Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Speciality Forums >> Science! Astronomy & Space Exploration, and Others

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | (show all)
deSitter
Still in Old School


Reged: 12/09/04

Scary relativity
      #6214651 - 11/25/13 09:14 AM

Scary because there is some linear algebra here!

A square matrix as many of you know, is an arrangement of numbers that embodies in some contexts a transformation of a certain sort - for example when I rotate the coordinates in the plane,

x' = x cos a - y sin a
y' = x sin a + y cos a

This is more easily expressed (read brackets as a column vector, and parentheses as a row vector, and double brackets as a matrix with entries in "reading" order)

[x' y'] = M [x y]

where M is the square matrix [[ cos a, -sin a, sin a, cos a ]]

The determinant is the product of the diagonal entries minus that of the off-diagonal entries, here cos^2 a + sin ^2 a = 1.

OK let's introduce four basic matrices (with complex numbers as entries)

Sx = [[ 0, 1, 1, 0]]
Sy = [[ 0, -i, i 0 ]]
Sz = [[ 1, 0, 0, -1 ]]
S0 = [[ 1, 0, 0, 1 ]]

and let's make the matrix object

R = x Sx + y Sy + z Sz + t S0 = [[ z + t, x - iy, x + iy, -z + t ]]

The determinant is

|R| = (z+t)(-z+t) - (x-iy)(x+iy) = -x^2 - y^2 - z^2 + t^2.

You'll see where this is going eventually. Ask questions now.

-drl


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Otto Piechowski
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 09/20/05

Loc: Lexington, KY
Re: Scary relativity new [Re: deSitter]
      #6214787 - 11/25/13 10:24 AM

For me, Danny, this math is over my head. I would need pictures to explain each step and a glossary (with pictures) to explain the words vector, row vector, column vector, and matrix.

BUT DO NOT DO THIS, at least at this time. Rick and Brentwood also asked you to explain the special relativity thing. It is quite likely they do understand simple math like this and I do not want to hold the three of you up. Later, perhaps y'all can draw pictures for me and stuff like that BUT NOT NOW, or perhaps, even at all.

Thank you for taking this on.

Otto


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
llanitedave
Humble Megalomaniac
*****

Reged: 09/26/05

Loc: Amargosa Valley, NV, USA
Re: Scary relativity new [Re: Otto Piechowski]
      #6214942 - 11/25/13 11:49 AM

Sounds like a job for numpy.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick Woods
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/27/05

Loc: Inner Solar System
Re: Scary relativity new [Re: Otto Piechowski]
      #6214978 - 11/25/13 12:08 PM

Quote:

Rick and Brentwood also asked you to explain the special relativity thing. It is quite likely they do understand simple math like this and I do not want to hold the three of you up.




It's even more likely that at least one of them has no idea what any of it means. I feel like Homer Simpson when someone talks to him, and all he's hearing is "blah, blah, blah". It may as well be runes, or the Voynich manuscript.

Is this degree of immersion in the math really necessary to create an understandable analogy for the car-headlight thing? If so, well, thanks anyway, but there's nothing here for me.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
PeterR280
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 05/27/13

Re: Scary relativity new [Re: Rick Woods]
      #6214985 - 11/25/13 12:10 PM

The Lorentz transformations would be much easier to follow.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
The Mighty Mo
professor emeritus


Reged: 10/12/13

Loc: South of North, North of South...
Re: Scary relativity *DELETED* new [Re: Rick Woods]
      #6215014 - 11/25/13 12:23 PM

Post deleted by The Mighty Mo

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
brentwood
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/04/05

Loc: BC Canada
Re: Scary relativity new [Re: The Mighty Mo]
      #6215039 - 11/25/13 12:35 PM

Nothing here for me either. I can understand some of Otto's posts more!
If the answer to the question, "What does an outside observer see when a vehicle travelling at just below c puts on its headlights" can only be answered with an equation, then I would say that there is no answer, it is still an unknown.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
deSitter
Still in Old School


Reged: 12/09/04

Re: Scary relativity new [Re: brentwood]
      #6215107 - 11/25/13 01:06 PM

C'mon be patient! You have to see things before you can understand them! It's not a linear process. Ask questions!

-drl


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dickbill
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 09/30/08

Re: Scary relativity new [Re: deSitter]
      #6215126 - 11/25/13 01:17 PM

why do you introduce imaginary numbers?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
deSitter
Still in Old School


Reged: 12/09/04

Re: Scary relativity new [Re: dickbill]
      #6215138 - 11/25/13 01:26 PM

You'll see! It's nothing unreal - it's very real. You HAVE to be patient. It will all come down to a flag...

-drl


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
choran
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 12/28/12

Re: Scary relativity new [Re: deSitter]
      #6215200 - 11/25/13 01:56 PM

Will the simplified version come down to solving a right triangle with sides
ct, vt, and (hypotenuse) ct' and eventually solving for t'? I've seen that approach and it is pretty understandable, but requires pics.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
brentwood
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/04/05

Loc: BC Canada
Re: Scary relativity new [Re: choran]
      #6215224 - 11/25/13 02:08 PM

Danny,aко аз ви е поискал въпрос в България, ще можете да го разбираме без да използвате Google? Не мога да поставя си пост в Google и да се превеждат.?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
choran
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 12/28/12

Re: Scary relativity new [Re: brentwood]
      #6215269 - 11/25/13 02:27 PM



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
deSitter
Still in Old School


Reged: 12/09/04

Re: Scary relativity new [Re: choran]
      #6215320 - 11/25/13 02:43 PM

Quote:

Will the simplified version come down to solving a right triangle with sides
ct, vt, and (hypotenuse) ct' and eventually solving for t'? I've seen that approach and it is pretty understandable, but requires pics.




Nope, 100% rigorous.

-drl


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Crow Haven
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 01/09/09

Loc: Oregon USA
Re: Scary relativity new [Re: deSitter]
      #6215370 - 11/25/13 03:04 PM

I haven't the math background or understanding of relativity to be able to see how this turns out. Can light be slowed down or appear slowed down from an observer's perspective at the side of the road? I have a hard time with the idea of a light beam traveling at a foot a minute or looking like it is proceeding this slowly. I thought that the light sent from the headlights would just travel at the "speed of light" as soon as turned on from the car. That it would appear instanteous from the observer in the car and from the observer at the side of the road it would also, regardless of how fast the car moved. Is there enough time and distance between the car and when the light is switched on to make it look like the light comes on before the car appears? Sorry if this sounds really stupid. I'm totally confused by it, but am hoping there will be a way to describe what actually would appear to happen for the observer at the side of the road that I can understand.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
choran
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 12/28/12

Re: Scary relativity new [Re: deSitter]
      #6215379 - 11/25/13 03:07 PM

Heck! Was hoping I could follow.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Neutrino?
sage
*****

Reged: 12/14/09

Loc: Wasatch Front
Re: Scary relativity new [Re: deSitter]
      #6215383 - 11/25/13 03:09 PM

Tough crowd.

Quote:


You'll see where this is going eventually. Ask questions now.

-drl



SL(2,C) to SO+(1,3) to PSL(2,C) to M ?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick Woods
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/27/05

Loc: Inner Solar System
Re: Scary relativity new [Re: Crow Haven]
      #6215398 - 11/25/13 03:14 PM

Maya, it doesn't sound stupid to me; or else, I'm equally stupid. I can't help feeling that there must be a simple analogy that would give people like us at least a rough picture of the situation.

Danny, I appreciate your attempting to explain the whole thing, and I will follow it and try to understand. But I really hope this ends up with something on the order of "think of it like this..."
But I have no questions now, beyond "what does it mean?"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick Woods
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/27/05

Loc: Inner Solar System
Re: Scary relativity new [Re: brentwood]
      #6215404 - 11/25/13 03:16 PM

Quote:

Danny,aко аз ви е поискал въпрос в България, ще можете да го разбираме без да използвате Google? Не мога да поставя си пост в Google и да се превеждат.?




Brentwood, is the above what you intended to post? Looks like a lot of ASCII to me.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Otto Piechowski
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 09/20/05

Loc: Lexington, KY
Re: Scary relativity [Re: Rick Woods]
      #6215414 - 11/25/13 03:20 PM

ask questions: OK; now mind you, I'm not being sassy or trying to be stupid; I just have no more familiarity with this math than I do with a language foreign to me.

What is a "square matrix"?

What do
x' = x cos a - y sin a
y' = x sin a + y cos a
mean?

And what is the meaning of these things in relation to the paradox of 1+1=1 at near light speeds?

I mean, I can do the simple equations of t=t(0) X the-square-root of 1 - v^2/c^2; the same for Length and the same for mass when mass(0) is divided by the-square-root of 1 - v^2/c^2. I can do it. I don't understand why these do what they do. I don't understand why, from the perspective of an outside observer, the combined velocity of headlight beam and the gal-in-the-spaceship-already-traveling-at-near-c is still just less than c? I would like to understand why this is the case. And as one of our colleagues here said, it would be nice if there was a real world example that explained this phenomenon; not just gave an analogical similarity like that silly higgs-boson-like-a-snow-field thing.

But, as I am writing, I am afraid I am getting to a really clear question.

Danny, even though this is special relativity and not quantum mechanics, is this an area of relativity which, like quantum mechanics, it cannot be explained with analogies from the ordinary world of fried eggs, baseball, and why the landlord can't get the furnace working?

Otto

Edited by Otto Piechowski (11/25/13 03:30 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | (show all)


Extra information
2 registered and 4 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  LivingNDixie, FirstSight, JayinUT 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 3816

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics