Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Reflectors

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
tag1260
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 10/07/12

Loc: Ohio, USA
Secondary spider designs?
      #6088296 - 09/18/13 03:33 PM

Looking for input on spider designs. I'm building a 12" truss dob and am going to order a new spider for it. What are the pros and cons of the different designs. 3 or 4 vein, straight versus curved ?

Help me decide what is optimum.

Thanks
Tag


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pinbout
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/22/10

Loc: nj
Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: tag1260]
      #6088342 - 09/18/13 04:04 PM

http://www.astrosystems.biz/spiders.htm

$44 for a spider. save a headache, buy it.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
hbanich
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 06/17/05

Loc: Portland, Oregon
Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: Pinbout]
      #6088362 - 09/18/13 04:14 PM

Hi Tag,

A three vane spider will create six diffraction spikes and is slightly more difficult to physically center in your upper tube assembly.

A four vane spider creates four diffraction spikes and is slightly easier to physically center in the uta.

A curved spider doesn't create any diffraction spikes but spreads diffracted light through the field of view and can be a bugger to physically center in the uta.

So it depends on how many, if any, diffraction spikes you prefer and ease of installation. Four vane spiders seem to be the most popular but all three versions are commercially available and not all that difficult to make yourself. I've made all three on different scopes through the years and prefer the four vane spider.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dpwoos
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 10/18/06

Loc: United States
Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: hbanich]
      #6089150 - 09/18/13 11:26 PM

I have made several of these:

http://woosfamily.net/dennis/Spider/


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MitchAlsup
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 08/31/09

Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: dpwoos]
      #6089814 - 09/19/13 12:03 PM

In any event, the thinner the vanes the less light gets diffracted. My 20" DOB gets away with 0.010" thick vanes. I used 4 vanes with a pair meating at 90 degrees on both sides of the secondary fixture. This prevents the fixture from rotating about its center (unlike common 4 vanes at 90 degrees centered on the axis designs).

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starman1
Vendor (EyepiecesEtc.com)
*****

Reged: 06/24/03

Loc: Los Angeles
Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: MitchAlsup]
      #6090262 - 09/19/13 04:32 PM

Want curved and thin and relatively stiff?
If your secondary is up to 3", this design should work:
http://www.obsessiontelescopes.com/telescopes/12.5/
go down the page until you see a pic of the spider on the right and click on the pic for a larger image.
If you install a spider like this, keep it vertically symmetrical, i.e. like )( and not tilted.

Edited by Starman1 (09/19/13 04:34 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ed Jones
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 04/06/04

Loc: Sin-sin-atti
Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: tag1260]
      #6090537 - 09/19/13 07:25 PM

Curved spiders are never as rigid as straight vanes and can be a source of vibration or sag unless they are rather thick. With 3 thin vanes you'll only see spikes on the brightest stars, that's my preference.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GeneT
Ely Kid
*****

Reged: 11/07/08

Loc: South Texas
Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: tag1260]
      #6090783 - 09/19/13 10:35 PM

A lot of people like the curved secondary holders. Call me old fashioned, but I prefer the four vein spiders. I know how to deal with the various issues they present; not so sure about the three vein or curved.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dpwoos
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 10/18/06

Loc: United States
Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: Ed Jones]
      #6090853 - 09/19/13 11:25 PM

Quote:

Curved spiders are never as rigid as straight vanes and can be a source of vibration or sag unless they are rather thick. With 3 thin vanes you'll only see spikes on the brightest stars, that's my preference.




When we first rolled out our homemade 10" f/6 dob, the curved spider was made from a single length of stainless steel ruler - a single curve. It was not good, as the vibration was awful. However, we added a second curve on the other side (like Don discussed above) and now it is rock solid - zero vibration - and it provides excellent performance. Our 5" and 6" dobs use a single curve, but made with wider stainless steel (as seen in my link posted above). They too are rock solid, and are excellent scopes. If I was to do the 10" again, I would try the wide single curve. When done carefully, the extra width is parallel to the incoming light and so adds rigidity without adding thickness.

On the other hand, I am totally in agreement that so far as rigidity and simplicity goes, straight vanes are the way to go. In my case, I was tired of having the spikes interfere with my observing double/multiple stars, and so went down the dark and dangerous curved spider road!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
tag1260
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 10/07/12

Loc: Ohio, USA
Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: dpwoos]
      #6091122 - 09/20/13 05:53 AM

Thanks everyone . I now am more confused on what to get then ever!!!!!

Anyways.....

Don

Where can you find a spider like the one from the Obsession page? Plus, what are the advantages to that design?

Thanks
Tag


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jpcannavo
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 02/21/05

Loc: Ex NYCer, Now in Denver CO!
Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: tag1260]
      #6091202 - 09/20/13 07:54 AM

All the above input is right on. I would only add this: if you don't have particularly strong feelings about the presence of diffraction spikes then go with the most straight forward arrangement: 4 straight veins. You can always experiment with alternatives down the road. also, just to be clear, and all things being equal, 3 vein spiders yield 6 spikes, yet each spike is only half as bright as in a 4 vein [3/4 the amount of total diffraction distributed over 3/2 the number spikes, I.e. 2/3 times 3/4=1/2].

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starman1
Vendor (EyepiecesEtc.com)
*****

Reged: 06/24/03

Loc: Los Angeles
Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: tag1260]
      #6091457 - 09/20/13 10:24 AM

Quote:

Thanks everyone . I now am more confused on what to get then ever!!!!!

Anyways.....

Don

Where can you find a spider like the one from the Obsession page? Plus, what are the advantages to that design?

Thanks
Tag



Well, the stiffest and strongest will be the 4-straight-vane variety.
The )( design on the Obsession is probably proprietary. It could be made easily enough by using an Astrosystems secondary holder and finding some sheet stainless steel for the vanes. You'd need a vise to bend the metal at the ends and a drill. The center could be wood or a metal block or whatever is convenient.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
hottr6
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/28/09

Loc: 7,500', Magdalena Mtns, NM
Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: Starman1]
      #6091560 - 09/20/13 11:33 AM

Quote:


Well, the stiffest and strongest will be the 4-straight-vane variety.



Don,

Are there any studies done on this? Intuitively, I sense that a 3-vane system will be as rigid as a 4-vane given the short beam-lengths we are using. A 3-vane spider accurately defines a plane, but a 4-point spider defines 2 planes, suggesting that a 4-vane spider will have out-of-plane forces acting on the secondary support. An engineer is needed here to describe the forces at work.

I'll also contend that a 3-vane system is much easier to adjust, and achieve equal tension on all vanes. This has implications for people using very-thin walled tubes.

3-vane spiders are likely lighter than a 4-vane.... an important consideration for the ultra-light weight contingent.

For the rest of us, I would say that the choice between a 3- and 4-vane system is a matter of personal preference..... 6 faint diffraction spikes vs 4 relatively bright spikes. I have both in my Newts, but I prefer 3-vane spiders.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
garret
sage


Reged: 07/26/09

Loc: Netherlands
Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: hottr6]
      #6091599 - 09/20/13 12:00 PM Attachment (15 downloads)

The ASA newtons has double (very thin) vanes:

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MitchAlsup
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 08/31/09

Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: hottr6]
      #6091696 - 09/20/13 12:41 PM

Quote:

Quote:


Well, the stiffest and strongest will be the 4-straight-vane variety.



Don,

Are there any studies done on this?




Yes, the 4 vane of >-< architecture is the only one that completely eliminates rocking couples of the secondary mirror on the optical axis. Both sides of the secondary holder attach to vanes at 90 degrees so all rocking forces are in pure tension.

Its 3 vane varient >-- has a rocking couple where the other side of the secondary holder attaches to the vane. The rocking couple on this end is in quadradic tension (i.e. not good).

The 4 vane varrient >< has rocking couples because the vanes prevent rotation around the optical axis only in quadradic tension.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
vct123
sage
*****

Reged: 11/17/09

Loc: Staten Island, N.Y.
Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: MitchAlsup]
      #6091804 - 09/20/13 01:24 PM

If viewing will be mostly deep sky, then go with 4.
If you plan on using the scope for planetary use, then go curved 3 or 4 vanes.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
csrlice12
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/22/12

Loc: Denver, CO
Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: vct123]
      #6091834 - 09/20/13 01:39 PM

I've often wondered, why can't the secondary be built into the focuser....you'd only need one vane and possibly some tilt adjustment screws. The secondary would be permanently aligned with the focuser tube that way except for the tilt....Of course this could be a mess if you ever decide to replace the focuser....

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starman1
Vendor (EyepiecesEtc.com)
*****

Reged: 06/24/03

Loc: Los Angeles
Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: hottr6]
      #6091990 - 09/20/13 03:26 PM

Quote:

Quote:


Well, the stiffest and strongest will be the 4-straight-vane variety.



Don,

Are there any studies done on this? Intuitively, I sense that a 3-vane system will be as rigid as a 4-vane given the short beam-lengths we are using. A 3-vane spider accurately defines a plane, but a 4-point spider defines 2 planes, suggesting that a 4-vane spider will have out-of-plane forces acting on the secondary support. An engineer is needed here to describe the forces at work.

I'll also contend that a 3-vane system is much easier to adjust, and achieve equal tension on all vanes. This has implications for people using very-thin walled tubes.

3-vane spiders are likely lighter than a 4-vane.... an important consideration for the ultra-light weight contingent.

For the rest of us, I would say that the choice between a 3- and 4-vane system is a matter of personal preference..... 6 faint diffraction spikes vs 4 relatively bright spikes. I have both in my Newts, but I prefer 3-vane spiders.




In a 4-vane assembly, each vane tension increase also increases the tension of the blade opposite. This actually lessens the necessary forces on the vanes because the forces are directly in line with the vanes. A higher tension down the length of the blade (necessary to hold the vane in place) results from less force applied to the bolts holding the vanes[than with vanes that are not opposite one another].

In a 3-vane assembly, each vane tension increase increases the tension on both of the other blades but not all of the tightening force goes into tightening the other blades because a substantial portion of it is lateral rather than direct in line with the blades.

Since thin flat blades have little resistance to lateral forces, the blades in a 3-vane arrangement have to be thicker than those in a 4-vane arrangement or the entire arrangement has to have a higher tension than a 4-vane arrangement. In other words, because tightening one blade tends to bend the other two vanes laterally as well as applying tension along their lengths, the tension has to be brought up to a higher level in a 3-vane arrangement to hold the center as tightly as in a 4-vane arrangement.
And since holding the center tightly is essential to preserving collimation as the scope moves up and down, the 3-vane arrangement is at a disadvantage.

Also, it seems, from a couple studies, that rigidity of the spider to resisting gravitational forces on the secondary as the scope points lower requires a vertical symmetry in the attachment of the spider. I.e. a 4 vane arrangement has to be attached as either an X or a + while a 3-vane arrangement should be attached as a Y or and upside down Y.

All of this matters little to the users of 8" and smaller scopes or 2" secondaries and smaller. But when the weight of the secondary and holder get higher (2.6" and heavier mirrors), resisting gravitational torque on the vanes with altitude change in the scope matters quite a bit if preserving collimation is desired. This puts curved vanes at a disadvantage as well as the 3-vane configuration.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
obin robinson
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/25/12

Loc: League City, TX
Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: tag1260]
      #6092232 - 09/20/13 06:00 PM

This discussion has me thinking of if I should use a 4-vane spider in my 4.5" astrograph I am rebuilding. This will be used primarily for imaging satellites especially geostationaries. Should I use my 3-vane spider or have a custom 4-vane one built? The money doesn't matter as I want to make this thing as perfect as possible on my first attempt.

obin


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starman1
Vendor (EyepiecesEtc.com)
*****

Reged: 06/24/03

Loc: Los Angeles
Re: Secondary spider designs? new [Re: obin robinson]
      #6092247 - 09/20/13 06:10 PM

Quote:

This discussion has me thinking of if I should use a 4-vane spider in my 4.5" astrograph I am rebuilding. This will be used primarily for imaging satellites especially geostationaries. Should I use my 3-vane spider or have a custom 4-vane one built? The money doesn't matter as I want to make this thing as perfect as possible on my first attempt.

obin



Well, since your secondary will be small, it matters more how you want the images to come out. With a 4-vane spider, you could have exceptionally thin vanes (0.01" or less) and reduce the diffraction, while getting those lovely crosses on the bright stars (which some refractor users ADD to the images). With 3 vanes, you'll get six spikes on every bright star.

It will matter a lot how long the focal length is and how large a chip you use.
If the scope is f/5 or faster, you will need some form of coma correction--especially on a large chip camera.
If the focal length is shorter than 1000mm, you might need a field flattener if the chip in your camera is a decent size.
Those factors will probably matter more than the number of vanes in your spider.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
10 registered and 13 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  ausastronomer, Phillip Creed, JayinUT, okieav8r 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1767

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics