Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

General Astronomy >> Beginners Forum

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
js1976
member


Reged: 12/27/12

Loc: Madison, MS
More newbie questions new
      #5852354 - 05/10/13 05:18 PM

The last post I posed the typical newbie question as to which type of scope to buy. The overwhelming response was a Dob. How would most of you compare the Celestron Nexstar series? I kind of like the Go To feature and was looking at an 8 inch

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Paco_Grande
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/14/12

Loc: Banana Republic of California
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: js1976]
      #5852406 - 05/10/13 05:50 PM

8SE is an excellent choice for many people. Hard to go wrong. Holds its resale value very well also.

Just keep in mind that you need a battery unit and that an SCT requires a cool-down period or it won't perform well. They work well with moderate and lower priced eyepieces, which is not always true with Dobs (depends on focal ratio.)

SE6 or SE8 uses the same mount, so both are a fine choice. If you can swing the extra for the 8, go for it.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pharquart
sage
*****

Reged: 11/11/09

Loc: Southwest Minneapolis Metro
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: Paco_Grande]
      #5852563 - 05/10/13 07:07 PM

I've had a Celestron 8" SCT for many years, and recently purchased the SE mount for it so I'd have GoTo. I also have a 10" Dob, so it's easy for me to compare your options directly.

The GoTo is a great feature, especially for a beginner. However, as stated above, the SE mount draws batteries down quickly. I use a powertank to feed mine. So the setup process for the 8SE is more involved (tripod, OTA, power supply, cables, etc.) By comparison, I can be looking through my Dob in a few minutes. And with the SE mount, if you forget your power cord (or it breaks, or the fuse blows, all of which have happened to me) you're stuck. There's no manual option to point. It's motors or nothing. The Dob is all manual.

Both Dobs and SCTS require a cool-down time. It's longer for SCT scopes. But that doesn't mean you can't use either one right at setup. Your higher power views will "swim" more until they hit thermal equilibrium. But you can absolutely use both right away.

SCTs have a longer focal length (1500MM or 2000MM, depending on 6" or 8") compared to a Dob (most end up at 1200mm). So the SCT is better for high power (planetary) and the Dob is better for low power, wide views (star clusters).

Both are great first scopes. Pick which features you like best! And in the end, if they don't work for you, sell on Cloudy Nights classifieds and buy something different.

Brian


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TexasRed
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 05/17/11

Loc: East Texas
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: Pharquart]
      #5852600 - 05/10/13 07:28 PM

Don't forget the Orion "g" series Dobs with GoTo and automatic tracking. Setup is quick and easy. They don't need to be leveled or polar-aligned, and they can be used manually without power. They can even be moved manually without losing alignment or tracking ability.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GeneT
Ely Kid
*****

Reged: 11/07/08

Loc: South Texas
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: js1976]
      #5852602 - 05/10/13 07:29 PM

I bought two NexStar8's for two sets of grandchildren. They are great telescopes. You can park there for a long time before having to worry about going bigger. Even if you go bigger, you can keep it for a grab and go, or for situations where less is more.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
kenrenard
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 12/13/12

Loc: Dunmore, PA
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: GeneT]
      #5852754 - 05/10/13 09:20 PM

I've never personally viewed through the 8 but a club member has the 6 and I was pretty impressed with what I saw in it. The 8 could only be better in terms of aperture. The gentleman in our club uses a power tank and also does some astro photos (short exposure). I've seen a number of Messier objects and they look pretty good.

As Paco says it will take some time to cool. As texasred says the xt8g is another option if you want to get some wider views and also play manual.

That way if the tank runs out you can still view manual.

Good luck with your decision.


Ken


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mfromb
super member


Reged: 12/13/12

Loc: Boston, MA
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: Pharquart]
      #5853012 - 05/10/13 11:24 PM

Quote:

SCTs have a longer focal length (1500MM or 2000MM, depending on 6" or 8") compared to a Dob (most end up at 1200mm). So the SCT is better for high power (planetary) and the Dob is better for low power, wide views (star clusters).




I don't mean to nit pick, but I want to sanity check what my current understanding is. Is this a true statement?

It would seem to me that the only assured 'advantage' of the longer focal length isn't necessarily 'better' high power views, but that you can obtain a higher power using any given eyepiece, or the same power while using a longer focal length eyepiece?

I'm not sure this classifies as being literally 'better' for higher powered views and, if they were actually better, that this could be attributed to the longer focal length?



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
star drop
Snowed In
*****

Reged: 02/02/08

Loc: Snow Plop, WNY
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: mfromb]
      #5853039 - 05/10/13 11:50 PM

Quote:


It would seem to me that the only assured 'advantage' of the longer focal length isn't necessarily 'better' high power views, but that you can obtain a higher power using any given eyepiece, or the same power while using a longer focal length eyepiece?




Correct.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
kfiscus
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/09/12

Loc: Albert Lea, MN, USA
Re: More newbie questions [Re: star drop]
      #5853082 - 05/11/13 12:21 AM

I'm a dob lover but got to use my friend's new 6SE over the fall and winter. I too powered it with my power tank. The views are high quality. It is VERY user friendly. (I tried and succeeded to learn it without reading any instructions.) The mount is well engineered. The tracking is very good. I put it on the Ring Nebula, put the dust cap on, and came back out an hour later. The Ring was still in the view.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
AstroTatDad
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 04/22/13

Loc: Los Angeles - San Diego
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: kfiscus]
      #5853208 - 05/11/13 03:34 AM

I have owned the 6SE for 2 months now, really great scope. With these scopes you don't need high priced eyepieces, low to mid range EP's are good. The 25mm that comes with it is pretty nice. PowerTank is a must, using AA battery's will die fast and when they start losing power the scope will start losing alignment and slew around the block LOL. The tripod that come's with the 6-8SE is pretty good, I don't put the legs extended all the way out on mine to help reduce vibration. I also picked up the vibrations pads, helped out a lot. Right now you can pick up the 6 and 8SE 10% off normal price until June.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mentor
professor emeritus


Reged: 09/30/10

Loc: Ontario, Canada
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: mfromb]
      #5853368 - 05/11/13 08:30 AM

Quote:

Quote:

SCTs have a longer focal length (1500MM or 2000MM, depending on 6" or 8") compared to a Dob (most end up at 1200mm). So the SCT is better for high power (planetary) and the Dob is better for low power, wide views (star clusters).




I don't mean to nit pick, but I want to sanity check what my current understanding is. Is this a true statement?

It would seem to me that the only assured 'advantage' of the longer focal length isn't necessarily 'better' high power views, but that you can obtain a higher power using any given eyepiece, or the same power while using a longer focal length eyepiece?

I'm not sure this classifies as being literally 'better' for higher powered views and, if they were actually better, that this could be attributed to the longer focal length?






A telescope with a longer FL will allow you to obtain a higher magnification using eyepieces with longer focal lengths. These longer FL eyepieces are generally easier / more comfortable to use. This can be overcome somewhat through the use of modern (and very expensive!) eyepiece designs, or through the use of a barlow (which introduces more glass to the optical train). I would say this is still an advantage for the telescope with the longer focal length. The shallow angle of the optical cone in the longer FL scope (assuming a constant aperture here) will also be more forgiving on eyepieces as well. A scope with a very fast focal ratio will ask more of the eyepiece.

Conversely, a shorter focal length will allow you access to wider fields of view than a longer FL scope. I moved from a 7" Mak (FL 2670 mm) to a 4" refractor (FL 880mm) and would never go back. The TFOV in the Mak felt like looking through a straw compared to the refractor. I love being able to use my 35mm Pan EP to turn my scope into a 102mm finderscope! To illustrate my first point, I now need an eyepiece with a FL of about 4mm to max out the magnification on my scope, while in the Mak the high-power EP was closer to 10 mm, even with the much greater aperture. If the apertures were the same this difference would have been even greater. Would you rather look through a 10mm plossl or a 4mm plossl?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MikeBOKC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/10/10

Loc: Oklahoma City, OK
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: Mentor]
      #5853406 - 05/11/13 09:07 AM

When people ask me about a first scope, unless they have very specific needs that would point in an equally specific direction, I tell them that IMO the best value on the market for a combination of aperture, versatility, user friendliness and portability is the 8SE. There's a reason Celestron has sold a ton of these scopes in their various models and configurations for many years now They just work, for a quite reasonable investment.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tony Flanders
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/18/06

Loc: Cambridge, MA, USA
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: mfromb]
      #5853412 - 05/11/13 09:12 AM

Quote:

Quote:

SCTs have a longer focal length (1500MM or 2000MM, depending on 6" or 8") compared to a Dob (most end up at 1200mm). So the SCT is better for high power (planetary) and the Dob is better for low power, wide views (star clusters).




I don't mean to nit pick, but I want to sanity check what my current understanding is. Is this a true statement?




I would say that it's true, but not for the reasons stated.

It is true that the shorter focal length of a Dob gives it a clear advantage for wide-field views. This can to some extent be offset by using a reducer/corrector on an SCT together with 2-inch eyepieces. But even then, a normal Dob has a clear advantage in this department.

As for high power, the longer focal length of an SCT isn't really an advantage. It is very easy to increase the effective focal length of a Dob with a Barlow lens. You can get a very nice Barlow for $100 -- not an expensive accessory at all.

However, the motor tracking of an SCT is indisputably an advantage at high power. Sure, Dob owners (including me) will say "Oh, it's not so bad" or "It's easy to learn to hand-track at high power," both of which are true -- in a way. But the best hand tracking in the world is no substitute for having your target just sit there in the middle of the field of view. Even when you take a break, or fiddle around in your case for that other eyepiece or filter, or simply zone out.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pharquart
sage
*****

Reged: 11/11/09

Loc: Southwest Minneapolis Metro
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: mfromb]
      #5853466 - 05/11/13 09:51 AM

Quote:

It would seem to me that the only assured 'advantage' of the longer focal length isn't necessarily 'better' high power views, but that you can obtain a higher power using any given eyepiece, or the same power while using a longer focal length eyepiece?




I probably didn't express myself as well as I should. (And I take no offense at all to your clarification.) I was trying to say that, in general, if you want high magnification views, you're better off starting with a long focal length because, as you and others have pointed out, longer (cheaper, more comfortable) focal length eyepieces will get you there. You can always jack up the magnification on a short focal length instrument, but if you're trying to get to 350x, you probably don't want to start with a 80mm F/5 scope. (And yes, I know I'm exaggerating. Please don't have all the short tube 80 guys pile on convincing me of all the great views they can get with their scopes!) On the other hand, if you generally like wide field, low power views, starting with a C11 (F/10, 2800mm focal length) takes a lot of correction to get you there.

In truth, the difference between 1200mm and 2000mm in focal length isn't that great. Want to get to 300x? 6.6mm vs. 4mm (or corresponding Barlowed eyepiece) isn't that different. You're still going to want something with better eye relief than a Plossl.

I totally agree with Tony: tracking at high powers is worth a bunch. Objects pass through the field of view very quickly at high powers. And one you lose them, you have to go back out to lower powers to find them again. At least I do.

Brian


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
wirenut
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 09/21/06

Loc: m'dale Pa
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: Pharquart]
      #5853539 - 05/11/13 10:40 AM

tracking at hi powers is worth a lot, so much I made a EQ platform so I'd have tracking. it's another thing to be able to use high power when things don't allow it. one thing that won't allow it is a scope that isn't at ambient temperature. Here the reflector/dob's has the advantage. it's open tube allows it to reach ambient temps much faster so you can use it sooner. this of course depends on where/how you store it. if you store scope in a unheated garage or shed where temps are close to that of the outdoors it's not a issue but if you store it in home it can be.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
YetAnotherHobby
sage
*****

Reged: 09/02/09

Loc: Central CT
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: js1976]
      #5853557 - 05/11/13 10:54 AM

My first telescope was a Nexstar 8". It allowed an impatient guy who wanted to see what was up there to see galaxies, nebula, and planets the first night out. Eventually aperture fever and a desire to know more about astronomy led me to a dob and the art of star hopping, but in my back yard light pollution I still prefer the convenience of goto (that impatience thing again). You can't go wrong with an 8SE for the price. There are some tips and tricks to getting the most out of the mount - the tips don't cost a dime but make a big difference in performance. Have a look at www.nexstarsite.com for lots of great info.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Isaacs
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/16/04

Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: wirenut]
      #5853594 - 05/11/13 11:24 AM

Regarding focal length and magnification...

First and foremost, getting good views at high magnifications requires a stable atmosphere, that is excellent seeing. To paraphrase Rod Mollise, "When it comes to planetary viewing, seeing is not the most important thing, it's the only thing."

Getting good views at high magnifications is about getting the image to the focal plane, that means good optics, a scope that has cooled down and stabilized, a scope with enough aperture to push the limits of the seeing.

Cool down, the necessity for the optics to be with a degree or so of the ambient air, is critical because a warm scope results in tube currents and changes in the optics which disturb the view. Thermal equilibrium is a moving target because the temperature drops as the night progresses. In general, Newtonians/Dobs have an advantage in reaching and maintaining thermal equilibrium because they can actively cooled with a fan while observing.

There are other small advantages to a Newtonian, the smaller central obstruction results is some what better planetary contrast.

Notice no mention has been made of the focal length or focal ratio...

In terms of a mount, a solid, stable mount that does not vibrate when you touch it is number one. A stable mount allows the observer to focus in real time instead of having to wait for the scope to settle after each tweak. Tracking is nice but not at the expense of optics or thermal equilibrium or mechanical stability.

So... I prefer Newtonians for planetary viewing, I find there is a small but real advantage. But in the big picture, either the 8 inch SCT or the 8 inch Dob is plenty capable of providing very good planetary views. It is, after all, about having your scope ready to take advantage of those nights when the seeing is excellent and both can do that.

Jon Isaacs


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
js1976
member


Reged: 12/27/12

Loc: Madison, MS
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: Jon Isaacs]
      #5859701 - 05/14/13 11:51 AM

Ok, sounds like I can't go wrong with either choice. A 10 inch Zhumell or a Nexstar 8. The Celestron is certainly a much larger investment, but I might be able to keep my kids interested longer since I won't be spending as much time searching the skies.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jerwin
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 05/17/12

Loc: Romeoville IL
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: js1976]
      #5859741 - 05/14/13 12:09 PM

the tracking you get with a goto scope like a nexstar is very nice when sharing the eyepiece. With a Dob, if you have something in the eyepiece and want to let someone else see it, you often need to place the object almost off the eyepiece, so by the time they look it's drifting towards the center. Depending on how long they look, you might need to fine it again, or reposition it for the next kid.

For me, the goto is nice, but the tracking is why the scope costs more.

Having said that, there are kits you can put in a dob to get them to track.

A dob takes long to cool off if you leave it in your house, but even with that cool off time, I'm almost always able to view the night sky faster with my dob than with my goto scope.

If I could only have 1, I'd pick my goto scope, but that would be like picking which kid you love the most.


Good luck and clear skies,
Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
csrlice12
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/22/12

Loc: Denver, CO
Re: More newbie questions new [Re: star drop]
      #5859769 - 05/14/13 12:20 PM

Quote:

Quote:


It would seem to me that the only assured 'advantage' of the longer focal length isn't necessarily 'better' high power views, but that you can obtain a higher power using any given eyepiece, or the same power while using a longer focal length eyepiece?




Correct.




However, that higher power comes at the cost of a narrower FOV.....


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
10 registered and 31 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  zjc26138, WOBentley, kkokkolis 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 873

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics