Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Classic Telescopes

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
Napersky
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/27/10

Loc: Chicagoland
What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS?
      #5733769 - 03/15/13 10:07 AM

We all collect Classic Telescopes. What does that entail? A little money only to find buys on Craig's List and lots of reading perhaps of Cloudy Night threads or John Siple's articles in the Rosette. This we are, CLASSIC TELESCOPE COLLECTORS, but where are we on the scale of knowledge and skill of astronomy?

I am not asking what do we each do for a living because we can all care less. I am asking about our love of the heavens and astronomy, although having a love of astronomy does not qualify a person in anyway for the appellation
"Amateur Astronomer", IMHO.

We certainly are all observers, a broad category. I am an observer who "knows nothing" according to my friend Darren Drake and he is absolutelty right on. But he has been a daily astronomy freak for 30 years.

What do you all think the minimum critera is to be called an Amateur Astronomer? Knowledge of astronomy equivalent to a PHD? or BS? You can't set the bar to low. Einstein was an amateur physicist when he had his miracle year at the Patent Office but he held an earned PHD in Physics, he just didn't have a job in it.

Those like me who's observing skills are very basic and who's knowledge of Astronomy is way below the Bachelor level can be classified as Astronomy Enthusiasts. Even winning all the observing awards or pins in the world an Amateur Astronomer doesn't make.

Need your help, I believe critiera need to be agreed upon.

Mark


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrcrillyAdministrator
Refractor wienie no more
*****

Reged: 04/30/03

Loc: NE Ohio
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? new [Re: Napersky]
      #5733777 - 03/15/13 10:12 AM

Quote:

having a love of astronomy does not qualify a person in anyway for the appellation
"Amateur Astronomer", IMHO.




Don't see why not. That is, after all, the literal meaning of the term.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Darren Drake
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/09/02

Loc: Chicagoland
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? new [Re: Napersky]
      #5733788 - 03/15/13 10:18 AM

We all have our stregths in particular areas of the hobby. Some know current scopes/technologies and some know the older classic scopes top to bottom. Some know the sky amazingly well while other are content to learn textbook astronomy very well. Some know astro history and others just wanna know the latest theories. And some just wanna learn everything they can and end up doing a very good job at doing it. Of course all one really needs to have to be an amateur astronomer is to have the curiousity to learn about and observe the heavans and to follow through to at least some extent.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mustgobigger
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/12/07

Loc: Michigan
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? new [Re: jrcrilly]
      #5733790 - 03/15/13 10:19 AM

I'm a amateur astronomer in training.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Napersky
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/27/10

Loc: Chicagoland
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? new [Re: jrcrilly]
      #5733795 - 03/15/13 10:20 AM

Because having a love of Physics makes one an Amateur Physicist, not. I believe we have to have the bar set higher than an ancient greek definition. Although maybe not.

Astronomy Enthusiast, Amateur Astronomer, Amateur Race car driver all the same.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Napersky
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/27/10

Loc: Chicagoland
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? new [Re: Napersky]
      #5733810 - 03/15/13 10:26 AM

Maybe part of the criteria is that a person has to do some amount yearly of actual observing through an instrument?

I think perhaps that is necessary to make a distinction between Astronomy Enthusiast and Amateur Astronomer. The Enthusiast may read articles on astronomy, online, in popular magazines or journals or just enjoy what's on TV. The Amateur Astronomer is something much much more.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Napersky
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/27/10

Loc: Chicagoland
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? new [Re: Napersky]
      #5733826 - 03/15/13 10:31 AM

I for instance am or used to be an amateur theologian but I hold the equivalence of a Phd in the knowledge of the subject and can better or stand my ground with most professionals in that field.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mustgobigger
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/12/07

Loc: Michigan
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? new [Re: Napersky]
      #5733829 - 03/15/13 10:33 AM

Most are here for the hobby
aspect and want to learn.
I don't think the level matters
Much as long as you show interest.
there are so many aspects of this hobby
Like restoration ...that can be done in any
Hobby ....but we have some great ones
Here.
I think even professionals can
Come here and learn something new.
just my opinion.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Napersky
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/27/10

Loc: Chicagoland
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? new [Re: mustgobigger]
      #5733838 - 03/15/13 10:37 AM

So hobbyist = Amateur Astronomer? I can accept that. I wonder if that will be the consensus here.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
t.r.
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 02/14/08

Loc: Upstate NY
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? new [Re: Napersky]
      #5733840 - 03/15/13 10:39 AM

Discussed and debated many times here...

Link


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
actionhac
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 08/09/08

Loc: Seattle
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? new [Re: t.r.]
      #5733866 - 03/15/13 10:54 AM

Its human nature to look up and stargaze.
Wanting to know more, an interest in all of those objects, is the point when you are a amateur astronomer.

Robert


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Napersky
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/27/10

Loc: Chicagoland
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? new [Re: t.r.]
      #5733931 - 03/15/13 11:23 AM

Thank you for the link Tim M. very enlightening.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grendel
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 04/12/09

Loc: Canterbury, Kent, UK
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? new [Re: Napersky]
      #5734121 - 03/15/13 01:12 PM

I am a telescope user, I use telescopes to look at the stars, hey I may not know the skies that well, but I enjoy looking, more I enjoy looking using classic scopes.
Grendel


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bremms
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 08/31/12

Loc: SC
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? new [Re: grendel]
      #5734271 - 03/15/13 02:51 PM

I've been involved in Astronomy one way or another since the late 60's. Used to know the sky like the back of my hand, could find probably 500 deep sky objects by memory.(Not anymore)Worked as a professional, know a good bit about a few topics. Know even more about engineering. Made more scopes than I can count on two hands. Like to collect, but I like to observe a more. Have more in common on the ATM side but, I really like the people on the classic forum too.
Yes, I would call myself an Amateur Astronomer.
Among MANY other things.

Edited by bremms (03/15/13 03:52 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
terraclarke
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/29/12

Loc: Just South of the Mason-Dixon ...
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? [Re: bremms]
      #5734321 - 03/15/13 03:20 PM

I have considered myself an amateur astronomer since I was a teenager and got my first telescope (a 60 mm refractor which I still possess). I was a science nerd in school and ground and figured a 6 inch mirror making my own telescope for a highschool science project. I majored in geology in college but never took a formal astronomy course. I have always continued to read about astronomy and look up at the night sky in wonder. Astronomy has been the one hobby that has stayed with me throughout my life, during years of working, being a parent, whatever. Even during the time that I was a flight attendant and had little or no time for it, if anyone would have asked me my hobby or interest or what i did in my spare time (what spare time then?) I would have responded that I was an amateur astronomer. It seems like I've been one forever. It just fits me; nothing could be easier in my mind. Now that I am happily retired and my kids are grown I have lots of time to devote to our wonderful hobby. I have 15 telescopes, a large collection of Astronomy books, every issue of S&T that has ever been published, and more time to pursue my interests. What am I? I'm an Amateur Astronomer (full time ).

Edited by terraclarke (03/17/13 04:33 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Dennis53121
super member
*****

Reged: 08/28/12

Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? [Re: terraclarke]
      #5734415 - 03/15/13 04:05 PM

My definition of Amateur Astronomer.

One who has the ability to make the skies cloud over.

Dennis


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bonco
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/17/06

Loc: Florida
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? [Re: terraclarke]
      #5734424 - 03/15/13 04:11 PM

In my mind an Amateur Astronomer is one that: 1)Appreciates frequent viewing of celestial objects with or without optics. 2)Has some knowledge of constellations and the ability to identify several, same with bright stars. 3) Has an understanding of the phases of the moon, solar and lunar eclipses. 4) Can look up in the sky and identify with reasonable certainty all of the naked eye planets when in view.
Not a very tight definition, in short, enjoy frequent sky watching and some basic understanding of what they are looking at. That's the basics in my opinion to qualify as an "Amateur Astronomer." Many of course go way beyond this entry level definition.
Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rdandrea
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/13/10

Loc: Colorado, USA DM59ra
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? [Re: Napersky]
      #5734465 - 03/15/13 04:42 PM

I'm an observer, not a collector. I only have one "Classic" scope, and I didn't collect it: I bought it new. It's only a "Classic" because I still use it and both of us (me and the scope) got old.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rguasto
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 11/18/10

Loc: Long Island, NY
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? [Re: Napersky]
      #5734660 - 03/15/13 06:37 PM

I have only one classic scope, but it's my main telescope other than my C6 which is a travel scope. I would love to have a whole bunch more but (only recently) have come to realize that I really don't need anything else. I think the "classic' telescopes are really a bargain for the quality of optics - esp reflectors like the Cave's and Criterion's. I have little to no experience with refractors though. I completely appreciate using an instrument older than myself ~100 days a year (including outreach events). I find the saying "they don't build the like they used to" very accurate. I don't think the current commercial reflectors will stand the test of time as well.
As far as an amateur astronomer. I never really liked that term. I always wondered why a professional astronomer isn't called an Astronomist. We have physicists, chemists, pharmacists, cardiologists... Professional astronomy has little to do with visual observing. I consider people like Gary Seronik,Rod Mollise and Phil Harrington to be professional astronomers. They have been lifelong observers (in an incredibly masterful fashion), authors, etc.. We're all pretty passionate about astronomy. I think that makes us astronomers. I find nothing amateur about it.
-Rob


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BarabinoSr
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 11/17/05

Loc: Slidell La
Re: What are we other than TELESCOPE COLLECTORS? [Re: rguasto]
      #5734714 - 03/15/13 07:06 PM

I am an amateur astronomer first and Classics collector second. I have many more instruments other than my classics,but I've always lived by a simple rule in this hobby- astronomy and observing is first and you can only use one scope with either eye at a time. I've been involved with astronomy since July of 1965 and encountered many situations and adventures along the way. I wear many hats in this field and are very grateful to be able to do that. Clear Skies, Gary

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
3 registered and 17 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Rich (RLTYS), Brian Risley 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1403
Calendar Event: 03/15/13

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics