Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Eyepieces

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
lbsgville
sage


Reged: 06/15/10

Loc: Florida
Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new
      #6042097 - 08/23/13 03:47 PM

I've been looking at the ES 4.7 82* to upgrade a little. Anyone who has one, what do you think? I'm not asking for a comparison to TV or Meade or anything, just pros and cons of the eyepiece. I have 10" and 14" scopes both around 4.5 FL and a paracorr. Thanks

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tank
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/27/09

Loc: Stoney Creek, Ontario, CANADA
Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: lbsgville]
      #6042179 - 08/23/13 04:35 PM

4.7 is good liked the 6.7 better!
More eye relief in the 6.7
Both are pretty good optically


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Scanning4Comets
Markus
*****

Reged: 12/26/04

Loc: Ontario, Canada
Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: Tank]
      #6042362 - 08/23/13 06:25 PM Attachment (56 downloads)

I've also had both eyepieces. Like Tony says, both are good optically, (excellent actually, and highly corrected even w/o a Paracorr).
However, to me, both suffered from eye relief, with the 4.7mm irritating my eye, so I sold both within a week of having them. I would rather barlow my 14mm and 9mm ES 100's which gives me better eye relief and a wider field.

But barlows are another piece of gear to fiddle with so if I were to get the equivalent of both again I would get a 7mm and 5mm Pentax XW, which I plan on doing eventually.

Just as a side note: I also own a Meade 5.5mm Series 5000 waterproof UWA and it is an excellent eyepiece which has an 82° FOV, has excellent eye relief, it is really sharp optically, it is very light in weight, and has a razor-sharp field stop.
I always reach for that more than barlowing my 9mm ES 100.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Scanning4Comets
Markus
*****

Reged: 12/26/04

Loc: Ontario, Canada
Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: Scanning4Comets]
      #6042370 - 08/23/13 07:15 PM Attachment (87 downloads)

Here is the field lens of the eyepiece. It is supposed to be painted flat black, but looks like a dark "grey", so I added a flat black felt adhesive ring so I won't get any light bouncing into the eyepiece when viewing Jupiter, which can do that to some poorly baffled eyepieces.

I don't even know if the felt black adhesive ring will make any difference or not.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Achernar
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/25/06

Loc: Mobile, Alabama, USA
Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: lbsgville]
      #6042447 - 08/23/13 08:43 PM

I have one and use it mainly for the planets and small DSO's. It is a very good high power eyepiece that is very sharp and does not have problems with flaring or field curvature. The contrast is high and so is the color fidelity, it is a little on the warm side but the views of Jupiter and Saturn are very nice when the seeing is up to it. I use this eyepiece on my 10 and 15-inch F/4.5 Dobs with very good results, it performs even better in a longer focus Newtonian/Dobsonian. The views are definitely better through my 6-inch F/8, which has excellent optics. You will however have to remove your eyeglasses to use this eyepiece, the eye relief is however not so short I find it uncomfortable. I find the need to remove my glasses a small drawback for the enjoyable views I get of planetary nebulae and the planets through it.

Taras


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
lbsgville
sage


Reged: 06/15/10

Loc: Florida
Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: Achernar]
      #6042507 - 08/23/13 09:25 PM

So now I'm thinking of going for the 6.7mm. I'll get more use out of a 6.7, you need really good seeing to use the 4.7, if the seeing is that good I can always Barlow the 6.7. After looking at Astronomics web site that has good views of each size, the 6.7 has noticeably better eye relief.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jarrod
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 01/20/13

Loc: SE USA
Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: lbsgville]
      #6042536 - 08/23/13 09:38 PM

My best view of Jupiter was through the 4.7. But the 6.7 is one of my most used EPs.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
aatt
sage


Reged: 07/26/12

Loc: CT
Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* [Re: Jarrod]
      #6042563 - 08/23/13 09:51 PM

I have the 6.7 and the 4.7-both are very nice e.p's in my F/5 w/o a paracorr. I do not notice any significant edge distortion and the views across the FOV are pretty consistent. I use the 6.7 more often, but as a Floridian your seeing is typically a little better than in the Northeast. I have used the 4.7 quite a bit on fainter planetaries and is has been very useful for eking out some extra detail. My best view of Saturn-ever-was in my 4.7 on a nice steady night in June. For those rare nights it has been very nice to have. Get both if you can afford them.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Scanning4Comets
Markus
*****

Reged: 12/26/04

Loc: Ontario, Canada
Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: aatt]
      #6042669 - 08/23/13 11:07 PM

I agree with what everybody is saying here! Both the 4.7mm and 6.7mm are both optically excellent eyepieces! The price on them is really good too! Can't go wrong in getting either one.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
REC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/20/10

Loc: NC
Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: Scanning4Comets]
      #6043148 - 08/24/13 08:25 AM

I have the 6.7mm and it's perfect for my highest power in my 80ED and is very sharp and comfortable to use. I have even barlowed it a few time on the moon on a steady night.

My other thought was to go one more deeper for say Saturn right now and I picked up a AT 5mm 60* FOV that I'm still evaluating as the weather has been terrible this summer. At $60, you may want to give one a try and if you don't like it with your scopes, you can easily sell it.

Good luck!

Bob


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mac57
super member


Reged: 02/19/13

Loc: DeLand of Oz, Florida
Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: REC]
      #6043206 - 08/24/13 09:13 AM

I love mine. Great buy for the price, too.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
karstenkoch
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/21/12

Loc: GMT+9
Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: mac57]
      #6043267 - 08/24/13 09:59 AM

I have both, use both, and like both. I would make your decision based on the magnification and exit pupil you want. Hey, the price is right so get both! You can always sell one if it doesn't fit your observing groove...

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
csrlice12
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/22/12

Loc: Denver, CO
Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: karstenkoch]
      #6043458 - 08/24/13 12:01 PM

At these f/ls, 2mm difference is a SERIOUS magnification difference. +1 on gerring both.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
lbsgville
sage


Reged: 06/15/10

Loc: Florida
Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: csrlice12]
      #6043696 - 08/24/13 02:07 PM

So I just placed my order for the Explore Scientific 1.25" 82° Series Argon-Purged Waterproof Eyepiece - 6.7mm with Agena Astro Products. They assured me that it is the new Argon purged and that the pic has not been updated yet, it's in stock and free shipping too. I can barlow my ES 11mm 82* and get down to 5.5. I also have a 3.5 68* so I'm well covered, and on the really good nights I'll try 2x on the 6.7mm. I'll comment on it and my new and yet to use ES 30mm 82* when ever the clouds clear.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Scanning4Comets
Markus
*****

Reged: 12/26/04

Loc: Ontario, Canada
Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: lbsgville]
      #6043878 - 08/24/13 04:22 PM Attachment (28 downloads)

Quote:

So I just placed my order for the Explore Scientific 1.25" 82° Series Argon-Purged Waterproof Eyepiece - 6.7mm with Agena Astro Products. They assured me that it is the new Argon purged and that the pic has not been updated yet, it's in stock and free shipping too. I can barlow my ES 11mm 82* and get down to 5.5. I also have a 3.5 68* so I'm well covered, and on the really good nights I'll try 2x on the 6.7mm. I'll comment on it and my new and yet to use ES 30mm 82* when ever the clouds clear.




Oh it is the Argon Purged one for sure! I also ordered mine from Agena Astro and the eyepiece was really nice, just like the 4.7mm ES 82 as well. I just didn't care for the eye relief, so I sold mine off and saved my money towards a 30mm ES 82!

My 5.5mm Covers a lot of higher powers and now I just barlow my 14mm ES and 9mm ES 100's for 165x and 250x respectively if I need to.

Here are the 6.7mm and 4.7mm Argon Purged ones from Agena Astro. Argon, Nitrogen, doesn't really make a difference...they both work great!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
lbsgville
sage


Reged: 06/15/10

Loc: Florida
Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: Scanning4Comets]
      #6044094 - 08/24/13 07:12 PM

I have the ES 11mm 82* and the eye relief is almost the same as the 6.7. I have only used the 11mm about a dozen times or more but never had a problem with the eye relief in it so the 6.7 should be fine. When I have those good nights that come around in fall in Florida, I'll try and boost up the power with my 3x barlow lens element. I do the same thing as Markus and just use the lens part of my Orion 3x barlow and screw it onto the eyepiece like a filter. I have also used the corrector for my binoviewrs. I'm not sure now what the corrector is, a 1.7 comes to mind, and if just using the lens part of a 3x barlow still gives you 3x but it looks really good when I put them on the ES 11mm 82*. I think it will take me as high as I need to go. I do really like the ES 14mm 100*, but I'm happy with the 82* spot. It is very pleasing at the eyepiece and more pleasing on the wallet.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
simagic
member


Reged: 09/01/13

Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: lbsgville]
      #6087865 - 09/18/13 12:04 PM

Quote:

So now I'm thinking of going for the 6.7mm. I'll get more use out of a 6.7, you need really good seeing to use the 4.7, if the seeing is that good I can always Barlow the 6.7. After looking at Astronomics web site that has good views of each size, the 6.7 has noticeably better eye relief.




Above it says ""After looking at Astronomics web site that has good views of each size, the 6.7 has noticeably better eye relief.""...... I'm confused as on ES website, they say the eye relief is 14mm for both. Is there something I don't understand (newbee)

Edited by simagic (09/18/13 12:28 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Scanning4Comets
Markus
*****

Reged: 12/26/04

Loc: Ontario, Canada
Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: simagic]
      #6087947 - 09/18/13 12:40 PM

The eye relief is not the same for both. The numbers are incorrect. The 6.7mm is not to bad, but the relief on the 4.7mm is very tight IMO.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Scotophobe Maryland, USA
Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: Scanning4Comets]
      #6087972 - 09/18/13 12:49 PM

I had the ES 82 4.7 nitrogen purged. Never owned the 6.7.

I thought the 4.7 was a decent eyepiece for planets. I kept mine until I bought an XO 5.1, which has even tighter eye relief! That tells you how much eye relief doesn't matter so much for me.

The only reason I sold the ES 82 4.7 was that the XO 5.1 was sharper and had better scatter control. But the ES wasn't bad at all. If I hadn't bought the XO, I'd probably still have the ES.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
PeterR280
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 05/27/13

Re: Explore Scientific 4.7mm 82* new [Re: simagic]
      #6087995 - 09/18/13 12:59 PM

I have the 82% 4.7mm and 6.7mm eyepieces and don't find eye relief to be too short. I like the lenses.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
18 registered and 22 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  ausastronomer, droid, Scott in NC 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 2251

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics