Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Cats & Casses

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
Seiko4169
sage


Reged: 07/04/09

A complimentary CAT? new
      #5968705 - 07/13/13 09:21 AM

I've jumped ship from the world of GOTO Cats to manual alt az mounts and refractors but with only a 120mm TAK TSA the globular clusters are really poor from my light polluted garden.

I'm using the Skywatcher Skytee 2 mount that in theory will allow me to mount two scopes and I'm thinking of adding an SCT so that I can have the best of both worlds.

Although I could theoretically invest back into the CPC, Nexstars etc I'm actually enjoying finding my targets so I'm thinking about just the OTA option at the moment.

With that in mind what SCT size and model would you suggest to

A) simultaneously compliment the TAK views
B) really bring the globulars to life
C) be manageable on the Skytee2 mount with the TAK

Thanks


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MikeBOKC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/10/10

Loc: Oklahoma City, OK
Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: Seiko4169]
      #5969137 - 07/13/13 03:00 PM

What's the weight capacity for that mount? If I was looking for an SCT to compliment a 120mm refractor I would go with the 9.25.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SteveC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 06/15/06

Loc: Sunshine State & Ocean State
Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: Seiko4169]
      #5969241 - 07/13/13 04:08 PM

I've never owned an SCT, but as someone who has had a TEC140 and an 7" Intes Micro Mak side by side, I can say that they probably won't be acclimated to air temperature at the same time, especially when the temperature is dropping. Granted, my Mak has a lot of glass and metal, but I found that spent more time looking through the TEC140 and waiting for the Mak to catch up. I'm not trying to dissuade you from trying the combo, but to advise that it may take more patience in setting up and viewing depending on the size of the SCT.

Edited by SteveC (07/13/13 04:10 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eddgie
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/01/06

Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: Seiko4169]
      #5969256 - 07/13/13 04:14 PM

I read your post on the Refractor forum and bit my tongue because there is so much "Refractors are better than anything else" rhetoric, but as you have quickly realized, for the vast majority of targets out there in the world respond better to aperture than any other telescope attribute.

All that being said, now you have the situation that you have a mount that is not Go-To and will not be capable of holding enough aperture to do some serious deep sky.

Alt Az mounts are not well suited to large SCTs due to the fact that their focal lengths mean that they are often used at fairly high power.

I would go as big as I could for the mount though. If it would hold a C11, I would try that. If not, a C9.

If you are not 100% weeded to a Cat, why not consider a Go-To Dob?

If you have a place to store it and attach wheelbarrow handles to move it, a Go-To dob can be out of the door and running before you can carry out your mount and your two telescopes that you would have if you put a C9 or something on your current mount.

12" Go-To dob for $1800....


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Seiko4169
sage


Reged: 07/04/09

Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: Eddgie]
      #5969512 - 07/13/13 07:35 PM

Thanks Eddgie and yes totally agree the frac is nice, quick to cool and shows lovely wide views buts its no magic scope and aperture clearly rules. Alas I really don't have enough storage space for a big DOB so will need to go with a CAT. I'm just not sure how much the mount will take. It's 15kg per side but you never really know until you try it.

The 11 of course would be superb but I do wonder if that's pushing things a bit too far. A lot of EQ mounts struggle with a C11 so it might be a bit to big.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Seiko4169
sage


Reged: 07/04/09

Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: Seiko4169]
      #5969517 - 07/13/13 07:38 PM

Thanks Mike, Steve,

Yes cool down size is a consideration along with the best size. I always thought the 9.25 and 11 where too similar in size to ever go with the 9.25? Perhaps it's the max weight the mount would take?

It's rated at 15kg per mount point so the C11 comes close.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mkofski
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 07/19/11

Loc: Greenfield, Indiana, USA
Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: Seiko4169]
      #5969841 - 07/14/13 12:33 AM

I had a SkyTee 2 and used it with Celestron 8" and Meade 10" SCTs. The 10" Meade was a bit too much for the mount. This was with about 15 pounds of refractors on the other side.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GlennLeDrew
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/18/08

Loc: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: Mkofski]
      #5969919 - 07/14/13 02:28 AM

Beware those complimentary CATs; they're smooth talking customers!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bill Barlow
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 12/03/07

Loc: Overland Park KS
Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: Seiko4169]
      #5969954 - 07/14/13 04:15 AM

I would choose the C9.25 as it weighs around 20 pounds and will out perform the TSA 120 on deep sky targets. I also use altaz mounts with my scopes, including some fairly large cats..a Meade 10 ACF and a C14. I also like to find my targets by star hopping and using the S+T pocket sky atlas, much more fun and rewarding for me. Good luck..

Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Seiko4169
sage


Reged: 07/04/09

Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: Bill Barlow]
      #5969969 - 07/14/13 04:31 AM

Seems the 9.25 is the 'goldilocks' for the mount. Looks like the 11 is too big but would the now infamous HD versus small aperture increase dilemma raise its head?

I know that purely cosmetically the Edge HD would look nicer with the TAK on the mount but I don't want to pay so much the Edge Hd 9.25.

My concern with the Edge 8 is that it won't guarantee to beat the TAK as its not quite large enough?

Edited by Seiko4169 (07/14/13 04:33 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bill Barlow
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 12/03/07

Loc: Overland Park KS
Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: Seiko4169]
      #5969983 - 07/14/13 05:02 AM

I would think that the TSA 120 might beat or at least stay with the edge 8 on planets most of the time, but not on deep sky targets. The standard C9.25 would give the Tak a run for it's money or beat it on decent seeing nights on planets and noticeably pull away on deep sky objects.

Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Seiko4169
sage


Reged: 07/04/09

Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: Bill Barlow]
      #5970014 - 07/14/13 06:24 AM

Thanks Bill, that's my gut feeling too. The edge 9.25 is expensive in the UK though! It's nearly twice the price of the edge 8!!

With my ES 100 eyepieces though the Edge would seem a natural fit over the regular?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Scott BeithAdministrator
SRF
*****

Reged: 11/26/03

Loc: Frederick, MD
Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: Seiko4169]
      #5970082 - 07/14/13 08:51 AM

The long focal length will be rough on a non-tracking mount.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
McUH
member


Reged: 05/29/13

Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: Scott Beith]
      #5970140 - 07/14/13 10:09 AM

C8 or C9 should do well. On Skytee2 I think you can have counterweights with scope on the shorter arm, so it does not need to be exact match. C11 might be too heavy.

Edge is fine, but I don't think you really need it in this situation. For low powers the 120mm will be good, and for high powers standard SCT should do Ok.

Manual tracking is not so bad when you get the hang of it. I use C9 on AltAz, 200x is not problem, 300x requires nudges often, but still Ok. 500x is tricky and no longer comfortable, but then such power is required/possible only very rarely. Wide-field eyepieces will help a lot in this case. Since Skytee2 has slow-motion controls the high power tracking should be even easier for you.

I have 120mm refractor and C9 Edge in light polluted skies, and the difference on most DSO's is really big. C9 will definitely bring the bright globulars to life compared to 120mm.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SteveSMS
super member


Reged: 03/29/08

Loc: Jersey Shore USA
Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: Seiko4169]
      #5970153 - 07/14/13 10:23 AM

Hi Seiko,

I have the Skytee2 and I have used an EdgeHD 8 and a 120ED f7.5 side by side and it works fine. I have the Skytee mounted to an Orion pillar and I use the heavy (2" leg) version of the CG5 for the tripod. It's a heavy setup but it is stable.

Clear Skies,

Steve


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Seiko4169
sage


Reged: 07/04/09

Re: A complimentary CAT? [Re: McUH]
      #5970155 - 07/14/13 10:23 AM

Thanks, yes, the C9 seems to fit the bill but the Edge price is a problem as I'd love the Edge version

:-/


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Seiko4169
sage


Reged: 07/04/09

Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: Seiko4169]
      #5976072 - 07/17/13 02:06 PM

Well, I've got a regular 9.25 arriving so hopefully globular clusters will come back to life?

Certainly hope it's not a lemon!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
wargrafix
sage


Reged: 04/10/13

Loc: Trinidad
Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: Seiko4169]
      #5976166 - 07/17/13 02:51 PM

so far my regular 9.25 is performing wonderfully. You won't regret it! :-)

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Seiko4169
sage


Reged: 07/04/09

Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: wargrafix]
      #5976299 - 07/17/13 04:17 PM

Yes, I'm looking forward to it arriving but can't help but feel the dread of the variable quality that every SCT brings!

:-/


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mskillen
member
*****

Reged: 06/07/13

Loc: Maryland
Re: A complimentary CAT? new [Re: Seiko4169]
      #5976464 - 07/17/13 05:38 PM

Quote:

Yes, I'm looking forward to it arriving but can't help but feel the dread of the variable quality that every SCT brings!

:-/




Saw your Comment, and since I am looking for a new SCT I would like to know what differences I would be looking for.

What makes a good one vs a bad one, and is it something that you can correct?
If it was a mirror issue I can see that would definitely be an issue, but I have heard others make similar comments about scope quality issue.

Just asking Thanks
Mark


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
8 registered and 25 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Starman27, kkokkolis 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 980

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics