Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Mounts

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | (show all)
dragonslayer1
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 02/25/12

Loc: SLC, UT
CGEM vs CGEM DX
      #6135945 - 10/13/13 10:12 PM

I have seen where some post or say they have cogging and trackibng issues?? I have also heard that the issues have been addressed in the new mounts being made now? Then have heard that the difference in the motors/gears between the two has the DX with a slight advantage? Any input from users, and regrets over purchase, or thrilled at purchase?? Thank you, Kasey

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Stew57
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 05/03/09

Loc: Silsbee Texas
Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: dragonslayer1]
      #6135985 - 10/13/13 10:30 PM

No difference in motors or gears. They both are subject to the cogging effect and 8\3 error equally as these are problems with the servos. Celestron has some beta software working on a fix for the cogging. Not all mounts suffer to a significant degree with either problem.

I have a CGEM. Mine exhits no cogging problem but significant 8\3 error. This error makes PEC useless and guiding at long FL problematic. The software is fantastic. Great pointing accuracy and an easy and accurate ASPA bonus. The price is good also. That said I wish I had spent more on the mount and got something better. I have my hopes on a EQ8 if\when they are released, provided I can get my finances back in shape.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
johnd39818
member


Reged: 12/31/12

Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: Stew57]
      #6138240 - 10/15/13 01:43 AM

Ive owned my DX for 3 months now with no issues at all. Able to run 10 min subs flawlessly and GOTO's are dead on.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dragonslayer1
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 02/25/12

Loc: SLC, UT
Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: johnd39818]
      #6138739 - 10/15/13 10:30 AM

Thank you Mark and John,
Thats what am looking to do right now for a while, is run unguided with video cam for about 2 minutes, from things have read and your 10 min (guided subs) sounds pretty good. Am using a 9.25 (deforked) right now on a CG-5. Mark, I checked on that EQ-5, pre-order is about 5K I think. Thats a big step up from 2K for CGEM-DX .. I found something on a sale sight that compared the CGEM vs DX and it said there was an upgrade in the motors or something, I will try to find it. Dis you ever consider the Losmandy G-11? Thank you both for your time input and hepl, Kasey


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Stew57
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 05/03/09

Loc: Silsbee Texas
Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: dragonslayer1]
      #6139033 - 10/15/13 01:10 PM

I can't see doing 2 min unguided even with a videocam at all. Even with shorter focal lengths the PE is going to be too great. Less than 20 arcseconds is good for a CGEM. PEC won't takeout the 8\3 error, and will in fact make it worse in some areas . A small guider (I use a 50mm finder as guidescope) will sufice for video.

I would be hesitant to buy from someone that advertises different motors or gears in the DX. There was a different MC board for awhile though. It allowed more current flow to the servos. Join teamcelestron and inquire there, or email celestron directly. You may get to discuss with an engineer.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dragonslayer1
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 02/25/12

Loc: SLC, UT
Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: Stew57]
      #6139332 - 10/15/13 03:45 PM

Thank you again Mark,
I had seen somewhere that the DX drives the motors a little smoother and better than the CGEM, but that may have been before motor board upgrade. How long have you gone unguided with yours? I have a SSAG set-up from when I had it mounted on the CPC., is all mounted ready to go for over a week now on my CG-5 but as normal the weather has been the pits,,,. I just didn't think most video guys were guiding, I'm VSS+ so am 2 minute max exposures. I have been signed up on Team Celestron for a little while now and have researched the cogging. From all I can get they speak of an upgrade (31.15/31.33) that resolved it?? I cannot find anything about 8/3 error tho.

I did find something interesting tho, the ability to do a tandem mount (like the EQ-45?)? You ever tried tt? ""Tandem support (the ability to turn the Dec axis 90 degrees and mount multiple optical tubes side-by-side) is now available for firmware versions GEM 4.15 and higher for Celestron’s German equatorial mounts."" Thank you again,
Kasey


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dmdouglass
professor emeritus


Reged: 12/23/07

Loc: Tempe, AZ
Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: dragonslayer1]
      #6139654 - 10/15/13 07:15 PM

Tandem mount...
Yup !! And it works too.

See images at: http://www.az-dahut.net/

[ Or, just look to the left at my avatar... ]

That is my backyard observatory.

Edit (Add): Of course, you do need an accessory from ADM for the "side-by-side" mounting...
http://admaccessories.com/D_Series_SBS.htm

Edited by dmdouglass (10/15/13 10:12 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
A. Viegas
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 03/05/12

Loc: New York City/ CT
Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: dragonslayer1]
      #6139965 - 10/15/13 10:45 PM

CGEM vs. CGEM DX is really a matter of cost and basically $500 when all is said and one, whether you buy new or used... What do you get for the extra $. Basically a better tripod, beefier counterweight bar and i suppose it's debatable if the motor control,board is better in th CGEM DX or not...

For a 9.25" the difference between CGEM or DX is probabl not worth $500... A 11" probably give the edge to the DX, I think 70% I would go with DX with 11"... A 8" is probably 70% better value on the plain CGEM and your 9.25" is more like 50/50 in terms of value proposition to the DX...

If you are planning to really upgrade in 3-5 yrs to an AP or Paramount, then I would say just get the CGEM and with resale value you probably do on... If on the other hand this next mount is close to your final mount purchase, then I would get the DX.

If you plan to guide, then the CGEM + DX are mostly comparable up to 2 mins... Given the savings I would say go for he CGEM ... I chose the CGEM because I bot it at NEAF, got a great deal and best of all saved enough,to buy more gear... I use it with my 8" and C80ED piggybacked...

Al


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Stargazer78
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 03/05/13

Loc: Susanville California
Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: A. Viegas]
      #6140178 - 10/16/13 01:25 AM

You will not be disappointed if you go with the DX. That being said it is a heavy mount but I purchased mine as a final mount. I plan on getting a 10 inch R/C and call it done for my asyrophotography hobby. I have not experienced any issues at all with mine. For the extra payload capacity it a great deal.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dragonslayer1
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 02/25/12

Loc: SLC, UT
Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: Stargazer78]
      #6140585 - 10/16/13 10:19 AM

Thank you all, and yes Al this should be the final mount for me; if I ever upgrade to C11 or the R/C Chris is using, I just want something that can handle it and not worry about weight issues. So would probably be the DX.. I don't figure on any pictures I take gracing the walls at NASA, but would like fairly good quality,,, would be nice to be able to unguided fro a couple minutes...
The Atlas gets good reviews but is only rated to 44 lbs,,, and new handset has ASPA.
I did copy and post a coment on Team Celestron site referencing the Cogging and 8/3 issue
""I can't find anything on the 8/3 anywhere. I own a CPC & CG-5 ASGT. I am looking for a larger mount and asking about the CGEM or DX series. I have seen this more than once but will post a copy of a post concerning the issue, this is the answer I got when asked about the 8/3 issue...
""It's a repeatable non correctable by PEC tracking error caused by the gears from what i understand.
That plus the motor cogging issue made me avoid the CGEM series (including the DX)even if i like them a lot as mounts.
If you give a look on the CGEM yahoogroup you will find a lot of information regarding both issues. ""

Will see what they say, and I knew Stargazer was sold on his DX ,
Kasey


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
A. Viegas
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 03/05/12

Loc: New York City/ CT
Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: dragonslayer1]
      #6140608 - 10/16/13 10:29 AM

Kasey

One last bit of advice. If you can wait 6 to 12 months then wait. I suspect celestron will be unveiling a newer CGEM/DX that uses the motor technology of the VX soon. That newer mount probably does not have the 8/3 or cogging risks. Moreover I would not be surprised for a hybrid like alt-az/GEM like the new EQ8. So if you can hold out I would say wait a bit for the new upgrade.

If however you come across a good deal on the used market for a CGEM it may be worth it to upgrade. You can probably go Cgem for a net $500 after you sell your Cg5. So if you really want to jump to a bigger mount now then swap to he CgEM for $500 or so (used) and that probably works for you with the mallincam for the next couple of years. By then the newer celestron mounts will be fully vetted

Al


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
fetoma
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 09/26/06

Loc: Southern New Jersey
Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: A. Viegas]
      #6140783 - 10/16/13 12:17 PM

Quote:

I suspect celestron will be unveiling a newer CGEM/DX that uses the motor technology of the VX soon. That newer mount probably does not have the 8/3 or cogging risks.




Al,

Where did you hear this information and is it from a reliable source?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Steve Cobb
member


Reged: 04/26/10

Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: dragonslayer1]
      #6140982 - 10/16/13 02:00 PM

I've got the CGEM-DX and have had some trouble balancing the load and getting regular steady slewing -- there are pauses, noises, even failures to perform the slew. Usually it is okay but nothing's easy with this mount. Sorry to be so ignorant but what is a cogging or 8/3 problem or error?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
orlyandico
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 08/10/09

Loc: Singapore
Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: Steve Cobb]
      #6141014 - 10/16/13 02:11 PM

Cogging - the DEC doesn't respond to small autoguiding corrections, then when the DEC pulses get large enough it jumps. This causes a sawtooth pattern in the DEC guiding graph. The cogging is caused by the cheap Igarashi motor whose armature doesn't have a cogless or reduced-cogging design.

8/3 - it is an irrational periodic error that occurs 8/3 = 2.6666.. times every worm cycle. Because it is irrational, it cannot be corrected with PEC. On some CGEMs and DXs the 8/3 is small, but on others such as the one I had (and Mark's/stew57's) it is huge. On mine it was over 20". With 20" of uncorrectable periodic error happening every 180 seconds, this means you are limited to about 30 seconds unguided with a short focal length (i.e. 400mm range).

Forget about Mallincam with a long-FL SCT as well, as Mark has discovered.

The 8/3 is caused by a harmonic in the cheap Igarashi gearbox used on both the CGEM and DX.

Bottom line, if you're lucky you'll get a decent CGEM or DX that doesn't exhibit cogging or 8/3. If you're unlucky you'll get both, and you'll get something that will bedevil the rest of your days with the mount. One big downside of buying used, is that the seller might be getting rid of it precisely because they're aware of these issues.

I sold my CGEM at a huge loss and I'm glad that boat anchor is gone. I sunk a lot of money and effort into it (Aeroquest high-precision RA worm, ADM dual saddle, replacement high-precision RA worm bearings, hypertuning, etc. etc.) but at the end of the day lipstick on a pig doesn't make it any less of a pig.

In fairness my CGEM pointed very accurately and was a dream to use for visual.

If I were the OP and I had $1500 or so to spend, I'd sit and wait for a used CGE to pop up. Made in the USA, Pittman Lo-Cog motors, same software as the CGEM, etc. etc. It is everything the CGEM and CGEM DX are not.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
fetoma
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 09/26/06

Loc: Southern New Jersey
Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: orlyandico]
      #6142831 - 10/17/13 12:16 PM

Quote:

If I were the OP and I had $1500 or so to spend, I'd sit and wait for a used CGE to pop up. Made in the USA, Pittman Lo-Cog motors, same software as the CGEM, etc. etc. It is everything the CGEM and CGEM DX are not.




+1


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dragonslayer1
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 02/25/12

Loc: SLC, UT
Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: fetoma]
      #6142923 - 10/17/13 01:10 PM

is that the mount that was made by Losmandy before he left? I had heard he made some mounts for celestron, Kasey

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
fetoma
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 09/26/06

Loc: Southern New Jersey
Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: dragonslayer1]
      #6143051 - 10/17/13 02:13 PM

Yes, it was the CI-700 I believe.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jason B
Proud father of 5!!
*****

Reged: 06/21/04

Loc: Mid-Michigan
Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: fetoma]
      #6143084 - 10/17/13 02:30 PM

All I can say is that we have 3 CGEM/CGEM DX's in our astrophoto group/club and all have worked great for guided long exposure imaging (in focal lengths from 420mm to 2000mm). All are 3 years old or newer.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DaveJ
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/07/05

Loc: NE Ohio
Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: fetoma]
      #6143196 - 10/17/13 03:34 PM

Quote:

Yes, it was the CI-700 I believe.




Negative. Losmandy made the original G-11 for Celestron. It was branded "Celestron by Losmandy." I know this because I purchased a CG-11 the first year they became available in September 1992. The CI-700 was Celestron's attempt to duplicate the Losmandy-made G-11 after they (Celestron) decided not to pay for the G-11s any more. Losmandy never "left Celestron" since he didn't work there, Celestron contracted "Hollywood General Machine" to build the G-11 for them. Losmandy's big (now discontinued) GEM was named the "HGM" for Hollywood General Machine.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DaveJ
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/07/05

Loc: NE Ohio
Re: CGEM vs CGEM DX new [Re: DaveJ]
      #6143232 - 10/17/13 03:59 PM Attachment (19 downloads)

Quote:

Losmandy made the original G-11 for Celestron.




It took me a couple minutes, but I found a photo of my 1992 Made-for-Celestron-by-Losmandy G-11


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | (show all)


Extra information
8 registered and 35 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Dave M, richard7, bilgebay, iceblaze 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 3232

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics