Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home page


Speciality Forums >> Astro Art, Books, Websites & Other Media

Pages: 1
Michael Rapp
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/27/04

Loc: Dickinson, TX
Bright Star Atlas or Cambridge Star Atlas?
      #6143956 - 10/17/13 11:14 PM

I love S&T's Pocket Sky Atlas, but I'd like an Atlas that has information about the objects on a page that faces the charts. So, that points me to either the Bright Star Atlas or the Cambridge Star Atlas, both done by Wil Tirion.

Both go to Mag 6.5. Cambridge's scale is a little better and also is spiral-bound so it can more easily fold back on itself (I think?). The Cambridge is also in color, but then out in the field under red light that is not all that useful I suppose. Speaking of red light...how do the renderings of the Milky Way show up in each atlas -- is it going to turn to black under red light rendering the stars in it difficult to see?

Any major compelling points for one over the other? Atlas would primarily be used with my 4" refractor.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tony Flanders
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/18/06

Loc: Cambridge, MA, USA
Re: Bright Star Atlas or Cambridge Star Atlas? new [Re: Michael Rapp]
      #6144293 - 10/18/13 06:09 AM

I own and like them both.

Perhaps I slightly prefer the Bright Star Atlas for its utter simplicity -- to say nothing of its low cost and very light weight. It covers the sky on fewer charts, which cuts both ways. It means less page turning and a broader perspective. But the projection chosen has pretty dramatic distortion at the north and south ends of the main charts.

The Cambridge Star Atlas looks much prettier because it's in color, though of course that advantage disappears under red light. It also contains more deep-sky objects, and has more extensive object lists.

They're both great atlases, and they both work beautifully by red light.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JimK
Skygazer
*****

Reged: 09/18/05

Loc: Albuquerque, NM USA
Re: Bright Star Atlas or Cambridge Star Atlas? new [Re: Michael Rapp]
      #6145684 - 10/18/13 10:00 PM

As a companion to the PSA, I often use "Objects in the Heavens" by Peter Birren (as discussed in an earlier CN thread -- click here). This was also discussed in a review on CN (click here).

I mention this because OITH, primarily organized by constellation, has a listing of objects, descriptions, and some technical stuff that is facing a simplified chart of where the objects are located. I can use the PSA to better locate the objects described in OITH. Both books are similar in size and spiral-bound. To me, this was much better than the Cambridge Star Atlas (which I bought, then sold), and the version of the Bright Star Atlas I have doesn't seem to work well (size-wise) for me (I have the one in the book "Binocular Astronomy" by Crossen & Tirion, which is a good reference itself, but that is another story).

FYI:
PSA mag limit = 7.6
Bright Star Atlas mag limit = 6.5
Cambridge Star Atlas mag limit = 6.5


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Michael Rapp
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/27/04

Loc: Dickinson, TX
Re: Bright Star Atlas or Cambridge Star Atlas? new [Re: JimK]
      #6145834 - 10/18/13 11:21 PM

Now why didn't I think of that. I also have OITH. Granted, it is still using two volumes rather than one, but as you said they are nearly the same size. I will need to try this...

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starman1
Vendor (EyepiecesEtc.com)
*****

Reged: 06/24/03

Loc: Los Angeles
Re: Bright Star Atlas or Cambridge Star Atlas? new [Re: Michael Rapp]
      #6157965 - 10/25/13 06:08 PM

For anything bigger than a 90mm, Sky Atlas 2000.0 is great in the field, and the Sky Atlas 2000 Companion has info about every object on the charts, and, more importantly, it's in numerical order.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick Woods
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/27/05

Loc: Inner Solar System
Re: Bright Star Atlas or Cambridge Star Atlas? new [Re: Starman1]
      #6158147 - 10/25/13 08:27 PM

Quote:

For anything bigger than a 90mm, Sky Atlas 2000.0 is great in the field, and the Sky Atlas 2000 Companion has info about every object on the charts, and, more importantly, it's in numerical order.




+1


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Michael Rapp
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/27/04

Loc: Dickinson, TX
Re: Bright Star Atlas or Cambridge Star Atlas? new [Re: Rick Woods]
      #6158194 - 10/25/13 09:00 PM

I just wish Sky Atlas 2000 wasn't so big! Wait, no I don't...if it were smaller, it would be less useful.

What I wish for is a stand/table arrangement to make it less awkward.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CelestronDaddy
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 08/22/09

Re: Bright Star Atlas or Cambridge Star Atlas? new [Re: Starman1]
      #6158326 - 10/25/13 10:15 PM

I agree with Don... The SA 2000 is a great atlas. Big compared to some but lots of detail. I just got the new one volume Uranometria 2000 and wow! I haven't had a chance to use it in the field due to clouds but I'm sure it will be a great atlas too...

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JimK
Skygazer
*****

Reged: 09/18/05

Loc: Albuquerque, NM USA
Re: Bright Star Atlas or Cambridge Star Atlas? new [Re: Michael Rapp]
      #6158413 - 10/25/13 11:12 PM

Quote:

I just wish Sky Atlas 2000 wasn't so big! Wait, no I don't...if it were smaller, it would be less useful.

What I wish for is a stand/table arrangement to make it less awkward.



A music stand works well for me, and some others, to hold an atlas nearby for reference.

Edited to add this link for an image: A typical stand is at this link -- mine is similar.

Edited by JimK (10/25/13 11:14 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TomCorbett
sage


Reged: 07/08/13

Re: Bright Star Atlas or Cambridge Star Atlas? new [Re: JimK]
      #6159893 - 10/26/13 10:14 PM

Quote:

A music stand works well for me, and some others, to hold an atlas nearby for reference.





I agree that a sturdy music stand is nice.

A bit pricey, but a sturdy flat-top service cart also provides a nice surface for sky atlases and kit.

*****

Regarding atlases at the scope--I use all of the popular editions--and like them all.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1


Extra information
3 registered and 2 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Geo557, kkokkolis 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 602

Jump to

CN Forums Home




Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics