Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Cats & Casses

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
Bill W.
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/09/05

Loc: Western PA, USA
Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new
      #5852634 - 05/10/13 07:49 PM

Is anyone using a Astro-Tech 10" RC and a SBIG 8300 w/8 position color filter wheel or something similar in weight? I was wondering if those people were experiencing the sag/collimation issues. I am interested in the AT10RC but that is my biggest reservation with the scope. It would complete my scopes for imaging rather nicely... Thanks!

-Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
pfile
Post Laureate


Reged: 06/14/09

Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: Bill W.]
      #5852687 - 05/10/13 08:24 PM

that's me

collimation issues, yes. probably you can't get perfect collimation at all OTA angles due to sag. check my astrobin for what i've done with it so far. OAG is a must in my opinion.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bill W.
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/09/05

Loc: Western PA, USA
Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: pfile]
      #5852791 - 05/10/13 09:40 PM

That's what I am worried about. I hate chasing my tail with issues like that. The skies aren't clear around here for weeks at a time. I thought I read where someone was making a plate for the back to help stiffen everything up some.

-Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
pfile
Post Laureate


Reged: 06/14/09

Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: Bill W.]
      #5852805 - 05/10/13 09:50 PM

well the problems are surmountable, but i guess "you get what you pay for" applies here. these scopes are really cheap compared to the competition... as such you will probably have to put in a little sweat equity. well and some actual equity since many people consider the stock focuser to be inadequate (though there are those that think it's fine). i have not yet invested in it, but the teleskop-service tilt/tip ring seems to be an essential tool for really collimating this thing properly. more $$$

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bill W.
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/09/05

Loc: Western PA, USA
Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: pfile]
      #5852827 - 05/10/13 10:02 PM

I think Astronomics is selling those tip/tilt focusing rings. I knew the focuser would probably need to be replaced. I'm spoiled by automated focusing.. lol. Thanks!

-Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrcrillyAdministrator
Refractor wienie no more
*****

Reged: 04/30/03

Loc: NE Ohio
Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: Bill W.]
      #5852842 - 05/10/13 10:10 PM

Quote:

I think Astronomics is selling those tip/tilt focusing rings. I knew the focuser would probably need to be replaced. I'm spoiled by automated focusing.. lol. Thanks!

-Bill




If you go with the Moonlight, I believe the focuser includes collimation adjustments.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bill W.
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/09/05

Loc: Western PA, USA
Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: jrcrilly]
      #5852898 - 05/10/13 10:34 PM

Thanks John. I would go with Moonlite. He's not too far away from where I live and makes a great product.

-Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jared
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 10/11/05

Loc: Piedmont, California, U.S.
Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: Bill W.]
      #5853133 - 05/11/13 01:01 AM

I have one of these RC's that I have been using with a FeatherTouch focuser and one of the adapters ensure the focuser is square. I have used it with ab SBIG STL series camera (heavier than your 8300 camera) and with an FLI Microline (lighter). It took some careful work collimating, but I did not have a significant problem with flexure--and that was with the STL which would pose more of a challenge.

I know some have complained that maintaining orthogonality is a problem because the primary is not attached to the back plate, but I didn't have any issues. I did have a problem with the fact that the system has no adjustment to ensure the focuser is square to the optical axis, hence the adapter from Teleskop Service in Germany. I understand you can skip this accessory if you get a Moonlight focuser since an adjustment is built in.

I found the scope to be a good value, and I was able to get sub 2" FWHM stars across the field of an 8300 chip without a flattener.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jared
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 10/11/05

Loc: Piedmont, California, U.S.
Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: Jared]
      #5853136 - 05/11/13 01:03 AM

A flattener is a requirement for chips larger than the 8300. And is a "nice-to-have" even with an 8300 based camera. The only way I could get sub 2" across the field was to focus 1/3 of the way out from the center of the field.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
pfile
Post Laureate


Reged: 06/14/09

Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 [Re: Jared]
      #5853157 - 05/11/13 01:34 AM

re: the teleskop tilt/tip, if i remember right sl63amg (photon) believes that the TS ring increases the stiffness of the mirror assembly by virtue of the fact that it's providing some tension when it's in place. so it might provide some benefit that the moonlite itself can not.

ram's recent thread about using a howie glatter collimation laser on an ATRC includes some comments from some that think it's too easy to accidentally rotate the moonlite, which will really upset any collimation adjustments you've done.

i can't really speak to either as i don't have the TS ring, and have not tried to collimate my moonlite. hopefully it's straight on from the factory.

having said all that, i know i still need to refine the collimation of my setup.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jared
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 10/11/05

Loc: Piedmont, California, U.S.
Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: pfile]
      #5853561 - 05/11/13 10:58 AM

I will also add that I would NOT recommend using the rotation feature of any of the common focuses with a long focal length scope like the AT10--Feathertouch, Moonlite, or stock focuser. Just leave the focuser rotation locked down. Moving it is enough to screw up your orthogonality a little bit--enough to be visible in your images. That could also be contributing to what some people report as sag in the system.

If you need to rotate your camera to find a guide star, do it with the camera mounting itself (which will vary from camera to camera--I strongly recommend threaded adapters at longer focal lengths, not just a 2" nosepiece).


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bill W.
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/09/05

Loc: Western PA, USA
Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: Jared]
      #5853588 - 05/11/13 11:16 AM

Thanks guys! Jared, I've read some of your posts on the RC. Your post are what has made me reconsider the scope as being doable. I never rotate my camera so that won't be an issue. What focuser were you using? I prefer attaching my camera by t-threads whenever it possible. That's probably my only complaint about the Moonlite I have on my 8" f/4 scope I have. It's a 3 point compression ring. I ended up buying a self centering adapter and it works somewhat better. I would still prefer the t-threads. If you can get good images using a STL I am very encouraged to possibly be able to get decent results from my 8300.

-Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bill W.
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/09/05

Loc: Western PA, USA
Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: Bill W.]
      #5853611 - 05/11/13 11:30 AM

One other related thought... would a Howie Glatter laser with the holographic grid pattern be useful with the RC? I have read some on the collimation of the RC about the hall of mirrors... Thanks!

-Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrcrillyAdministrator
Refractor wienie no more
*****

Reged: 04/30/03

Loc: NE Ohio
Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: Bill W.]
      #5853982 - 05/11/13 03:07 PM

Quote:

I prefer attaching my camera by t-threads whenever it possible. That's probably my only complaint about the Moonlite I have on my 8" f/4 scope I have. It's a 3 point compression ring.




I know that all current drawtubes for their 2.5" focusers offer threads at the drawtube end; I think the 2" models may as well. It's not a T thread but it provides a square and solid attachment so you can go all the way to the camera with appropriate threaded fittings. I use a self-centering T adaptor with my older Moonlight.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bill W.
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/09/05

Loc: Western PA, USA
Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: jrcrilly]
      #5854562 - 05/11/13 11:10 PM

Thanks John. I'll have check out my Moonlite.

-Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jared
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 10/11/05

Loc: Piedmont, California, U.S.
Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: Bill W.]
      #5855164 - 05/12/13 10:34 AM

I have the Feathertouch 3" focuser on my AT10. In my case, I had an Astro-Physics flattener for my AP130 that I wanted to use with the AT10, so I bought the FT 2.7" adapter so I could thread in the flattener. I already had a custom adapter to mate the STL camera to AP flattener. Interestingly, I found that I shouldn't thread the flattener on all the way or it would mess up orthogonality (seeing a theme here?), so I need to thread it on most of the way and then use the AP lock ring to tighten things down.

In general, I would not recommend my AP flattener with this scope. While it is a good match as a flattener, it uses all of the available back focus and then some--I had to actually bring in the mirror spacing slightly past the optimum value to reach focus. This introduces a small amount of spherical aberration, but not enough to matter (I only needed a few extra millimeters). Most field flatteners do not use up so much back focus, and so would be a better match.

I would definitely recommend something threaded rather than compression rings. If you can't find something stock, Precise Parts can put together exactly what you need. They do very nice work. The 8300 has such small pixels, and you are working at such long focal lengths, that you need everything just right to avoid obvious astigmatism in all four corners. Based on my experiences with a much larger chip (and with an FLI ML8300) it is very doable, though. I found I needed the TS tip/tilt plate with the larger camera, but probably could have gotten away without it with the 8300.

Honestly, I never had problems with the focuser/imaging train sagging. It is a finicky setup, though (as is anything at this focal length), so you need to get the compilation right and make sure everything is rock solid from the back plate out. I even, at one point, had an issue with my FLI filter wheel messing up the orthogonality of the camera because one of the holes attaching the back cover wasn't machined out quite far enough and a screw head was sticking out a fraction of a millimeter causing the camera to be slightly "canted" rather than seated properly in the dovetail. That one took a while to find!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jared
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 10/11/05

Loc: Piedmont, California, U.S.
Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: Bill W.]
      #5855195 - 05/12/13 10:49 AM

One other thing I will mention that you probably already realize... Unless you have better than average seeing conditions, you will likely find the 5.4 micron pixels are somewhat over sampled on this scope. You're going to be getting something like 0.54 arc seconds per pixel. This would be great for 1" or 1.5" FWHM seeing conditions, but is slight overkill at 2" or worse. Not a major issue, but you should be aware. You may find that binning 2x2 actually yields better results on most nights (though I'm not certain how well the 8300 works binned--I recall some issues with micro lenses when binned).

Best of luck! I think this can be a really good imaging setup for you. Just don't expect everything to be perfect right out of the gate. Imaging above 1,000mm focal length requires careful adjustment and optimization to get good results. That's why I cringe a little every time I see a new imager starting out with a 12" SCT on a fork mount and wanting to know what accessories they will need. Long focal lengths are finicky.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jared
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 10/11/05

Loc: Piedmont, California, U.S.
Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: Bill W.]
      #5855207 - 05/12/13 10:57 AM

Quote:

One other related thought... would a Howie Glatter laser with the holographic grid pattern be useful with the RC? I have read some on the collimation of the RC about the hall of mirrors... Thanks!

-Bill




I have one, but don't find the holographic projector particularly useful. I prefer to just use the regular spot. Your mileage may vary, though. I use a Cheshire and the "hall of mirrors" reflections of secondary spiders to get the primary and secondary collimated, then use the laser return spot to ensure the focuser is square to the optical axis. Final tweaks under the stars.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bill W.
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/09/05

Loc: Western PA, USA
Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: Jared]
      #5856431 - 05/12/13 10:01 PM

Thanks so very much Jared for your time in posting your experiences with the scope. It is appreciate! I will no doubt end up getting the AT10RC. I will usually do some research and decide on what I want. Then, think about it for a bit and come back and rehash through the details. I'm very much not an impulse buyer. I am a very methodical person so I do think I can overcome this scope being finicky because I am the same way... lol. I do plan to go with a threaded attachment point for the camera to the focuser.

Yes, I did realize that I would be oversampled by quite a bit for my area. I planned to try binning at 2x2. I have imaged at 1750mm before and know the challenges that lay ahead. My setup was different when I imaged at 1750mm. I used a LX200 10" f/6.3 w/AO7. The DEC drive on my LX200 was dying back then. But, I think my current setup will outperform my old one. I have a CGE Pro now. I moved three years ago. Now, I live at the base of a mountain, which at this point, is my biggest concern. I do have a 8" SCT that I plan to use to test out how doable guiding at 2000mm is here. I usually get around 2.6-3.0 in FWHM. How flat is the AT10RC?

I have a cheshire/sight tube and laser. Does the tak collimating scope have big advantage over regular collimation aids? I'll be burying myself in reading up and understanding RC collimation before I get the scope. I have a 8" f/4 newt that can be pretty finicky. But, most of it's issues are tube flexure because my camera and filter wheel are heavy and the tube would flex. The tube would flex enough just slewing to different angle that you could see it easily in the images. I just replaced that scope with a carbon fiber version with the same specs... I'm waiting for clear skies to put it through it's paces. I think the RC will round out my imaging scopes nicely. Thanks again for your time!

-Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jared
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 10/11/05

Loc: Piedmont, California, U.S.
Re: Astro-Tech 10" RC & SBIG 8300 new [Re: Bill W.]
      #5857393 - 05/13/13 12:30 PM

You should do fine guiding with the 8" or the new scope--just expect to work through a few kinks. The CGE Pro is a nice mount. With either scope, I'd recommend OAG rather than guide scope.

The AT10RC is flat enough that I would consider a flattener "optional" with an 8300 sized chip or smaller. You'll be able to detect an improvement with a flattener, but you can certainly get away without one. It's on the edge of acceptable, though.

I haven't used the Tak collimating scope so can't speak to its effectiveness. I can tell you that it isn't required, though. Your cheshire and laser are sufficient. Ritchey's are finicky about collimation, but the AT tends to hold its collimation well so I wouldn't expect a problem with just the tools you have.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
9 registered and 16 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Starman27, kkokkolis 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1133

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics