Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Cats & Casses

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
MrFiremouth
member


Reged: 05/23/09

Loc: St.Louis Area USA
Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6
      #5102389 - 03/03/12 09:43 AM

I have a Celestron C6 refractor and it is about 100lbs to move around. I have not been using it because it takes time to set up and because the hand set does not align stars properly.

I am selling it for $600 with Gt mount. Once it sells I am going to replace it with either the LS6 or the Skyprodigy 6. My question is which one is better and why?

Thanks


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Griffin!
sage


Reged: 09/12/10

Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: MrFiremouth]
      #5102573 - 03/03/12 11:36 AM

From what I can tell the Skyprodigy mount is basically a DS type mount/tripod with self-guiding added on. The LS mount and tripod seems to be more substantial, and you have the option of ACF, but it's also more expensive.

I haven't seen any reviews of the Skyprodigy scopes yet (I'll go search around again), but the LS series has been getting mostly positive reviews with the latest revision.

I think it comes down to what you're willing to spend.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rmollise
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/06/07

Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: Griffin!]
      #5102951 - 03/03/12 03:04 PM

Meade made the DS. The mount on the Sky Prodigy is an adaptation of Celestron's NS mounts, which are quite problem free compared to the poor DS.

The LS got off to a very shaky start, but seems better now. If you ask me, a NexStar 6 without the self-align stuff is a better, proven deal than either.

Edited by rmollise (03/03/12 03:08 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
yweln
member


Reged: 08/05/11

Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: rmollise]
      #5103033 - 03/03/12 04:02 PM

The SkyProdigy telescopes are toys with autoguiding piggybacked onto them. They're the same kind of telescopes you'd find at Costco or WalMart.

The LSs are serious SCs. There's really no comparison.

Edited by yweln (03/03/12 04:03 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rmollise
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/06/07

Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: yweln]
      #5103054 - 03/03/12 04:13 PM

Quote:

The SkyProdigy telescopes are toys with autoguiding piggybacked onto them. They're the same kind of telescopes you'd find at Costco or WalMart.

The LSs are serious SCs. There's really no comparison.




Negative. Have a look at the 6-inch.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
yweln
member


Reged: 08/05/11

Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: rmollise]
      #5103126 - 03/03/12 05:01 PM

Quote:

Have a look at the 6-inch.




I have. Classic Meade optics. Decent telescope. What don't you like about it?
Especially in comparison with any of the SkyProdigys?

Edited by yweln (03/03/12 05:02 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jay Wise
sage


Reged: 11/21/08

Loc: Near Williamsburg VA
Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: yweln]
      #5103270 - 03/03/12 06:26 PM

My 6 month old 8" LS is a great trouble free scope. Well, at least so far. To watch it align itself is my idea of astronomy fun! I do recommend a good stable power supply. I use a Pyramid 5 amp transformer because I have a AC power supply at my observing area. I would forget flashlight batteries! Get a good 12 volt heavy duty marine style battery or a heavy duty car starting unit. The tripod was a bit shaky however. The 6" would probably be OK. I cured my "shaky" problem with a tripod from an older 12" LX. It is now the best SCT scope I have ever owned. If you go Meade I highly recommend the ACF version.

JayW


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rmollise
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/06/07

Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: yweln]
      #5103319 - 03/03/12 06:52 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Have a look at the 6-inch.




I have. Classic Meade optics. Decent telescope. What don't you like about it?
Especially in comparison with any of the SkyProdigys?




I am skittish about its performance, since so many people have had so many serious problems with it. I hope those are fixed now, but I am not willing to say that is the case, not yet.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
yweln
member


Reged: 08/05/11

Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: rmollise]
      #5103356 - 03/03/12 07:16 PM

From what I've heard, the early problems were with the GPS functions. The unit I looked at didn't have those problems. Aligned perfectly inside of two minutes, and an entire night of viewing without any hitches (this was three months ago).

So, do you recommend the SkyProdigy, or just not have heard issues about it?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JustPlainBill
member


Reged: 12/15/11

Loc: Hilo, HI
Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: yweln]
      #5103376 - 03/03/12 07:30 PM

The SkyProdigy 6 uses the same OTA as the 6SE, just has a different paint job. You can ask a lot of people that own 6SEs if they like them (I love mine). I don't know about the tripod, it looks a little shaky to me.

I would say to just get the 6SE, but I'm biased
IMHO, 'point at any 3 bright objects' is simple enough, but I guess watching an automated system would be more fun.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
yweln
member


Reged: 08/05/11

Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: JustPlainBill]
      #5103397 - 03/03/12 07:43 PM

Quote:

The SkyProdigy 6 uses the same OTA as the 6SE, just has a different paint job.



yes, and on a very spindly tripod. I'd say look at the specs:
http://meade.com/ls
http://celestronsites.com/skyprodigy/


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rigel123
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/29/09

Loc: SW Ohio
Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: MrFiremouth]
      #5103517 - 03/03/12 09:07 PM

I have had my ETX-LS6 for nearly 3 years now and mine was good right out of the box. I know others had some issues with the GPS alignment, but I never did. Optics are great, and I even did some imaging with it but have moved on to an GEM for imaging and use the LS6 for visual now. I have the ACF and views are crisp with nice contrast.

With the newer revisions in firmware it aligns quickly and gotos are very accurate. It's pretty nice to flip a switch and just let it do it's thing!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MrFiremouth
member


Reged: 05/23/09

Loc: St.Louis Area USA
Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: rigel123]
      #5103754 - 03/03/12 11:24 PM

I was wanting the LS6 ACF, then I saw the Celestron and wondered if it would be worth getting? I have had problems with my GT mount and hand set, and I have the DS-2114 which is a good scope, but has smaller aperture. Star alignments can be a pain for me. To just go out and let the scope do it automatically is an awesome feature. I do a lot of outreach with my club and I waste a lot of time trying to get an alignment. I also had tracking issues with my C6 refractor. The views are stunning, but the scope mount is a pain. I am looking for something with more user friendly electronics for the out reach program.

I am also looking for the assembled weight of the Meade LS6 and LS8 with tripods. I need to know what I will be carrying out into the fields from the van in weight. If the LS8 isn't too heavy I might opt for it. I am saving money for them now and just need to sell my scope.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
donnie3
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 12/15/04

Loc: bartlesville oklahoma
Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: MrFiremouth]
      #5103904 - 03/04/12 01:22 AM Attachment (60 downloads)

i will second uncle rods suggestion about buying a nexstar 6. i have one and love it!! the mount is light, the goto is accurate and easy to set up. i have it on a table top.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rmollise
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/06/07

Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: yweln]
      #5104143 - 03/04/12 08:37 AM

Quote:

From what I've heard, the early problems were with the GPS functions. The unit I looked at didn't have those problems. Aligned perfectly inside of two minutes, and an entire night of viewing without any hitches (this was three months ago).

So, do you recommend the SkyProdigy, or just not have heard issues about it?




Take a stroll through the Yahoogroup archives of the LS group, and you'll see the problems were more extensive than just the GPS. As I said, those _might_ be all fixed now.

I recommend _neither_. The self align function is problematic for many folks. If the area where you observe doesn't have a clear view of the sky, you will likely find yourself aligning manually anyway. I think most folks would be happier with a semi-automatic telescope like the NexStar 6.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rigel123
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/29/09

Loc: SW Ohio
Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: MrFiremouth]
      #5104188 - 03/04/12 09:04 AM

Quote:

I am also looking for the assembled weight of the Meade LS6 and LS8 with tripods. I need to know what I will be carrying out into the fields from the van in weight. If the LS8 isn't too heavy I might opt for it. I am saving money for them now and just need to sell my scope.




The LS6 is 28lbs and the LS8 is 30lbs and the tripod is 9lbs
and the LS series have a carrying handle at the top of the mount. I ended up getting the case from JMI for mine so I could roll it out which is nice.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MrFiremouth
member


Reged: 05/23/09

Loc: St.Louis Area USA
Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: rigel123]
      #5105233 - 03/04/12 05:50 PM

So the total weight of the LS8 with tripod is 39 lbs?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rigel123
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/29/09

Loc: SW Ohio
Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: MrFiremouth]
      #5107233 - 03/05/12 08:14 PM

That's what I come up with. I was always surprised the 8" was only 2 more lbs than the 6". It has a nice "beefy" feel (6"). I got an Orion case for the tripod so carrying that over one shoulder and the scope with the handle on the mount isn't too bad, but as I stated I got the JMI case for the scope and just roll it out when I'm going to use it.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ProAstroPD
journeyman


Reged: 07/07/12

Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: yweln]
      #5306942 - 07/07/12 03:25 PM

>QUOTE
The SkyProdigy telescopes are toys with autoguiding piggybacked onto them. They're the same kind of telescopes you'd find at Costco or WalMart.

The LSs are serious SCs. There's really no comparison.

--------------------
8" LX90-GPS
NexStar 5SE
ETX125
>UNQUOTE

Nothing could be further from fact, WRT Sky Prodigy. Cloudy Nights prides itself on objectivity - before you categorically snob a telescope, please consider owning or at least operating one for a spell to give it a fair shake. The staff here obtained two early on, to study the guide algorithm. Stand by for long-winded response <wink>....
Been an ATM/AA for about 44 years, scratch-built optics, mounts, gotos and robotic scopes and their electronics and systems. Bought the same, too. Eventually became a professional astronomer and observatory director in that time. I say that because, I have not only been involved with buying, making and operating goto and upper end avocational telescopes for many years, I am quite familiar with the astrometric methods used in a Sky Prodigy that we use in large professional instrumentation in the $ten-figure class. So I think I can speak with some accuracy on how the little Prodigy's work.
Contrary to the innuendo, this kind of sky alignment algorithm is not used in dimestore telescopes, but is a technique used in the orientation and navigation of billion dollar spaceborne intelligence systems, strategic aircraft, and special shipboard systems. That "ACN and ST" (Automated celnav & star-tracker) field is far, far more advanced than anything seen here on CN; and while the little Sky Prodigy is not so fancy either, its pointing heritage certainly does not put it anywhere near "dimestore" class. Having used one at length, I can say it does not deserve that slight.
While Sky Prodigy certainly is aimed at novices, that alone is important to an amateur astronomer -- most of whom want to perpetuate the hobby. I get countless PR appeals from newbies that they cannot align the telescope to then "goto", and along those lines, I am sure Celestron wanted to answer that key issue for novices. You can't maintain an avocation's people-base by intimidating entrants. But Sky Prodigy still is useful for more than just the rote beginner as we see it (and no we were not paid by Celestron LOL).
When my staff got ours a year ago to actually see how Celestron's code aligned the instrument the turned out surprisingly easy for us to use (our pro's know the night sky BTW) and reinvigorated an aesthetic appreciation for the sky. Like I said, we were comparing SP to advanced alignment systems -- specifically to understand the relationship of the StarSense algorithm to angles-only Kalman filtered algorithms . There even, Celestron did a quite good job -- especially for the price. We may look at "Autoalign" on Meades next, but they are really not in the same alignment league, relying on GPS, time of day, expected positions, etc, not star fields alone. Last year's news, Meade and Celestron (with somewhat similar SkyAlign, have tested those), can go arm-wrestle about who is on who's turf there; we wanted to focus on how the SP did its alignment.
We've tested a Sky Prodigy for a year... and it is no dimestore telescope. While optomechanically similar to its Nexstar brethren, and at least equal to that line of optics, the mount at or better than an SLT's beefiness, and it is much much easier to operate. Every time I could walk up and goto 30 objects in sequence across 2 pi-steradians -- and find them well centered, after every starsense alignment. I know the night sky well, but it sure is impressive to set the unit out, and go inside for a coffee, come out and watch it finish self location, then present itself for tracking. The 130 would be easy to backpack as well; did that. Optical collimation remains quite solid both using ole Techtron tools, and also cross checking in our optics lab on a Zygo interferometer-- after a year being roughly used.
BTW people here have hip-shot that the instrument is basically a" Nexstar with autoguiding piggybacked onto them". This is also false and very misleading; sounds like someone got confused with Meade's Starlock system.... Go read up on how the Sky Prodigy operates (and some nice videos and Youtubes out there too). I don't believe it's the best principle instrument for an advanced amateur... any more than I would put an advanced amateur on a robotic liquid helium cooled IR 2-meter with an echelle at the naysmith, a professional's tool... BUT, SP would be a great, quality beginner telescope to bridge a lack of sky knowledge and get an exhuberant youngster excited to keep looking at he sky. It's a great knockabout quickie scope too, can throw in the car or the pack (sort of) for some desert fun.
In fact it would come from a line more capable, and is IMO better than than the LS. And as an aside, I'd be careful about how one uses the term "serious SC" as amongst amateur telescopes, as _very few_ currently marketed SC's are indeed "serious" telescopes, from an expert point of view, either - Point being -- it's *all* a *point of view* - and such subjectivity should be avoided when fairly evaluating an instrument... SP is as optomechanically decent as most all other small Celestrons.
Finally, I know some AA's disdain making alignment and learning the sky 'too easy', as abjuring some rite of passage. To them I'd say don't dismiss this novel and simpler method for aligning a telescope, as some short circuit as to learning the sky, anymore than oldsters of yesteryear used to dismiss a 4 function calulator as cheating vs. a slide rule... I've actually seen little kids at open houses marvel at the auto-alignment, then start to spatially grasp the sky as the SP marched from object to object. It is the future, and hopefully the method will spread into upper end amateur instrumentation, like GOTO once did.
So, the technology under the Sky Prodigy's hood is actually advanced, and not dimestore-trivial, and so instead makes the alignment, goto and operation all the simpler -- time to pay attention to other things more important. Like your smartphone made life simpler (allegedly LOL). If you are satisfied with Nexstar and CG quality, the Prodigy easily equals or betters that, but is just alot easier to use. If you like GOTO this is the next step. Try one; I will probably buy my own 6" variant in fact, after our staff experience with the littler SP's (I do wish Celestron sold just the Starsence mount, sans OTA; I have a nice 6" R-C that would be just great riding on a Sky Prodigy arm!). FWIW.... again sorry so long - I just did not want a dimestore innuendo have people miss what a different experience for our staff the little SP's provided. Your mileage may vary.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SDTopensied
super member
*****

Reged: 04/25/11

Loc: Atlanta
Re: Meade LS6 VS. Celestron Sky Prodigy 6 new [Re: ProAstroPD]
      #5307518 - 07/07/12 11:20 PM

My personal observations, having used both...

The SkyProdigy 6 is "over mounted" in my opinion. The altitude clutches handle the 90 mm Mak just fine, but the 6" is a bit too wobbly for my taste. The alignment process is an automated derivative of the SkyAlign process (which I love!) as far as I can tell. I like the new handset. The keys are not nearly as mushy as the previous version. The new version is the one with the Celestron logo on the lower leftmost key. Optically, both are equal as far as I can tell. The Celestron
OTA exhibits less image shift while focusing than the Meade.

The tripod and mount are sturdier on the Meade. Additionally, the Meade uses worm gears, while the Celestron uses spur gears. A well trained and backlash adjusted Meade mount will be more accurate in tracking and gotos than the Celestron. I like the way the AutoStar handset feels better than the new Celestron handset. I also like the AutoStar scripting language that lets me write my own tours. I don't like the fact that you have to use a third party application to upload those tours because the AutoStar Updater from Meade scrambles them on upload to the 497EP.

My two cents...go with the LT6 or the 6SE. The LT6 will save you some money over the LS6 and give you the same goto and tracking functionality. The 6SE will give you a better mount and more stable tripod than you'll get with the Sky Prodigy.

By the way, you can't judge a product by activity on the yahoo boards. No one ever goes to a tech board to talk about how problem free their scope is. Every scope has its issues, and the Celestron and Meade scopes are no exception. These goto mounts are not kitchen appliances, rather they are complex robotic instruments. All have issues and all require some amount of tinkering to work just right.

-Steve

Edited by SDTopensied (07/07/12 11:31 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
9 registered and 27 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Starman27, kkokkolis 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 9895

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics