Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

General Astronomy >> Beginners Forum

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
LeubDier
newbie


Reged: 03/16/13

Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new
      #6076206 - 09/12/13 12:46 AM

I have a used Nexstar 8i with a few nice 1.25-inch eyepieces (a 28mm, a 9.5mm, and a 5mm and two Barlows (a 2x, and a 2.5x).
I read something the other day that someone really thought the 2-inch eyepieces was the way to go for a scope like mine.
I'm a little skeptical about it because the 2-inchers are soooooo expensive, and I have a pretty good array of 1.25-inch eyepieces.
Also I've heard that the rear of the scope is 1.5-inches, so you don't really get full benefit of the 2-inch eyepieces.
Anyone out there with an opinion about the 1.25" vs 2" eyepieces?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
StrangeDejavu
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 03/20/13

Loc: Florida
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? *DELETED* new [Re: LeubDier]
      #6076235 - 09/12/13 01:08 AM

Post deleted by StrangeDejavu

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dpwoos
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 10/18/06

Loc: United States
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new [Re: StrangeDejavu]
      #6076252 - 09/12/13 01:32 AM

Whether an eyepieces is 2" or 1.25" has nothing to do with eye relief. A 2" eyepiece does allow for a larger field stop and so wider field, but once the field stop diameter is 27mm or less a 1.25" barrel works just as well. Note that every Ethos 13mm and less uses a 1.25" barrel, as well as every Nagler 16mm and less, and every Delos, etc. So, the only time one needs a 2" eyepiece is when a field stop greater than 27mm is desired.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
starcrafter
super member
*****

Reged: 08/06/13

Loc: Scranton, PA
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new [Re: dpwoos]
      #6076253 - 09/12/13 01:34 AM

Yes.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GlennLeDrew
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/18/08

Loc: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new [Re: starcrafter]
      #6076259 - 09/12/13 01:42 AM

I've used a TeleVue 55mm Plossl on a C8 to very good effect. This was with a 2" visual back and full aperture 2" diagonal, which introduces not at all noticeable vignetting. The 2" thread-on SCT diagonals have a needlessly small aperture somewhat closer to the focus, which results in more prominent vignetting.

The reason a 48mm field stop behind a 38mm rear port can result in not notable vignetting is because of the separation between the two apertures. This throws the vignetting source well out of focus.

For the kind-to-eyepiece f/10 telescope, even a very low cost eyepiece performs well. My recommendation? A 30mm 80 degree eyepiece, which can be had for about $75, will be a very enjoyable experience. It has a 46mm field stop for essentially maximal true field, yet delivers a more versatile 3mm exit pupil that is both reasonably bright under a dark sky and not too bright under light pollution. And it will go deeper and deliver more detail than will an eyepiece putting up a larger exit pupil.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
lamplight
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 09/18/12

Loc: western MA, U.S.
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new [Re: GlennLeDrew]
      #6076492 - 09/12/13 08:15 AM

Hi there.

This all assuming you want the largest field of view you can get. Which may or may not fit into your viewing preferences. I find I don't use mine that often since im usually starhopping faint fuzzies. But that may change. Like mentioned above, you'd really want to upgrade the visual back and diagonal to 2" as well to get the most out of the field of view. If you like wide binocular views you might like the views of a nice 30mm+ . If you have any opportunity to look through some good wide field 2" EPs that will decide it for you


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mich_al
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 05/10/09

Loc: Rural central lower Michigan ...
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new [Re: lamplight]
      #6076527 - 09/12/13 08:41 AM

If you where to go to a 2" visual back you can still use your existing 1.25" eyepieces, just use a 2" to 1.25" adapter. I don't think short focal length eyepieces come in 2" anyway.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Joe Aguiar
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 02/10/07

Loc: none of your buss
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new [Re: mich_al]
      #6076591 - 09/12/13 09:20 AM

yes and a 2" EP doesnt have to costs hundreds, you can get one of the Skywatchers 28mm, 35mm, 42mm EP for about $50 to $60 about new. It will give you low power and wide field as MICH Al says keep your current 1.25" EP for the higher power and use a 2" for low power large objects.

What i do is the low powers since its not hig mag the ep doesnt have to be as great or expensive as a high power ep where you are looking at fine detail close up, so you dont have to buy an ethos at $700 a decent 2" up to $100 will be fine for low powers.
joe


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
brianb11213
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/25/09

Loc: 55.215N 6.554W
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new [Re: Joe Aguiar]
      #6076627 - 09/12/13 09:46 AM

Quote:

yes and a 2" EP doesnt have to costs hundreds, you can get one of the Skywatchers 28mm, 35mm, 42mm EP for about $50 to $60 about new. It will give you low power and wide field as MICH Al says keep your current 1.25" EP for the higher power and use a 2" for low power large objects.




Agreed.

Quote:

What i do is the low powers since its not hig mag the ep doesnt have to be as great or expensive as a high power ep where you are looking at fine detail close up



Actually the demands on a low power EP are greater than those of a high power EP as it needs to be corrected over a much wider area. I don't advocate spending huge amounts of money on individual EPs (unless you have a huge shedload of cash just begging to be frittered away) but many really basic 2" EPs are somewhat disappointing. There is a bit of a link between the EP and the type of scope you are using it in, especially with short focus Newtonian/Dobsonian scopes where low power EPs need to be very well corrected to be worthwhile.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
REC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/20/10

Loc: NC
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new [Re: Joe Aguiar]
      #6076630 - 09/12/13 09:49 AM

Yes, good way to go. You can find a good 2" for about $100 and gives you a more secure way to mount to the scope.

As for 1.25" EP..the widest FOV you can get with a 32mm EP id about .8*. With my 34mm SWA I get a 1.2* FOV and can fit the entire Double Star cluster in it and most of the Pleiades ...that alone is worth it!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
REC
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/20/10

Loc: NC
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new [Re: REC]
      #6076652 - 09/12/13 09:59 AM

BTW....I just checked the classifieds and found a few good ones around $100 and below.

Also, if you want I have a new Apetura 2" 30mm 68* fov that I can sell you for $45. It is the same as the GSO superview and had great reviews.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Joe Aguiar
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 02/10/07

Loc: none of your buss
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new [Re: REC]
      #6076726 - 09/12/13 10:43 AM

There is a bit of a link between the EP and the type of scope you are using it in, especially with short focus Newtonian/Dobsonian scopes where low power EPs need to be very well corrected to be worthwhile.

yes agreed with you on this with fast scope ep need to be well corrected but i said about those 3 eps as the poster is using a 8" F/10 sct so it doesnt have to be super well corrected in a f/10 scope
joe


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
obin robinson
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/25/12

Loc: League City, TX
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new [Re: Joe Aguiar]
      #6076731 - 09/12/13 10:45 AM

I have one 2" eyepiece: a Galileo 32mm. It's all I need and it works very well. I really like the wide-field views when searching for a well hidden object. After I find it with the 2" I swap out for some high powered 1.25" eyepieces.

obin


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Kevdog
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 07/11/12

Loc: Desert Hills, AZ
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new [Re: LeubDier]
      #6076746 - 09/12/13 10:55 AM

Quote:

I have a used Nexstar 8i with a few nice 1.25-inch eyepieces (a 28mm, a 9.5mm, and a 5mm and two Barlows (a 2x, and a 2.5x).
I read something the other day that someone really thought the 2-inch eyepieces was the way to go for a scope like mine.
I'm a little skeptical about it because the 2-inchers are soooooo expensive, and I have a pretty good array of 1.25-inch eyepieces.
Also I've heard that the rear of the scope is 1.5-inches, so you don't really get full benefit of the 2-inch eyepieces.
Anyone out there with an opinion about the 1.25" vs 2" eyepieces?




I wasn't sure what to do either on my C11. But I did upgrade to a 2" diagonal (Williams Optic SCT threaded one) and the Williams Optic 40mm SWAN. It made a HUGE difference in how much I could see in the extended objects (like the Orion Nebula, Andromeda Galaxy, Pleadies, etc). Also I really like the light gathering of the lower magnification, so many objects got brighter and easier to see, even though they got smaller. And I was moving from a 32mm Orion Sirius.

I'm now selling the WO 40mm, only because I got an 18" Obsession and the fast optics aren't as forgiving, so I've upgraded to the 30mm ES82, so I no longer use the WO 40mm, but it's great in a slower scope f/6 or slower (like any SCT).


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BigC
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 09/29/10

Loc: SE Indiana
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new [Re: LeubDier]
      #6077460 - 09/12/13 05:25 PM

If you want to get the widest possible field of view at modest cost then get a 2" visual back ,2" diagonal (with 1.25 reducer insert to use when needed) and ,yes, a Galileo 2" 32mm eyepiece. As another says the inexpensive 2" 32mm does very well for those big views (I have several of them) ;unless you find a great deal on a widefield 2" ,your higher power views will be done using a 1.25" eyepiece.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bob Griffiths
Getting Grouchy
*****

Reged: 10/10/05

Loc: Frederick Maryland
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new [Re: BigC]
      #6078365 - 09/13/13 09:00 AM

ALL of my 26 mm and lower power eyepieces are 2 inch eyepieces.... and all of my higher power are 1.25 inch eyepieces that I use in ALL my scopes including
my C8 as well as C11 and my 4 and 5 inch refractors...

So put me in the YES you should category

Bob G


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
csrlice12
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/22/12

Loc: Denver, CO
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? [Re: Bob Griffiths]
      #6078447 - 09/13/13 10:03 AM

Yes, and with a long f/l scope, they're you only option for wide field DSO viewing...not to mention if you get a focal reducer in he future..you'll. Want well corrected eyepieces.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Isaacs
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/16/04

Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new [Re: obin robinson]
      #6078481 - 09/13/13 10:26 AM

Quote:

I have one 2" eyepiece: a Galileo 32mm. It's all I need and it works very well. I really like the wide-field views when searching for a well hidden object. After I find it with the 2" I swap out for some high powered 1.25" eyepieces.

obin




Obin:

I see that you have a 10 inch Starfinder, those were F/4.5 if I am not mistaken. Does it have a 2 inch focuser? If so, how sharp are the stars at the edge of the field? What exactly does "working very well mean?"

Having owned a number of 2 inch eyepieces around 30mm in focal length and owning telescopes of a variety of focal ratios, it has been my experience that most of them are quite sharp in the center of the field of view but most exhibit astigmatism away from the center, particularly at faster focal ratios. At F/10, an eyepiece has a much easier job of it than at F/5 but off-axis astigmatism is still an issue with simpler designs. Good edge performance at F/5 is expensive, less so at F/10.

Jon Isaacs


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
obin robinson
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/25/12

Loc: League City, TX
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new [Re: Jon Isaacs]
      #6078553 - 09/13/13 11:20 AM

Quote:

Obin:

I see that you have a 10 inch Starfinder, those were F/4.5 if I am not mistaken. Does it have a 2 inch focuser? If so, how sharp are the stars at the edge of the field? What exactly does "working very well mean?"

Jon Isaacs




Jon,

I have 2" Crayford focusers on all of my telescopes including the Starfinder 10" F/4.5. the 32mm 2" Galileo does have a bit of astigmatism away from the center. I use the 2" eyepiece as a wide-field finder and then I drop the 1.25" higher powered eyepieces in. When I use the 2" on the 4.5" telescope it works pretty well. I also only saw astigmatism towards the edge of the ED80.

I may get another 2" eyepiece in the future but for now the one I have does the job. It actually works really well in the ST80 when I am looking for satellites. The fast optics and wide field of view really grab a lot of light. Because I am looking for a moving object I don't really mind the astigmatism. It is particularly useful for finding geostationary birds. I really like the Galileo 32mm and would recommend it to anyone looking for a bargain 2" wide-field eyepiece.

obin


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Isaacs
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/16/04

Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA
Re: Are 2-inch eyepieces all that? new [Re: obin robinson]
      #6078590 - 09/13/13 11:46 AM

Quote:

I really like the Galileo 32mm and would recommend it to anyone looking for a bargain 2" wide-field eyepiece.




Obin:

How much did you pay for it? I see offered at a variety of prices. Have you compared it to other similar cost eyepieces?

My recommendation first timers is to try to get some looks through a variety of eyepieces if at all possible. Obin refers to a "bit of astigmatism" but what "a bit" means depends on the individual.

Jon


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
2 registered and 18 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  WOBentley, kkokkolis, Chuck Hards 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1248

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics