself getting super-uber-duper wide field eyepeices like the Ethos, you may find the edge of the field sharper in the EdgeHD 8", but for eyepecies like Panoptics and the ES 68 degree eyepecies, the difference will not be great.

At the center of the field, they will perform about the same.

So, while the Meade weighs less, it is on a less flexible mount.

Mainly then, this is a mount issue. If you think you are going to only ever want to use one telescope, the fork mounts are very comfortable, compact, and stable.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Seiko4169
sage


Reged: 07/04/09

Re: Celstron 8" EdgeHD vs Meade 8" LX90-ACF? new [Re: Eddgie]
      #5845635 - 05/07/13 01:36 PM

I could be wrong but I'm guessing the OP is talking about the CPC range vs the LX90 and not the CGEM mount?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eddgie
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/01/06

Re: Celstron 8" EdgeHD vs Meade 8" LX90-ACF? new [Re: Seiko4169]
      #5845990 - 05/07/13 03:55 PM

Ah, perhaps.

I did not know that they EdgeHD was now available in the fork mounting.

So, my mistake for not being aware of this option.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: Celstron 8" EdgeHD vs Meade 8" LX90-ACF? new [Re: Eddgie]
      #5846220 - 05/07/13 05:56 PM

No prob! I think I'm leaning toward the LX90ACF now due to its weight. As for astrophotography I see that it can be done (despite it not being the LX200), at least from what I have seen on youtube.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ohata0
member


Reged: 03/10/09

Loc: Hawaii, USA
Re: Celstron 8" EdgeHD vs Meade 8" LX90-ACF? new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5847134 - 05/08/13 04:14 AM

those are alt/az mounts right? so i'm guessing you're not planning on doing long exposure AP...just short exposure for stuff like the moon and planets?
unless you're planning on putting it on a wedge or something, it wouldn't work well for long exposures (because of field rotation) and the wedge would just be more weight to carry around anyway.

or am i completely wrong about that?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: Celstron 8" EdgeHD vs Meade 8" LX90-ACF? new [Re: ohata0]
      #5847256 - 05/08/13 07:43 AM

Yes, I would certainly use it with a wedge when doing astrophotography. I would be observing more often, so I would leave that piece behind.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eddgie
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/01/06

Re: Celstron 8" EdgeHD vs Meade 8" LX90-ACF? new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5847321 - 05/08/13 08:45 AM

If you are going to use the wedge, then why not consider the EdgeHD 8" on a GCEM mount?

Adding the wedge ups the weight and costs.

But get what you think is best for you.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: Celstron 8" EdgeHD vs Meade 8" LX90-ACF? new [Re: Eddgie]
      #5847372 - 05/08/13 09:20 AM

I would go that route if I was driving. I'm looking at this as an on-the-go solution, something portable enough to carry with me on mass transit. The CGEM mount/tripod is 60 pounds alone :/

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
WesC
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 02/06/13

Loc: La Crescenta, CA
Re: Celstron 8" EdgeHD vs Meade 8" LX90-ACF? new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5847873 - 05/08/13 02:16 PM

A fork mount is going to be pretty darn heavy and harder to break down for transport. Taking stuff like this on mass transit??? I don't think either solution is good for that requirement. Anything that is solid and stable enough for an 8" SCT is going to be too heavy and complicated for one person to take on a bus or subway.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
belgrade
sage


Reged: 10/05/07

Loc: Frisco, TX
Re: Celstron 8" EdgeHD vs Meade 8" LX90-ACF? new [Re: WesC]
      #5848072 - 05/08/13 03:56 PM

The Celestron 8" Advanced VX (GEM) Series Edge ED is sold for $2K with free shipping. The mount/tripod isn't as heavy as the CGEM (though the payload is less too) but one can do decent amateur/beginner's imaging.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Whichwayisnorth
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 07/04/11

Loc: Southern California
Re: Celstron 8" EdgeHD vs Meade 8" LX90-ACF? new [Re: belgrade]
      #5848786 - 05/08/13 09:29 PM

Quote:

The Celestron 8" Advanced VX (GEM) Series Edge ED is sold for $2K with free shipping. The mount/tripod isn't as heavy as the CGEM (though the payload is less too) but one can do decent amateur/beginner's imaging.




This is what I have too. I may have my first great weekend for imaging this coming weekend. Hopefully I'll have some photos to post next week. I LOVE this setup.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
thesubwaypusher
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 07/08/04

Loc: New York City
Re: Celstron 8" EdgeHD vs Meade 8" LX90-ACF? new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5849228 - 05/09/13 02:56 AM

Quote:

They both claim no coma but I believe the Celestron boats clear images to the edge. How does it compare with the LX90-ACF? The Meade is $400 less expensive plus it weighs about 18 pounds less than the EdgeHD at 52 pounds.




Wait a few months for Celestron to have that great deal of their CGEM and the OTA together. Although I can't recall if the 8" deal is as great as the 11 was.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bob Griffiths
Getting Grouchy
*****

Reged: 10/10/05

Loc: Frederick Maryland
Re: Celstron 8" EdgeHD vs Meade 8" LX90-ACF? new [Re: thesubwaypusher]
      #5849478 - 05/09/13 08:47 AM

Mass transit.... ??

Been 40 or 40 years since I even got on a bus

BUT I honestly would not even think of "carting" anything larger then binoculars...if I was forced to...

Just me.. and how I am...

Bob G


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
thesubwaypusher
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 07/08/04

Loc: New York City
Re: Celstron 8" EdgeHD vs Meade 8" LX90-ACF? new [Re: Bob Griffiths]
      #5850773 - 05/09/13 07:39 PM

Quote:

Mass transit.... ??

Been 40 or 40 years since I even got on a bus

BUT I honestly would not even think of "carting" anything larger then binoculars...if I was forced to...

Just me.. and how I am...

Bob G




Hi Bob:

I think you think I take my equipment on buses???

NO way man!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
pjensen
super member


Reged: 04/08/12

Loc: Highland Village, Tx
Re: Celstron 8" EdgeHD vs Meade 8" LX90-ACF? new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5851086 - 05/09/13 10:42 PM

Quote:

I'm looking at this as an on-the-go solution, something portable enough to carry with me on mass transit.




Mass transit !?!??

Maybe get a vehicle first.... Then a scope.

I'm not sure you can carry on large items (like a scope) to your seat. The bus driver puts luggage in a large compartment on the side of the bus. A fragile item like a scope would get destroyed in there.

But if you could carry on a large scope (like a 12" tube dob) - it would make a great youtube video. I can just see someone dragging a huge cannon-like tube down the aisle, hitting people with it - trying to get it in a seat. On every turn, the tube would lurch around dangerously...

Ok, I have some pretty sick humor.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: Celstron 8" EdgeHD vs Meade 8" LX90-ACF? new [Re: pjensen]
      #5851191 - 05/10/13 12:14 AM

lol.. well I intend a more conscientious route -

http://www.amazon.com/Transworld-Luggage-Rolling-Duffle-Oversized/dp/B004EHN4...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1


Extra information
9 registered and 27 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  zjc26138, tecmage, rflinn68 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 975

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics