Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Astrophotography and Sketching >> DSLR & Digital Camera Astro Imaging & Processing

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | (show all)
mpgxsvcd
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 12/21/11

Loc: Raleigh, North Carolina
How much difference do more subs make?
      #6265953 - 12/21/13 08:03 PM Attachment (66 downloads)

So I wanted to see where the point of diminishing returns comes into play. I had stacked 79 6 second ISO 6400 images of M42 before.

I decided to see what 60, 28, and 16 looked like instead. I stacked the 60, 28, and 16 in the exact same manner and saved the output of DSS without any edits.

Here are what they looked like. I also have the original 79 image file. However, the processing on that was slightly different.

I think that 30-60 images is sufficient. 16 images definitely shows some difference.

60 Images


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mpgxsvcd
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 12/21/11

Loc: Raleigh, North Carolina
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: mpgxsvcd]
      #6265954 - 12/21/13 08:03 PM Attachment (53 downloads)

28 Images

Edited by mpgxsvcd (12/21/13 08:03 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mpgxsvcd
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 12/21/11

Loc: Raleigh, North Carolina
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: mpgxsvcd]
      #6265955 - 12/21/13 08:03 PM Attachment (51 downloads)

16 Images

Edited by mpgxsvcd (12/21/13 08:04 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mpgxsvcd
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 12/21/11

Loc: Raleigh, North Carolina
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: mpgxsvcd]
      #6265956 - 12/21/13 08:04 PM Attachment (38 downloads)

Here is the 79 images but with slightly different processing.

Edited by mpgxsvcd (12/21/13 08:05 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tom and Beth
Post Laureate


Reged: 01/08/07

Loc: Tucson, AZ
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: mpgxsvcd]
      #6266097 - 12/21/13 09:58 PM

Interesting. undoubtedly a significant jump between 16 and 28, and at least to me another significant jump going to 60 looking only at these down-sampled examples to fit CN guidelines.

In particular the "V" shape just off center at the 11 o'clock position


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jbalsam
sage
*****

Reged: 07/06/12

Loc: Darnestown, MD
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: Tom and Beth]
      #6266124 - 12/21/13 10:22 PM

The 60-frame image certainly looks the best. I don't think you've hit the point of diminishing returns yet because you can definitely see a difference between 28-60. Try 120 and 250 frames. 6s is a short exposure time so they're easy to capture.

In other news, what are you using for a coma corrector?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Samir Kharusi
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/14/05

Loc: Oman
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: jbalsam]
      #6266196 - 12/21/13 11:34 PM

I doubt that there is EVER a point of diminishing returns. The longer the integration time, the fainter/dimmer the wisps you can dig out at a good Signal-to-Noise-Ratio. But one should not think of x frames more, think of doubling the integration time for each step. After 79 think of 160, then 320, etc. Here's what I mean, small crops displayed at almost 1:1 from APS-C stacks, identical processing for all, 2-minute subs at f4 at a dark site:


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tonk
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 08/19/04

Loc: Leeds, UK, 54N
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: Samir Kharusi]
      #6266423 - 12/22/13 05:26 AM

Yes - I don't count number fo subframes but the total integration times.

Put it this way, the Gendler's, Croman's and Hallas's of this world do 20 to 30 hours integration. A few DSLR folks here have run up to 20 hours with stunning results.

Personally I find things look very good after 10 hours worth.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
garret
sage


Reged: 07/26/09

Loc: Netherlands
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: Tonk]
      #6266498 - 12/22/13 07:41 AM Attachment (36 downloads)

Multi hour integration time? not needed for a brite object:

Here is a crop of my imaghe of M17, only 14 subs of 60 seconds, canon 5 dmk2, F 3.6 telescope, m17 was only 19 degrees above the horizon.
In the image the right part is noise free more subs is not needed, left could have more subs.

Garret van der Veen


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: mpgxsvcd]
      #6266537 - 12/22/13 09:03 AM

Additional frames improve signal to noise ratio proportionally to the square root of the number of subs. So, if you take 4, you get twice the signal to noise ratio of one. Remember, this is statistical improvement. To get 4 times the improvement, you need 16 subs.

Adding up the integration time grossly overestimates the improvement. With 100 subs, you would predict the image was 5 magnitudes deeper than one sub. In reality, the difference is closer to 2.5 or less. The only time this is valid is when it is all in the same exposure. So, twice the exposure length gives twice the signal to read noise.

I've ended up doing 16 sub frames and putting as much integration time into them as possible.

-Rich


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: Starhawk]
      #6266539 - 12/22/13 09:05 AM

Note, there are other sources of noise besides read noise, so the real improvement from stacking isn't quite as much as the square root of the number of subs.

-Rich


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jbalsam
sage
*****

Reged: 07/06/12

Loc: Darnestown, MD
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: Starhawk]
      #6266581 - 12/22/13 09:44 AM

There's always a point of diminishing returns. In this case, it's when you don't notice a difference in the image quality by adding a significant amount more data. It probably takes a large amount of data to accomplish this for a low SNR object (20-30 hours as someone mentioned) where the shot noise of the object is significant.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Cotts
Just Wondering
*****

Reged: 10/10/05

Loc: Toronto, Ontario
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: jbalsam]
      #6266650 - 12/22/13 10:52 AM

I am very interested in this 'minimalism' discussion. I will be travelling to Chile in March for 11 nights at Atacama Lodge. I plan to devote about 5 of the nights to astrophotography through an AT65EDQ/Canon60Da combination. (The other nights will be visual observing with the 24" dob while shooting wide-angle stills and time-lapses..)

There are waaaay more targets than I will have time for so I will have to compromise on S/N ratio by shooting some bare minimum of subs, flats, darks etc. ISO 1600 works well with my camera...

The big question is: How many subs is the minimum acceptable number? And how long should they be? Which would be better, e.g., 2x6min, 3x4min, 4x3min, 6x2min or 12x1min?

I have a 'wish list' of about 25 targets with the AT65 so, with my planned schedule, I'll do about 5 targets a night -- about 1.5 hours maximum per target. Whatever shall I do?

Thanks

Dave


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Hilmi
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 03/07/10

Loc: Muscat, Sultanate of Oman
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: Cotts]
      #6266895 - 12/22/13 01:26 PM

Dave,

You are sometimes limited by saturation in the stars. If stars get saturated they look bad post processing, so my personal advice is to take an image at the maximum exposure at which the stars don't saturate and work on from there.

Hilmi


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Footbag
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/13/09

Loc: Scranton, PA
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: Cotts]
      #6266906 - 12/22/13 01:31 PM

Quote:

I am very interested in this 'minimalism' discussion. I will be travelling to Chile in March for 11 nights at Atacama Lodge. I plan to devote about 5 of the nights to astrophotography through an AT65EDQ/Canon60Da combination. (The other nights will be visual observing with the 24" dob while shooting wide-angle stills and time-lapses..)

There are waaaay more targets than I will have time for so I will have to compromise on S/N ratio by shooting some bare minimum of subs, flats, darks etc. ISO 1600 works well with my camera...

The big question is: How many subs is the minimum acceptable number? And how long should they be? Which would be better, e.g., 2x6min, 3x4min, 4x3min, 6x2min or 12x1min?

I have a 'wish list' of about 25 targets with the AT65 so, with my planned schedule, I'll do about 5 targets a night -- about 1.5 hours maximum per target. Whatever shall I do?

Thanks

Dave




Just expose until your histogram is separated from the left by 1/3. How many? That's up to you. How noise free do you want your images to be?

Edited by Footbag (12/22/13 02:06 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tonk
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 08/19/04

Loc: Leeds, UK, 54N
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: Footbag]
      #6266960 - 12/22/13 02:03 PM

+10 ^

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
nofxrx
Vendor (HyperCams & Mods)
*****

Reged: 07/12/05

Loc: Palm Bay,Florida
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: Tonk]
      #6267110 - 12/22/13 03:28 PM

But do you use the BOC histo to determine the 1/3 rule, or use an unstretched histo?

Also,that 1/3 rule is really dependant on the model used... For instance my 5D2 could EASILY take that to 1/2(center) or even slightly more to the right (like 9/16th to 2/3 from left)
But my old XS could only do 1/3 to slightly closer to center. ?.
The T2i was closer to 1/2 as well without issues..

And this was using the BOC histo. (Which is stretched non linearly (IIRC))

If you look at the Raw images on a PC they are MUCH darker...
So you would have to expose for nearly 2/3++ to get those to look similar to the stretched histo. Just not sure if there is any benefit our negatives in doing so(Though logically would think that the images would be completely washed out with LP... which would make removal near impossible... Again just a guess..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Cotts
Just Wondering
*****

Reged: 10/10/05

Loc: Toronto, Ontario
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: Footbag]
      #6267131 - 12/22/13 03:41 PM

Adam, you said, "Just expose until your histogram is separated from the left by 1/3. "

Can I observe my histogram 'on the fly', as I shoot or must I shoot a 'guess frame' and then look at the histogram then adjust exposure?

Thanks,

Dave


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
petemumbower
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 07/12/09

Loc: West Michigan
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: Tonk]
      #6267133 - 12/22/13 03:41 PM

Agree with above too, we all want the awesome images we see posted, but rarely do many of us put in the integration times needed to achieve those results. But we all got to decide if we want a handful of great images or lots of ok/good ones.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Footbag
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/13/09

Loc: Scranton, PA
Re: How much difference do more subs make? new [Re: Cotts]
      #6267144 - 12/22/13 03:46 PM

Quote:

Adam, you said, "Just expose until your histogram is separated from the left by 1/3. "

Can I observe my histogram 'on the fly', as I shoot or must I shoot a 'guess frame' and then look at the histogram then adjust exposure?

Thanks,

Dave




You will need to take a guess frame. The exposure length will depend on sky brightness, F-Ratio, iso, etc...

At Atacama, I suspect you will be using longish exposures, unless you are imaging with very fast optics.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | (show all)


Extra information
17 registered and 39 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Dave M, fishonkevin, WOBentley, tecmage 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1982

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics