Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums
Privacy Policy |
Please read our Terms
of Service | Signup and
Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu.... uh, User
Mike Loffland
Web Guru (Astronomics)
   
Reged: 09/03/04
Posts: 2080
Loc: Norman, Oklahoma
|
|
Astro-Tech 66mm Refractor + Imaging
|
Pierre Stromberg
super member
   
Reged: 02/07/08
Posts: 184
Loc: Woodinville, WA
|
|
I purchased an AT66 earlier this year for imaging purposes and cannot say enough nice things about this scope. Great article.
Pierre
-------------------- ------------
1978 orange tube Celestron C8
1990's Celestron C90
Astro-Tech AT66
Atlas EQG with EQMOD
Nikon D50
Homepage: Explore the outer limits of human belief
http://www.paranormalamerika.blogspot.com
|
mathteacher
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 05/13/07
Posts: 2059
Loc: SF Bay Area
|
|
Very nice results. Thanks for your article.
-------------------- Regards, Mr. Wang . . . . . . . My gallery . . . . . . . I'm a refractor guy!
CR 150-HD - The Hammer, Vixen ED100sf - The Skipper, Orion ST80 - The Pug, Orion 7x50 Scenix
Meade DSI Color, Vixen Porta Mount, Vixen Super Polaris, 2" pipe mount
Please join the International Dark Sky Association
|
Grouptele
sage
Reged: 08/11/07
Posts: 304
Loc: Qcy, IL
|
|
I second the findings of the report.
It allows casual imagers like myself, with modest equipment, to capture decent wide-field images.
Victor
-------------------- C8-XLT, G5, AT66
EQ-G
Starshoot color CCD
Canon XS, HapMod
SPC900NC webcam
|
johnnyha
Pooh-Bah
   
Reged: 11/12/06
Posts: 1111
|
|
That's actually one of the best photos of the Andromeda Galaxy I've ever seen anyone post.
-------------------- Johnny
Spicewood, TX
Sherman Oaks, CA
|
Bowmoreman
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 09/11/06
Posts: 3992
Loc: Bolton, MA
|
|
George... GREAT review! I've "got all the pieces" to do the same thing, and you've now inspired me to get off my lazy posterior and give it a go!
Question: how did you find out what the required spacing between the WO .8X reducer and the QHY8 Chip was supposed to be? (I'm wondering if it is the same as the spacing from my f6.3 SCT reducer for my C11 using it with my QHY8)? If so, then I've already got the spacers...
Or, does the spacing distance CHANGE with a variance in the focal reducer/flatteners?
Again, great article and inspiring wide-field shots!
clear enough skies
-------------------- Dave
Imaging: MI-250+ADM/SBS/Optec Libra: C11Hyperstar,TMB80SS
Visual: XT10i RTP
TV: 31T5,22T4,17T4,12T4,13Ethos,8Ethos;2x Powermate,Paracorr, 1.6X Antares, Hyperion8-24Zoom
Cameras: Mallincam Color Hyper Plus, QHY8
Guider: SBIG STV eFinder
Key Add-ons: Gerbings Heated clothes, WilderSkiesObservatory(BYO#90), Speco 9"Monitor
|
bill fusroy
member
Reged: 03/23/07
Posts: 10
Loc: Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
|
|
I'm not positive about this, but I don't think the old 100" Mt. Wilson scope ever took a film photo of the Andromeda galaxy, at least as a whole, anywhere as sharp, or with the dynamic range, as the one displayed in the review article, off the home page here, which shows some early images taken through the AstroTech 66mm refractor! Pretty amazing what even a far from top-drawer modern refractor can do when mated to a good CCD camera! And, even in non-inflation- corrected dollars, I bet the 66mm scope was still cheaper than the Hooker scope and observatory! What fantastic technological progress!
-------------------- Bill Fusroy
|
geokolb
member
Reged: 07/10/07
Posts: 16
Loc: Phoenix, AZ
|
|
Dave,
Williams Optics recommends a distance from T thread to CCD chip of 56mm. I just followed their suggestion. I actually am using about 58mm based on the combination of spacers I used. I purchased the Baader spacers from OPT. Using the Meade or Celestron 6.3 FR/FF requires a spacing of about 105mm per an article I found on the S&T website: http://www.skyandtelescope.com/howto/astrophotography/3304356.html?page=3&c=y
See 1st graph on page 1. I didn't have good luck using the Celestron 6.3 reducer on my C9.25. I was getting elongated stars at the chip edges. The circle of illumination was sufficient for my chip on the QHY8 though. I've switched to the Astro-Physics CCDT7 FR and am getting better results now (not perfect but better). I communicated with a great astrophotographer - Jim Thommes and he gave me some good advice on how to reduce the elongated stars on the outer portions of the chip: try focusing mid-way between the center and outer areas of the chip vs just the center. The more out of focus the outer areas of the chip are, the greater the star elongation. Thanks for the response to my article. Regards - George
|
geokolb
member
Reged: 07/10/07
Posts: 16
Loc: Phoenix, AZ
|
|
Thanks for the positive feedback on my review of the AT66. I appreciate it and enjoyed writing it. The AT66 is a great little scope. I still can't believe the images it provides. Thanks again - George
|
|
1 registered and 2 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: spaceydee
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|