Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Mounts

Pages: 1
jakecru
member


Reged: 04/10/13

Which Alt/Az Mount for Explore Scientific ed102?
      #6381537 - 02/17/14 06:18 PM

I have a ES102ed essential edition refractor telescope. The scope itself ways close to 10 lbs, but It could come closer to 15 lbs with the finder, rings/dovetail, and heavy tele vue eyepieces. For visual use I want a nice portable sturdy alt/az mount for this setup. Here are the options I was looking at.

-Vixen Porta II Porta II

-Orion VersaGo III VersaGo III

-Explore Scientific Twilight ES Twilight

-Astro Tech Voyager ATV

Which one of these would be best? Am I missing a better option in this price range? I know the ES Twilight II would probably be much better, but it is slightly out of my price range. Also I would like to have an option with a pier extension so the eyepiece will be in a more comfortable location. The ATV could have a pier extension, but it is on a wait list so that may not be a possibility.. Any Ideas?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
T1R2
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 06/11/13

Loc: NeverWhere, 35*N
Re: Which Alt/Az Mount for Explore Scientific ed102? new [Re: jakecru]
      #6381554 - 02/17/14 06:29 PM

I would get the ESTW, I just like stuff to match...lol

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
brokenwave
sage


Reged: 05/10/11

Loc: Scottsdale, AZ
Re: Which Alt/Az Mount for Explore Scientific ed102? new [Re: T1R2]
      #6381632 - 02/17/14 07:24 PM

+1 on the ES Twilight, if you look at the Vixen Porta, get the HAL tripod for better stability.
The AT is similar to the Vixen and the Orion is similar to the ES tripod styles.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jakecru
member


Reged: 04/10/13

Re: Which Alt/Az Mount for Explore Scientific ed102? new [Re: brokenwave]
      #6381795 - 02/17/14 09:18 PM

So would the ES Twilight I be stable enough for my scope, or would the Vixen Porta II with HAL tripod be more stable? I like the price of the ES mount better, but I do not want to loose a lot of stability over the price difference.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mwc11
member


Reged: 07/25/13

Loc: Las Vegas, Nev.
Re: Which Alt/Az Mount for Explore Scientific ed102? new [Re: jakecru]
      #6382036 - 02/18/14 12:14 AM

I believe that the steel legs of the Twilight would be more rigid/dampen better than the aluminum legs of the HAL tripod. If it were me, I'd pick the Twilight over the Porta II

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bill Barlow
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 12/03/07

Loc: Overland Park KS
Re: Which Alt/Az Mount for Explore Scientific ed102? new [Re: jakecru]
      #6382679 - 02/18/14 11:56 AM

Another option you may want to consider are the altaz mounts and tripods that Universal Astronomics has. They are excellent and I own several of them and use them from my 4" refractor up to my C14. If you have questions, contact Larry and he will be glad to talk to you and find out what your needs are. Good luck.

Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
hottr6
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/28/09

Loc: 7,500', Magdalena Mtns, NM
Re: Which Alt/Az Mount for Explore Scientific ed102? new [Re: jakecru]
      #6383041 - 02/18/14 02:46 PM

All the mounts you mention are of, what I call, the offset-arm design. Maybe there is more common-place term for this design.

Yes, they will all handle your 'scope, but.....
1) The CoG is offset from the center-line of the tripod. Personally, I don't like this from a security POV, or esthetics. Further, they are much more awkward to carry around.
2) The tripod legs will foul the 'scope at high elevations. Astro-Tech offers a pier (18" high???) that mitigates this problem.

This is based on my experience with a Voyager, which I still own.

Personally, I prefer alt-az's that are balanced over the tripod center-line, like this:



There are many manufacturers that offer this type of system, albeit at some expense, but the cheapest would be the very highly-regarded and beautiful Vixen Polaris GEM in alt-az mode. You can find them for less than $200, and with a wooden tripod to boot!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
pwd
newbie


Reged: 05/15/08

Re: Which Alt/Az Mount for Explore Scientific ed102? new [Re: jakecru]
      #6385318 - 02/19/14 07:06 PM

You might check a Free-Turn Q or X from Nova Hitch:

http://www.halfhitchtelescope.com/index.htm


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
coopman
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/23/06

Loc: South Louisiana
Re: Which Alt/Az Mount for Explore Scientific ed102? new [Re: pwd]
      #6385593 - 02/19/14 09:33 PM

Unistar Deluxe

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JonNPR
sage
*****

Reged: 03/04/13

Loc: Oregon
Re: Which Alt/Az Mount for Explore Scientific ed102? new [Re: coopman]
      #6386762 - 02/20/14 12:56 PM

I believe the VersaGo III and the Twilight 1 are essentially the same mount. I have the a Twilight version. For comfortable refractor viewing higher up in the sky, towards zenith, height is important to me. The Oberwerks Tall wooden tripod legs have worked very well for me and attached easily to the Twilight mount head.

Jon


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1


Extra information
26 registered and 51 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Dave M, richard7, bilgebay 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 656

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics