Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Astrophotography and Sketching >> DSLR & Digital Camera Astro Imaging & Processing

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
Greg K.Administrator

*****

Reged: 12/11/03

Loc: Clifton Park, NY
M13 new
      #5852619 - 05/10/13 07:40 PM Attachment (35 downloads)

M13
From 2013/5/5
Canon T2i (550D) ISO 800
Celestron 11" SCT @ f6.3
QHY5L-II guided
15x120s light frames
BackyardEOS, PHD, DSS, Photoshop, etc.

larger version


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
zjc26138
Loved By All
*****

Reged: 02/24/05

Loc: Mingo Junction, Ohio
Re: M13 new [Re: Greg K.]
      #5852674 - 05/10/13 08:12 PM

Excellent shot Greg!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ewave
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 05/16/09

Loc: northwest NJ
Re: M13 new [Re: zjc26138]
      #5852692 - 05/10/13 08:29 PM

Greg
Very nice photo! BTW, for the QHY5L-II, what software did you use to guide it with and which mount did you use?
Clear skies.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Greg K.Administrator

*****

Reged: 12/11/03

Loc: Clifton Park, NY
Re: M13 new [Re: ewave]
      #5852712 - 05/10/13 08:47 PM

Quote:

Greg
Very nice photo! BTW, for the QHY5L-II, what software did you use to guide it with and which mount did you use?
Clear skies.




PHD 1.14.2, (on the prerelease page) supports the QHY5L-II natively. Mount was a CGEM guided via the ST4 port.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
David PavlichAdministrator
Transmographied
*****

Reged: 05/18/05

Loc: Mandeville, LA USA
Re: M13 new [Re: Greg K.]
      #5852868 - 05/10/13 10:20 PM

You've been busy, Greg. Nice work!!

David


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tom and Beth
Post Laureate


Reged: 01/08/07

Loc: Tucson, AZ
Re: M13 new [Re: David Pavlich]
      #5852903 - 05/10/13 10:36 PM

Nice shot.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
srosenfraz
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 03/06/11

Loc: United States
Re: M13 new [Re: Tom and Beth]
      #5853016 - 05/10/13 11:26 PM

Very sharp, Greg - nice job!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Greg K.Administrator

*****

Reged: 12/11/03

Loc: Clifton Park, NY
Re: M13 [Re: srosenfraz]
      #5853111 - 05/11/13 12:37 AM Attachment (12 downloads)

Ok, I realized I had some data on this from about a year ago, same scope, camera, ISO and exposure so I decided to combine it all together. Here with 38x120s light frames.

larger link


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
srosenfraz
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 03/06/11

Loc: United States
Re: M13 new [Re: Greg K.]
      #5853158 - 05/11/13 01:35 AM

All the better, Greg - really nice!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Phil Hosey
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/29/08

Loc: LaGrange, GA
Re: M13 new [Re: Greg K.]
      #5853784 - 05/11/13 12:56 PM

Hey Greg,
You've been putting up some nice images with the C11 and f/6.3 reducer lately! What are you using to connect your recucer to your camera? I have a similar setup to yours except that my reducer is the Celestron version. I'm also using the Celestron T-adapter that is supposed to put the reducer at the optimal spacing but it doesn't seem to work well at all. I get severe vignetting and the stars get distorted very quickly as you move from the center.
Keep up the good work!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Greg K.Administrator

*****

Reged: 12/11/03

Loc: Clifton Park, NY
Re: M13 new [Re: Phil Hosey]
      #5853980 - 05/11/13 03:07 PM Attachment (5 downloads)

I have an SCT T-adapter #93633-A that doesn't work so well with the reducer, like you said I get significant vignetting with that.

Instead I use an Orion 2" T-adapter, the threads on 2" barrel part just happen to match SCT threads.... So I just stick the reducer between them, as close to the camera as it can get.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Erk1024
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 07/06/11

Loc: Henderson, NV
Re: M13 new [Re: Greg K.]
      #5853988 - 05/11/13 03:12 PM

That's a beautiful shot Greg, nice work. Tight stars and good processing. That's a keeper.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Phil Hosey
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/29/08

Loc: LaGrange, GA
Re: M13 new [Re: Greg K.]
      #5854096 - 05/11/13 04:39 PM

Quote:

I have an SCT T-adapter #93633-A that doesn't work so well with the reducer, like you said I get significant vignetting with that. I don't think that's designed with DSLRs in mind, frankly - the chip sits too far back.

Instead I use an Orion 2" T-adapter, the threads on 2" barrel part just happen to match SCT threads.... So I just stick the reducer between them, as close to the camera as it can get.





Greg,
That's interesting, I happen to have one of those prime focus adapters as well (mine is Antares but looks identical to yours). By my calculations, the FR to sensor distance with the configuration you have is 64.5mm (9.5mm for the Orion camera adapter because the SCT threads eat up part of the distance putting the front of the FR inside it, 11mm for the T-ring and 44mm from the front of the camera to the sensor. That distance would effectively put you at f/7.7. Would be interesting if you could plate-solve a full frame of one of your images taken that way so that we can verify what your true f/ratio is.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Greg K.Administrator

*****

Reged: 12/11/03

Loc: Clifton Park, NY
Re: M13 new [Re: Phil Hosey]
      #5854122 - 05/11/13 04:54 PM

Quote:

Quote:

I have an SCT T-adapter #93633-A that doesn't work so well with the reducer, like you said I get significant vignetting with that. I don't think that's designed with DSLRs in mind, frankly - the chip sits too far back.

Instead I use an Orion 2" T-adapter, the threads on 2" barrel part just happen to match SCT threads.... So I just stick the reducer between them, as close to the camera as it can get.





Greg,
That's interesting, I happen to have one of those prime focus adapters as well (mine is Antares but looks identical to yours). By my calculations, the FR to sensor distance with the configuration you have is 64.5mm (9.5mm for the Orion camera adapter because the SCT threads eat up part of the distance putting the front of the FR inside it, 11mm for the T-ring and 44mm from the front of the camera to the sensor. That distance would effectively put you at f/7.7. Would be interesting if you could plate-solve a full frame of one of your images taken that way so that we can verify what your true f/ratio is.




That's a good point - According to Astrobin/astrometry.net, I'm getting .42 arcseconds per pixel with this arrangement, that works out to a focal length of 2080mm, so it's about f/7.4 in actuality.

It would be shorter if I could ditch the 2" adapter and screw the FR directly to the rear cell, but orienting the camera would be difficult that way.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Greg K.Administrator

*****

Reged: 12/11/03

Loc: Clifton Park, NY
Re: M13 new [Re: Greg K.]
      #5854145 - 05/11/13 05:14 PM Attachment (7 downloads)

Here's a flat frame from this setup. Vignetting is pretty minimal and easily corrected.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Phil Hosey
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/29/08

Loc: LaGrange, GA
Re: M13 new [Re: Greg K.]
      #5854185 - 05/11/13 05:39 PM

Quote:


It would be shorter if I could ditch the 2" adapter and screw the FR directly to the rear cell, but orienting the camera would be difficult that way.




Actually that would make almost no difference in the effect f/ratio because it's the distance between the FR and the sensor that matters. Screwing the FR directly to the back of the scope would still give you the same distance between the FR and the camera's sensor. If you wanted to decrease the f/ratio, you would want to increase the distance betweent the FR and camera sensor. I'm planning to try this by adding a Baader Vari-lock T2 extension between the T-adapter and T-ring. It's about 20mm so I should be able to get it around f/7. I am going to have to get a 2" visual back though so I can rotation the camera to whatever position I want.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Phil Hosey
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/29/08

Loc: LaGrange, GA
Re: M13 new [Re: Greg K.]
      #5854186 - 05/11/13 05:40 PM

Quote:

Here's a flat frame from this setup. Vignetting is pretty minimal and easily corrected.




Yea, that looks much better. I don't mind increasing the f/ratio if it means less vignetting and better looking stars.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Greg K.Administrator

*****

Reged: 12/11/03

Loc: Clifton Park, NY
Re: M13 new [Re: Phil Hosey]
      #5857633 - 05/13/13 02:16 PM

Quote:

Quote:


It would be shorter if I could ditch the 2" adapter and screw the FR directly to the rear cell, but orienting the camera would be difficult that way.




Actually that would make almost no difference in the effect f/ratio because it's the distance between the FR and the sensor that matters. Screwing the FR directly to the back of the scope would still give you the same distance between the FR and the camera's sensor. If you wanted to decrease the f/ratio, you would want to increase the distance betweent the FR and camera sensor. I'm planning to try this by adding a Baader Vari-lock T2 extension between the T-adapter and T-ring. It's about 20mm so I should be able to get it around f/7. I am going to have to get a 2" visual back though so I can rotation the camera to whatever position I want.




The difference should be that with a shorter imaging train length, the scope's overall focal length is shortened to achieve focus, a quirk of moving mirror SCT design. The reducer would have the same reduction factor, but on a slightly shorter overall focal length. It would be interesting to play with anyway, maybe I need to spring for an AP 2" visual back. At least I could seat the 2" barrel shown above all the way in.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rutilus
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 12/17/10

Re: M13 new [Re: Greg K.]
      #5857689 - 05/13/13 02:49 PM

Superb shot of M13.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Phil Hosey
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/29/08

Loc: LaGrange, GA
Re: M13 new [Re: Greg K.]
      #5858488 - 05/13/13 08:27 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


It would be shorter if I could ditch the 2" adapter and screw the FR directly to the rear cell, but orienting the camera would be difficult that way.




Actually that would make almost no difference in the effect f/ratio because it's the distance between the FR and the sensor that matters. Screwing the FR directly to the back of the scope would still give you the same distance between the FR and the camera's sensor. If you wanted to decrease the f/ratio, you would want to increase the distance betweent the FR and camera sensor. I'm planning to try this by adding a Baader Vari-lock T2 extension between the T-adapter and T-ring. It's about 20mm so I should be able to get it around f/7. I am going to have to get a 2" visual back though so I can rotation the camera to whatever position I want.




The difference should be that with a shorter imaging train length, the scope's overall focal length is shortened to achieve focus, a quirk of moving mirror SCT design. The reducer would have the same reduction factor, but on a slightly shorter overall focal length. It would be interesting to play with anyway, maybe I need to spring for an AP 2" visual back. At least I could seat the 2" barrel shown above all the way in.




Of course, you are correct, I forgot about the change in the overall focal length due to the moving mirror.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
13 registered and 22 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Dave M, fishonkevin, WOBentley, tecmage 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 694

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics