Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Announcements and News >> Discussion of CN Articles, Reviews, and Reports

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
Charlie HeinAdministrator
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 11/02/03

Loc: 26.06.08N, +80.23.08W
Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece
      #5968915 - 07/13/13 12:21 PM

Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece

By Richard Lines


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
smallscopefanLeo
sage
*****

Reged: 01/23/11

Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: Charlie Hein]
      #5969243 - 07/13/13 04:09 PM

Interesting review, thanks for sharing your take on these heavy hitters. For the time being, I doubt that I will go quite -so- wide with my own glass. Since I am mostly self-relegated to the more diminutive end of the telescope spectrum, I tend to prize lightness, compactness and simplicity in eyepiece design.

BUT, I would be lying if I said that I don't daydream a decent bit about a great Dob every here and there (and also about the accompanying eyepieces that would enable me to luxuriously slew by hand at low to moderate powers with it). So it is with ample interest that I like to hear what others have to say about these meaty 2" oculars.

Based on my own experiences, and on those of countless ones shared here on our forums, I am gradually learning that tolerances for edges in various fields of views vary tremendously. Perhaps I am a fairly tolerant one when it comes to such things, for I have not found different sorts of slightly mushy, partly coma-y edges to really bother or hinder me too much overall. Sure, I care about more than just what's up front and centered, but I have to wonder as to just how much of a deal-breaker this would be for many folks out there. I understand that some are very sensitive and particular to these details, and more finely attuned to slight changes in them from eyepiece to eyepiece.

Right now I see that one can buy the ES 20mm AND the ES 25mm for about the price of one 21mm Ethos. So I wonder, without having owned any of these - is the 21mm Ethos so superior to the 25mm ES (or other ES eyepieces for that matter) that it is worth so much more? The Ethos also has an extra 9th element, I assume? (It would be fascinating to see how they would both test out on-axis.)

I too am eager to hear from others who have had experiences with the ES 25mm. We eyepiece connoisseurs are certainly spoiled for choice these days with all of the dizzying arrays of glass combinations that are now being produced!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
star drop
contra contrail
*****

Reged: 02/02/08

Loc: Snow Plop, WNY
Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: smallscopefanLeo]
      #5969311 - 07/13/13 05:10 PM

Thank you, Richard. You have saved me from a disappointing purchase.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starman1
Vendor (EyepiecesEtc.com)
*****

Reged: 06/24/03

Loc: Los Angeles
Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: star drop]
      #5969748 - 07/13/13 10:49 PM

I'll add to Richard's excellent review with a few comments of my own, and some suggestions:

I spent a fair amount of time with the 25mm in my 12.5" under dark skies, too.

My comments could be similar to yours, since I use both a 31 Nagler and a 21 Ethos, in a 12.5" f/5 scope with Paracorr.II.

Here is what I found:

1)distortion--obviously corrected for AMD, because RD is noticeable. It's obviously corrected for nighttime, astronomical observation. This is not a negative, just a comment.

2)vignetting--obviously significant, since it's easily visible in both day AND night viewing, starting about 80% of the way to the edge. Not unexpected, since the field stop is a little larger than would be expected in a 2" barrel with this AFOV (probably why TeleVue stayed away from this focal length), but also minimally noticeable at night, and pretty much only if you let the moon drift toward the edge of the field.

3)light scatter--not great. When the crescent Moon is in the field, the light from the lighted part bleeds over to the earthlit part and reduces contrast. Averted vision shows this.
When the Moon is outside the field, it's obvious which direction the Moon lies.
More aggressive baffling would have reduced the FOV, I believe. Not a great lunar eyepiece, therefore, but since the eyepiece is highly unlikely to be used as a lunar or planetary eyepiece in any scope, this may be a non-issue.
Suggestion: use for all purposes except Moon viewing.

4)astigmatism correction--not the best. Even in the Paracorr, star image degradation starts a little more than half-way to the edge and gets suddenly worse at about the 90% point.
Going back and forth through focus on a star near the edge, the astigmatism at the edge is obvious.
It's better than many 80 degree eyepieces, though.
Suggestion: Use as a finder eyepiece for really low power.

5)lateral color. Star images become prismatic near the edge, and moving the eye only partially eliminates this. Holding the eye in the wrong place with an Ethos can do this too, but changing the position of the eye eliminates it. In this case, it can't be eliminated, AND the blue ring at the edge is very noticeable on the Moon; otherwise not at all.
Suggestion: Experimenting with eye placement is essential to reduce this effect.

6)internal reflections. With Sirius slightly outside the field of view, there is a semi-circular ghost in the field. The center of that circle is where Sirius is.
The ghost is not evident when Sirius is in the field, but it's obvious that reflection from the interior wall of the eyepiece barrel, or the side of a lens, or the filter threads at the bottom, or a modestly bright spacer ring visible near the bottom causes this. It could have been fixed with a baffle, probably, but wasn't, and for the reasons I mentioned above.
Suggestion: I would recommend darkening the filter threads on the bottom of the eyepiece and the bottom of the barrel itself.

7)image sharpness on axis and in the center 50% of the field is very good. If a user mainly looks here, it will be an engaging eyepiece to use.
Suggestion: Use for objects that can be framed well by the field of view.

8)field curvature. In the Paracorr, I didn't really notice anything that I couldn't eliminate by careful focusing (I'm 62). But without the Paracorr, though coma dominated the edge, (and astigmatism), I could focus the edge a little better and when I did, it defocused the center. Since my scope has a 1587mm focal length sans Paracorr (1825mm with), I would bet the field curvature of the eyepiece matches the scope and augments it to create a noticeable curvature. It really didn't matter, though, since FC wasn't the biggest issue at the edge, and it was fully eliminated in the Paracorr by focusing partway out from center.
Suggestion: Don't focus on a star in the center, but partway out and the entire field will be in better focus. Astigmatism and lateral chomaticism are reduced by having a better focus over the entire field.

9)coloration. Well, I'm pretty insensitive to this. Even if the tint were slightly yellow, my eye would see it as white 2 seconds after looking through the eyepiece. It's one of the reasons I regard any discussion of tint as a "tempest in a teapot". You might notice it if quickly changing eyepieces, like in a turret, but otherwise? It's only important to me if it reduces the ability to see colors in stars or objects. if I see a tint, it's STRONG. But in eyepieces? REALLY subtle. I saw none in this eyepiece, even on the Moon.

It would be interesting to see if a simple black ring on the bottom of the eyepiece might eliminate an internal reflection (as it has done on some other eyepieces) or whether simple blackening of the filter threads helps. Had internal baffling been more aggressive, and the FOV reduced to, say, 90 degrees, this eyepiece could easily have earned a better review.

[Excerpted from a March 17th post and somewhat enhanced]


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
astrophile
sage


Reged: 06/30/13

Loc: Chaise-lounge, 18x50s in hand
Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: Starman1]
      #5970152 - 07/14/13 10:22 AM

Richard (and Don), thank you for the cautionary tale. I've always wished TeleVue could produce an Ethos 25/26, and this ES would have been a tempting dead end for me. I'll have to continue being satisfied with the Nagler 31 for my widest-feasible good FOV (which, by the way, can be had used/like new for much less than a new ES 25)...

Edited by astrophile (07/14/13 12:01 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rlines
newbie


Reged: 07/14/13

Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: astrophile]
      #5970925 - 07/14/13 06:14 PM

Gentlemen...many thanks for your feedback. There are some interesting points made. It might be worth mentioning that while I have been fortunate enough to own some of the best eyepieces around, I'm not generally that critical of minor optical shortcomings. The ethos is not necessarily the most practical choice, especially with small scopes. I keep a selection of 1.25" eyepieces; Meade 24mm 4000 series, TV 24mm widefield (1980s), Orion megavista 10.5mm, Meade 8.8mm and 6.7mm ultrawides....all of these have minor defects which do not detract much from the viewing experience. All have been used in a wide variety of scopes. All were bought secondhand for not very much money and have given many years of service. In spite of 40 years in the hobby I couldn't tell you which is best for planetry observation from an ethos 8mm, TV 8mmm Plossl, or Baader or Zeiss orthos of the same FL. I know what the consensus opinion would be, but to be honest my eyes don't see that much difference. My beef with the ES25 is that the defects do detract from the observational experience, to the extent that I could not sell on the eyepiece with a clear conscience. I'm pretty certain that the next owner would be similarly disappointed. This was the main motivation for submitting the review. ES on thair website go out of their way to invite comparison with the best (by which they mean TV in this case?). This one eyepiece in their portfolio is found to be rather wanting on that basis....I suppose they would argue that there is no comparable product.
The value-for-money argument is a good one and rather different over here. In the UK all US imports become dollars-to-pounds plus dealer factor X. Thus there is an incentive to import directly from the US. In the UK the ES prices are certainly lower than TV but the relative differential is less, certainly for the 100 degree series. It's very much a premium product.
Just a little extra perspective...
RL


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
star drop
contra contrail
*****

Reged: 02/02/08

Loc: Snow Plop, WNY
Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: rlines]
      #5970984 - 07/14/13 06:44 PM

Hi Richard and welcome to Cloudy Nights.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starman1
Vendor (EyepiecesEtc.com)
*****

Reged: 06/24/03

Loc: Los Angeles
Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: rlines]
      #5970988 - 07/14/13 06:49 PM

Richard doesn't mention the f/ratio of his scope (I suspect f/5), but this eyepiece seems to like f/6 much better than f/5 and it detests f/4.
I used it in a friend's f/6.5 scope a while back, and it was OK--much of the complaints that Richard and I had about the eyepiece were considerably reduced and a much larger % of the field was in sharp focus.
Of course, most of the users of this eyepiece will have short f/ratios and larger scopes, so that doesn't help, but I did want to point that out.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
russell23
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/31/09

Loc: Upstate NY
Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: Starman1]
      #5971900 - 07/15/13 09:39 AM

After reading the review I find myself wondering if Richard's speculation about incorrect assembly is correct - particularly because he says that the stars are even bloated in the center of the field. I've had numerous ES eyepieces including a 14mm ES100 and I have never seen one that had bloated stars at sharpest focus. In fact, my 20mm ES68 comes to sharper focus than the 20mm XW.

Dave


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
obrazell
super member


Reged: 04/03/05

Loc: United Kingdom
Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: russell23]
      #5972084 - 07/15/13 11:45 AM

I bought one recently at the IAS show and tested it on an F6 TMB triplet (80mm) I found that the centre of the field was sharp but towards the edge the focus went very quickly. As Don says the ring of fire effect was making it unusable on the Moon which is about all we get a shot at here in northern latitudes until August. My main scopes are F4.2 so Don's comments suggest the eyepiece will not be that usable. There was obviously a good reason why Al said it could not be done :-)

Owen


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Zamboni
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 01/03/05

Loc: Colorado Springs
Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: obrazell]
      #5972373 - 07/15/13 02:10 PM

Unfortunately, the problem with long focal length for Ethos class eyepieces (and the ES100 EPs are optically clones of the Ethos) is that they are physically constrained to around 22mm due to the physical limitations of a 2" barrel. In order to make a longer focal length, compromises have to be made resulting in edge distortion which is something ES is apparently OK with doing, but TeleVue refuses to do.

This is why ES is introducing a new 3" barrel size for the 30mm 100* eyepiece, although I think it may ultimately be a fool's errand. Of course, that's what people said about Al Nagler's namesake eyepieces when they first came out.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rlines
newbie


Reged: 07/14/13

Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: russell23]
      #5972867 - 07/15/13 06:34 PM

russell23...
The focus is generally ok in the middle, although there is a touch of ambiguity in the exact focus which under other circumstances would pass un-noticed at this level of magnification. The issues really start about half way out. The scope is a 12" f/4 Newtonian so, yes, it is a tough test. But doubling the focal ratio with a barlow lens (of known good quality) fails to provide much of an inprovement! The main market for this ep will be big heavy dobs that can brush off the balance problems. My own comments after 2 weeks of ownership mirror virtually exactly what Don has said....it's not a one-off. Other comments are coming in to the same effect.; no-one has replied saying they've got a good one. They're all like this...You might as well take a 25mm 2" plossl and remove the field stop. RL


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starman1
Vendor (EyepiecesEtc.com)
*****

Reged: 06/24/03

Loc: Los Angeles
Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: rlines]
      #5972938 - 07/15/13 07:05 PM

Well, I don't know how much accommodation you have in your eyes, but try focusing on a star away from the center (try 25%, 50%) to see if that tames some of the field curvature. If you can still focus the center after you do so (and I suspect your accommodation will allow it), that does seem to reduce the edge of field aberrations somewhat. Because the edge issues are exacerbated by defocus when the center is dialed in.

I've had other eyepieces like that (35 Panoptic comes to mind), where focusing half way out allowed me to see an entire field more-or-less in focus.

And since the Paracorr will tame the coma and flatten the field slightly, that just might work to give you a larger portion of the field in good focus.

If you can get 75% of the field into sharp focus and only the edge deteriorates, then most of any edge problems will be outside the normal viewing field.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JimP
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 04/22/03

Loc: South Carolina
Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: Starman1]
      #5973182 - 07/15/13 09:42 PM

Hi Don,
Interesting that you say, "If you can get 75% of the field into sharp focus ... most of the edge problems will be outside the normal viewing field". That helps explain, perhaps, why I like eyepieces with a 70 degree FOV so much. Of course wider FOV eyepieces are nice because the remaining FOV (over 70 degrees) adds to the overall observing experience. It's like looking forward at the bookshelf and seeing the rest of the room with my peripheral vision which is not in sharp focus.

best,

JimP


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
obrazell
super member


Reged: 04/03/05

Loc: United Kingdom
Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: JimP]
      #5974230 - 07/16/13 02:02 PM

Looks like this one might be a pup :-( I had bought any ES eyepieces before and it looks like I won't again.

Owen


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
obrazell
super member


Reged: 04/03/05

Loc: United Kingdom
Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece *DELETED* new [Re: obrazell]
      #5974233 - 07/16/13 02:03 PM

Post deleted by iceblaze

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Shneor
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 03/01/05

Loc: Northern California
Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: obrazell]
      #5974408 - 07/16/13 03:28 PM

The review and following comments in this thread underscore the need to match an eyepiece with a specific purpose appropriate for the telescope or telescopes it is intended for. I own this eyepiece. It's an excellent eyepiece in my 22" for extended objects, especially when used with a filter, in my case, normally an NPB. For me, this eyepiece is far and away the best eyepiece I own for framing large objects. It gives superb views of M8, the Veil and M42, for starters. It's pretty useless as a finder eyepiece (in any case, I use my 9mm ES120 for that) or for other purposes in my 22".

Having said that, I own other ES eyepieces; they are uniformly excellent performers. I also own several Televue eyepieces, which are also excellent performers. For the best possible views, better than either ES or Televue products but with a smaller apparent field, I own a set of Baader Classic Orthos (see list below). And just a word about my 9mm ES120 (which actually has a true AFOV or almost 140 degrees) which is simply revolutionary, and also is as good as a Delos in the central field (same 72 degrees).

I won't bash Televue except to complain about their high prices, but ES has produced eyepieces rivalling Televue's quality at much more reasonable prices. Bashing ES and Scott Roberts - who I have met and who is not only a gentleman but a true innovator - is just off the mark. Hopefully, this competition will spur more innovation and even better prices all around.

Clears,


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TechPan6415
sage
*****

Reged: 07/29/12

Loc: Aspen, Co
Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: Shneor]
      #5974874 - 07/16/13 07:34 PM

I just ordered mine, will compare it to my ES82 30mm which I am pretty happy with but would appreciate the improvement on exit pupil. I intend to use this eyepiece in the manner in which Shneor does above, large, low surface brightness DSO's and low power star field work with my 16".

I live at altitude with some pretty dark skies so I will be curious to see how it measures up to the 82/30mm and my 100/14mm. If it is not to my liking, I will just return it and stick with the 30.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JimMo
I'd Rather Do It Myself


Reged: 01/08/07

Loc: Under the SE Michigan lightdom...
Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: TechPan6415]
      #5975071 - 07/16/13 09:44 PM

I've had one for a while and have used it three times so far in my f4.3 dob w/ Paracorr II. I've tried to critically test it, but find I don't use this wide of a field very often and with observing time scarce I haven't really put it through it paces. That said I haven't noticed any problems with it and I get tight stars across the wide FOV using the same Paracorr II setting (A) as the 17 and 21 Ethos. I've only used it on DSO's at a semi dark observing site. There is a slight vignetting of the last 10% or so, but not objectionable at all. I haven't decided if I will keep it or not, but one or two of my longer f/l wide fields must go.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
davidpitre
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/10/05

Loc: Central Texas
Re: Explore Scientific 25mm 100 degree eyepiece new [Re: Shneor]
      #5976288 - 07/17/13 04:11 PM

Quote:

Bashing ES and Scott Roberts - who I have met and who is not only a gentleman but a true innovator - is just off the mark. Hopefully, this competition will spur more innovation and even better prices all around.

Clears,



Agreed. I have seen and heard nothing but good from Mr Roberts. Like the eyepieces or not, I think we should be respectful.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
1 registered and 10 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  droid 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 4103

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics